Breakingthewall

The Saudi regime is rigid, as befits the region, but it is not expansionist. It is aggressive, but its aggressiveness, for example in Yemen, is oriented toward containment.

Then the cosmic joke is? I created this post to expose the fallacy of the actual spirituality, as the title says. Seems that you got personally offended then you try to offend me but you didn't do a single contra argument. Maybe that's being enlightened? Seems a cosmic joke, I agree.

That's enlightenment according peter Ralston. I absolutely know that this is not enlightenment and you can understand without a doubt why really is as it is, you can see that directly. That perspective about no self is=enlightenment is limited, then it's false. The self is absolutely real, just like a stone. The thing is, the self and the stone are relatively different. From an unlimited perspective, they are the same: they are. The question is: What is being? I've explained this quite clearly in a few posts above.

2 years ago I had a surgery . They had to drill through my tibia, insert a plate with two screws on each side and a metal wire between them, and then open and stitch it up. I convinced the surgeon to do it without anesthesia. I told him that if I moved even a millimeter, he should tell the anesthesiologist to put the gas in my mouth. It lasted about 40 minutes, and I didn't suffer at all and I didn't move. In fact, I enjoyed the experience. I've been researching this my whole life. Try reading what I've written before.

Iran regime It's founded on hatred of Sunni Islam, the prevalence of Shiism, and an absolute hatred of the West. It's a fundamentally toxic system, a real piece of shit, if you will. Regarding missile launching capabilities, Iran has close to 2,500, and has launched a good percentage of them with minimal results. If Israel were truly in danger, it would devastate Iran within two days. This has been made abundantly clear. The question is how the Iranian regime will react now, what its strategy will be. The situation now is totally different. Iranian regime based its legitimacy internally and with its neighboring countries as the country that challenges Israel and the West. Now they've pissed in its face and launched a mock missile at the Americans. They'll try to spin a narrative of victory, but the truth will come out. It remains to be seen whether the regime can continue oppressing Iranians much longer.

Who is not intelligent is who manipulate an IA 😅. The IA is a tool to empower your logical capacity, to get deep in coherence, but if you are basically incoherent, the IA will empower your incoherence

Try to get this: any idea with an opposite comes from the limited perspective and means absolutely nothing in the unlimited perspective. Imaginary is the opposite than real, that difference is relative, limited. Imaginary is limited by real, and real is limited by imaginary. They are just ideas, from an absolute perspective there is only the openess to the nature of reality. The nature of reality can't be named because it has not opposite, it's the reality. You could call it life, because death is just change, or being because not being is not, but both are just pointers.

The goal of spirituality is to freely abandon the limited perspective and situate oneself in the unlimited perspective. From this perspective, there is no qualitative difference between anything; everything is, and is unfathomable, alive, and totally existing. This doesn't mean that the limited perspective is false, only that it is limited. And being límited closes the perception of the true nature in exchange of the perception of the structure. It's quite simple and obvious, nothing mysterious at all, it's exactly what you are

It's exactly the same the suffering caused by the anxiety or by a stone, are arising that happens. Are the structure that the reality is taking now. Suffering is the same than anything else. Yeah sorry, I'm too brave right? I'm not in that level of understanding . But id say that the nature of pain is the nature of reality

In all of your post rage is perceived. That's the cosmic joke? It's not so funny Let's see, then the real cosmic joke is? That the seeker is not seeking or what? Really I don't know that. I don't see any joke in the unfathomable that lives. I see absolute life, without bottom If something lives, reality lives. If you perceive your life, it is the absolute life of reality. It is total plenitude. It is the simple consequence of limitlessness; it is unfathomable, and its vitality is infinite. If you perceive a spark of life in you, that life has no limits; it permeates infinity. There is no boundary between living and nonliving; there is existence. That is openness. It is absolute life, and it is perceived directly now; that is what reality is.

From an unlimited perspective anything is the same that anything else, both are, and that's everything. From a limited perspective the slightest movement has infinite butterfly effects, and is created by infinite butterfly effects.

Going a little further, your ultimate nature is openness, limitlessness. You might think: this is the cause of being. But it would be more precise: this is being. Openness and being are one and the same reality; being is to exist, and openness is existence, since it is open. You might think: if there is being, there is intelligence, since there is relationship, coherence. It would be more precise to say: being and intelligence are one, an equivalence, since what is incoherent is not. You might also think: if reality is open, it flows, expands, sprouts, causes infinite energy, infinite love. More than cause, it is equivalence. Openness, by its nature, is flow, it is energy, bottomless, infinitely alive.

In other words, if you keep opening the frame of possibilities, all possibilities appear. If you keep opening the frame, all possibilities blur and erase their definition; only their essence, their substance, remains. That substance doesn't blur; it remains intact, with a total, infinite openness. That substance is exactly you. But that substance isn't something; it's the openness itself, it's what you are.

If you enter into deep meditation, it's common to perceive the reality of form as an insubstantial hologram superimposed upon absolute emptiness. This can be perceived as either horrible nihilism or absolute calm. In both cases, it's a limited perspective, since there is a remainder of the observer observing something external to them. If this state of absolutely nothing is sustained long enough, the observer who gazes into the limitless void shifts and becomes the limitless void. At that moment, the barriers fall and totality manifests. Absolute potential and absolute being manifest as an inevitable consequence of the absence of limits. There is no bottom, and therefore, reality is. You are. You are total. Any form is total, and outside and inside overlap without limit. It is the exact opposite of an illusion; it is reality. Illusion is precisely a comparative idea. If you realize the unreality of what is, it is because you are outside of it. If you merge with it, you will see its total reality. Reality is absolutely alive, unfathomable, and you are that. You expand, and in doing so, you open your heart, closed by fear. There, you realize you are home; you always are. You are. In that is everything.

The ego isn't illusory; it's a limited, comparative, superficial perspective. You truly are the drop, but you are also the ocean. The ego is the drop's perspective; openness is the oceanic perspective. Both are real; one is limited, the other unlimited. Reality is always both.

Self inquiry is meditation or asking yourself what you are? Both are doing with a purpose

What is the cosmic joke?

According to mainstream spirituality, this is creating suffering, not accepting reality as it is, resisting it. This is true; suffering is resistance, wanting things to be different, that's the human nature. According to spirituality, the solution to this is to realize that the self is an illusion, so "wanting" is also an illusion, a misinterpretation that has trapped you and that you can let go at any moment. But the self is a completely real structure, and so is suffering. It doesn't matter if its source is not accepting or anything . Then, you could erase the suffering erasing the self, that's erasing the will and the preference. Convincing yourself that reality is empty, nothing, then you prefer nothing. This is violence. It's possible, you can do it, you can even burn yourself to death without lifting a finger. This way, you're putting your enormous will not to suffer and your enormous fear of suffering above your nature. Instead of flowing perfectly in synchrony with life, you violate yourself and withdraw yourself. You die in life. It's pure fear and pure will disguised as the absence of fear and will. Absolute arrogance disguised of humility.

Look, supposedly this is a forum of spirituality, supposedly serious. I just did a not bad tesis about some essential matters in actual spirituality and you come with that of poop? Are you....well, put the adjective . Seriously,.try to go deep, out of your dogmas that make you feel so safe.

Just too closed.

Look, the form is infinitely dual, the substance is not dual. To talk you need the form, talking is the form, then form are limits. Do you understand the nuance? It's very simple

Sure, then go and fly like Neo. Do it in Iran if you could, then the ayatollah would surrender immediately

The ego has the substance of reality: infinite. It is not a floating illusion nor a mere accident of perception; it is composed of the entire unlimited relationship that reality is. Its existence, as form, is not independent, but neither is it nonexistent. It is an inevitable and legitimate effect of the infinite in motion. You cannot recognize its emptiness, but its total fullness. The so-called "emptiness" is merely a negative concept that points to the boundary of form when isolated. But when you understand that all form is the inevitable unfolding of infinite relationship, emptiness dissolves into fullness. Real freedom is not "letting go of all identification," as if one could dwell in a conceptual limbo without form or content. True freedom is the dissolution of boundaries, recognizing that the limits that seem to separate the self, form, or any structure are merely mental projections. Emptiness, understood as absolute absence or negation, is itself a boundary ,a restrictive concept. How could an ego, with its millions of nuances, its complexity, its interdependence, its real relational structure, be sustained by nothingness? That makes no sense. If you look from an unlimited perspective, everything is empty in terms of separate meaning, yet at the same time, everything is. Being is everything, implies absolute meaning, not absence of meaning, because being is total. Real openness is not found in taking refuge in the denial of form, but in seeing that all form , including the ego, is the direct, inevitable, and absolutely full expression of unlimited reality.

Let's see, serious Buddhism doesn't deny the self; it sees it as a wave in the ocean, not an immovable center but a transient reality. The adjectives "illusion" and "false" are unnecessary. The ego is absolutely real as form, and its substance is the substance of reality. True nirvana consists in being one with substance, seeing form as what it is, a structure that reality now assumes. Absolutely real as form, perfect, interconnected with the whole; it is the whole in motion. Simplifying doesn't work; it's impossible to deny what is. The ego has foundations that come from the totality of form; they are butterfly effects of infinity, which in turn cause butterfly effects in infinity. They are the flow of reality. Where's the point in calling it illusion? It's a mistake that castrates the mind.

Contemporary spirituality, directly inherited from Buddhism and its Western derivatives, commits a profound structural error that limits, castrates, and distorts the true expansion of the mind. That error is the denial of the ego. It is claimed that the ego is maya, an illusion, an empty construction that sustains human suffering. Based on this premise, it is proposed to suppress, transcend, or dissolve the ego as a necessary condition to achieve so-called "enlightenment" or "nirvana." This state, idealized as the ultimate realization, is presented as a realm without desire, without identity, without conflict. However, what is promoted under this label is not real openness, but an existential lobotomy. The ego is not an illusion in the sense of being nonexistent. It is a real and tangible compendium of energetic, relational, and cognitive structures that compose the concrete configuration of every human being. Denying its existence is equivalent to denying one's own structure, to amputating the foundation upon which all interaction with reality is built. True fulfillment is not accessed by eliminating the ego, but by integrating it, understanding it, and overcoming its limitations without denying it. The so-called nirvana, as interpreted by this superficial spirituality, is not fullness but amputation. Suffering is eliminated at the cost of eliminating real interaction with the world. Conflict is suppressed, but so is expansion, complexity, and the authenticity of existence. The result is individuals who are apparently calm, but structurally amputated, incapable of sustaining a realistic, vibrant, and open vision of existence. Authentic expansion of consciousness is not born from denying the self, but from understanding it as what it is: a real structure that must be integrated into a much broader movement of openness and relationship. Only when the ego is recognized, neither idolized nor denied, can its rigidity be transcended without mutilating the mind or closing the door to true fulfillment. The spirituality that denies the ego castrates the mind. The one that understands, integrates, and transcends it, without amputation, opens existence to its deepest potential: a living, complex, relational reality where the self is a legitimate form, but not a limit.