Breakingthewall

For me conciousness is a word that means being concious of anything. For example Leo use to say: increase your level of consciousness. This means be more conciouss, for example, you can't be concious about that harming animals is wrong, then in some point you become concious of that. Conciousness is awareness, it's an attribute that you have. Reality could be unconscious of itself, because reality doesn't need to be concious. Conciousness appears in reality, but as it appears it's an absolute, because reality has the potential of consciousness. But reality Is not conciousness, saying that is a lock, a limit.

The reality is absence of limits. You can't name the reality with a positive name as conciousness, it's an hindrance, a barrier. You could say maybe that reality is absolute potential or absolute being, but even that contains a small hindrance. Btw, what means "conciousness" exactly?

It's sad to have to read those shit, sorry to say. Try to be mature and talk without your brilliant ego. Can you? The point is talk about the truth, not a competition

What is conciousness? Reality arises. Nobody is creating it. If you say: you are creating the reality, it's just a false assessment.

Great reading, I enjoyed every word. That's the attitude, sharp as a knife

I've read it a bit in Google, and it sounds good, but there are two things it repeats that are confusion: reality is consciousness, and you created reality. These two statements are a lock. What is consciousness? Is it something? Where does that word point? And you created reality. Who? So, you are not reality; it's a creation of you. Only those 2 statement are a huge hindrance. If you want opening yourself to the real freedom you have to remove all the barriers. Creation and conciousness are mental barriers. The mind has to be absolutely empty. This doesn't mean "silence", as Adams also says. He said many times that what you are is "silence". This is another hindrance. Empty means diaphanous, free of barriers. There can be thought and absolute freedom same time, thought is not so important, what is important are the barriers. The barriers are not created by the thought, is the thought that is created by the barriers. Repress the thoughts is not the point, silence can be full of energetic barriers. Anyway, congrats for your progress, sounds genuine. Just realize the traps, there are many. Conciousness and creation are traps, walls in the mind.

Then, for a moment, what you are manifests totally. It is total plenitude, what you were searching for. You were searching for yourself. You were lost, wandering in a desert. Every second of your existence was incomplete, and that incompleteness vibrated with an anxious vibration. Then, immediately, that opening closes, and you instinctively perceive what it is closing, what your structure is, and how it closes. How much distortion, anxiety, need for acceptance, fear, projection into the future, even the immediate future, is in you. You are very impure (I mean me). impurity closes, and there are tons of impurity. It's possible being pure? Has to be absolute, without stain🥱😭 if not, the self is like an armored door Seeing this allows you to begin to focus and little by little the openess start to be more normal, but still rare, even partial openess is full time if you don't get total openess not far on time things start to get dark. Only openenss is essential, more than anything else . It's a long process that I suppose never ends, although some say it does, that there comes a moment when your openness is total all the time. It seems impossible to me; human nature is very dense. But who knows? Reality is always in motion. If it moves in that direction, its movement is slow but constant, Inevitable.

Btw, If you seek total openness, there's something you'll find sooner, or at least in my experience: total absence, absolute emptiness. It's a very difficult experience that shrinks your soul, squeezes you, and before you can look away, you've seen absolute horror. This, for me, is typical of experiences with 5 meo, but also just meditation. Ultimately, reality is empty, lacking everything, dead, absolute death. This realization occurs because one last movement is missing. there is something in the reality, there is you. What are you then? Who observes the empty reality? Are you alone in cosmic solitude observing the empty reality? Who observes? You are not observing; you are the reality. Then it opens. You are everything; there are no limits. The cup is absolutely full.

So bored talking alone, I couldn't

Yes, it exists, but do you know what is? It's difficult, because you see a hand, not the infinity. The hand is veiling the fact of that right now the infinity is infinite and you are that. You only see a hand, but you see it flat. It's depth is unfathomable, and from the fact that you are unfathomable you are. And "you are" is infinite. It doesn't means that its something that is not going to finish, it means that right now it's infinite. The experience is like a screen that is flat, but it's absolutely alive because it has not bottom. That's the point, that the absolute life of this moment is because it has not bottom. The life springs of the source of having not bottom, the totality of the limitlessness is absolute life, not just a hand, is the absolute infinity alive because it's everything. If you are totally open to it, to what you are, you get it, that's everything, nothing else is missing, nothing else could be.

Their line of thinking implies that the self is a kind of conceptual error and is a real energetic structure. It's as real as something physical, just on another plane of existence. For nondualists, enlightenment is realizing that they are not the self that appears, but the complete experience—"this" as they say. In my opinion, this is confusing and irrelevant. It's the same to think you are the separate self or the complete experience; the important thing is the openness to what you are, what your nature, your substance, is. What they talk about is a change of mental schema, but that's still within the mind. Openness is the actual breaking of boundaries, transcending experience and being the ultimate unlimited nature. It doesn't matter if you are the separate self or everything, or whatever, if you can't break through the barrier of experience. The experience must appear as a transparent hologram, irrelevant, simply an experience. Just behind it, beneath the surface, is the whole. The whole requires total surrender, totally letting go of the mind and totally opening the heart. This means totally eliminating fear for a moment. Surrender to reality, to the total absence of foundation, knowledge, understanding, or grounding. There are energy chains that prevent you from doing this; you must dissolve them. Listening to non-dualists, it becomes clear that they cannot escape their prison because they do not perceive it. They truly think they are free, and are trapped in the experience.

They could be absolutely and genuinely sure of what they say and absolutely wrong.

Newman says this: Within this apparent paradox arises an experience. That experience is, that this appearance is happening to 'me'. That experience is not paradoxical; it feels very real. There's no space, no room, no possibility for the reality, that 'this' isn't happening to ‚me’. That experience of duality is dissatisfying. It's uncomfortable. Out of that experience arises the need to bring about a wholeness, to cover up the feeling that what is, isn't complete, to make the feeling that it's not okay - okay. Out of that arises the need for good and bad and right and wrong. So this appearance then turns into ‚my life‘, and my life is the need to make 'this' better, 'this' good, to find out or to solve the problem of why I don't feel like it's okay, why I feel like something's wrong, why I feel like I need to seek, to find something else. Then, according to him, to cover the sensation of not complete of this experience, arises the need for good and bad. Well, id say that it arises after having the experience of being impaled and your children sold as slaves, eaten millions of times by crocodiles, abused, tortured, extincted, rejected, mutilated, enjailed, submitted. From you were alone in the jungle surrounded by monsters that wanted to kill you and killed you and your entire family billions of times. Then you created an energetic structure that we call fear, and others structures that we call desire, because without them you couldn't exist. And at a certain point, language and the self appeared, drawing on millions of years of war. This self began its own wars, which were far more savage than those of the jungle, millions and millions of times over. War, desire, death, birth. And this is a concept? More solid than the most solid steel box. A riddle within a riddle within a riddle. An extreme labyrinth, the ultimate game, when the rat that emerged from the hole can align its entire energy system, created over the eons, and open itself to its absolute nature.

There could exist someone whose energetic structure is such that they are completely open to the absolute being, and for them it would be the same to have lung cancer as to be on a paradise beach. Form is just form; essence is everything to him. Pain and pleasure are the same, transparent holograms through which the absolute shines through with total clarity. It is total now, always, beyond time and any human preference. But given the energetic structure that is created by being human, it is extremely difficult to find this, maybe impossible

I just finished reading a little bit of Jim Newman, which I'd never heard of before, and in two minutes, in my very humble opinion, he doesn't know what he's talking about. He's lost in the idea of no self and all that. The self is real, it's genetically encoded over millions of years of evolution, it's an energetic structure as solid as a steel box. Can be broken, but more difficult that a steel box. there is a seeker, and there is an end to the search. All that "this is all there is, there is nothing else, and it is complete." It's simply a failure to understand how reality hides itself from itself with the creation of the self. The self is a real process, and repeating that there is no self won't stop it. There is no depth in Newman's message; it's flat, empty, dead.

It's different to hate another race than thinking that it's inferior, That's what I meant. Whites were superior just because they were stronger. If they were weaker, they would be inferior. That's how it works. If the Japanese had crushed the Americans and invaded the US and forced their president to humiliate himself, and then the US had been Japan's bitch, the Japanese would not have put round eyes on their manga.

In old times you either enslaved or were enslaved. Blond whites used to be slaves of the Romans. So, looking Norwegian wasn't something people desired. You didn't want to have Gallic or Germanic ancestors; you preferred to have Persian ancestors.

Don't be so angry. Do you know that black women use a rather harmful product to lighten their skin? Do you know that black women in Latin America consider it a success to have a white partner and so when they have children they "improve the race"? Do you know that Asian women modify their features with surgery to look more Caucasian? Have you seen that Japanese cartoons make characters with round eyes? Do you understand that for a Filipino woman it is a success to have a white partner, but for a Filipino man that is almost impossible unless he is a millionaire? I am sorry if reality is not as it should be according to you. I'm not saying that whites are superior, just that the collective imagination they are given the circumstances. We'll see how that changes when the Chinese truly dominate the world.

There is a preference for Caucasians as a race because it's the race that has dominated the world and set the cultural, economic, and political pace. This is the case now; it's not absolute; it's something that has undeniably occurred since the Baroque era. Humans are genetically programmed to bow to the leader, and the leader so far has been the white race, which is why people prefer the white race.

@Someone here 😘

The substance of the reality is limitlessness, or better than substance, the nature of reality, what you última are. For that reason, it exists in a limited form. Saying "apparently" limited is like saying you've "apparently" broken your leg. There's no difference with really broken. The point is, you'd rather not break your leg. You can realize your total nature every day; that doesn't mean you'd rather not go to a Russian prison for 25 years. But maybe you get a level of openess where for you it's the same anything, you are absolutely out of the form, only in the substance. Sure that this is possible, but first a bit, little by little. In my case, i prefer balancing both. I wouldn't like being a mystic absolutely out of the form, the form is beautiful, but being able to break the limits sometimes is absolutely useful, removes all the sadness, makes your life open

Without a sense of self, you wouldn't care whether you lived or died, and those teachers wouldn't care whether they taught or not. What does it matter whether you helped people? What's the difference between humanity disappearing in an endless war or everyone being enlightened and happy? From an infinite perspective, it's exactly the same. Only the self sees the difference.

Try to think by yourself. The frogs have their own experience, same than you. You could call them magic or physical, the fact is that there are frogs, and the fact is that in the unlimited possibilities of the unlimited reality, one of them is a frog, as you can see (if you see a frog)

Maybe your religion could be named : "lobotomized". Or "magical lobotomy"

Where is the difference between material or "magic"? maybe you should start a religion called "magic" Yes oh master.