Breakingthewall

This point is very delicate. What you say implies that he's lying to spread the truth. Maybe it's a good strategy, because just the truth is empty, then I understand. He is creating a multi-coloured package, attractive but at the same time obviously false for anyone who wants to see, because pure truth is not expressible and is extremely unattractive for those who are attached to the ego. A transition phase is necessary and that is what Sadhguru gives. What I have said is just a hypothesis, perhaps he really believes that there are 84 universes and eats mercury for breakfast, but he seems too focused and logical a guy for such things. Anyway, mercury?

He's a genius, no doubt, but by default I think that everything mystics say is made up, copied from one another, a business to gain fame, to be venerated, ego in its purest form. Now, maybe it is not like that. The best thing is to have an empty mind in order to see directly, and study these people from a distance without believing in them. If you believe in what they say you are lost, your mind is chained, it is no longer free for direct perception. So as a defense I reject their claims, but that does not mean they are false, they are simply toxic to me.

Sadhguru claims to be a kind of supernatural avatar that knows the 84 universes and eat mercury. In any other circumstances I would laugh of the joke, but then I listen him speaking about enlightenment and his clarity is the best that I listened, then....I can't make an opinion

@Ishanga btw, your approach to those people seems very relative, for you the important point is if they are useful. This is twisted in my opinion, maybe the most useful was Hitler, who settled the basis for a new order of peace and justice with his bad actions, who knows. Relative things are impossible to judge But there are absolute things, is someone a narcissist or is he totally true? This is an absolute, then the consequences of his actions could be the opposite of his intentions, but if you want to understand him, penetrate in his soul to understand the human soul, you should focus in the absolute

I don't think nothing about sadhguru, it's a real enigma for me. I would pay high to have a long conversation with him, it's a extremely interesting character, I'd like a lot understanding him, like an entomologist who study a new species. Maybe he's the most fascinating character alive nowadays

Look teresa from Calcuta, everyone thought that she was the top of the holy work for the others, and she was a demon. Things are not what they seem

It's not a problem, just a hobby. It's fascinating. Is he a fake? It's the possibility of knowing past lifes and those indian histories, or are just scam to be famous and venerated? The human nature friend. It's fascinating.

god or the reality is positive absolute impulse. it is the imbalance of the infinite between being and non-being, there is only being, therefore being explodes in infinite manifestations, infinite dimensions developing infinitely. it is absolute intelligence, since what is not absolutely intelligent does not appear. reality is an infinite living tapestry that develops infinitely for the sole reason that it is inevitable. focusing on the form is madness, it leads nowhere, focusing on the essence is the real deal, it is always the same, the total brilliance of existence, the absolute drive, your

I'm not focused in the personality, I'm focused in the truth. I want to know what is the reality, not what works to improve my experience. I don't need that, I'm not so selfish, my experience is enough good, but I really want to understand those people, it's like an enigma

Sadhguru is a real enigma to me, he's fascinating. A real genius without any doubt. Authentic inside? I'm not sure, maybe he's a real demon, maybe he's the real deal. In my opinion lies are not allowed, any lie means that you are rotten, then I would like seeing him eating mercury. But maybe in indian culture lies are just funny jokes, I don't know

I'm not going to use any method, I just want to understand what is inside them, if there is falsehood in them, narcissism, lies. Anyway, so if Hitler's talks make you feel better, that means he's authentic? Many millions of people loved Hitler's hysterical talks and the healthy hatred of the Jew made them feel better. Does that mean Hitler is the real deal? I think Hitler was a mentally retarded drug addict, but that's just an opinion.

Totally agree, any narcissist is a boy, independent of the age. Self honestly is essential to start any real growth

Osho was legit in many senses, but what I mean is about real enlightenment or be just wise. Krishnamurti was the típical indian smart fake, very narcissist, Osho had soul, depth, energy, openess, but in my opinion he was límited, but who knows, maybe all humans of all times were límited and total enlightenment is impossible. Look for example sadhguru, his claims. He eats mercury, knows that there are 84 universes and his presence could do that this would be your last incarnation 😅. Everything with those gurus is ...let's say not very sure

It's very difficult for men to see our weakness, we use to fool ourselves to avoid it, then become narcissist. Narcissism is the parallel personality that we build to bury our weakness

Maybe he's smart enough to know that. Indians have a millenary tradition of scamming in spirituality

Well the other reason, just sexual attraction, It should also take some time. If it is on the first date it is superficial, it means that the person bases their attraction on superficial reasons, not on there being real chemistry, for this to happen it takes some time. Fast food is junk food, but well, it depends of the person I guess

Women have this kind of fantasies because they sexuality goes to the passive side, the submissive surrender to a man in sex, then they get very horny with that fantasy because it's the extreme of that, but they wouldn't feel horny at all in real violence

In my opinion Women use to have sex for two reasons: because they see you as a possible partner, or because they feel very horny about you. It's not because they had a great time in a date, that's friend zone

True, if any man could, when we were in school at 13, 14 years old, we would fuck all the girls of school , 3 per day, in rotative turns. I think that 80% of men would do that if it were possible. Women are very different, they do very strange things like don't want to fuck with anyone who's not her boyfriend, except if he's famous, then yes. It's more pervert in my opinion

Yes, there is one who has this challenge to 2025, in 2024 she fucked 100 in 24h

Good put, it's a process, but you have to be perceptive enough to see yourself, your weakness with honesty and don't do evasive attitudes that leads to narcissism. I think you explained very clear, for men it's more difficult, we are less humble and we don't admit our weakness, then we pretend being strong and fool ourselves

It's very simple, you are not strong in yourself, you compare and doubt yourself, and in the presence of people with a strong attitude you feel weak, and in the presence of people with a weak attitude you feel strong. It's normal, if you become fully aware of it, you will be able to completely free yourself from comparison, then you will prefer to have solid people around you, since you will also be solid. It is essential to reach that point in life, but it's not easy.

"the women" is not an entity who has an attitude. There are women that never would have sex with you without a deep connection and confidence and others who tries to fuck 1000 men in 24 h, same than men, and us, the men and women, often are so stupid that act disconnected of ourselves to fit, doing a lot of things that are out of our real behavior, losing what is our real behavior and being treacherous to ourselves to fit in the mold

@Ishanga today I read that sadhguru says that he eats mercury to improve his health. Why sadhguru says so strange things? Is he crazy? What is his intention with that attitude? Sadhguru is anything except stupid, if he says that it's for a reason, same than trees bleeding and that. Maybe he want to attract superstitious people? Maybe with good intentions, because he thinks that those people are more possible to enlighten, or I don't know. Really I can't understand him, sometimes seems evil, dangerous manipulator, other times he speaks very good about enlightenment, but those Indians are smart and cultivate about this topic.

Are you capable of putting yourself in the situation that tomorrow they are going to crucify you? Imagine it seriously, you are tied up in a room waiting for tomorrow to be nailed to a cross to suffer an agony of about three days and then die. You alone with your pain, every minute. Can you give yourself to this? Think in it deeply, what this implies, what is your resistance to it. That resistance is the ego.