Breakingthewall

There is not a god as an entity, it's the infinite flow of the form that's the expression of the absolute. Nobody is driving it or doing jokes, it's infinite, then it's impossible to be driven. Do you know the principle of uncertainty of Heisenberg? It's a fundamental principle of reality. It implies that no one knows what number the dice will show when they stop rolling, since what is rolling is the infinite itself

I don't suffer, I can open myself to the absolute every single day if I take some time at night, but the absolute is the absolute, and the relative is the relative, and in it I want develop myself as much as its possible, and the mind, that mechanism that makes relationships, is magic, it's the best tool ever, is the reality in its glorious expression. Denying it is so stupid, like wanting to be a monkey when you are almost a god that can touch the divinity.

Sure. As human civilization, born of the mind, thought, emotions, war, longing, searching, and lack, cares for you like a baby in your first-world apartment, bottle-feeding you every day, you can deny the mind and say those kinds of things. Even despise the mind as something inferior. Not inferior, nonexistent! 🤣 Like a teenager who asks dad for money and then says dad is stupid, that he doesn't understand anything. Yes, that teenager should be sent to the Congo for a couple of years, to care for lepers, so that he would appreciate one of the jewels of existence: the mind, which escapes matter, comes to life, unites with other minds, and generates a new dimension capable of penetrating reality, modifying it, and flowing within it with mastery, control, and intelligence. The mind is reality in its purest and most sublime expression.

It's so easy. There are many planes. For example the quantum plane is not the same as matter, life, or the mind. There you have four different planes of reality that, although interconnected, operate according to different laws. Of course you can say that those are concepts, because Ralston and neo advaita said that reality is "this", but maybe they are wrong

There are infinite dimensions of being, not all are smelly or tasty. Past and future are concepts that represent the flow of the reality, they are real as concepts. They are made of quadrillions of quantum process in perfect synchronicity that are as real and an universe. In fact, they are an universe itself, everything is. I don't need to to point it, not everything that exists does in a spacial dimensions. That something is human made doesn't mean that's not real, anything is made by anything else. Maybe it's that you can't understand what I'm pointing because it's a broader perspective. Just the possibility Btw, I'm used to see that people who believe that they are enlightened because they adopted the neo advaita philosophy become aggressive when they are questioned, without giving solid argument, just: you are in a mental mess, concept are false, you are love! Ban that son of a bitch! 🤣 Seems the norm, it's interesting to see it . But give a chance that those neo advaita ideas about thought, past and future are very limited, narrow perspective

I told in the post that that's true, but with some nuances.

They should have mods realized in yaveh, no jokes with them.

The statement "I am God" is true from a certain perspective. What I am is reality manifested in a form that is both part and whole. As Rumi said, you are not a drop of the ocean, you are the ocean in a drop. This phrase is very apt. But at the same time, you are also the part, and your form as a drop is defined by all the other drops. If we continue with the statement, we arrive at: and I am creating reality. Well, just like the previous one, you are being created as form, and at the same time, you are creating the other forms with your flow, with what you are, and as the butterfly effects of each movement reverberate in infinity, then are infinite, they create the infinite forms that In turn, they create your form. so it would be fair to say, I say: Let it be! And reality is. This statement alone is creating the infinite totality of reality. Of course, any other statement is also.

Imo compassion sounds arrogant since implies that I am above those people, but I forgive them. This implies that I am "forgiving" reality for being as it is, when it manifestation is an infinite mechanism that flows in infinite dimensions in a synchronized and perfect way. Therefore, instead of having compassion, I should set aside my personal human opinion and understand the absolute harmony of what is, and in doing so, exclaim: hallelujah! as an expression of total joy that total unlimitedness is, whether in its essence or in its form, even I'm in the middle of the ruins of Gaza. Of course, we are humans and our human conditioning is strong and prevent us to see beyond the walls of our cave

How do you know that before your so called birth there was nothing? Because you don't remember it? Better focus in what is now, then maybe you could open yourself to the nature of the reality. But first you should identify the barriers that are preventing you to do it, and if you prefer ignore them as they don't exist.... well, that's don't going to make them dissapear

There can't be "an" absolute, only the absolute, and it's not a mind, a mind is relation between opposites. A mind happens relatively in the absolute. The absolute is absolute and nothing else can't be said about it, because anything that you say is relative. Can be more obvious?

They obviously exist since they are. They are another plane of reality, but in essence are the same. Neo advaita says: thought are not real, are maya, the reality is non thought. This is duality. You can be in absolute silence and closed. In the past I believed that of no thought, like anyone else because sounds logical and seductive, but if you are insightful you will intuit that something is missing there. Enlightenment is opening yourself to the absolute, the thoughts are an expression of the absolute, like anything else. It's true that if you get attached to the content of the thought you are closed, but same if you are attached to fear, the problem is that the second is not no obvious because it's not conceptual, it's the deep programming of the human form. There are many layers of energetic barriers, and until you don't collapse the duality between thought and reality you can't start to go deep into them

If you mix the thought of everything and everything is infinite, then there is no definite thought, no definite nothing, just absolute without opposite, that's enlightenment. Anything that is defined, like "there is no physical world" is relative. Anything definite is relation with its opposite, the absolute is without relation, is where relationship can happen. This is a logical explanation and it's impossible to denying, but the point is being open to it for some moments, really.

Then I'm not happening? I'm not a facet of the reality, and the thought so? It's the reality in one side and me in another? That's what the non duality masters claim: reality is dual, and that's non duality. I'm also walking and I can stop walking, that's doesn't mean that me walking is not an arising of the reality, the reality itself Then a cat has no self? Prick it with a needle, you will see if he has a self, you will see it painfully

Look, just a logical reasoning: enlightenment is the realization of the absolute. Do you agree? Let's say that yes. Then, in the absolute, how could you realize that there is not Physical world, and the reality is an idea? It's impossible, because if you do, you would be in the relative. Don't you see it? In the absolute it's nothing that can be defined because it would be relative to anything else. Can be more obvious? The absolute is absolute, period. Then you see the relative, and you realize: fuck, this relative things that appears are made of the absolute, are the absolute in a form or perspective. Then, from this perspective seems that the reality is not physical....but who knows, it's just a perspective. Don't you see it?

"Physical universe" is just an idea that is the opposite of: "non physical universe". It is meaning. Enlightenment is out of meaning because it's total. Total is impossible to define because definitions happen in it, are relative. Physical universe is relative, nonexistent physical universe the same. If you don't believe it it's ok, but I think that many spiritual traditions agree, maybe tao te quing, or some kind of Buddhism. I think that what I'm saying is not offensive or unrespectful

That's just an idea. Enlightenment is openess, believe me. It's in another plane. Maybe anyone gets it as an intuition, and doesn't get stuck in the idea of no thought as enlightenment as I was for long time

If you are in total silence, there is still barrier. It's easy to be in mental silence if you practice meditation, anyone who does can after a while. But that doesn't implies that your being is open. That's why people try 5meo, 1000 ug of LSD and those things. To break the barrier. The thoughts are happening in the now, are the now. Enlightenment is not silence and direct perception of the now, is the opening to the real substance of the reality.

A lot of layers of fear and alert that are beyond the structured thought

Great post! According to Chatgpt, the risk of valvular heart disease with LSD begins at 60 mcg per week. This isn't a real certainty, as no cases have been reported. I often take microdoses just to enjoy the slightly high and expansive state. I notice it clearly at 2.5 mcg, and at 5 mcg, it's high. I take 10 mcg to go to a social gathering where I want to get directly high, since I don't drink alcohol. It's an extremely useful substance. I find psilocybin worse, less clean, but it's a matter of taste. Microdoses of weed are also absolutely useful. Meditation with a single toke of weed is another dimension of openness.

Long time without reading you. Sad that someone really interested is spirituality only post here to show condescension about leo, you should try some expression, we will appreciate

Maybe you didn't understand the process. During those 5 minutes I was in mental silence, I wasn't thinking nothing of 11 or work, but later I thought about those 5 minutes and I realized that there was a barrier, then I thought (because I was thinking, after those 5 minutes) about it and I wrote that of the 11 morning as a possible explanation about that barrier to give an example about silence and closeness.

I'll give you a clear example. Just now, I spent approximately five minutes in absolute mental silence, without a single articulate or conceptual thought. But the entire time, there was a state of alertness in the background. It's 11 a.m. and I'm at the gym. In half an hour, I have to run some errands for work. So, in addition to the articulate mental noise, there's an underlying tension of alertness. If you understand how your psyche works, you'll know there are many energetic layers beneath the surface. Once, for a month, I took strong psychedelics every day. This was helpful in beginning to understand the layers of the psyche. It's not so simple. You need a lot of understanding about how fear and desire closes. Not conceptual understanding, direct, see them and identify what they are, same than you can see a stone falling, you don't need to conceptualize to understand what's happening

No, the stopping of mind chattering can help with the openess to the nature of existence, but it doesn't implies enlightenment . You define enlightenment like Ralston, no mind and direct perception. That's not enlightened, it's just a mental State

quote any post that is wrong in your opinion, then I'm going to explain you deeply why I wrote this. Everything that I write is with a background, and can be developed. Try.