Breakingthewall

It's not nothing, it's beyond that distinction. Let's see death is beyond consciousness. It is not something experienced, nor a state observed: it is what remains when all framework disappears. It is not becoming, it is not form, nor relation. It is the absolute without structure. And yet, it is reality itself. Not in the sense of a empty nothingness, but as the bottomless essence of all that exists. This openness cannot be thought, nor sustained from form, it's out of the conciousness, but you can open yourself to it and surrender to it, then the self can dissapear for a moment, the perception becomes irrelevant, it's beyond perception, it's not nothing that you perceive but you are.

Not detaching but see through the structures. Let's see, total openness is not "nothing" because it includes "everything." Even though it isn't "something," it is imbued with all things. It is fullness, not emptiness, because the moment a possibility is possible, it is absolutely full of potential. If all possibilities are possible, its power is absolute. If you open yourself to it, the sensation is overwhelming. You can only do to some extent since you are a form; opening it completely would kill you. You are limits, if you totally break your limits, means that you are not a form anymore. You could become transparent, but not inexistent, unless you really stop existing as a form.

Great point. Alive is focusing in a facet. The absolute is not alive, life is just as conciousness, a facet, a possibility that happens. It's difficult to detach yourself from it because we exist, but non existence is the same than existence from the absolute perspective. The absolute is open, period. Then life , intelligence, etc are, but they aren't the absolute, are a expression of the absolute. But as they are a possibility, the absolute implies them, in the openess they are always implicit, same than everything Absolute potential isn't something defined, but the fact of its limitlessness always implies all possibilities. It's not a tranquil, empty nothingness; it's the bottomless imbued with totality.

Good idea 😅

It's alive because it is, it could not be and be, but being superimposed to not being. But agree, alive is bad word, better open. About the center, let's see, from that center, I perceive that I, as a center, am a perceiver, but that I, as a substance, am the opening. The opening is absolutely impersonal, but at the same time, I am that. The perceiver is a circumstantial perspective, a structure that occurs; the real is the opening that lives. Life not as a relationship but as a being. As if, given its absence of limits, it is that which I am. The perceiver is always there because it is my structure now, but they are lines; the real is the opening

It's not illusory, it just is. It's a perspective and it's infinite, there are infinite forms, becoming , perspectives. You can't avoid that fact. No, the unlimited is absolutely full. It's substance is alive because it has not limits. The fact of limitlessness makes the reality being. Be is everything, is the absolute power. Is the total potential, with the power of infinite universes . Is direct, alive, full. It's unfathomable, reality have unlimited power , it's wild, and it's joy even in the destruction and pain, because it is

It speak so slow that I ve not patient to listen all but seems interesting, I think he will say that to arrive to the "absolute truth" as he says you should eliminate structures until you reach total simplicity. Total simplicity is looking at reality without a filter, directly, without structure or construction that filters, but absolutely open. You have to be here and now, staring eternity in the face, at the bottomless abyss, with nothing else to do but look at it. And at a given moment, you are the abyss, and the whole opens up because you are that. It's not necessary don't do nothing or be a monk; it's necessary for your mind to reach total simplicity by erasing all the structures that filter, the recognition that you are that and you don't need filters, just open yourself to your true nature

Locally they are, as you can see. From an unlimited perspective there is not movement, only substance, the totality. But from a local perspective a lot of things are happening

Opposite, I'm the only that I can see. I see the the life in me, the movement of the reality like a fluid machine flowing in itself, alive, branching out and going deeper into itself. hat you see with your eyes is just the surface. They are useful to see forms, but the real thing is substance, and you only can see yours.

Say that there is no self and nothing ever happened 😅

You call it dream for a reason, because for you is a mental creation of god. That's impossible, it's not that, it's the inevitable development of the unlimited potential. Everything that you perceive, even a thought, develops to infinity, there is no center not end, the other people aren't a dream, are infinite, everything is. There is no will, just the reality flowing in itself without begging nor end. God is a center, there is not, the unlimited reflects in itself in infinite dimensions that develops in infinite dimensions without end, and all of them are just facets, perspectives, but anyone of them is infinitely deep, and contains the whole reality. The whole has no will, it's unlimited, can't avoid that, it's absolute expansión already expanded without limits in all directions and dimensions, and all of them can burst like a soap bubble because any form is the same than another, just the unlimited.

So there is an illusion. Maybe that idea makes you feel safe. Neo advaita is seductive because it sells that there is not suffering, you could be lazy that doesn't matter, fight is an illusion, stop breathing because it's an illusion. It could be useful as anesthesia if the reality doesn't gets hard. But who needs anesthesia if the reality isn't hard? When it gets hard, all those ideas will be useless

Then that's the same than no will, so god is the same than no god. The problem is the idea of a dream. It implies a dreamer, and a dreamer is an entity, someone who emits something, a dream, which is a representation of reality, not real in itself. This implies that there is something else, more real, which defines "dream" by contrast. If there were only "dreams," then it wouldn't be a dream, just as if the will had no preference, it wouldn't be will. Will is desire, wanting to live and not die, for example. If it's exactly the same to you, then there is no will. But who has will? God? Who is God? Nothingness? Nothingness has no will, nor does it dream, nor does anything, if it do it would be something,."will" for example. This whole idea of God dreaming is simply impossible.

You can't meet me there because we are here, and here there are stones

I saw one very big and I tried to move, I couldn't. I don't care the name, was a thing in the middle of my way so heavy.

The self is as real as a table, but more definite, more than a table as a plant, It's a structure that carries within itself the pattern of its form. A table isn't that. A universe is. The self is a universe within another universe, like any life form. An any living (and not living) being it is interconnected with all of reality, but it is a defined relational structure. Defined does not mean separate, since it is connected in all its dimensions. But while it exists, it is a defined living structure. Real, definite, with apparent limits, like a cell or a plant.

Still there are two limits, god and the dream . And about the will, how an unbiased will is a will?

It's easy, just remove what is impossible, then what is inevitable remains

Me, a relational node that is operating now. The absolute is limitlessness. That is the essence of everything. Since there are no limits, fluctuation occurs, the breaking of symmetry, differentiation, relative movement in limitlessness, or of limitlessness with respect to itself, is the same. This movement is multiplied by infinity; it has never begun; it has always been; it is absolutely expanded and cannot be thought. This infinite relative movement flows upon itself, creating infinite structures of the same reality, different facets, expressions of the bottomless abyss. It seems mysterious, but it is not. The fact of the absence of bottom and limits gives rise to totality; it is obvious and inevitable. You are that, and everything that exists is also. Manifestation is inevitable; there is always form, but the essence is always the same: the whole. You can see it whenever you want, just make the form transparent. also the manifestation is absolutely interconnected, you could perceive it without doubt

Then god wants that things appear . Then god has a lot of ideas, will, bias, he has a project and he's doing it. Where is all of that ideas, power? In his mind? Then he's an entity, something. And he's god, so there is nothing above him. So he's a limit. Then he's dreaming and the dream appears. That dream is just a flat image, without depth, just an illusion. Then it's limited , one limit up, another down

Made of relations, same than anything else. Absolutely limited, awareness is a limit. The absolute is not awareness or conciousness, awareness is just relation, same than a plant. The absolute is absolute with or without awareness. As the absolute is limitlessness, absolute potential, awareness happens. But it's something that happens, without movement there is not awareness.

I never read, I checked in Chatgpt. i don't share that about univerlsal archetypes, seems too magical, it's much more simpler. Just evolution. But he's interesting, he sees the psyche as an alive structure, open, always in movement. that's true, but then seems that he gets is a mess talking about the soul

What is a dream? It's something that has an end, flat, without depth. It's like a flat screen, limited.

Your true nature is the nature of the ego. The ego is a construction of the reality, same than anything else. The ego is not a thought, it's an energetic structure that the reality build, same than a star or a plant. Great that you appreciate

That's a mistake, but anyway....I don't want to argue. But it's so obvious. God dreaming is an impossibility, requires will, intention. It's a limit. In one side god, in other the dream. Limit A and limit B, and in the middle the action of dreams. Can be more limited?