Breakingthewall

It's impossible, Little to gain, everything to lose. What would Russia gain by conquering Europe? Selling its inhabitants as slaves and putting Russian viceroys in charge of the countries? It doesn't seem like a very good idea. What would the US gain in a war against China? That 300 million people die of hunger and bombing and the world goes back 150 years? And if it wins, what? Nothing. It's impossible, useless. The forces are too powerful, the destruction would be total, and the world's economic balance is very precise but very delicate. No one wants to break it; everyone wants to be on top, but everyone knows that it's better to be second than for the system to disintegrate.

🤣 Then I am energy. Energy is the same than matter, it's something, what is something? Any "something" is relation. Energy is relation, flow of relations. Reality manifested is done of relations, infinite flow of relations, or mathematical relationship create possible dimensions inside of other relationship inside of other, and other....it's impossible to be anything else. Reality is a flow of maths. Possibilities that's can happen because are logical, symmetrical, syncronized, perfect, coordinated with the whole infinite. Nothing not mathematically logical can exist. Not because the reality follow the laws of maths, it's because the maths are the expression of the logically possible

If that energy made the choice using my hands, ultimately I'm that energy, so I made the choice You could say that there really is no choice but a manifestation of a possible relational mathematical possibility in this particular framework that is synchronously interconnected with the totality of the possible, but then, I would be the possible mathematical possibility, therefore I would have made the choice by the fact of the inevitable development of the potentiality

Let's see, in my field of perception, two bananas appear. I choose the one on the right. Where's the mystery? I am a structure of reality that interacts with other external structures and makes decisions. There are infinite dualities taking place, and they all have a direction, a movement. Deciding on the banana on the right is my movement.

I don't understand that. There are things, like breathing, that you don't choose, but there are others that you do. You say it seems like you choose them, but they were predetermined. How do you know that?

What I see is that there are people who place their sovereignty on something external to themselves, on the norms of society or the standards of their family. If this is solid, these people have a high probability of finding a stable partner because there is someone who fits exactly what they're looking for. But if there's no such external frame of reference, people are lost. They look for what they lack in the other person, and it's never there. So, either you go very deep or you're in no man's land, what seems to be the norm in our society.

I don't think it's exactly like that, imo it's more that if you don't have a real, deep connection with yourself, you always perceive a lack in your relationships with others. So, it always seems to you that this isn't exactly what it could be, and you keep searching, but it's always unsatisfactory because you're not complete. Some settle for what more or less fits, and others don't, but always it's a bottom of dissatisfaction

You have an area of decision and action, right? Why do you say there's no such thing as individuality? If, for example, I decide to stay home now or instead go out, they're two different possibilities. Where is the absence of self?

If you find casual sex you don't know the other person and there's no real connection. If you're very emotionally disconnected from yourself, in psychopathic mode, you don't care, but if not, you're really having sex with someone you don't know at all and that's weird . Their physical beauty doesn't matter; it's strange and alienating. So, if the situation is sustained by your sexual desire, there's only sexual desire. But the moment that desire disappears, in two seconds the situation reveals itself as uncomfortable, weird, not natural

We are talking about casual sex . Casual. You don't know the other, you haven't deep connection, you don't care about anything except sex. That is casual. It's not noble and pure, it's something that people do because it's impossible to avoid. It's better perfect sex of your dreams, but if it doesn't happen, then you do anything, like 99,99% of men. If you manage to get free of that impulse, you have done a big thing, it's very difficult.

This situation is a mess, you love the other but she controls you and gets deep into your life, you lose your freedom, and you can't break because you feel that it's shit doing it, but same time it's unbearable. And women never will make it easy, they will make you feel guilty as you were a genocide if you are empathetic. Stupid attitude, if they would loose the bondage and let you feel free respecting your independence and your freedom, everything would be much better, but try to tell them that, it's impossible, and they never, even under torture would admit that they are acting toxic with their need of control .

People do that for many reasons, one of them is because can be your only chance to have sex. Sex is almost impossible to avoid, it's genetic, you would do anything to get it, so do that of the clubs is not so extreme. If for you it's not a problem, good for you. But it's for 99%

Sure, the sexual dynamics are so simple, clean ,satisfactory and easy, that's why everyone is so happy in their sexual/couple life. Sex is the root of narcissism, and narcissism is the root of human shit.

We are talking about casual sex. Casual sex means that you approach anyone, usually in a club, then you do your game, and if you are successful then you have sex. Is the activity that millions do every Friday and Saturday night around the entire world.

Exactly you will see.

Who talks about undesirable girls? You ve not experience, then don't insult so much. It's not the same a prostitute than being flirting 4 hours, then go to an apartment, continue the game, then have sex, and in the end, when the fire is out, there's nothing left. The whole false operation seems empty, and there's really nothing more to do there with someone you barely know and with whom you've been acting fake since they were talking in a club with the sole idea of fucking.

How many times have you done casual sex in your life?

Then why I can't imagine some millions? Just two, I don't need more.

Someone like Ramana Maharshi, who one day completely loses his worldly inclination and finds himself in a state of permanent, total openness. He barely moves, speaks little, sits in meditation all day, and is indifferent to one thing or another, life or death.

Perhaps science is at a very basic level compared to what it could be, and perhaps in the future it will be able to delve into the structure of reality to a level we can't imagine. Perhaps it will be possible to penetrate quantum dimensions where reality is only information and unfold universes within particles, things that will make current science like that of the Middle Ages in comparison.

Sure that most of women from a structured family consciously or unconsciously they look for a partner who is approved by their father, but that does not mean that the father chooses him

Sure, women reach an age where they leave the game. This can be very traumatic for some, but the change is usually toward more balance, being human and stopping being a toxic harpy who believes she's a movie star drunk on power over an army of monkeys😅 Anyway, it's different working together than be in a relationship, then the toxicity arises (in both sides)

may not be clearly perceived, but use to be due to the dynamic between the sexes. I suppose there are some women who don't have that emotional way, but most do. Most men, after casual sex, would pay a good amount of money to be immediately teleported to their bed alone. You've fed the devil inside you, and there's nothing else you can do about it. Women don't process things that way; they're horny, have a lot of fantasies and want sex, but it's not a necessity, it's something that have to be good in many senses, not just physical. Well, maybe not consciously, but go out on a summer day in the city and see how the girls dress. They look like they're going to a erection-inducing contest, right? They don't seek direct attention from men; in fact, it bothers them. They want to be seen as high-value, and to do that, they have to be sexy, and that implies attention. It's paradoxical, the direct attention bothers them but the total lack of attention is dramatic because implies that they worth noting.

Well, theoretically society is evolving toward a more conscious place where women and men can find more fulfilling and authentic ways of relating, and along the way there are mistakes and suffering. But of course, "theoretically" doesn't mean it will be achieved; there are no guarantees, but it's the path that is taking place. Furthermore, there is overpopulation on the planet, technology is evolving, and if half the population is single, it's not so dramatic (well, for some, it is). I don't think returning to the old ways is a possibility.

Yeah, humans are part of the hive, not real individuals. It is extremely rare for humans to prefer real solitude. The jungle where the leopard hunts is the social matrix for humans, and their instrument is language. A human alone couldn't survive, he's a weak being without the hive.