Breakingthewall

It's different to hate another race than thinking that it's inferior, That's what I meant. Whites were superior just because they were stronger. If they were weaker, they would be inferior. That's how it works. If the Japanese had crushed the Americans and invaded the US and forced their president to humiliate himself, and then the US had been Japan's bitch, the Japanese would not have put round eyes on their manga.

In old times you either enslaved or were enslaved. Blond whites used to be slaves of the Romans. So, looking Norwegian wasn't something people desired. You didn't want to have Gallic or Germanic ancestors; you preferred to have Persian ancestors.

Don't be so angry. Do you know that black women use a rather harmful product to lighten their skin? Do you know that black women in Latin America consider it a success to have a white partner and so when they have children they "improve the race"? Do you know that Asian women modify their features with surgery to look more Caucasian? Have you seen that Japanese cartoons make characters with round eyes? Do you understand that for a Filipino woman it is a success to have a white partner, but for a Filipino man that is almost impossible unless he is a millionaire? I am sorry if reality is not as it should be according to you. I'm not saying that whites are superior, just that the collective imagination they are given the circumstances. We'll see how that changes when the Chinese truly dominate the world.

There is a preference for Caucasians as a race because it's the race that has dominated the world and set the cultural, economic, and political pace. This is the case now; it's not absolute; it's something that has undeniably occurred since the Baroque era. Humans are genetically programmed to bow to the leader, and the leader so far has been the white race, which is why people prefer the white race.

@Someone here 😘

The substance of the reality is limitlessness, or better than substance, the nature of reality, what you última are. For that reason, it exists in a limited form. Saying "apparently" limited is like saying you've "apparently" broken your leg. There's no difference with really broken. The point is, you'd rather not break your leg. You can realize your total nature every day; that doesn't mean you'd rather not go to a Russian prison for 25 years. But maybe you get a level of openess where for you it's the same anything, you are absolutely out of the form, only in the substance. Sure that this is possible, but first a bit, little by little. In my case, i prefer balancing both. I wouldn't like being a mystic absolutely out of the form, the form is beautiful, but being able to break the limits sometimes is absolutely useful, removes all the sadness, makes your life open

Without a sense of self, you wouldn't care whether you lived or died, and those teachers wouldn't care whether they taught or not. What does it matter whether you helped people? What's the difference between humanity disappearing in an endless war or everyone being enlightened and happy? From an infinite perspective, it's exactly the same. Only the self sees the difference.

Try to think by yourself. The frogs have their own experience, same than you. You could call them magic or physical, the fact is that there are frogs, and the fact is that in the unlimited possibilities of the unlimited reality, one of them is a frog, as you can see (if you see a frog)

Maybe your religion could be named : "lobotomized". Or "magical lobotomy"

Where is the difference between material or "magic"? maybe you should start a religion called "magic" Yes oh master.

In Roman times, being a white Nordic person was considered inferior. The Arab ethnic group was considered far superior to the Aryans.

I don't think so. If all of this happens, it means you're having a mystical experience, in which you realize something beyond the human, the divinity of reality etc. For complete openness, that has to be overcome; it has to seem normal to you; reality must be mystical to you by default. Even so, there's a barrier. The moment that barrier is broken, there is freedom and recognition of your true nature. Simple, clear, diaphanous, total.

its impossible to having no sense of self, or at least I don't want that. It's not necessary to reach that point; rather, you need to learn to have no sense of self for a while, at will. Then, the sense of self returns, and it's quite solid. A solid self is essential, as challenges will constantly arise.

Yes, you have to reach total openness, where you are the limitless. At that point, there's no question of whether there's more, since that's everything

No, you are the living infinity. You just have to unlock the closed compartments of your psyche so that it flows more and more freely. Ultimately, you have no limits, so break them to the fullest extent possible. That's the game here.

Heisenberg's uncertainty principle prevents anything from having zero motion and zero energy. Reality is never static. In an absolute void there is zero field energy, which is measurable. On a metaphysical level, we could say that it is impossible for anything to be absolutely static because zero momentum does not exist. It would be a moment between two motions, and it would be nonexistent. You can expand a piece of space infinitely, and you will never find a static field. This means that the energy of 1 cubic cm of empty space is infinite; it is an unavoidable mathematical result. Since this is not possible in physics, a "normalization" is made and the zero-point energy is considered to be the observable one. Then the problem of the cosmological constant arises, etc. The reality is that nothing is ever static. Reality is always in motion. So, what is a "thing"? Well, simply that vibratory movement organized in synchronous patterns until it reaches you, asking questions and threatening @Yimpa with your 🍌

That's different. You're asking about the concrete structure of current reality, its details. I don't know how it works, but there are incontestable realities: it's not limited, it's not originated, any movement or change of state is relative to another movement or mirror state. Absolute movement is impossible; it needs a reference point. From there, use the power of your mind to try to understand exactly how everything works. Perhaps it's possible to do so, starting from the right foundations. But what it is is obvious: it's the manifestation of the total potential.

Exactly, The answers are simple, direct, and inevitable. Potential that expresses itself, since it cannot not do so, because it's potential and nothing prevents it's expression. As we can see right now. What's more difficult, and the real work, isn't the mind, it's the energetic structure, opening it to the totality. That's all. Everyone should be able to do that. Humanity would have taken a complete step, but it seems the barriers are too solid, and that's not going to happen for now. Not all of humanity, but practically no one.

Just because it's what is happening among infinite possibilities. All of them are the totality manifesting itself, it's absolutely inevitable, just because there are not limits. It's total and absolutely obvious. Can't be otherwise. If there are no limits, the potential is total; you are that in essence. If you erase everything from your mind, down to the last barrier, the totality manifests and you see it completely clearly. It's not a story of falling on your knees, praying in tears; it's the opening to your total nature, which is simply limitlessness; it's nothing more. But in doing so, one thing becomes obvious: limitlessness is everything, and that's you. And from that totality that you are now, something is emerging that is truly irrelevant. It wouldn't matter if you were a snot stuck to a wall for a thousand years. What is real is the essence. You've always been that. It shines through everything. Form is nothing, substance is everything. Then a toothache starts and form takes center stage, and you lose yourself in it, as is inevitable.

Because there are not limits. Where is the doubt or the mystery? Can't be more obvious Why not? Is there any reason? Just the inevitable manifestation of the total potential

Ultimate truth is obvious and very simple, be absolutely open to it is not so simple but very possible. But a question that I'd like to know is how's going to be the thing when this life ends. Anyway, I know the answer, that also is very simple: the infinite being flowing developing it's unlimited potential. How? Impossible to know

There is one ultimate truth that is irrefutable: the unlimited. and from this truth branch out secondary truths that are nonetheless absolute because are aspects or consequences of that. If you truly realize the absence of limits and you open yourself to it without keep anything else, you can attempt to deduce the structure of reality through logic. But if you begin your deduction from a distorted basis, your logic will be flawed.

really the two views are two compatible perspectives. One says that the cosmos creates consciousness, therefore the cosmos is conscious. The other says that consciousness creates the cosmos, therefore the cosmos is conscious. The reality is that consciousness, understood as self-perception of the flow of reality by itself exists and therefore is absolute. Therefore, it makes no difference whether it is caused or causes. In infinity there is no ultimate cause, nothing begun, because if infinite has the potential for consciousness to be, as it is obvious, conciousness is infinite.

Dennett says that what we experience as consciousness arises from mechanical brain processes, not from anything mystical or magical. Perhaps he hasn't realized that what he calls mechanical brain processes is infinity in absolute synchrony. If he could open process after process, entering the quantum level, the fact that something like this happens is "magical" enough, no matter how mechanical it is. Science and mysticism are the same.

Reality is the absence of limits, and since there are no limits, there are infinite limits. Paradoxical but obvious. Let's see, the absence of limits implies something impossible: absolute movement. It can't exist because there is no reference, so the only possible movement is relative: changes of state that occur because they are reflected in something else that is in another state. Both things are essentially the absence of limits, but they reflect each other, creating change, and in this way, they are creating a limit between one and the other. This obviously occurs since there is movement, change of state, as we can perceive, or better, as we are. so in the absence of limits, it happens infinitely, so there are infinite limits. All those limited fractions of reality facing each other like mirrors, creating movement by opposition, are really the same reality, the whole, and in itself is the absence of limits, absolute potential. This is obviously speculation, but I would say that within an "elementary" particle, there are infinite reflections, the infinite cosmos, and within each particle of that cosmos, the same thing. This goes on in all directions. infinite limits of the same unlimited reality. That's what means when they say that the form is an illusion, the real thing is the substance, the form is a reflection of the infinite in itself creating inevitable syncronized patterns to infinity power, but this "illusion" is the expression of the absolute potential, then it's as real as it could be