Breakingthewall

Yes sure , very still with quadrillions of processes happening. I know what's meditation btw, I meditated 2/3 hours by day many years, I was only concerned about meditation. This narrative about conciousness is advaita. Ralston, spira, adyashanty, mooji, even Ramana maharsi. It's wrong. Nobody never get enlightenment following those teachings. But what to do? This is spirituality. A mess absolutely wrong in its basis. Idealism vs materialism by kastrup, for 12 years old minds. Or the screen of spira. Or Ralston. They are not enlightened, even close. They are absolutely wrong and the fact that human spirituality has in they the higher expression shows the level of current spirituality

@Yeah Yeah the movement that you have to do is openenss. No one can guide you to do that. Forget concepts like dreams or God; they are misleading and will only trap you further. Realize that you are. delve into that fact to the fullest. Forget absolutely everything; you simply are. Open yourself to it, dissolve any concept, idea, mental barrier, intention, or projection. Only you are. Open yourself to it absolutely. Everything is in this, nothing is missing. Then you will see that forms are just forms, but anyway, pain is painful. That's life.

I'm perceiving movement right now, that's means perception: movement. If it's an illusion or not means nothing, it is

Time is just a measure for movement. Time=movement. Time itself is nothing. But movement is real, existence is movement.

Totally agree The now is in movement right? movement is time. Without movement there is not time, without time there is not existence. Existence=movement. Existence is the manifestation of the reality, not the reality itself. Reality is beyond the "happening" Then, time is made by movement and movement is made by "others". Infinite others. Without others would be stillness. There is stillness is the essence of everything, it's our nature, the void that is full of reality. But in our manifestation there is always movement, because without movement there is not manifestation, just because that, and movement=others

Can any solipsist answer the question of how it is possible for the appearance of movement, of events, to exist when only I exist? I already know the answer: because I'm dreaming it. Does no one understand the superficiality of the dream analogy? A dream implies an infinite number of processes external to your field of consciousness; a dream is reality, because the most important thing: you are not you. The you that seems to be a unit that believes it is the center is a multidimensional entity branching out into infinity, with infinite external ramifications. You are like a donkey with blinders on, allowing you to see only what you should see. You are not the donkey; you are the blinders. Reality is infinitely broader and more impersonal than what you perceive.

Conciousness is not who observes, it's the fact of observing. Conciousness means relation, without relation there is no conciousness , and can be relation without conciousness

It's not boundless, you are a definite form, a human, full of boundaries. In fact you are bounded in infinite directions. You also could be a rat , where are the rats?

It's obvious. They are not "false", they are limited. realizations with psychedelic are almost always contaminated with limits because they are violence, you aren't ready for breaking the limits but psychedelic do it for you, but you in background are holding the limits.

I did a lot of trips where I realized solipsism, over all with 5meo.more than hundred, and all of them are false. Only one realization is true: absence of limits. Anything else is just limits.

Then do you think that all the eternity is going to be in the form of a human that imagine the past and the future, or could be in any moment something different like a rat? If you say yes, where is that rat?

In case anyone hasn't realized yet, current experience has a beginning; it's a cycle. Your memory starts at one point and ends at another. "Afterward," your experience will be another structure, and then another, ad infinitum. Since "afterward" implies time, and time is relative, all afters and befores unfold in the now, ad infinitum. It's absolutely impossible for it to be any other way. The experiencer is always the same, the unlimited one, but the you you think you are isn't that; it's the experience. Solipsism is confusing the ego with ultimate reality.

Ok, oh arahat. It Is so cute when people say to finish a debate: you are no awake . A question: are you solipsist because the leos video?

you are everything and the others too, because you are limitless "The others don't exist" is a limit

Consciousness is a stable relational structure in which absolute reality reflects itself synchronously, generating the appearance of a center of perception, from which reality is observed and experienced. It is not a substance, nor a universal witness, nor a separate entity. Consciousness is not something that exists "in itself," but a form that reality takes when it synchronizes itself in a coherent and sustained manner. It is not a foundation, but a local manifestation of the foundation. Absolute reality is not consciousness, but the limitless. Consciousness occurs within the limitless, as a form that arises when there is sufficient synchrony between relations. It is a node of relational coherence. When certain relations stabilize and coherently forward each other, an apparent center of perception appears: this is what we call consciousness. The self is a structure derived from consciousness when it identifies with particular forms of memory, desire, or body. But consciousness can exist even without that self. Consciousness is the process by which the infinite experiences itself in a particular form. It is neither a thing, nor a center, nor a witness: it is a synchronized, reflective relationship. Just as a whirlpool is not something distinct from water, but a stable form that water takes when it is organized in a certain way, consciousness is not something distinct from reality, but a stable form that the infinite takes when it synchronously reflects upon itself. Or is another words: the tao that can be named is not the true tao

Enlightenment is: I am everything Solipsism is: the others doesn't exist. which of the two do others exist? In solipsism, since they are thought of negatively. In the other option, neither others nor anything concrete has any relevance; they are neither denied nor affirmed; you simply open yourself to your infinite nature. Then you can understand that there are infinite perspectives, just because...why not?

This bubble of experience has very clear limits, if it were unlimited any experience would be impossible. Experience means time, something happening, that implies limits

If you hit your knee with a hammer it feels different than if you hit my knee with a hammer, then we are two Anyway, if you are the only perspective that exists, why you can't control the reality? Who's making the things appear? You? God?

Any fraction of infinity is infinite. In fact, the fact that there are no limits that give rise to what we could call infinity makes it necessary for there to be infinite perspectives, since it precisely has no limits and be limited to one , or any other number would be limited Think in the obvious fact that in eternity the reality has adopted infinite perspectives, and eternity is now.

How could I see that if I don't exist?

I agree but thats not what leo means with solipsism, you can ask him directly

What is a materialist? What is matter?

What is constant is the nature of the reality, the unlimited, as the tao te king said, it can't be named. It's not conciousness, that's a mistake. Conciousness arises in it

No, there is not. Everything is in constant change. The self , the center or perceptor seems to be the unchanging receptor of the experience, but it's precisely the "illusion". It's created by the perception of change. Consciousness is nothing, it's just the reality appearing as an structure perceptor / perception. It's an arising of the reality Consciousness is an appearance. Reality doesn't need conciousness to be, but conciousness arises. As it arises it's infinite, but not absolute. It's an essential nuance

Leo have said hundreds of times that solipsism means that the people that you are talking to doesn't exist, you are imagining them for a reason, and they have not inner experience