Breakingthewall

Leo In his answers he does what he always does: he mixes the relative with the absolute. He says: you invented Buddha. That is a total error, on the absolute level, Buddha does not exist directly, he is mixed with the totality, on the relative level, Buddha is a possibility of the infinite as real as you. The whole Leo error comes from not differentiating relative Leo from absolute Leo. but he is right when he says that he spira, etc., they have not opened themselves to reality in all its depth, the same as you 😉.

Our perception can be absolutely clear, that is what this work is about.

Yes, but I am not trying to define existence, but rather explaining a moment in which existence has been cleansed of all its colorful clothing and has shown itself naked. It is always now, but now veiled, that creates time. If the veil dissolves, time disappears and the absolute manifests. The absolute has several facets, or can be perceived itself from differents angles. It is a mistake if you think: they are just visions, the one who sees them is the absolute. No. reality sees itself, there is no subject that observes. When reality manifests itself as total emptiness or total love, they are not two facets that an observer, always the same, the empty consciousness, observes. There is no such thing as empty consciousness, reality is self-conscious. There is no reality without awareness of itself, not awareness without reality. reality is infinite and is self-aware of its infinity, there is no such thing as consciousness projecting an image of nothing . does not exist. When the infinite void happens t ultimate reality manifest in it's essence, it's not an object of consciousness. It's reality concious of itself. Now waterriver would say: there are some rests of identification in you, that's why you have that experience. But I don't agree, that is the reality, the infinity perceiving itself without barriers. There is not something, let's say, superior, called conciousness, that create the infinity. It's just the infinity, that is empty and full same time . That is the subtle mistake that I see in waterriver, but who knows, maybe it's me who is wrong

You are talking in the mental level. What means now? Now is the existence. You can't see the existence with the mind, you have to drop the mind completely. Zero mind.

Look, the absolute openess to the emptiness is an energetic happening. It's not something that you realized, it's something that opens in you, that changes your pattern of existence and erases everything. It's something that frozen your blood in your veins.

Then I have said myself: forget your human misery, throw it away like an old skin, take off that burden as if it were a paper suit, and shine in the pure light of living reality. be complete in yourself. Open your being completely to the world since the world is you. all the fear, the sadness, the imperfection, the narcissism....what is that? that does not exist, it is a psychological addiction called lie. The lie is fear and makes you shrink. Be the total truth.

Then I realized: reality is love. The openness between two humans, the flow that exists between two people who are truly open to each other without reservation, is simply the substance of reality, that could defined to as everything, so love is everything, complete reality, infinite absolute emptiness is absolute love. Emptiness=love, because has no limits. That's the logic of the equation. It is an infinite ocean of love. then, the tears are again of joy. Luckily there is this forum to tell these stories, because anyone who tells it would think I have a psychosis 😅😅

Btw I have had another opening, but to the void, the absolute loneliness of the infinite void. party. It's absolutely terrifying. There is nothing left of you, you are the infinite void, the dark face of enlightenment that produces infinite sadness in me. When I wrote the above, I had just felt infinite joy. I was at home and my house was glory. but later, the glory closed, and I was the immeasurable void. I was that. No one observed it but I mixed with the emptiness, the absolute zero of infinite depth. It's unimaginable, as before with the glory, and if before tears of joy flowed, now they are of sadness and loneliness. The thing is that are absolutely the same. It's something to get crazy , impossible to understand . Nobody, in the earth, will understand me. I'm absolutely alone as a human, except for the language of love.

I've had two puffs of weed and I'm in a park and suddenly reality has opened up. The absolute is terrifying because it is absolute, from outside your whole body trembles, it is infinite loneliness. it is awful. but from within, it is a laughter that springs from the unfathomable abyss, which expands infinitely and you are that. without feeling your substance, the opening is total horror, you can't imagine. You are absolutely alone, absolutely unlimited, absolutely undefined. It's 1000 times worse than death. Face this is extremely challenging. If your substance opens, it is total glory. It's the absolute flow, the absolute love, the absolute beauty that springs from the infinite source of the infinite, clear as a diamond, without stain, full of glorious existence . That is enlightenment? it's something that can burn.

The thing is to be it. It's brutal. Knowing that it is infinite is good, being absolutely open to it is enlightenment. It's more than the gurus say, it's the total depth, and yes, you are alone there, when the self come back.

This is said a lot in spirituality, even Leo says it, and I think it is a complete mistake. reality is absolute infinity, not consciousness. Absolute infinity is self-conscious since if it were not, it would not be infinite. Just as it is infinitely intelligent, it is infinitely conscious. The forms that the infinite takes are conscious of themselves as forms, but their essence, what they are, is the absolute infinite, which is much more than consciousness: it is everything. So, non-duality, as Leo mentions, is limited, but enlightenment is not limited, it is total. The opening of your being to its essence, total infinity, is everything. But many say: it's a subtle change of angle. No, this is an absolute lie. Enlightenment is Open yourself to the divine light of the sacred infinity . It's a wild smile, is a laugh that comes from an abiss without bottom. Is the wild, absolute, unimaginable, freedom of the absolute. It's total. Its A shit than nobody else see it. All the humans should have this openess, then all would be brothers.

Agree, but the important point is not to realize how you imagine reality, it is to realize what you are, to open your being to the absolute and heavenly light that the infinite is. the full glory of existence without limits. That is reality beyond any compression, and I think you totally agree with my statement. Then, understanding as you imagine, as absolute, this concrete reality, is it something? because maybe this is only valid for this dimension, in other infinite dimensions you don't imagine anything. It is impossible to know, the only absolute certainty is the substance, what you are, and perceiving it in a total way is what this work is about. Are you perceiving now the absolute light of the existence? Because I don't, and only one conclusion could be achieved from this fact: my perception isn't clean enough. It's veiled. Sometimes it's clear, but usually it isn't. What veils it? That's the question, how to clean the doors of perception.

I think the same, true spiritual opening gives the body balance and strength, since all energy channels flow perfectly.

Interesting . Where is the difference with god realization?

yes, I perceive everything as one, and same: I perceive the total depth of existence, the infinity, a perceiver implies a perception. I cannot say: I am enlightened, but I have accessed states of total openness in which there is no perceiver, there is total amplitude. It is very subtle to arrive at this because the slightest movement of the mind bifurcates it. As you say, it is completely impersonal since there is no perceiver, or the perceiver is the perception . My previous definition maybe was not exact. Reality perceiving itself implies subject. There is no subject, there is total existence, it is not thinkable, it is attainable, and quite difficult btw, just some seconds . But in other hand, once it happened, seems that it's always in back ground

Seriously, I suppose the guy would reach mystical states of incredible depth. Perhaps total passivity is necessary for such depth, but anyone would think that a balance would be better, we will reach depth when we die. but each one has his destiny, and his was clear

Yes, when they told him that: after the enlightenment, chop firewood, carry water, he said: ufff, how lazy my friend, I think I have to enlighten myself a little more, you do the firewood thing if you are so kind.

How would you define enlightenment? I would do it like this: reality perceiving itself without obstacles. nonduality is an obstacle, it says: I perceive everything as one. It is already something, it is an identification, an idea about reality: it is non-dual. is limited Enlightenment is deeper, it's not seeing that everything is one, it's seeing what is everything.

Ramana was quite lazy . all day sitting meditating. it is worth doing, moving and evolving, as is the case. is it worth living? obviously, since it happens

Overall we must realize something obvious: the mind, "understand", is within reality, it cannot encompass it. Here everyone talks about infinity, and they want to understand it with their mind, which is one of the infinite possibilities of infinity, that is, absolutely nothing. then, all going around in circles like rats on their wheel, in their tiny mind, wanting to fit into it nothing less than infinity. The only understanding of the infinite that one can have is what it is, what its substance is, and that understanding is not mental, it is the infinite perceiving itself as existence. To do this you have to eliminate any barriers, and the barriers are energetic, even if they take the appearance of ideas. Nobody understands it and they debate like philosophers about minutiae that don't even exist.

What is happening to him is simple and obvious: he has focused completely on the mental. has forgotten the energetic facet, the most important. he despises humanity because he only grasps its stupidity on a mental level, which is the case, but he does not grasp the enormous human vital drive. it does not realize humanity as a living evolutionary organism of infinite intelligence. It is disconnected from the source. In short, he has become an intellectual

Sex has always been a problematic issue since it is the cause of genetic descent, lineage, and this has had extreme importance in all human cultures. It is absolutely vital that your children are truly yours, and it is impossible to know 100%. This importance is encoded in the genes, you would give your life for your lineage, but give it if it is really your neighbor's lineage... wrong. In all cultures adultery of women has been punished with death, and the homosexual thing has almost always been seen as a perversion of something absolutely sacred. almost always, not always. In some cultures, a few, it has been more or less allowed, and always with the active and passive roles very defined. The Greeks did not approve of homosexual relationships between equals, nor did the Native Americans. if they did it between a young man and another adult or between a man with a feminine role, inferior ,and another masculine one. In general, all cultures have prohibited it. Leonardo Davinci was narrowly saved from being burned at the stake for being a homosexual. In the Roman legions it was punished with death, and in general in the tribes it was only allowed if it meant using an inferior.

The energy issue is everything. What happens is that it sounds a lot like woo woo and people feel more comfortable treading on familiar ground: the mind. Here, when someone tells you that they have "awaken", they will say that they have realized this, and that....they don't realize that they are still playing in the school yard, they haven't gone out into the streets. . The mind limits, true awakening is the breaking of limits, as that guy in the text you quoted explains.

5 meo In many ways it is an easy psychedelic, because it has a short duration, and because its effect is more energetic than mental, you do not enter horrible thought loops as you could with LSD or mushrooms, the most that could happen to you is to have a sensation extremely unpleasant blocking. like resistance when something very powerful wants to break you. It is something extremely unpleasant if the roa is nasal or plugged, because you are half an hour of extreme suffering, but it is a suffering like walking around the room looking at the floor saying: stop this shit now for the love of God. It seems as if a hand is pressing on your heart and brain, but at the end it finish. vaping is 15 seconds of that, it happens and that's it. It's not that traumatic. What can be traumatic is having an experience of dead emptiness, and believing that that is reality. It is not, think that you have not broken completely, and do it again, until the experience is one of total opening. The 5meo is like skydiving, at first it is horribly challenging, then it is a bit of an exciting process very beautiful

Yes, humans, kangaroos and aliens, but he says that they are all imaginary, that everything is God imagining stupid kangaroos or smart aliens, so, non-duality. There is only one, God. But yes, I think I understand the difference. Non-dualists say that reality is "not two", but there is no creator god, there is oneness. Leo doesn't say "not two", he says "one": God. It is a small difference, which may not be any difference but another angle of approaching the same thing. a creator god? Well yes, reality is creating itself, developing. although as Leo expresses it it suggests a certain duality: creator and creation. but he knows that creation is the creator...so...leo, confess: you are a non-dualistic, you just don't want to come out of the closet