Breakingthewall

God create evil , and loves evil. evil, struggle, corruption, are necessary. without them reality would be an undifferentiated unit. the moment there is time, evil appears. evil is selfishness, and even a proton is selfish, otherwise it would stop being a proton. enlightenment is accepting and loving evil. You don't need to forgive god, only understand. everything negative that has happened to you is a gift that brings richness to your individual existence. Jesus finds glory being crucified. being one with everything, eternal pure happiness, is very good, but is it... boring? God likes to party, to give all of itself. and suffering is essential for it

individual existence is evil in itself. since to exist it must exclude what is not it. even the trees of a forest compete for light, and the one left below does not prosper. To be born a human, one sperm must succeed and the others must die. and from here begins the egoism. God creates evil in order to create division, since without evil, everything would be an undifferentiated soup. the problem is in humans. animals have their exact dose of evil. the predator kills, the deer fight to mate, etc. but in the human there is an enormous range of possible evil, until you reach the limits of almost total selfishness, and complete unhappiness. total happiness is unity. total unhappiness is complete separation, because it is the absence of happiness. he who is separated is unhappy and spreads unhappiness to the extent of his separation. Is a devil, that is no more than a separate individual, and the engine of his evil is the fear of ceasing to exist but on the other hand, evil makes the individual strong insofar as it preserves his individuality. the absence of evil blurs individuality, and creates a feeling of helplessness in the individual. that's why enlightenment is difficult. it is not enough understanding. first you have to conquer the world

If you are completely indifferent it doesn't matter whether you are slave or free, or torturing children or whatever, but as a human, slavery is extremely selfish, have slaves will increase your ego and take you away from the truth and plunge you into suffering. so it is impossible to be completely indifferent while you are human, so you can say that good and evil are absolute from the human point of view

It's normal friend. you say hello to a girl in a club, and then you go to fuck. If you are a minimally sensitive person, this situation is not going to excite you at all. It's not that you're impotent or anything like that, it's that sex is an intimate relationship between two people that has to flow naturally. It's okay to have experiences like this if you want to, but you'll only get great sex if you practice great interpersonal relationships.

Well It could be said that the ideal is to create an artificial moral system based on natural morality. and understand natural morality as the subjective tendencies of justice that occur in the completely disinterested person. It's selfish. you can not care about survival but prefer the truth to lie

the question is not whether slavery is wrong or right. it is what happens in you if you witness it in a completely disinterested way. You may see it as something indifferent, it was just an example. but probably when you see how children are separated from their mothers so that an owner can sell them to a brothel and thus buy jewelry, as a dramatic example, something in you sees it as wrong. Except if you are totally selfish and you can't see nothing beyond what's positive or negative to your situation in the world Yes it is, but subjective is objetive at the end

Im not saying that kill is wrong. And there are degrees of selfless. 100% selfless is impossible except if you are dead. so it could be said that the only good human is the dead human. but it can be, for example, 70% selfless, which is very different from 2%, 98% liar, vicious and narcissistic. The thing is that's it works in a counterintuitive sense. the closer you get to selfless, the happier, the more selfish, the more unhappy. so it could also be said that the true egoist, who seeks real happiness, tends to be selfless. or put another way, the smart one is selfless, the idiot, selfish

for example, you know deeply that it is wrong that there is slavery, so you denounce this fact. You do not do it to elevate yourself, nor for any ideal of how a saint should be, but because something really yells at you: denounce this injustice. you know that by doing so you will most likely be killed, but you do what must be done without worrying about yourself. this has happened in innumerable cases and circumstances, and it is what makes human society not total rubbish

not always, and there are degrees. On one side are the saints who completely renounce the ego and do what must be done without considering their interest, for example allowing themselves to be crucified, or tortured. it is something that has always existed. At the other extreme is the total egoist, who only pursues his interest, corrupt, vicious, deceived and deeply unhappy. good and evil, anywhere and at any time.

the false morality dictated by society is about survival. the true ethics that springs naturally from a person when he is selfless and integral is real

I don't think morality is relative. I think there is good and evil. On the one hand, there is integrity and disinterest, and on the other, falsehood and selfishness. You notice it clearly if you are open to it, and it is not something learned, it is innate.

what you say is true, but the question is: do you prefer to be free, or to be in prison? in prison you are guaranteed food and shelter, but you can't choose. freedom, nothing is guaranteed. you can end up starving, alone and abandoned by everyone. there are no beaten paths, and you can only trust your intuition, and mistakes are expensive. the positive part is freedom itself, and the opportunity to become a person of integrity. for many people it is not enough.

It seems that you are here for something, a kind of apprenticeship. the human avatar is full of traps. It is a trap in itself. going deep enough to undo all the knots seems like a work of genius to me. It requires intelligence and passion and when you think you have solved it, you see that you have not. there are more layers, more traps are revealed. most don't even understand that a game is being played. And of those who understand it, how many manage to solve it? you can see that you are existence, all that, but the human avatar is still there, needing adjustment, equalization.

monogamy is ideal. The problem is that for many people, regular sex with the same person loses strength, while emotional ties gain strength. then the problem arises: not having sex with others becomes a duty towards your partner, rather than a real desire, then your partner becomes someone who makes you have to repress yourself, that is, limits your freedom. The relationship became your jail. for me the solution is easy: never mix attachment and sex. The problem is, how to grow kids if you want to ?

Yes but Christianity is most easily understood as a metaphor for enlightenment, although for centuries almost no one understood it that way. It's pretty obvious if you consider that Christ was a hippy who preached love and poverty. Muhammad was a conqueror, a kind of Genjis kahn who unified the Arab tribes through the war. Maybe that's why the Islam is difficult to understand since our perspective, but there is spirituality in it would say that the difference is that Christianity says: love unconditionally and you will dissolve your ego. islam says: obey completely and you will dissolve your ego, renouncing to it. it would be said that the first is theoretically higher, and the second more practical. probably throughout history more egos have been dissolved by obedience and renunciation than by unconditional love

the suffering that has happened in your life weighs you down because you are attached to it. Like an addiction. you think it defines you. spirituality will make you identify with the formless, and all that past suffering will be like a dream, unreal. only the present is. You will see that all that suffering is nothing, it's you, now, who is creating suffering. Get out of this is possible

but the result has been to scare them in perpetuity. Christianity says: love and you will enter the kingdom of heaven. islam: obey or go to hell. both penetrated among very primitive people, but their formulation is the opposite

That's what I was thinking, if maybe I'm wrong and it's a metaphor about enlightenment and the ego, but it doesn't seem like it. although on the other hand the Sufis were true mystics

imagine that there is no difference between nothing. anything is the same as anything else. that is nothing. "something" is the apparent differentiation, the form. without form there is nothing. only you, and you have no limits, and you are nothing. in deep sleep it is like that. eternity doesn't last long. it doesn't last. an instant is eternity. until you imagine the differences and time begins

You are here to learn. don't complain and get to work. Nobody is going to do for you

an evil tale to dominate ignorant people through terror, making them believe that they have a spy inside their mind who is going to write down their every act and thought so that, when death comes, they will be sent to eternal torture if they have not obeyed what their dictator order. An horrible way to submit the humans

Well, was one way of putting it. to express that the typical alpha man apparently sure of himself and leader is deep down a slave of his self-image, of his results, of what others say. and by definition, slave is not alpha, so for me it is beta. but of course there are many points of view about what is alpha and beta

Let's see, in the case of an atomic war of total destruction, how many missiles would come to touch US soil. on the other hand, if nato unleashes all its power on russia, the destruction would be much more effective

because people are trapped in form and cannot conceive of formlessness, so even those who are interested in spirituality, which are many, are not able to go beyond separation and the concept

there is only one true alpha: one who is completely independent, indifferent to the opinions of others, completely integral, rooted in the present, and one with the whole. the others are all beta