yetineti

@Vrubel Also what do you mean by ‘you people?’ What group are you throwing me in?

@Vrubel are you trying to gaslight me? Karmadhi said: The risk of loosing another 50 childreen does not justify killing 15.000. You said: Are kidding me!? I’ll do everything in the world to save 50 Israeli children. I gladly will give my life for it. I wish The Palestinians viewed their people with the same reverence and did not use them as human shields or disposable pawns.

I find the other responses too analogous and not clear depictions. Jailbreaking your mind involves aligning your values, perspectives, opinions, thoughts, beliefs, etc. with that of the entire world around you and what benefits it. This still includes you and your body. Nonetheless, changes in these concepts will shift the information you receive or accept and consequently the way you view and interact with the world to a level otherwise foreign to someone who has not decided to do something like this. Hence, it’s called jailbreaking. You get access to a multitude more than you would with a closed source system (like IOS or the human minds standard limits). Also, like jailbreaking, you open your mind to all the bad stuff that the original means may or may not have been preventing. For IOS, this means viruses, hackers, etc. For the human mind, this means conspiracies, bad or dangerous ideas, etc. The cost benefit analysis is yours to decide. Much like jailbreaking if you know what you’re doing and do it with care you will be fine. But also plenty of people try to jailbreak their phones and mess up.

GPT 4 and Opus 3 are practically the same, as Leo mentioned. GPT has an app, better UI, access to DALL-E, etc. It also has one of the best speech to text functions, and has a conversation mode. Opus can support slightly longer formatting, is a bit more ‘human’ and is better for coding than GPT (slightly). I use GPT4 for the ease of access and essentially as a glorified search engine. I would use Opus if you plan to code and don’t care about some of the accessibility or DALL-E that comes with GPT.

@Vrubel All you’ve done is deny peoples points and when they start to make better ones you ignore completely. You stopped replying to me to tell other people how they shut down and don’t address things. 😂 and you’re still just name calling and insulting people too. Take your own advice and let the people who have studied the topic speak and maybe take a seat. You’re clearly riddled with personal bias here.

@Vrubel “Plain old atrocities denial” ?!?!!? You’re the one downplaying the IDF doing 1000-2000x times more killing.

@Vrubel How are comments like these allowed? You should do anything to save any children. How are racist comments like these allow here? Vrubel is openly saying they’d do anything up to and beyond killing 20,000 (1000 times) the amount of Palestine children for just 50 Israeli children. Oh AND it’s the Palestinians fault the IDF killed them, he says.

@Vrubel Right…. If I think you’re wrong I am wrong… if I say one thing you could say the opposite. Do you run the IDF?

@Vrubel What are those lines? So far you have not demonstrated you understand the severity of the situation here. If you did, you’d understand why you get slammed. You’d understand that, ironically how you want Hamas to just lay down his weapons, you must lay down your ideas. Surrender your ideas. You really think you’re going to have a reasonable conversation with people who are going through what the IDF is putting them through? Also, it’s not fair to call it childish here while also calling people internet trolls and not engaging in real conversation yourself.

@Vrubel Name calling doesn’t go far here. And of course if one side surrenders it is more likely to be over. That’s been true in every war and it’s laughable to even suggest. Also, surrendering is much different than agreeing on anything. Have you ever been asked to just give up, surrender? How easy was it for you? Was it because you should or because the other side was simply intimidating? Israel calling for a cease fire is like taking all your legos and punching you in the face until you give my ball back and telling you, while I’m punching you, that if you would’ve never taken my ball I wouldn’t have had to take all of your legos and punch you in the face and if you just give my ball back I would maybe stop.

@Nivsch Of course I have taken that into consideration. What I have never taken into consideration is killing women or children. The IDF has currently killed 20,000+ women and children. Injured 50,000+ women and children. I am not a fool. This will happen in war but the proportions here are far beyond any other war anytime recently and its cause has been obvious disregard for human life from a scared and angry IDF. It’s becoming genocidal- many, even within Israel, think it already is a genocide.

@Nivsch I am sorry for whatever losses or personal experiences you may have with the war. But it’s not complicated. Israel has overreacted. They have killed a completely disproportionate amount of people many of which are women and children. They have freaked out and killed their own people waving white flags. They have freaked out and killed international aid. They have freaked out and killed an Iranian commander. They’re paranoid and have been unjustifiable for quite sometime now; it has become genocide. The people who recognize that already understand it’s mainly the government. They already understand the great culture, vegan, sexual openness, etc. No one cares 🥱 All the other stuff is much more important. People pushing back on this thread never hated Israel- they’re pushing back because a thread on polls, LGBTQ+, etc. is seemingly semantic, distracting and counter productive in war time. Especially a war of this nature. Israel is already getting billions every year from the United States and has been in good relations for decades. We get it; time to acknowledge some faults.

Average IQ + all Knowledge = fantastical illusion these AIs are intelligent

@Leo Gura I’m not trying to oversimplify, obviously bias, cognitive development, etc. exist. However, bias, cognitive development, perceived intelligence, etc. are all tied together by knowledge, as well as intelligence. AI’s seem smarter than us not just because they’re ‘unbiased’ - they have access to all of the information. Knowledge is not intelligence and vice versa. Thats my ‘theory.’ Frankly I find their IQs to be around 100 still. I do not find these AIs smart. I find them knowledgeable.

Blood looks good; I’m assuming diet is decent as well. Dumb question: do you work out? What’s your cardio look like? Other than that, do you have any major stressors currently?

Would a mod or Leo like to tell me off here? I was told I was ‘fighting windmills,’ however my points were ignored as well. If I am fighting windmills, I’ll stop and leave. But it seems although nobody has rebutted me other than facepalming and saying bad science just needs more rigor.

@undeather Why ignore me? I understand you are open to criticism. But you’ve shown zero willing to express its integration. At one point in this conversation, physics was a ‘hard’ science to you but you’ll so cavalierly also agree how untestable and abused something like ST is? But that’s physics? Isn’t that supposed to be a hard science? Can you clarify your position and rebut the substance I gave you, that you asked for?

@Extreme Z7 I wouldn’t do it. I don’t even kill spiders. I put them outside.

@Extreme Z7 Subjectively. Subjectively, inhumane. If the nazis thought it to be, they wouldn’t have stomached it.

@Extreme Z7 It’s not anti-human; it’s anti-Jew. It’s pro-nazi. Nazis are human.

It’s silly we need to toss studies back and forth at all. This isn’t about that at all. The lenses of ‘science is a gun. Science is a weapon. Science is dangerous’ needs to be taken on 100%. This is dangerous for someone who doesn’t already understand science. But, for those who do, it is paramount. Science is a responsibility - and most who practice it just idolize. Criticism or not. I’d find a critque or two, probably even good ones, if I didn’t think much would change and I could keep paying my bills. But then, again, everything would change and paying the bills could get hard. How could you continue doing science- at all- at least for some time? Assuming I have anything to say here at all.

Yes you do. That’s what makes ChatGPT ironically so powerful it handles every bias and it doesn’t bitch. But it takes it rationally. It is not rational to ignore any bias.

Science is a gun.

@undeather It’s your turn to rebut. You asked for substance and you got it. It doesn’t matter it came from AI; rebut it. This is not a rebuttal. Nor is a facepalm meme. You don’t get to answer the problem of science with ‘do better science.’ That’s what you did. Also, no one has said Stop! Science. But if you’re going to come here, with your post signature listing your credentials, your, yes, bias, and ‘evidence based….’- Perhaps you hold a greater responsibility to prove you’ve had these experiences in ‘8+ years.’ But how do you prove yourself without evidence? This forum shouldn’t have authoritative figures, with credentials like you, swaying people. I am not saying you should leave- but it’s really not a good look to dismiss my case because- what? ChatGPT? What else? Again you asked for substance and you got it.

@undeather This isn’t about your point and you have too much attachment and bias to the topic at hand to even be respected here. Come from a place of wonder. Do not claim to understand and then defend science like your child.