Breakingthewall

Interesting reflection. The main difference I see between animals and humans is a phase shift. Animals have a level of perception that's completely integrated with their physical structure and environment. They're one with their experience, with the humans a new level arises, the mind , that is the center of the experience, who can process and analize the experience, it is not the experience but the experiencer. This mind communicates with other minds through the language giving birth to the collective mind. It is logical to think that if other levels such as plants, complex animals, and humans emerge from a level like bacteria, there would be more levels of existence, expanded pure intelligence, consciousness without physical support, conscious energy, things like that.

So if, for example, the doctor tells you that you have an aggressive tumor in your brain, it's the same as if he tells you that you have a cold?

yeah, the mind is a very solid construct, full of traps. It creates a world of emotions and meaning, and it's very difficult to escape from it. It's like opening your energy center, surrendering your mind completely, and opening your heart without reservation and without expecting anything except the act of opening. The mind must be empty, the heart open. Open means without greed, total surrender to the unknown. Yes , fear is the biggest barrier. But if you understand that you have to do it because you are trapped in the land of the mind like being trapped in a maze ,then you know that you have to do it without doubt, nothing is more important than that, it's like an obsession.

The self, that center from which reality is experienced, is not a substantial entity or a soul separate from the world, but a coherent relational structure: a stable node within the changing flow of existence. This coherence is not an illusion, but a real form of organization in a universe that is, at its core, purely relational. To be conscious does not mean to be a thing, but to be a relation that refers to itself, a form capable of integrating information, perceiving patterns, and ultimately, observing itself. The reality we inhabit is neither chaotic nor arbitrary. It is logical, not because it obeys external laws, but because in a boundless framework, only what is coherent can persist. The incoherent disintegrates before it can manifest. Thus, every form that appears, from a particle to a thought, is logically possible and structurally synchronized with the rest of the universe. Consciousness, then, is not an accident but an inevitable expression of the deep logic that organizes the existence. And yet, the basis of that logic is not a prior structure, but the opposite: the absence of limits. Absolute reality is not a thing, a principle, or a being, it is infinitude itself. Not infinity as an endless sum, but as a boundless background, pure possibility. This infinitude does not need to be, it simply is. From that absence of form, all possible forms arise. Consciousness, understood as self conciousness, can open itself to this foundation. It can understand that its coherence is not suspended in emptiness, but supported by absolute depth. It can recognize that its logic is the logic of the whole: that in understanding itself, it is understanding totality from a particular point, without needing to step outside its own frame. This is not a spiritual statement or a dogma, it is a logical consequence. In a relational and unlimited universe, consciousness is the organized form of the infinite. And when it looks at itself with enough clarity, it can see that its structure is also the background; that its being is also possibility; that its "self" is also the whole, perceiving itself through a finite angle. This process does not occur by chance. The evolution of consciousness follows a logical sequence of increasing complexity: from the closed mind, centered on survival, to the abstract, symbolic mind, and from there to the open mind, capable of understanding itself as both form and background. It is not an external destiny, but the result of structural alignment: when conditions allow for greater coherence, coherence manifests. Structures that reach sufficient openness can recognize themselves as what they already are, expressions of the absolute. From this perspective, there is no transmigration of souls, no personal continuity beyond structural dissolution. Consciousness is not a substance that can move about, but a complex configuration of coherent relations within a given framework. When that coherence ceases, the form dissolves, and with it, what we call "self." However, the unlimited background remains. And new forms may emerge from it, not as repetitions of a past entity, but as new manifestations of an akin, resonant structure. What has been called reincarnation can be understood, within this framework, not as the transmission of a soul, but as the possibility that certain structural configurations reappear when conditions allow. There is no enduring identity, but there are patterns that may reorganize. What persists is not the individual, but the background from which everything arises and to which everything returns. This reappearance requires no direct transmission. It can be explained by three mechanisms consistent with a relational universe: 1, structural resonance in the boundless background, where highly coherent patterns may leave an imprint of possibility that reactivates when the field is compatible; 2, the probabilistic reconfiguration of patterns that reappear when certain relational conditions recur; and 3, structural contagion through the environment, where complex relational patterns are partially replicated through distributed memory. There is no transmission of personal information or migrating soul, there is structural reorganization within the total field. Then, there is no mystery, there is depth. There is no transcendence, there is openness. There is no leap, there is recognition. Infinitude does not need to be understood. But when it organizes itself into a form coherent enough, understanding happens. not as a deliberate act, but as the inevitable consequence of being what it is.

You can point out what is a barrier or a projection, and if you are going to live with someone you will judge them according to your own values.

Very good article. The idea of communism was seductive but impossible. It is an equation that, to work, needs to eliminate human corruption, and that is like not seeing a herd of hysterical elephants in the room. Stalin and Trotsky when young. They shared revolutionary ideas in politics and hairstyling

This is an interesting approach to enlightenment. Well, he says that reality is a simulation, I'd say that is coherent relations between states due the absence of limits, but I think it's the same idea . He says there is no self, I think there is no center but there is this concrete structure now, and we could call it self.

That isn't exact . Spirituality has used this mantra to say that everything is consciousness and that we create reality by being aware of it.

That's true

I just had that opening. A moment is enough; it's the total relaxation of the barriers. At a given moment, the pressure you're constantly exerting gives way, and there are no limits. Reality is unfathomable, and you are that. It's luminous, open, and total. It's nothing, but everything is there. Then, irrevocably, the contracted operating system returns. It doesn't seem like something I can do, but rather something that has to happen. In a way, it is letting go of the self. It is the relaxation of all the mechanisms of the self, it is the culmination of a very complex process, and I don't think I'm going to complete that process. There is too much density in me. But anyway, what we are is wonderful, it's openenss. Some moments of openess is energy for many days, light.

It's easy to perceive, almost everyone who's in spirituality are pursuing bliss, immortality and feel accepted . Its a kind of evasion. Then in some moment they have some experiences, they match them with everything that they ve read and they think that they know the truth, but then, after some time some crisis happens. Almost no one is on the path to real enlightenment.

When they really want it. Not bliss, or evasion, or do psychedelic to believe that they are god imagining the reality like a game. just absolute openenss. If someone really want that, means that's ready

Yes I know all of that, but then, if you really would know the truth, you would know that it's absolutely impossible that someone who's not absolutely ready for a process that is the opening of your being to the absolute reality would do it. People looks outward not inward

Yes, transparent means that for you it's the same life or death, at least for 5 minutes. You have to trick your psyche to really be able to deactivate it. The psyche is who tries to deactivate itself, it's twisted. There are strong forces that prevents it. For me it's extremely difficult, I can do just sometimes, it's like you dissapear and the whole is, but it's impossible to be in that state more than a moment. Close yes, but with some barrier, without barrier is difficult. I guess that some people can, but I'd say, very few in the entire world

What is the truth? Would you reached that truth without any belief?

Experience is reality in a given configuration. Another configuration would be non-experience. For example, if you were a stone, you wouldn't have experience, but you would be. Difficult to understand, right? From experience, we think that only experience is real. We can't think about non-experience because it's beyond the realm of the thinkable, but it is real. We need the idea of God because things happening without someone directing everything seems impossible. But it is. Infinite nature manifests itself, and consciousness is one more manifestation. If you want to open yourself to the absolute, open yourself to total death, to absolute unconsciousness, to being your essence independently of experience.

@PolyPeter seem that you want to spread a new religion

your problem is that you didn't focus on the truth, but on bliss. It seems the same, but it's very different.

Yeah, transparent, aligned, relaxed. What we call the self is the structure of our psyche. Normally, the psyche is very dense, governed by impossible-to-ignore impulses that have been cemented over millions of years of evolution. Human evolution—all struggle, drive, and social unity—come from foundations forged at the origins of life. The emotional switches we have are decisive, overwhelming, and absorbing. They are what unites families, tribes, and nations; they make people go to war to die for ideals or study the structure of the atom. Without this psyche, we would be less than rats, nothing, extinct corpses. This psyche doesn't let you see beyond what it dictates as essential. Normally, if you become spiritual, it's a shift of the psyche to evade or sublimate other emotional impulses. The true desire to break through the barrier is rare. To do so, you must see through the psyche. To say that the psyche doesn't exist and is an illusion is meaningless, confusing, and false. It's like saying you don't have a body. Stories to brainwash people into escaping their problems for a while. Spirituality is absolutely fake. To see through the psyche, you must first confront it and face your fears. Then, make a real decision, committing to yourself that you want to open yourself to the depths of existence, whatever that may be. It doesn't matter; it's real, and because it's real, you want to see and be that without obstacles. Then you find a way to do it. Little by little, you go deeper in that direction. It's a natural process.

Imagine that all that stuff about God dreaming and deceiving himself to play at being human is absolutely false, and people thinking that others are stupid because they haven't realized something that they take for granted because someone else said it and they have internalized it as their own realization, and that seen from a a external perspective shows they are doubly stupid. What stupidity would that be!

I told it clear, but you dont understand because you don't like a open frame, it's weird for the mind, people needs a limit, like god or anything .

Not true, you can open to the absolute in some moments even you are reactive and focused in some mundane things. You have to reach a minimum of alignment, integrity, then even you are not in perfect peace you can learn how to remove the barriers of the mind.

No, before I always had in mind that I had to drop the self , like, let do any mental grip, drop the understanding, I did a lot of psychedelic with that goal and a lot of meditation. then little by little, I began to reach a state where I had no mental grip. Reality becomes fluid, and you don't interpret anything. It's like you're floating in empty immensity. And if you hold that long enough, and your intention is to open up to whatever, absolute surrender, eventually you do it. You open up to yourself, you break the boundaries. At first, a moment, then longer. If you do that, it's something like: this is it, absolutely. The total, the absolute depth alive, the total potential, my true nature. But you realize that the one observing this is the structure of reality we call human. Your mind may be absolutely empty of content, but it's still your mind. It's still you. It's the human self open to the total. It's different from a fly's self open to the total. The whole is the whole, but the one perceiving it is the human form. It's not an illusion; it's meaningless. It's like saying: you're not playing tennis. That's an illusion. You are a human. No, you're a human playing tennis.

Sadhguru is a scammer in my opinion, quite evil

I don't know exactly what the self is supposed to be. You have to be able to deactivate the meaning of mental content at will, erase all meaning, which erases the emotional charge of everything. Then you can open yourself to what you are, in other words, break through the limitation. Perhaps that's the self. Anyway, that doesn't mean that nothing has meaning, but that it doesn't have any from an unlimited perspective, which is where you try to position yourself.