Breakingthewall

@Natasha Tori Maru Imagine you're a woman who comes from a family of successful professionals, very focused on social status. During your childhood, your relationship with your parents was acceptable; they were demanding but not bad people. From childhood, you internalized that you should be accepted, fulfill your role, not be less than your siblings. Love? Well, I guess so, some. They do their best. You managed to live up to expectations, found a partner, a job as a lawyer, and had children. None of this really interested you much; the basis of your movement was not to be left behind. Do you love your children? Well, you think so. You try the best for them, although dealing with them was always tense. And your husband? Do you know him? You think so. He's a good person, he doesn't treat you badly. Everything is so strange, alienating. Sometimes you daydream about your family dying, and you immediately feel enormously guilty. Besides, what would you do? Alone, in middle age, sad. Sadness. Everything is strange, alien. You start having obsessive thoughts about your health and that of your children. You don't understand why, you don't understand anything. You go to the psychologist, you explain things, it helps you let go, but the sadness continues, and old age and death are right in front of you. Then, are your thoughts the cause of your suffering, or a consequence of an energetic structure built in a whole life in contact with an environment that creates those structures? It's real, built in decades, layers and layers of structure. You must be, let's say determinate and smart to penetrate to the bottom and destroy it. Maybe you should be someone determined to conquer the reality. Unfortunately, the most probably is that woman wont be that , but there are medicines, and some videos about self help to have some illusion that you are creating your suffering, and if you stop thinking everything would be wonderful

That's fair, without reading the book any opinion is superficial. I admit that I get triggered by those ideas because I have been trapped in that paradigm, trying to stop suffering and it's impossible, the solution is deeper . But my opinion is just about short videos

What I see is that the core of this idea seems logical and obvious, but it has a basic flaw. It's similar to the core of Dyer and Tolle's ideas. Let's see, he says that you create unnecessary suffering with your mental activity, remembering the past or fearing the future. If you become aware of how you do this, you'll realize you're sabotaging yourself and stop doing it. The matter is not even remotely that simple, and I know this from experience. When you create constant mental suffering, you do so because the structure of your psyche is broken. You, as a psychic structure, emit a constant vibration, and that vibration can take the form of negative thoughts, anger, hatred, shame, etc. This is not because your consciousness is low or because you do this due to some processing error. It is because this is the manifestation of your structure, and you cannot stop doing it because you are that. It's extremely frustrating trying to stop doing it because it's impossible. The only thing that works, and I speak from experience, is to profoundly and radically change your structure. This is brutal work that requires absolute deconstruction and a vision of what you are to the utmost depth, which must end in a true opening to your true, total nature. Anything else won't work. Addressing the symptom (the thought) as if it were the root doesn't work and is extremely frustrating. Hence my comment (a bit stupid, I admit).

the way i see it is that you are only going to experience this life or line of lifes, since once you disappear reality will continue flowing but without you, since you are only a perspective that reality has created at a given moment in its infinite flow. this implies that you are not really you, but reality, only that now you have the form of this self that suffer, but reality does not suffer in the sense that for reality suffering is the same than pleasure, those things are only arisings that occur in the living flow that develops eternally, reality is total and flows in its absolute glory, and you as a self that desires, prefers, fears and seeks are only a temporary vibrational state that is happening in the reality. Then, if you achieve dissolving the self you will realize that you are the reality itself. It's quite shocking. But later you will be back in the self perspective because it's the structure that is happening now But it's very possible that this self/structure when it disappears, it will re-originate based on the energetic imprint of the current self, creating a line of infinite, but laterally limited, experience. That is, you won't experience being me, but rather you in infinitely different possibilities, and I will experience the same thing on another dimensional line between infinite dimensions. This is only what I deduce is possible, not the "truth."

I don't know, they are just my ideas. Any system of ideas is different, the point is where they lead you. No system of ideas is the truth, they are possible keys to lead you to the truth

Could be ideas that helps you to open yourself to the truth, but not the truth. The truth is your true nature, it's not an idea. If you open up to the truth you will say: fuck! The truth! Of course....the absolute truth, what I am, what I always was, how is possible that I forgot it? It's so obvious.... wait....what? I don't remember exactly what happened....what truth? It's impossible to remember, you can't grasp it, you only can be opened to it and be one with it. And it's absolutely 100% maximum fullness, no flaws, no lack, perfect, total glory, absolute jackpot.

Are Leo's insights, not yours. The truth, or enlightenment, whatever you want to call it, is you, it is what you are, therefore "knowing" the truth is being one with the whole. If what leo says helps you with that, great. If it closes you off because of fear or whatever reason, simply forget it. No one can tell you the truth, not Buddha, not Jesus Christ, not anyone at all. It's something that happens when you align your, let's say, energetic system; it's being one with your essential nature. Afterwards, you can talk and talk about it, but the truth opens up, it's not said. In short, don't believe anyone, me neither. It's disappointing, I know, but nobody said that the path was easy

@Mmartinez The ideas that someone transmits to you may or may not help you open up to the absolute truth of reality, but they are never, in any case, the absolute truth; they are just ideas. If you want to delve deeper into this matter, you must understand that you cannot believe anyone because doing so, no matter who it may be, closes you off from the real truth. Even if Buddha appears to you surrounded by angels and demons to tell you: Martinez, the truth is that you will be reincarnated as a rat, or whatever Buddha says, you should not believe him. They are just ideas; ideas are not the truth; the truth is direct. In fact, the best thing is to forget absolutely all ideas, empty your mind, and begin to see. Leos ideas could be a help to open your perspective, but at the end only you can see.

Thanks for appreciating, really I'm getting deeper and deeper, I can't avoid it, it's like a compulsion. The point is that one day you are one with the totality and next day you aren't, then it's not easy to write without fall in some blind points, but humbly, I think that in two or three years I'll be able to articulate a fairly clear explanation of the mind/enlightenment/absolute issue. I hope Leo doesn't ban me because I like writing here, although I've never looked elsewhere. What I see here is that very few people are open-minded to real understanding, so sometimes I get into very silly, aggressive, and sterile arguments that only add stress. It's a stupid attitude that I'm trying to correct.

No I didn't, I just listened videos. I admit I react too aggressively when I hear that of: you are responsible for your emotional suffering and that to solve it you just have to stop thinking, because it's an unrealistic vision that blames the sufferer and trivializes the suffering. Suffering is a symptom, it's a vibration that arises from a fractured structure. That fracture is what makes openness possible, but it must be deeply understood. If someone internalizes that suffering as a mistake they're making, they'll be stuck there forever.

Ok ok don't get angry. Could you call me arrogant and sure I should correct it, but I argumented my answer, I didn't say just that. Anyway, I agree, some expressions plays against me in any case, I shouldn't show reaction, emotional behavior, etc. It's nonsense. But all us are humans.

Sure but your mental activity is the reality.It's not something you do because you're stupid or because you're functioning incorrectly. It's the flow of reality, which splits into two lines, creating duality. The work of enlightenment is to equalize those lines, seeing that they are one. This isn't achieved by canceling one of those lines, believing it to be nonexistent or illusory, but by taking a step back and placing yourself in an unlimited perspective in which the flow is seen for what it is. Then you are not afraid of the unknown, because "unknown" is meaningless, just as the known is. There is the becoming of reality, and you are that. And beneath the becoming is ultimate nature, your essence. If you open yourself to this, you can equalize the becoming of the human mind with external becoming. If not, it's impossible. It's a profound process, not something you do according to the simple logic that Ralston preaches. That's totally false. It's mental castration and it's absolutely frustrating. That's why I point it like Im a smartass, because i see it like a trap of a demon

It's difficult being more superficial. His understanding about human nature is a joke. Then, you cant know the unknown because you don't know it! (Ironic so nice giggle). Okay, well, the human structure is maintained by fear, and fear of the unknown is the fear of destructuring. He doesn't understand it because his mind works by superficial logical obviousness. Regarding depression, according to him, it's all thought about the past and the future. His understanding of how the human emotional structure is constructed is the same as a 14-year-old boy's. It's understandable why he's so successful; he says things that everyone can understand and seem obvious. The only problem is that they're false, but who cares? The important thing is that it sounds great. I'm not saying this for aggression , just to help you to don't get lost in that perspective. It's unreal , just consider it

It's very easy to see when someone is wrong, the issue of suffering is not relevant, but if you are trying to place yourself in an absolute perspective of existence and what you do is place yourself in another supposedly broader relative position, it is clearly seen and there is no ambivalence about whether your personal opinion is valid or not, it is a dual perspective, and if you say that it is absolute, it is wrong.

Limitlessness implies that existence exists, and it's unlimited. Then it can't stop existing of be límited. God is not an entity who decides, is the reality flowing, and this flow is it's will. Then, the God's will and the God's intelligence is exactly the flow of the reality. It's not like if I say: my will is going walking, let's go, then I go. God's will manifests in the movement, it's not separate, not previous. It's exactly the same. Intelligence the same, it's not that god is an entity who is intelligent and creates the flow, it's the flow, and it's intelligence is exactly the flow. There is zero separation between God and the flow of existence, the flow of existence is not a manifestation of the intelligence and will of god, is exactly the intelligence and will of god.

Many people say that reality can't be expressed in coherent explanations, only in koans. This is just because they don't understand anything , but they have a kind of feeling that in their opinion is enlightenment and as they need that status, they convince themselves about it and try to convince anyone

It's very possible to talk about this if you really understand it. The self is not the thinker, it is the perceiver of the experience, whether it thinks or not. A clue: all those who talk about experience as absolute and consciousness don't understand this, but of course, they are 100% sure that they do. It's a very subtle shift of perspective from which duality collapses, there is no perceiver or perception. There is reality, and reality appears in the form of perceiver and perception, simply because it is doing so now. Reality manifests as a river that constantly flows and takes forms. Form is now separation; it is absolutely real as form, not an illusion, it's a real structure, but beyond this structure the self can perceive itself as a creation of the flow and realizing that the flow itself is the existence, that the duality is a construction that happens now. Then the self become an interface of the reality with which reality observes itself .It is as real as a rock or anything else, a stable form of flux. The non duality is not the ultimate realization, when the self perceives itself as a construction, then it can perceive the ultimate nature of the reality, getting open to it, being it

any definition is duality, it's absolutely obvious and a closure, I don't understand how's possible that no one understands what non duality means and can't really collapse the duality. It's a very strange fact. Non duality is extremely simple, and is the first step to the totality

Yes sure, no worries if your business breaks, your family is sick or anything. Life doesn't work like that. There is nothing wrong being human, but it implies being human

God is not omnipotent at all, it's inevitable, a natural phenomenon that happens due the limitlessness. It has no choice.

means that the nature of reality is unlimited potential, and from it existence arises as infinite coherent relations developing as a becoming, and in that becoming everything that happens is absolutely synchronized with the totality of the form, nothing is independent, everything is interconnected, a breath has a butterfly effect that reach everything, and everything has to allow that breath

Anyway, the development of the solipsism was good. The self feels alone; it is alone in eternity, being a perceiver who can never leave its perception. This is because the self doesn't realize that it is a mirage. Not in terms of its substance, but in the fact of being a self. It is a concrete configuration of reality now, a self that perceives. If you take a step back, the self and perception are exactly the same, therefore you cannot be alone because you are not you. You are reality, and it is everything. It has no limits and lacks nothing; it is absolute totality and plenitude. Only the apparent self feels lack, like being alone, which is a lack of another. In totality, there is no other because other is meaningless, like everything else, there is no lack; there is totality But of course, the self is always here, you can make it transparent for a while, but later you are again in the perspective of the self, with lack, need of others, need of purpose, of developing your human potential. Then the point is doing it

Imagination implies a subject, an action and a result, the reality is absolutely direct. It's the reality, period. Imagination needs two. Sure , the reality dies and immediately restart again because the lapse without existence doesn't exist Dying should be quite challenging, the total surrender of the self. Doing before dying is the point

All is false, no one did in a laboratory

That's duality, believe me. "You" "are" "conciousness" is duality. In one side is you and in other what you are doing, being concious. Collapse the duality It's just a change the perspective, it's the first step to the openess That also. "Sensation" is duality. Why you don't see it? 😂 Sensation is an appearance, same than conciousness, just seem that you are concious of something, it's real in the duality, but from a step back it's totally meaningless, if there is no difference from perceptor and perception there is no conciousness. It's impossible to transmit that idea, you have to collapse the duality absolutely totally, it's very difficult, like stopping to being you, absolutely dissolve the self. The real game. Then the absolute can manifest, the totality. Your mind must be a hole without structure. "Conciousness" is fucking structure