yetineti

In one of Leo’s videos, he knocked on his head and said something to the effect of ‘Haha-right now. Yes. Hello. Right now. You’re dreaming. Wakey. Wakey.’ and I about shit myself. Also, the concept of a limit needing a limiter. And that EVERYTHING cannot be limited because you would need a limiter. And if that limiter is not unlimited it needs a limiter and so on. Infinite regression. The amount of power needed to limit an endless stream of limiters is less rational than there just being one unlimited limiter that can do what it wants and accounts for everything. Then, you realize everything is the same thing and you’re listening to a YouTube video you made, sitting on yourself, thinking about yourself, being yourself, doing yourself, as yourself, in yourself, around yourself and you take a break for awhile, not seeing quite the same use in watching the videos.

@SOUL which has 0 meaningful consequences to you if you're just hallucinating...

You don't even need your computer anymore. I don't even own a computer anymore. And I definitely never coded beyond mandatory robotics basics, in 8th grade (I don’t remember anything I could put to use). I have about an additional 2 weeks experience vibe coding on my phone now lol. GitHub will take an html from Claude (the regular phone app - it has to be called ’index.html’) and let you save the data to your local browser storage so it persists. You just make a free GitHub account, start a new repository, upload the HTML to main branch, settings, pages, click website link - bingo. Or you can just run it through the Claude app itself, if it's more of a once and done sort of usage app. There's a bunch of other platforming apps that can run things that I'm not familiar with, and some of them have private links and a bunch of stuff. I know there's Vercel. I have preferred Claude over anything, even close for the actual vibe coding. That's about as far as I've come. I just talk to my phone, and it builds things for me.

@Sugarcoat dudes, just be thinking about the what ifs and what they would do and how it could work out, and nobody's even considering that this girl sounds boring as hell. 🤣

I don't know how to code, but I've been using Claude for fun. Currently, I have a minigame called ChoreCraft, which is basically my chores list ripping off a version of Minecraft aesthetic and mini Ender Dragon battle sequence. That's basically me just checking chores off of a list, but I get XP and achievements and stuff. It's fun. And then I also have an app that shows me how much time I have left to live based off of when I was born and the average life expectancy. Great stuff, really! 🤣

The left sucks because they're stuck in game theory while the right just endlessly appeases their own survival beyond reason.

You mean what does it take to become powerful? God is already everything.

Love may imply two. But it is really self referencing; not connection.

Is this YOUR best hallucination?

What are you talking about?

@LordFall You live a in a physical world, from your perspective, so of course a monopoly on violence is all world peace is to you. There is so much more to this it would make your brain explode. Seriously, imagine war without violence. I find it fairly easy. How do you plan on avoiding that? You can’t even debate without it becoming confrontational. You think the world will be peaceful because systems merge and physical violence may drop? That is not peace. You do not know peace and you do not understand that you do not know it. You tell me to acknowledge your points or I have none of my own because you would have to understand my points to rebut them. I stand by what I said initially. If the world is not peaceful for you now — it may never be.

It requires a rare craftiness to bridge them. So rare, I wouldn't hurt yourself trying.

The real problem is going back and redoing them all 😁

The gap between experience and language is a legitimate problem.

@LordFall Spiritual bypassing is making a post about world peace and fantasies of how it will happen. World peace does not exist. But peace does. No use in explaining that to you.

Depends on the child and the parent’s level of development. There is no other answer. Its really a question of nature vs. nurture. What percentage of children removed from or prevented from being in religious environments see notable improvement. What is the improvement, though? What’s the control in the study?

I feel like I just walked in on someone masturbating. (never have)

@SageMind Sounds like you need to be more empathic towards yourself first. Those people that said that do not know what they are talking about. I sure you can be quite pleasant and empathic when push comes to shove. Maybe you like being alone more than you or others appreciate. Or maybe you crave a party every now and then and haven’t figure out how to do it with your (reasonable) boundaries. Whatever it is, try not to frame it as a deficiency.

Trying to figure out creativity won’t make you creative. I can tell you that.

Suffering is an imaginary problem created by imaginary beings living dream lives who have something to lose. Want to reduce suffering now?!—have nothing to lose!

Take on more responsibility than you are now. Reflect on how it changes you. What did you like? What changed that you did not like? Rinse and repeat. +if you like something. Like it harder. Don’t let the responsibility you have to take on smolder the joys you felt as a child. When you are responsible for everything and you can still have fun, you’re a man. That could be tonight—and fade tomorrow. Just keep going.

Stop trying to navigate ‘stupidity.’ It assumes a lot. Assume nothing. Talk to people about what they want to talk about or shared interests. Work your way back. Chances are what you want to talk about does not resonate with 99%. But taking a step back will help reintegrate. The real problem is you dunno how to talk to people. Not stupid people. Figure out why. What was the tradeoff? Did you choose it or was it unconscious? What can you do now? Why do you even want to talk to people?

@Leo Gura Invisible alt text or a hidden text layer on the image would solve the searchability problem without changing the look at all. Or just render them as styled HTML — you’d have full control over the design and it’d actually look better on mobile.

Del-incog-right-ion; subtle right-wing indoctrination that is formally acknowledged internally but otherwise presumed unknown.

@Someone here Tell that to the midgets.