yetineti

@oOo Another user not engaging with the person they attack. Seems all though if anybody's seeking attention, it's the person making a non-substantive statement like yourself.

@Inliytened1 I don't care what happens to you. I'm just pointing out that under Leo's own rules, you don't belong here.

@Inliytened1 You quoted Asayake’s post containing a plainly stated question, pretended not to understand it, and then demanded that it be restated. This is deliberate evasion, not confusion. You have responded to criticism with trolling, sexualized insults, intentional misreadings and repeated attempts to turn accountability into another joke. You are not engaging honestly. @Leo Gura review the thread and decide whether this is acceptable conduct from a moderator. The record speaks for itself. We’ll see what happens.

@Inliytened1 I've just never had someone question my sex life or be so defensive in a conversation like this. Figured something was up. I mean, what's next? You're gonna ask to see my penis?

Can someone get @Inliytened1 laid? He’s really angsty. He's resorted to having sexual fantasy conversations with other men online. Somebody help him fast! He's even started speculating about the sexual proclivity of other men! lmao this guy

@Inliytened1 You have a status-seeking insecurity I have been describing throughout this thread. You keep demonstrating the point because you have no answer to it. And just because you don't know how to type without typos doesn't mean you have to act like you don't know how to read @Asayake post.

@Inliytened1 Keep trolling.

@LordFall I have been far from flailing out of control. I've made one point you've been too fearful to acknowledge.

@Inliytened1 Did you think I was going somewhere? Your mistake.

@Natasha Tori Maru Well, it's really annoying coming to a high development forum and being more developed than the moderators.

@Inliytened1 Just say it. Why are you letting fear guide you?

@Natasha Tori Maru What's the process? How did you become a mod here? Why is Leo tolerating this?

Weak mindset.

@Inliytened1 What don't I want to do? I genuinely don't know what you're referring to here. I'm not embarrassed that I fucked a girl in a bathroom, dude. I'm embarrassed how I used it in an argument. It's also personally creepy towards me the way you just referenced that and my virginity. Thank you very much. Me backtracking there is exactly what you should do now.

I deleted my sexual story because it was unnecessary and contradicted my point. I let myself get pulled into proving my sexual credentials because I worried younger men might dismiss me as some kind of bootlicker. That was ego, and I stooped to the level I was criticizing. My point had already been made, and I apologize for weakening it. @LordFall Discussing your sex life is not the bad behavior. The problem is that you repeatedly: Recast criticism as “shadow,” shame, fear, Stage Green sensitivity and a “victim mindset.” Defended degrading remarks as mere “phrasing” while calling objectors triggered snowflakes. Replaced criticism of objectification with the straw man that people fear sexuality. Framed attractive women and threesomes as rewards for male “game” and development. Minimized a woman’s suffering as acceptable “alignment” and validated blaming her maturity. Demanded civility while calling critics low-value people and keyboard warriors. Your latest response demonstrates the problem: you asked what you did wrong and immediately declared that anyone perceiving wrongdoing exposes their shadow and victim mentality. Nobody objects to you discussing sex. The objection is that you use psychological and spiritual language to place yourself above criticism while refusing to address it. Now you have your answer.

@Inliytened1 Less talking, more doing.

@Inliytened1 “I apologized. What more do you want?” is not accountability; it is resentment that the apology did not immediately purchase immunity. What was wanted was conduct consistent with your apology. Instead, you continued bragging, dismissing critics, and objectifying women and eventually declaring, “Either I’m trolling or I have the most pussy here. Either way I win.” LordFall did not say your words, and nobody claimed he did. He is responsible for defending and rationalizing the atmosphere afterward. But you created it, you continued it after apologizing, and you are the moderator. An apology contradicted by everything that follows is not resolution. It is cover. This is pathetic, man. And everyone can see that now.

@LordFall @Inliytened1 Neither of you answered the criticism. You demonstrated it. The criticism was never fear of sexuality. Nobody objecting here condemned threesomes, sexual openness or explicit conversation. What was condemned was calling women “leftovers,” “whales,” and “ugly bitches,” then treating sexual access to them as proof of male status and spiritual development. LordFall’s response—“sexuality is not that scary”—is therefore a straw man. He replaced the argument actually presented with an imaginary fear of sex because the real argument was much harder to answer. Then he said that mastering the universe earns a man threesomes as his “reward.” Even as a joke, that perfectly embodies the criticism: spiritual development becomes male achievement, and women become the prize awarded for it. Inliytened1 made the underlying mentality even more explicit: “Either that or I have the most pussy here. Either way I win.” There is the entire thread in one sentence. Either he successfully trolls the forum or establishes superiority through the quantity of women he has fucked. Those are his two forms of “winning.” Women remain sexual inventory, while every objection becomes another opportunity to perform dominance. This is not “getting raw.” Sexual honesty does not require describing women as animals, leftovers, weight categories or interchangeable bodies. Sexually mature people discuss promiscuity, swinging, threesomes and unconventional relationships every day without degrading anyone. When confronted, you used nearly every avoidance mechanism available: Critics are frightened by sexuality. Critics are oversensitive. Critics have exposed shadows. Critics carry unintegrated sexual shame. Critics lack consciousness. Critics have no stake in the conversation. The objectification is merely trolling, fun or male bonding. Not one of those claims answers the criticism. They are straw men, status assertions, psychologizing and evasion. After being directly asked to acknowledge how women were being discussed, you deliberately continued exchanging threesome stories. When Natasha independently confirmed the objection, the dispute was converted into jokes about coalitions, anime and control of the thread. That is not transcendence. It is ironic detachment used to escape accountability. The most revealing exchange concerned a woman who loved Inliytened1, was hurt badly enough to end the relationship and stopped speaking to him for years. The eventual conclusion was that she lacked emotional maturity. LordFall immediately validated this as a matter of “alignment.” Her suffering became evidence of her deficiency. The men remained mature, aligned and spiritually sophisticated. That is responsibility displacement disguised as relationship wisdom. The record is now straightforward: Nobody condemned sexual freedom. Nobody argued for repression. Nobody claimed that threesomes are inherently immoral. The criticism concerned dehumanization, hypocrisy, responsibility and a moderator’s conduct. Rather than answer it, you bragged, joked, diagnosed your critics and continued performing the behavior being criticized. No further interpretation is necessary. Your own responses completed the argument against you. Two sexually insecure men disguising objectification, status-seeking, and avoidance of accountability as sexual liberation and spiritual maturity.

@Natasha Tori Maru Oh, I know. I'm just trying to make it as obvious as possible. Admittedly, there's not much more I can do here, though. They've made it extremely obvious, lol. I'm most disappointed in Leo. I feel like this mod in particular has had issues in the past, but I could be wrong. Nonetheless, this would be enough for me to can him if I were in charge.

@Ulax You should look up the word and verify whether or not what I said was true before you think that I was trying to get anything out of it. They're acting pretentious. I can say that as much as I want because I'm not trying to get a rise out of anyone and it's true.

@enchanted Trolling is not allowed here. Not that I'm against it. I just would have accepted it as an answer if it was allowed.

@Schizophonia LMAO. They're accusing you of spiritual bypassing and sexual shame from your comment alone and completely skimmed over the fact that they were just called a perverted troll. Omg, Lord Fall is so pretentious.

@Inliytened1 @LordFall I think the women of the forum and people in general may appreciate you guys acknowledging what I said instead of continuing your circle jerk. If you guys want to get off about each other's stories, this is clearly between you two at this point and could be taken to a DM. The less you acknowledge it, the worse it looks, frankly. You can make whatever comments you want about having a stake in the game or high consciousness, low consciousness, but the fact of the matter is you're avoiding something right now.

@Inliytened1 @LordFall I’ll wrap this up. You made a public thread asking members where they have fucked women. The conversation included women being called “whales,” “ugly bitches,” and other degrading names. Multiple people independently told you it had become objectifying. Instead of seriously addressing that, you dismissed critics as outsiders, questioned their sexual experience and forum history, and told me “nobody asked” after I made one joke about how mutually self-stimulating this conversation had become. Then, when I called the thread creepy, your defense was that you still look young, still fuck like you’re twenty, can still get your dick up, and wanted to know whether I had fucked someone on my car. That did not rebut my point. It demonstrated it. My reference to your age was not “old people bad.” It was about an older moderator soliciting sexual stories from younger members, behaving this way when challenged, and apparently seeing no problem with the power dynamic or the example he is setting. And LordFall, you cannot call my perspective “low quality,” lecture anyone about elevating the conversation, and then immediately pivot into an extended joke about grooming your pubic hair. That contradiction speaks for itself. You wanted a space where men could be “raw.” Apparently “raw” means you can degrade women and brag about sex, but criticism of your behavior must remain deferential, flattering and invitation-only. No. Public speech receives public criticism. A moderator especially does not get to tell members they have no stake in what happens publicly on the forum. I said the thread looked pervy. Your responses made that description considerably more accurate. I’ve made my point, and I’m leaving the rest here for Leo and everyone else to judge. Unless you guys would like to engage, honestly, like the ‘men’ and ‘high consciousness’ individuals you claim to be.

@LordFall Do you always speak in riddles? You can just say things how they are, right? People tend to prefer that.