Breakingthewall

@Salariatu the soul It's that thing you sell to the devil in exchange for fucking models and having a yacht with two helicopters.

It depends of what is meaning for you. The only meaning of existence is existing, but it's an absolute meaning What is alive is existence because it's existing, then it can't end, the self is just a construction that the perception or duality makes but without self reality still is, and you are that

Normal, and when this war finish a lot of Jews will feel disgust of themselves and they will loose their self-esteem as a nation, since the Jews think that their main value is morality and the sense of justice, so that Hamas will win this war, it will be one more step to weaken Israel. Hamas knows perfectly what they are doing. Even I don't agree with them I can't but admire their commitment Sure, and the Quran also says that it is legitimate to kill the enemies of Islam. "Enemies of Islam" is quite broad.

Sure me too, but when someone shows aggression it's hard for me not to respond, I guess I learned that as a child.

Yes, the Japanese also did those things, The Serbs killed Muslims, the Turks killed Armenians, the Hutus killed Tutsis, Saddam killed Kurds, the Muslims of Suharto the christians, the Belgians cut off the hands of the Congolese and so on. The world is full of evil and violence. The Nazis do not have the monopoly of evil, they were a group psychoticized by loosing a terrible war who found in racism the way to channel their hatred

Those people are not a cause, are a consecuence

Enlightenment is not no self, is total being or absolute self. It's not negative, absence. It's positive, presence.

@Schahin look, it's not Elon musk brainwash, I think that Elon musk is retarded, but the fact is that Europeans don't want to live with Muslims. Islam is an ideology very rigid and they don't integrate into European society. Europe is full of Latin Americans, some of them real criminals, Chinese, Indians, people of all kinds, and there is no problem, but there is a problem with Islam, because Islam is a very specific and sectarian ideology that does not fade with time but grows stronger and creates very traumatized individuals who harbor a lot of hate and shame. This is a time bomb that nobody wants around, and that is normal. Maybe my opinion is biased since my mother was a Muslim, she apostated, which is punishable by death in Islam, and she was baptized, and she always told me that Islam is the religion of evil, then who knows, I'm not so impartial but I try

It's very possible, But now there are guys from the new generation fighting in the war. To what extent are they committed? Certainly less than the Palestinians. The Palestinians carried out the massacre on October 7 to provoke the martyrdom of their people, thus demonstrating their absolute commitment to their cause. If I had to bet, I would bet that Palestine wins, Israel loses. Not today, not in 10 years, but in 20, 30 years, Israel disappears, Palestine remains. That would be my bet. There is something impossible, that they live together in harmony

Who said that I support Zionist? Where? I just said that the Jews have the promise land, Jerusalem, as a fundamental part of their religion. Im not saying that they are right, I just exposed a fact, then you start yelling. I'm not corrupted by any deception because I don't support the Zionist, if I were a Jew living in Israel I would emigrate and I would forget that I'm a Jew, what the fuck is being Jew? I'm a human nothing else

I didn't call you monkey, I just told you that you scream like a monkey. If you learn to interact like a human, then you are welcome

Maybe yes maybe no. The reality is that a coalition of several Muslim countries that were more than 20 times their population declared war on them and it was a war called the Six Day War, or also called the supreme ridicule of Islam. So it is silly to say what the Jews will or will not endure, perhaps they will surrender in 6 days like Egypt after declaring war, perhaps they will hold out for at least a month.

Muslim is not a race. You should learn basic concepts before talk with smart people, you are not in the level . You start scream as a monkey very fast. I don't care about your race, but I don't like to listen your screams here

He says that politics and Islam are to guide humanity in this world and the next, that is, to guide humanity towards the path of salvation. The problem with Islam is that they believe that there is a paradise and a hell and that, for example, killing homosexuals is a lesser evil since it prevents there being more homosexuals and these, as everyone knows, go to hell, so they are doing good to society. Also covering up women, since sex outside of marriage sends you to hell, and many other things, like eating pork or drinking alcohol send you straight to hell, where you will have to swallow molten lead for all eternity and your pain will be infinite. Who would want that? Do you want it? No, right? So let's kill homosexuals, where's the problem?

If this is the emptiness and seems full, why do you call it emptiness? Empty of what?

Angela Merkel had the brilliant idea of filling Germany with Syrians. It seems that the Germans find it difficult to live with Muslims. The same does not happen with the Chinese or the Latin Americans. Germany was also cheated with the war in Ukraine and is now in recession. ADF is not Nazi, the Nazis were just people who really wanted revenge for the humiliation of the First World War, all their aggressive rhetoric could be translated as: I want war. It was exactly what they wanted and they got it in abundance. The German right today is a consequence of living with Muslims. Look at England, do you think the English are happy now with Pakistani child rapists? This gives wings to the extreme right. The green left only works if your daughters are not raped, when this happens, you are not green anymore. A fair and supportive world is incompatible with fundamentalism. Yes, yes, fundamentalism is the fault of the Americans, like everything else.

I'm not racist , I think all the races are the same, but I don't respect fundamentalist of any race. Are you smart enough to understand that it's different a race that an ideology? I Know it's difficult for some people, let's see. Race is black, asian, etc. ideology is Islamic, Nazi, etc. Do you understand? Look, a Islamic could be asian or black or anything. I know there are difficult concepts, but work hard, do your best and maybe you will get some of them,.over all never give up

I don't support nothing, I exposed facts. The Jews would never have accepted Uganda, Madagascar or Argentina, that is misery for them. Their religion is Jerusalem, and anything else is unacceptable. They have been cooking that up for 2000 years. You don't like it? Well, that's your right, but reality is what it is.

They have an ancient goal that is the promise land, anything else is irrelevant. They act like any other human group, absolutely selfish. I'm not saying that they are right, just the fact that they have been a nation in exile for 2000 years by an ideology based on returning to the promised land. This is like nirvana for Buddhists or paradise for Muslims. Their religion is the state of Israel, and it is irrelevant whether it is safe or not. Their emotional investment is absolute, and they will never leave. With every attack on them their resolve is firmer and their goal of greater Israel clearer. Every Israeli death makes them a little more expansionist. They are a people who have maintained their identity for 2000 years in exile, so their determination is beyond question. How to solve this? I don't know, but force doesn't seem like a solution unless you can exterminate them, and for now their enemies can't.

Not only that. In the core of the Jewish religion is the return to the promised land. This is not something ritual that they say, but the fundamental pillar of Judaism, what keeps them united as an ethnic group. Without that they would have dissolved, like many other ethnic groups.

Let's see how's the Russian Trump when he arrives Btw, this guy has an interesting theory about the Korean soldiers and his arguments seems credible

Seems that for a dictator with absolute power, Putin is quite balanced and not very egotistical. He seems to be someone guided by objectives other than his own greatness. His main objective seems to be the future of Russia, which is a very complicated country. Without much firmness, Russia would quickly be dismembered into many parts run by oligarchs interested exclusively in their own wealth, who would sell all the natural resources to foreign companies and leave the population in total misery. Russia is a world power with a GDP smaller than Italy's, and this is largely made up of natural resources. If the hand is loosened, Russia disappears. Probably due this show of force there are more and more extremist politicians intoxicated by the glory of Russia, the Slavs are extremists, emotional. It would be positive if Putin lived to be 200 years old, because his replacement could be someone quite crazy

Russia has a very different history from most countries, as it did the communist revolution and became a world empire. For decades, the Russians thought that their model would spread throughout the world and that they would be the pioneers of the new world order. Soon they realized that all this was a dream and that they had to bow their heads and associate with their capitalist "friends." The United States then thought that it would be a fantastic idea to balkanize Russia and exploit its enormous resources. Russia became a country ruled by mafias, increasingly poor and disorderly. The Americans promoted a grey and submissive official called Putin who turned out to be a fairly firm guy and convinced that Russia had the necessary strength to continue being a power and not a country of miserable people. Russia's greatest assets are natural resources and military power. With these assets, Russia hopes that its youth will not have to emigrate and its country will not fall into indefinite misery, and it acts accordingly. Now Russia has put its military machinery in motion with great success, and it is going to gain enormous benefits from it. Its nuclear power is absolutely deterrent, so no one will ever be able to invade them, so be careful with Russia, respect, they are someone very important in the neighborhood

@Schahin Injustice, predation and genocide are common to all human groups. The difference is that the West, having been more efficient, perpetrated them more efficiently. The Armenian genocide, the Indonesian genocide of Suharto, slavery in the Ottoman Empire, for example, are in no way different from the injustices committed by the West. They are lesser in magnitude only due to a lack of power. What is being discussed is not who was worse in the past but who is intolerant and immobile now. Islam has a component of degradation of women that is absolutely incompatible with the evolution that is intended to occur in today's society. Something like the obligation for women to cover themselves in Iran is currently unacceptable, the same as condemning homosexuals to death. In the past, homosexuals were imprisoned in the West, but now the West says: that was a dramatic mistake, an injustice and an attack on the human being. Anyone who thinks that homosexuals should be put to death has no place in our society, just as anyone who thinks that Africans should be enslaved and forced to work with whips has no place in our society. I cannot start a movement that says: let's enslave Africans. It is forbidden and i would be imprisoned. The trend is towards justice and equality, not towards the supremacy of men over women. At least theoretically, there is obviously a long way to go, but if your initial values are oppression you cannot begin it

The problem with Islam is not whether or not it was right a thousand years ago, or whether the European religious wars were horrible and colonization unjust, but that Islamic society now has an obstacle to evolution and freedom: Islam. Western society does not have a giant elephant in the room. It has a multitude of potentially solvable flaws. But Islamic society has that elephant pressing in and getting in the way, and it needs an ideological revolution. Arguing that it is the West’s fault, that Mohammed was better than Genghis, and that Napoleon was a son of a bitch is not going to solve the Islamic stalemate.