Breakingthewall

Who talks about undesirable girls? You ve not experience, then don't insult so much. It's not the same a prostitute than being flirting 4 hours, then go to an apartment, continue the game, then have sex, and in the end, when the fire is out, there's nothing left. The whole false operation seems empty, and there's really nothing more to do there with someone you barely know and with whom you've been acting fake since they were talking in a club with the sole idea of fucking.

How many times have you done casual sex in your life?

Then why I can't imagine some millions? Just two, I don't need more.

Someone like Ramana Maharshi, who one day completely loses his worldly inclination and finds himself in a state of permanent, total openness. He barely moves, speaks little, sits in meditation all day, and is indifferent to one thing or another, life or death.

Perhaps science is at a very basic level compared to what it could be, and perhaps in the future it will be able to delve into the structure of reality to a level we can't imagine. Perhaps it will be possible to penetrate quantum dimensions where reality is only information and unfold universes within particles, things that will make current science like that of the Middle Ages in comparison.

Sure that most of women from a structured family consciously or unconsciously they look for a partner who is approved by their father, but that does not mean that the father chooses him

Sure, women reach an age where they leave the game. This can be very traumatic for some, but the change is usually toward more balance, being human and stopping being a toxic harpy who believes she's a movie star drunk on power over an army of monkeys😅 Anyway, it's different working together than be in a relationship, then the toxicity arises (in both sides)

may not be clearly perceived, but use to be due to the dynamic between the sexes. I suppose there are some women who don't have that emotional way, but most do. Most men, after casual sex, would pay a good amount of money to be immediately teleported to their bed alone. You've fed the devil inside you, and there's nothing else you can do about it. Women don't process things that way; they're horny, have a lot of fantasies and want sex, but it's not a necessity, it's something that have to be good in many senses, not just physical. Well, maybe not consciously, but go out on a summer day in the city and see how the girls dress. They look like they're going to a erection-inducing contest, right? They don't seek direct attention from men; in fact, it bothers them. They want to be seen as high-value, and to do that, they have to be sexy, and that implies attention. It's paradoxical, the direct attention bothers them but the total lack of attention is dramatic because implies that they worth noting.

Well, theoretically society is evolving toward a more conscious place where women and men can find more fulfilling and authentic ways of relating, and along the way there are mistakes and suffering. But of course, "theoretically" doesn't mean it will be achieved; there are no guarantees, but it's the path that is taking place. Furthermore, there is overpopulation on the planet, technology is evolving, and if half the population is single, it's not so dramatic (well, for some, it is). I don't think returning to the old ways is a possibility.

Yeah, humans are part of the hive, not real individuals. It is extremely rare for humans to prefer real solitude. The jungle where the leopard hunts is the social matrix for humans, and their instrument is language. A human alone couldn't survive, he's a weak being without the hive.

What I wanted to point is since your experience is finite there are infinite possibilities out of it. In an infinite frame that's implies that are others dimensions that are coexisting out of your field of experience. The fact that you don't experience them doesn't mean that they doesn't exist. if mathematically they are a possibility, they are real. In a infinite frame mathematically possible is equal than real.

That true, they have it much harder because their real goal is finding a life partner who meets certain standards in a relationship that works and grows over time with great monogamous sex, commitment and social life together. Their entire game is geared toward that end, and many, if not most, fail, as it's a difficult goal.

Yeah in general, women find random sex humiliating. What they find stimulating is the attention and, at a given moment, having a man they consider high-value tied to them.

Yes ok but the only possible answer is because it's out of your field of possibilities. "Out" implies just that something is out, not solipsism.

Okay, but the last thing. Let's see, the ultimate reality at the physical level is changes of state. This is obvious and any physicist accepts it. Changes of state are ultimately information, and this information can ultimately only be a symmetrical duality changing state with respect to itself. On, off, on, off, etc., that is facing itself, reflecting a change of state. What is really what is facing itself ? The reality. Ultimately, it's impossible for it to be anything else. This implies that the most fundamental aspect of reality contains the totality of reality. In all directions, reality unfolds to the infinite power. It's always the same: symmetrical changes of state synchronized with other changes of state raised to the infinite power. It's only information, zeros and ones, but each zero and each one is the totality of infinite reality that unfolds infinitely. What else could be?

Look, experience is change isn't it? What is change ultimately? Change of state. If there is only one thing, one field of reality and nothing to compare it, there is not a state, the state is in comparison with another field of reality that is in another state, is obvious or not? Then multiply that reflection to infinite power. It has to be absolutely synchronized because if not there can't be contrasted, and if it isn't contrasted it doesn't exist

Why not? What prevents it? According solipsism it's just an image that you are creating right now as god

Without something exterior to your field of perception perception is impossible. You are perceiving a phone now, then how this phone appears, who created it? You? Then make it levitate with your will. You can't control what appears, then it's external to you. You could answer like Leo in the solipsism video: you as god created it but you hidden this fact to have an experience. Then this fact is outside of the experience, then something is outside, then infinite things are outside

Your answer is full of condescendence, now I remember why I talked you like hostile 😅

Imagine an infinite framework, in which there is nothing, no limits, no differences, no reference points. It is neither large nor small, it has no dimensions, it is nothing but it is not limited, it has no bottom. If there is movement in that framework, what does that mean? What moves? With respect to what does it move? It's impossible. If there are no limits, there can be no change because there is only the absence of limits. It's the same now as before, here as there. So, how can there be change? The only way is by changing state. How can something change state without a reference that's in another state? It's impossible. The only change of state is in comparison to a reflection that's in the other state. A zero is zero compared to a one. If there's only one zero, then a one, There never really was a change because there never really was an "after." It's always now. And if now is only one state it's always changeless. It's only zero compared to one, and one is one compared to zero. Without the two states reflecting each other, there's only one state. Which means no state, no change. Nothing. Any change must be relative to a reference that is in the other state.

Then expose your point. For now your point is: all of you are idiots. Imo it's a negative approach, that's why I tried to make you see it. Then you don't like that others point you negative things, ok, then be positive, explain why people is wrong without insulting them. When I asked you before you just answered: I'm not your monkey, then I thought you are here just for trolling and that's annoying. Maybe I shouldn't say anything, but what to do? Then we are in a endless argument. Let's finish it. Sorry to be hostile, but try to stop putting down the people without any positive contribution

Where is a mistake or something that is not obvious?

Do you think that in eternity there have been different experiences than yours now? not human experiences, totally different . If you answer yes, where are they now, if you are not experiencing them right now? Are in the past? Then reality is a timeline?

Just pointing the obvious, if you can't see it, what to do?

This is the logic of solipsism, which confuses the absolute with the relative, needs a step back. The absolute is not experience; it is the matter of experience, its source. Experience is always relative because it requires perception, and for perception to exist, movement and change are necessary. In the absence of change, perception disappears. The absolute is where change occurs; it is the source of change, the total potential, but it is not change itself. Change is a manifestation of its unlimited essence. Therefore, you will never leave experience because you are the experience. But ultimately, experience is an emergence from infinity. Therefore, it requires another experience to exist: infinite intertwined experiences reflecting each other in perfect synchrony. Otherwise, perception would be impossible.