Breakingthewall

Well, yes, but everyone knew that it would happen in the case of joining NATO. Bombing the Russian population in Ukraine and joining NATO is saying: Russia, you are nothing, I piss in your face. Then Russia is officially weak and powerless, and Crimea would be the next step. Those who organized this event know this absolutely without a doubt. And they also know that people are going to think: Putin is a evil dictator who invades, Ukraine is a good democrat with heroic Zelensky. It's very simple. It is a maneuver to weaken Russia and, if possible, balkanize it and plunder its resources, and weaken Germany along the way.

Things are not that simple. Those who want democracy are one of the most corrupt countries in the world, at the level of Africa, with an exclusive nationalism towards a minority that is from the ethnic group of the neighboring country, much more powerful. so everything is problems. In addition to having come to power with a coup d'état and spending 8 years bombing pro-Russian areas, and receiving weapons from EEUU, 5 American laboratories for virus studies were built there. You can check this, Victoria Nuland said: Don't Ukrainians have the right to defend themselves from epidemics like COVID? But those laboratories were next to the military bases and we already know what type of research is done in them, and why there are none on American soil. When the possibility of nuclear weapons in Ukraine was going to be a certainty due to Russia's entry into NATO, Russia invaded. The Biden administration knew this was going to happen, and so did the Ukrainian government. The problem is that they miscalculated the resilience of the Russian economy, they thought it was going to collapse and that Putin would fall.

Russia is a nuclear power that dominated much of the world for many years. This may seem bad to us but it is a fact. It is a very complex and quite poor country, with harsh living conditions. If Russia dismembers, it will most likely be chaos, the rule of mafias and warlords with atomic weapons at their disposal. A solid Russia is better for everyone. By the way, before the invasion of Ukraine there was an 8-year civil war in which the Ukrainian Azov battalion attacked the Dombass separatists. The commander of the Azov battalion was the former leader of the Kiev Dynamo fans, you can see photos of them anywhere, look at these. As you see, things are not always so black and white.

I just think that could be quite worse. If you understand this conflict you will know that it was very difficult to avoid for several reasons, and an important one is the strong Ukrainian nationalism, and this nationalism is not "bad", it's just nationalism. In Ukraine there has been great resentment towards Russia for centuries, and there have been many affronts. The famous Holodomor, in which Stalin supposedly caused a famine to kill millions of Ukrainians and repopulate with Russians, makes Ukrainians not like Russia, but the reality is that the Russians have been there for almost a century and there are lot of them, what is the solution? For the Ukrainians they are enemies, but the Russians cannot tolerate being harassed by Ukrainian nationalists. who is right? It depends on who you are, it's like the thing between the Palestinians and the Israelis, it's impossible to reach an agreement, that's why there was the war. The problem for me is the US's determination to pour gasoline on the fire so that it burns as long as possible, the result being inevitable.

Putin wants Crimea and Dombass, and that's it. Putin is considered too soft in Russia, there was an uprising against him because he was considered weak in the war. In Russia there are many people with power much more aggressive than him. The problem is that with all this madness that has been promoted, Russia has put its war machinery to work at full power, and is now producing more ammunition and weapons than all of NATO combined. Russia is a poor country compared to others, but it is a country that dares war. To begin with, it is displacing the UK and France in Africa, that is why they are so angry. Russia does not want to be a miserable country, and now it has the most well-oiled military machine in the world, it has been a mistake to wake up the bear, perhaps after Putin there will be another more aggressive leader and that will be a problem.

It is completely impossible for Ukraine to win a war against Russia. The areas that Russia wants are populated by Russians and in a referendum they chose to join Russia. Crimea is ucranian just from recently for a strange donation, then the right about it is not so clear. So why make a million soldiers die? what is the reason? just business. Ukraine and Russia should be allies, but evil people feed the hatred and this happened . You can't ignore that Russia is your neighbor, maybe you don't like, but it is, feed hate against it is stupid, death.

Putin wants Crimea and Dombass, and Ukraine out of NATO. Not Putin, Russia wants that and there is not choice.

Yes, an arrogant businessman is not the same as a predator. With the fat bastard you can reach some kind of agreement, with the predator you are going to be preyed on.

We will see. Maybe he has an instinct that helps balance the situation, or maybe it will be a disaster. We all know that Trump is corrupt, it is absolutely obvious, but corrupt is not the same as evil to me. evil is provoking a war for business. Would Trump do that? I don't know. maybe not. rumsfeld, victoria nuland or blinken it seems so. it's just an opinion

It is not so easy to make an opinion. Trump's interview with Zelensky is the most rude, embarrassing and crazy thing in the history of modern politics, but maybe it will prevent 50 thousand guys from dying or being crippled when the final result is already clear and inevitable, so is it positive or negative? Maybe You are sure that it is negative, but from another point of view it is positive. The other possibility was the blinken option, lowering the recruiting age from 25 to 18 to send 18-year-olds to die for something? For what?

The reality of today's world is extremely complex. anything can happen. Whether I like Trump or not is indifferent, if he's corrupted , narcissist , idiot or anything are childish opinions, all of them are corrupted and narcissist. the important thing is whether an apocalypse is going to occur where 2000 Million people die or if humanity is going to develop forward. Trump's actions can tip the balance in one direction or another, and it is absolutely impossible to know which way he will go. Biden's actions precipitated the Ukrainian war and that is a fact. Yes, Putin is the one who invaded, the bad guy, whatever you want, but the reality is that the Biden administration's policy has pushed this result while the could avoid it. I'm not saying that they are the guilty or whatever, just that they could avoid the war easily and they didn't . what's going to happen now? The reality is very complex, the rivalry between the US and China is going to become greater and greater. The crisis in Europe is going to get bigger and bigger. The crisis of Islamic immigration is going to get bigger and bigger, the hatred in the Middle East is going to get bigger and bigger. What is Trump going to do? do you know? I don't, and I don't think anyone can know if their actions will tip the balance toward peace or war. it's too soon to know

When he was president did not fully develop its potential. This does not mean that this potential is positive, perhaps it is terrible, but we have not seen it yet. He is making many radical and disconcerting decisions right now, and the world is in a very delicate moment. You have to see where what he is doing is leading and what else he is going to do. Many times people with good intentions cause disasters and corrupt people avoid them. It is impossible to predict the movement of the world in the coming years and the influence of Trump. Maybe it will be catastrophic and there will be a nuclear war, or maybe there will be no war in the next 10 years and the world economy will prosper like never before. It is absolutely impossible to know now. Trump seems more like a natural phenomenon than a politician, we will see what the consequences of his presence in the world are.

I'm talking about the facts in the war, anyone who read what I wrote could see that I'm only concerned by the facts. Do you remember that yesterday I told you why Crimea was ucranian and why is populated by Russians? Tell me, it's an interesting fact for you? Do you remember it? The facts are the key for understanding Some clues: krushev, Stalin, ottoman empire. Then? Other facts very important: why dombass is populated by Russians? What is holodomor? Who's Stephan bandera? What was Treblinka?

Maybe, but the topic is about the war in Ukraine, how if begun, etc, not about the personality of trump. I don't know yet how trump is. Seems quite crazy and impulsive, and of course corrupted, but it's a must in politics. Let's see what he does, not what he seems. For now it's soon to make an opinion.

About this war, Biden is more relevant, because he was the president when this war started, and he was very involved in ucraine when he was vice president with obama The war really started in 2014, but the invasion happened when Biden said that ucraine was going to join NATO, in a moment that was in war against the Russian population in dombass. When Biden did that, he knew the consequences

Ok, then don't go deep, don't try to know the reality of this conflict and keep your opinion based in generalisation and intuition. Almost everyone do that, they follow their intuition without knowing the facts. Then they are very easy to manipulate. That's how the world works: advertisings. This documentary is very interesting:

Just contrast the facts that I said. Check information before the war, and after the war, realize the difference, watch documentaries made before the invasion, go deep, you will see.

You, same than most, follow your emotions, and this makes you susceptible to manipulation. The information that is spread is aimed at manipulating the emotions of people who do not bother to go deeper but take sides according to their emotional preference and only want them to feed the option they have already chosen. That's how the world works and the leaders know it. The question is: what do you want, to understand in depth or to feed your emotions?

Why you can't understand what I'm saying? I am not pro Russia, I say that this conflict has deep roots that go back to the Second World War and the time of Stalin, that it was surely inevitable and that the result will be that Russia stays with the Dombass and Crimea and Ukraine is independent without those areas, but that the Western "aid" to Ukraine has only served for more destruction, it has been deliberate to make business, and that the idea that Russia wants to invade more countries is a lie and those who spread they know it perfectly

Maybe he's much more dangerous. Biden pushed this war where like 1 million of young men are dead or with serious injuries, and many millions traumatized for ever, let's see what trump does, maybe he destroy the world, it's a possibility. Anyway, read this if you have some minutes: Kissinger already warned in 2014 that "for Russia, Ukraine can never simply be a foreign country" and that, therefore, it needs a policy aimed at "reconciliation." He was also firm in his stance that "Ukraine should not join NATO." - John Mearsheimer - probably the leading expert on US geopolitics today - in 2015: "The West is taking Ukraine down a bed of roses and the end result is that Ukraine is going to be destroyed [...] What we are doing is, in fact, encouraging that outcome." - Jack F. Matlock Jr., US ambassador to the Soviet Union from 1987 to 1991, warned in 1997 that NATO expansion was "the most profound strategic mistake, [encouraging] a chain of events that could produce the most serious threat to security [...] since the collapse of the Soviet Union." -Clinton's Secretary of Defense, William Perry, explains in his memoirs that for him NATO enlargement is the cause of "the breakdown of relations with Russia" and that in 1996 he was so opposed to it that "out of the force of my conviction, I considered resigning." -Noam Chomsky in 2015, saying that "the idea that Ukraine could join a Western military alliance would be absolutely unacceptable to any Russian leader" and that Ukraine's desire to join NATO "is not protecting Ukraine, it is threatening Ukraine with a major war." CIA Director Bill Burns in 2008: "Ukraine's entry into NATO is the clearest red line for [Russia]" and "I have yet to find anyone who views Ukraine in NATO as anything more than a direct challenge to Russian interests." -Pat Buchanan, special assistant and consultant to US Presidents Nixon, Ford and Reagan, wrote in his 1999 book A Republic, Not an Empire: "By moving NATO onto Russia's porch, we have scheduled a 21st-century confrontation."

Read again and find one fact that I mentioned that's wrong if you can

I'm not saying that trump is good, I'm saying that what he's doing is just business, same than any other president, but more rough, without diplomacy, like a cheap movie cowboy, but the reality in the end is always the same, business. everything for me, nothing for you, or the least for you

You could follow your heart if you want, but what I wrote were facts, at least take them in account

Just some facts: Did you know that Biden pardoned his crack and prostitute addicted son for any crime he might commit? And did you know that that son was a director of Burisma, the largest gas company in Ukraine? Why that guy was a director of a Ukrainian gas company? Did you know that the first thing the Biden administration did after the invasion was destroy Nord Stream 2, the largest underwater construction made by humanity, which connected gas between Russia and Germany? Did you know that they blamed Russia for destroying their own pipeline, but then they admitted that it was their work together with the Ukrainian military? Did you know that after this the US sold gas to Germany at a much higher price? Just facts, easy to verify. Who is lawless? Or better, who does the laws?

I think that this is totally wrong. Trump simply sees that the adversary is China and Russia is indifferent to his interests. If he can keep the minerals from Ukraine he will do it and give it to Putin in Dombass because he doesn't give a shit about that. This game is finished, we shake hands, we distribute the cake and on to the next and most important game with China. Ukraine was Biden's project, it was done, it weighed down Germany and the EU, and it is finished, nothing more than gaining there. The only peculiarity of trump is that he's too direct and transparent, far from the diplomacy that's needed in those games, but at the end, same than the others. Just business.