yetineti

So do I get a participation woman for losing or not?

Notes? I have the best story here.

Problem with an airport is they can leave… to anywhere! Problem with a train… you’re stuck with them. Until they find a better cabin. Now you’re stuck and alone… Never know on a cruise ship.

Let’s get back on track. The tension has been low. In a plane, on a train…

Do I get a participation woman?

I’m going to leave this here. I stand by my main concern, but the personal attacks and amount I’ve posted haven’t helped. I got too caught up responding to everything. Leo said he’ll review the thread, so I’ll let him do that. I already contributed the best sex story here. My work is done.

Did this work for you, or are you just giving more unsolicited advice? Are you in a relationship?

@Joseph Maynor You didn't make sense to me until maybe the past year or two. Your responses always seemed so outside and observed, so to speak, but I really, really enjoy your responses now. Thank you for all your input. You are indeed a classy man.

@Asayake Yeah, go watch his videos. That vibe is more than apparent here. You can tell he's not really connected to the venue or the music or modeling or anything. It's a weird pseudo-social formation just to get him laid.

Why don't you confront my points? You've avoided confrontation more than anyone here. You also have a limiting belief that explaining yourself is generally bad. Again, why is anyone supposed to trust your advice here?

@Inliytened1 I think that'd be good for you. You've been at this non-stop since Monday.

@Inliytened1 Wake up and cut the excuses. You said it only took you two weeks. Obviously, wasn’t good enough.

@Inliytened1 "stalking" Apparently, that's what public accountability feels like to you.

@Ulax I love sex. What sort of misconceptions are you having? Didn't you hear about the hotel and Dairy Queen story? Where's your story? Stop conflating offensive speech with any sort of values preference.

@Ulax Bait is just a meal on the end of a hook. And he’s been eating. Maybe cite some examples before you throw yourself under the bus. I just gave a full chronological analysis of how he did not just apologize.

@Leo Gura I would not be raising a flag if this extended to mere poor judgment.

@Inliytened1 If you were dedicated to truth, you'd understand. It's really not that difficult of a concept to understand. I don't care about you. The dishonesty from men like yourself haunts me. I see it only as fit that whatever record a person like you distorts has a clean response for the bystanders.

@Inliytened1 You can't stop thinking about me fucking that chick, can you? That's the whole reason you started this thread, though. It seems like you're actually getting off on this, which is very concerning.

@Inliytened1 I have no reason to be offended. Please don't project your feelings onto me. You're the one who's under review. If anyone would be worried or offended, it would be you. I'm merely trying to make a comfortable environment for everybody here. You're making that extremely difficult. You're more than capable of reading the guidelines or rules, and I'm not about to explain to you how the women you scared away aren't responding here. You had one person in mind that you're cherry-picking, and you're ignoring your abhorrent behavior everywhere else: wasting people's time, dishonestly engaging

@Inliytened1 Show any level of respect, please.

@Leo Gura Fair enough. I respect your time. I just hate seeing the forum be degraded like this. More women here would be great, but it'll never happen with conversations and especially moderators like these. If it's any help, ChatGPT work function or Claude co-work function can go into a browser and read this entire conversation, pinpoint direct comment links, and help you sort it through it on a more reasonable timeline. Thank you, Leo.

Asking the real questions. 👍🏽

@LordFall People have been DMing me privately because they don't feel like dealing with your fakeness on this matter or your insults. It's also hard to call someone a white knight when it sounds like they have a better sex story in this thread than you. But you're not gonna acknowledge this because I break your paradigm.

@Leo Gura You can see he's even arguing with you now. This has reached the point of ridiculousness. Your open-ended statements are not proper forum moderation. You are avoiding a very simple solution(s) here. — AI-assisted summary, reviewed and edited by me. I’m providing direct links so you can evaluate the record yourself. Leo, I want to clarify that my concern is not merely that this became another disrespectful discussion about women. It is that a moderator created the problem, acknowledged it, continued it, and repeatedly used trolling and personalized sexual remarks when challenged. Chronology: Inliytened1 initially admitted that he was being sexist and apologized: comment 1804648. After that apology, he described women as “leftovers” and a “whale”: comment 1804847. He then continued with “ugly,” “fat,” “whale-like” and “old chicks”: comment 1804850. When I entered the public discussion, he told me, “No one asked you,” said I had “nothing,” and implied I had no standing to comment: comment 1805242. He then redirected the discussion toward my sex life, asking whether I had “fucked her” on my car: comment 1805248. The personalized sexual mockery continued. He claimed I was “crying” because I had not gotten “that piece of ass”: comment 1805352. After I deleted a personal sexual story and explained why, he insisted that I could not take it back because everyone now knew how I lost my virginity: comment 1805377. He publicly speculated that you had probably only been laid once and were therefore “mesmerized” by the thread: comment 1805407. He later said that you would not remove him and that, even if you did, he would return “without stars”: comment 1805430. Natasha eventually got him to acknowledge directly that the degrading descriptions were inappropriate: comment 1805516. That concession was valuable, but it did not end the conduct. When you finally instructed everyone to pause and reflect on the disrespect toward women, comment 1805850, his immediate response was to redirect responsibility onto you: “you are the one doing the pickup game, not us”: comment 1805851. He then resumed competing with and mocking you sexually, saying you had “limited ability in this area” and that he surpassed you “by a mile”: comment 1805858. After I pointed out that he was continuing, comment 1805860, he characterized the criticism and moderation as “abuse”: comment 1805864. I am not presenting myself as blameless. I became personally insulting and retaliatory at several points, including making comments about his age, attractiveness and sex life. I accept scrutiny or moderation for those posts. That does not erase the chronology above or the heightened responsibility attached to moderator status. I am not demanding that anyone be banned. I am asking you to review whether repeatedly trolling members, sexualizing criticism, dismissing objections, speculating publicly about your sex life, and suggesting immunity from your authority are compatible with being a moderator. This is broader than whether members are sometimes disrespectful toward women. It concerns whether the moderator responsible for escalating the thread can be trusted to enforce the standards you just stated.

@Leo Gura He is not going to stop. He's literally been making jokes about you and toying with the idea that he has some sort of immunity from you and the forum. This is is not just cruel towards women. It's completely dishonest engagement even after formal acknowledgement. If this is the type of engagement you want on your forum from a mod, then I guess so be it.