Breakingthewall

This video is good, but his way of looking at it in my opinion is the other way around, he says: the universe is perfect geometry, if it weren't it would collapse, that's why it works. It's the other way around, perfect geometry is the only option, all the other possible options can't arise, perfection is not the cause but the consequence. His description of aligning yourself, emptying yourself, so that the cosmos enters you is accurate, he's talking about real enlightenment there

@Howtolive if I were you I would totally forget any spiritual teaching, all are toxic. Each mind is different from the others, its structures are unique. You have to penetrate into yourself and perceive your energetic structure, no one else can do it, only you. Words and ideas must be left out, only one intention: enter, perceive, open. Do you remember when you were a kid, when you were 2 years old? Probably you don't, but in that time the magic was flowing in yourself, and this is the absolute happiness. This is still inside you, without stain, completely perfect, closed in an energetic box. You have to open it

When adyashanti talks, and some fragments that is read, immediately I have the feeling that he's talking about self help. How to modify your emotions to make them more loving and harmonious. I believe that this does not work, there is only one possibility, to break your human structure completely, anything else keeps you in a state of dissatisfaction. I perceive that Adyashanti is in that state of dissatisfaction.

There is another possibility. Reality is being without opposition, it is positive momentum because negative momentum does not exist. Reality explodes and coordinates with itself in infinite synchronistic patterns. The fit is perfect because that which is not perfect does not arise. Potential is infinite and selects itself by synchronizing itself in increasingly complex ways in infinite cyclical dimensions. Everything is like a holographic bubble, infinite reflections of reality with itself infinitely synchronized in infinite directions, dancing. Nothing that is not absolutely perfect to infinite power can appear

Then the kid went to the school, He grew up, and with each passing day he became a little more distant from himself, until one day he said to himself: wow, how funny, I am completely alienated, confused, full of neuroses, anxiety and the prospects are rather dark/black! Then he thought: there is only one possible way: real awakening, the destruction of this structure that I call human, all of the lines that makes him, because are lines designed by a crazy architect. Then, in the middle of nowhere, absolutely alone, he found himself

What spirituality is is looking directly into the abyss and become it, to expand and forget about yourself. To open your mind completely now, without any energetic barriers, without limits. It is not something that is achieved by stopping thought with techniques, but through will. You want to open yourself, you want to give yourself. To what extent? To death, you have to slowly accept total dissolution and desire it. There are barriers, I have them, you have them, but in the end we all die. Why not now? Beauty awaits. I perceive it, it's becoming more and more clear. Inside is everything

Islam reached excellence in that era. They were a positive culture, lovers of life, researchers, philosophers of the highest level. Ibn Arabi or Rumi are much superior to any European mystical philosopher.

Exactly, that means that the reality is absolute beauty, but our human bias closes the lens and only perceives as beautiful what is good for us, so the more selfless you are, the more open you are to absolute beauty, and the more selfish, the more open to relative beauty, like Lamborghinis and models

Then we should differentiate between absolute and relative beauty. Absolute beauty would be the perception of beauty inherent in reality, and relative beauty would be the perception of what suits us. So, elevated taste would be what tends more towards the absolute and vulgar taste towards the relative. The absolute is absolutely beautiful by default, but some manifestations highlight that beauty more than others, even if our perception is not very open.

Maybe sadhguru should promote you to enlightened super Saiyan z gt 30 cm dick when he retires. I settle for a secondary position as a semi-divine superhuman avatar Yes sure, when a meth addict fucks his 2 year old son while stabbing him, he is acting with good intention. What is "good intention"? People act according to their nature, just like crocodiles or viruses

🤔 That could be true. In something natural like an insect or a cloud, beauty is objective, since it is absolute, but the depth of perception depends on the observer. In a work of art, beauty is in the creation, the beauty perceived, imagined and captured by the artist, which is transmitted to the observer as a communication from deep within. The question would be: Why something natural, like hyenas devouring a rotting corpse full of flies, is not beautiful?

I wanted to give an example of where beauty is and where each person finds it. The first painting is beautiful because it evokes a sunset or sunrise and the contrasts between blue and red create a special feeling. The second one, the heavy organic galactic samurai style armor contrasts vividly with the open eye with intelligent and alert expression, not aggressive, which gives it a rare beauty, and the magistral combination of colour the dreamlike landscape based on the Kaganawa wave is beautiful for its combination of color and its evocation of other dimensions. The man in the jail is wonderful, look the shape of that hand, you can feel the heat, the oppression, and the shadow is wonderful. The others two, as you said, the white is objectively beautiful because the colors and the shapes, the other because the evocation to the high. Then, we could conclude the the beauty in those cases is a combination of pure combination of colour and shape in one side, and evocation to our unconscious mind in other. The other paint that Leo's liked has no meaning, it's abstract, then it possible beauty is only in the combination of colour and shapes, much more difficult, because any colour could be considered beautiful, and any shape too, like those paints that a monkey did, but in this painting you (or I) can perceive something special, the combination of the white in the exactly places with that pink gives a special melody ,the black arch in the center gives strength, the yellows give the precise light, and the blues the necessary depth. This only orange close the red arch give me a sensation like it's exactly where it has to be, and the light pink in the left upper corner gives space, relax the pressure

Choose one

@LoseYourvelf Spirituality Is to change the finite focus for the infinite focus. How? That's the question.

Impossible paradox, if beauty sense is subjective, the thing is not beautiful or ugly in an absolute sense, it's depending of the observer, the beauty is in the observer not in the object. The question would be: why I perceive beauty in something and not in other thing? Is more beautiful a butterfly than a worm? Why?

Half are gay and another half are transgender, but the new messiah, Elon musk, is going to change them by hipermasculine cyborgs who will conquer the Galaxy

Buddhism is the religion that says any human can attain Buddhahood or realization, which a guy named Gautama Buddha did through a series of stages, and that encourages its followers to pursue Buddhahood or at least get close to it in this life and then continue on to the next.

For women enlightenment is much more difficult as it requires being absolutely alone as a total reality, completely detached from any human emotion, and women are much more social and emotional.

Buddhism is different from worshipping an Aztec god who orders you to rip out the hearts of 10,000 captives to prevent the sun from devouring the earth.

Demagoguery, like always. "Innocent people" is who I decide is innocent, then I decide that anyone is no innocent and done. The other, when we talk about Christianity, we refer, as you know, to the New Testament, to the life of Christ, which annuls the Old Testament, the New Covenant annuls the Old, so citing the Old Testament is demagogy, since Christ says to love your enemies and forgive them. But you already know this and you do not speak to build, you speak to stand out, then it's difficult to arrive to any point

@zazen I watched the half, later I will watch all, but for now, my opinion it is demagogy, I respect your views as they are usually accurate and backed by real information, but this guy says things like the West is more violent than the East and wants to give lessons in peace, or that in terms of respect for women it is at the same level. This is demagogy, the West is historically more violent because it is more efficient, therefore it conquers and makes total war. Regarding women's freedom, in the West since the Middle Ages there were queens of enormous power, this is not a possibility in the East. Obviously in the West women were also subject to men, but a king could not have a harem of 300 wives guarded by eunuchs and be proud of it

I see that you didn't read it, it's ok. The Quran repeatedly states that it is legitimate and obligatory to kill in order to defend oneself if Islam is attacked. The problem is that "attacking Islam" can be interpreted in many ways, such as apostasy, which is punishable by death. Sura 191 Kill them wherever you find them and expel them from wherever they expelled you. Opposition (to your belief) is more serious than killing.

You will agree that Islamic societies have stagnated, and the cause of this can only be Islam. Islam is against evolution, its goal is spiritual salvation through obedience to laws, many of them arbitrary, such as not drawing human figures or not eating pork. Could Islam be interpreted in such a way that eating pork and drinking alcohol is not a sin? Or drawing animals? I suppose you will also agree that the treatment of women in Islam is humiliating, in the sense that it allows each man to have 4 wives legally. How could evolve a society that accept those premises?

Again thanks for the clarification about slavery. Anyway, another example: Jesus saw that they were going to stone an adulteress and said, "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone," and he stopped the stoning. Muhammad saw that they were going to whip two adulterers. He asked why they didn't stone them, and they answered that the chief's son was an adulterer and was not stoned. Since then, they hadn't stoned. So Muhammad ordered the couple to be stoned to death. Do you see a essential difference in the message?

You are obviously a prisoner of your human bias, it prevents you from seeing clearly. If it weren't so, you would see Donald Trump as a perfect manifestation of infinity, and the beauty of his orange face and yellow hair would shine like the most precious flower in the cosmos. So everything you say is biased. Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder