Breakingthewall

The only possibility is that Trump has done this with the idea of achieving some benefit, using his well-known Arab market bargaining tactics to pressure and gain "respect." His manners are childish, crude, rude and stupid, and he looks like a clown. But all this is irrelevant, what is relevant is the results. If the US economy improves in the next few years, and there are no wars, Trump is good, even if he is in diapers and poops himself and then throws it at Trudeau in the face in a debate. If the economy worsens or there is war because of his actions, Trump is bad.

A good professional will repeat the questions over and over again, he will note the inconsistencies, will dig until he finds the truth

Torture works, there are professionals at torturing, and it's not about being sadistic, but about getting the information. If you torture someone for many days, their will will disappear and they won't be able to lie, unless they are someone exceptionally resistant. If they isolate you, don't let you sleep for days, torture you with electricity, hot irons, pulling out your teeth, etc., for a week, everything will be the same for you, you won't be yourself, you will be suffering, nothing won't matter to you, you won't be able to lie, you just would want that this hell ends

@AION what you said is obvious, Europe has been in decline for a long time, its industry is getting weaker and its momentum is getting weaker. Birth rates are constantly falling and the future looks like a recession. It is normal, it is something cyclical. Behind them come others who were previously in misery, they are hungry and the Europeans are comfortable. There is not drama with this if we admit and adapt to the new situations. Btw, the next is US, that now is a giant without foundations. By the way, you will have seen that many people are extremely annoyed when certain things are pointed out and they accuse you of being a slave of Putin if you state obvious realities. It is a current phenomenon, people only want to hear reinforcement of their ideas and absolutely refuse to consider other points of view, they are incapable of real understanding, since for them everything is emotional. It is important to realize these dynamics in order not to fall into them, since they are totally limiting.

Do you really think that the French and the English are going to die in Ukraine? Macron is a fool, he believes in the great colonial France, and it hurts him a lot to be displaced in Africa, but that is already a fact, and not a single Frenchman is going to freeze in Ukraine while they throw bombs at him

It is true that Trump is an egomaniac and a cheater but what he does usually has a reason, and in this case there doesn't seem to be one. disconcerting seems to be the only one. surely in the end he will not make the tariffs. Maybe he's crazy, maybe it's a strategy, for now we don't know.

The question is: why? What does he expect to achieve with it? The fentanyl thing is an excuse, there is very little volume from Canada. What is he trying to do by doing this? The answer that he is retarded and does it out of ego, I don't know, it's not possible for him to be so stupid, or is it? must have hidden reasons, some kind of strategy. But what? I don't know.

Furthermore, a Canadian battalion led by a football ultra with neo-Nazi insignia on their flags would bomb a state in dispute between Canada and the US for 8 years, killing thousands of people each year, while China builds 5 virus laboratories near the border, and at one point is preparing to place nuclear weapons aimed at New York. After 8 years, President Trump orders the invasion of that border state, and the entire world calls him Adolf Trumper and everyone idolizes the president of Canada who promoted this situation, who was a comic actor who in his show appeared with two Uzis machine-gunning the parliamentarians in parliament.

Trump has not done anything important so far. Important thing is to provoke a war with a million dead, sink Germany's economy and promote the rise of the extreme right and polarize the world, placing it on the brink of World War 3. Trump for now has only done symbolic actions, bluffs, when I know the consequences of his actions I will be able to have an opinion on him. For now I haven't. For example, what's going to be the trump's attitude about Taiwan? That's important

Who put trust in trump? I just said that I can't judge trump until I see the consequences of his actions.

@zazen Imagine if India also supplies natural gas to China, and Trump's son, who is a drug addict, is a director of Pakistan's main gas company, and just when the war starts Trump destroys Indian Stream 2. and no one says anything. are they crazy?

The point is that Kazakhstan never would do that, unless NATO encourages it, more specifically the US. This is all a biden and viky nuland project, it is extremely easy to access the records. the coup d'état, the euro maidan, everything was promoted by them. Before saying that it is false information, please read this 2014 report from the BBC. It's not long, it's the famous conversation where Nuland said: fuck the EU. You could see in that conversation how Victoria Nuland is planning who's going to be on the power in Ukraine. They are talking about vitali kitchko, former champion of the heavy weight in boxing, very nationalist and and important character in Ukraine, and about others who are more convenient to their interests. After the euro maidan the nationalist allies with US and anti-Russian came to power and the Dombass war began. Of course Russia tries to interfere in the Ukrainian politics, but because Ukraine is in the area, extremely strategic place for them, historically tied with them. Why it's important for the Americans? It's not in their spheres. It's only important because the resources, and to weaken Russia and Europe https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26079957

And nobody would care, nobody would sent tons of weapons to Kazakhstan, and create a war that kills hundred thousands . It would appear marginally in the news once a week

You could see here that showing the most obvious facts, people who's supposedly open minded and interested in understanding are going to say that you are evil demon supporting the dictators against the goodness and the freedom. It's shocking . Obama destroyed lybia, which was the country with the highest welfare index in the Middle East and lowered it to the category of a miserable country ruled by warlords with slave markets, and everyone thinks that Obama was some kind of saint. If you tell them about Libya, they will say that Gaddafi was a dictator and deserved it. and the population? Cities were bombed in Iraq, much worse than in Gaza, but since Saddam was "bad", it is allowed. They are bombed for their own good. It's amazing that people believe these narratives. It's all for business, for the oil.

Everyone knew it, and Biden administration of course knew it. They also knew it and are informed people: Kissinger already warned in 2014 that "for Russia, Ukraine can never simply be a foreign country" and that, therefore, it needs a policy aimed at "reconciliation." He was also firm in his stance that "Ukraine should not join NATO." - John Mearsheimer - probably the leading expert on US geopolitics today - in 2015: "The West is taking Ukraine down a bed of roses and the end result is that Ukraine is going to be destroyed [...] What we are doing is, in fact, encouraging that outcome." - Jack F. Matlock Jr., US ambassador to the Soviet Union from 1987 to 1991, warned in 1997 that NATO expansion was "the most profound strategic mistake, [encouraging] a chain of events that could produce the most serious threat to security [...] since the collapse of the Soviet Union." -Clinton's Secretary of Defense, William Perry, explains in his memoirs that for him NATO enlargement is the cause of "the breakdown of relations with Russia" and that in 1996 he was so opposed to it that "out of the force of my conviction, I considered resigning." -Noam Chomsky in 2015, saying that "the idea that Ukraine could join a Western military alliance would be absolutely unacceptable to any Russian leader" and that Ukraine's desire to join NATO "is not protecting Ukraine, it is threatening Ukraine with a major war." CIA Director Bill Burns in 2008: "Ukraine's entry into NATO is the clearest red line for [Russia]" and "I have yet to find anyone who views Ukraine in NATO as anything more than a direct challenge to Russian interests." -Pat Buchanan, special assistant and consultant to US Presidents Nixon, Ford and Reagan, wrote in his 1999 book A Republic, Not an Empire: "By moving NATO onto Russia's porch, we have scheduled a 21st-century confrontation."

Well, yes, but everyone knew that it would happen in the case of joining NATO. Bombing the Russian population in Ukraine and joining NATO is saying: Russia, you are nothing, I piss in your face. Then Russia is officially weak and powerless, and Crimea would be the next step. Those who organized this event know this absolutely without a doubt. And they also know that people are going to think: Putin is a evil dictator who invades, Ukraine is a good democrat with heroic Zelensky. It's very simple. It is a maneuver to weaken Russia and, if possible, balkanize it and plunder its resources, and weaken Germany along the way.

Things are not that simple. Those who want democracy are one of the most corrupt countries in the world, at the level of Africa, with an exclusive nationalism towards a minority that is from the ethnic group of the neighboring country, much more powerful. so everything is problems. In addition to having come to power with a coup d'état and spending 8 years bombing pro-Russian areas, and receiving weapons from EEUU, 5 American laboratories for virus studies were built there. You can check this, Victoria Nuland said: Don't Ukrainians have the right to defend themselves from epidemics like COVID? But those laboratories were next to the military bases and we already know what type of research is done in them, and why there are none on American soil. When the possibility of nuclear weapons in Ukraine was going to be a certainty due to Russia's entry into NATO, Russia invaded. The Biden administration knew this was going to happen, and so did the Ukrainian government. The problem is that they miscalculated the resilience of the Russian economy, they thought it was going to collapse and that Putin would fall.

Russia is a nuclear power that dominated much of the world for many years. This may seem bad to us but it is a fact. It is a very complex and quite poor country, with harsh living conditions. If Russia dismembers, it will most likely be chaos, the rule of mafias and warlords with atomic weapons at their disposal. A solid Russia is better for everyone. By the way, before the invasion of Ukraine there was an 8-year civil war in which the Ukrainian Azov battalion attacked the Dombass separatists. The commander of the Azov battalion was the former leader of the Kiev Dynamo fans, you can see photos of them anywhere, look at these. As you see, things are not always so black and white.

I just think that could be quite worse. If you understand this conflict you will know that it was very difficult to avoid for several reasons, and an important one is the strong Ukrainian nationalism, and this nationalism is not "bad", it's just nationalism. In Ukraine there has been great resentment towards Russia for centuries, and there have been many affronts. The famous Holodomor, in which Stalin supposedly caused a famine to kill millions of Ukrainians and repopulate with Russians, makes Ukrainians not like Russia, but the reality is that the Russians have been there for almost a century and there are lot of them, what is the solution? For the Ukrainians they are enemies, but the Russians cannot tolerate being harassed by Ukrainian nationalists. who is right? It depends on who you are, it's like the thing between the Palestinians and the Israelis, it's impossible to reach an agreement, that's why there was the war. The problem for me is the US's determination to pour gasoline on the fire so that it burns as long as possible, the result being inevitable.

Putin wants Crimea and Dombass, and that's it. Putin is considered too soft in Russia, there was an uprising against him because he was considered weak in the war. In Russia there are many people with power much more aggressive than him. The problem is that with all this madness that has been promoted, Russia has put its war machinery to work at full power, and is now producing more ammunition and weapons than all of NATO combined. Russia is a poor country compared to others, but it is a country that dares war. To begin with, it is displacing the UK and France in Africa, that is why they are so angry. Russia does not want to be a miserable country, and now it has the most well-oiled military machine in the world, it has been a mistake to wake up the bear, perhaps after Putin there will be another more aggressive leader and that will be a problem.

It is completely impossible for Ukraine to win a war against Russia. The areas that Russia wants are populated by Russians and in a referendum they chose to join Russia. Crimea is ucranian just from recently for a strange donation, then the right about it is not so clear. So why make a million soldiers die? what is the reason? just business. Ukraine and Russia should be allies, but evil people feed the hatred and this happened . You can't ignore that Russia is your neighbor, maybe you don't like, but it is, feed hate against it is stupid, death.

Putin wants Crimea and Dombass, and Ukraine out of NATO. Not Putin, Russia wants that and there is not choice.

Yes, an arrogant businessman is not the same as a predator. With the fat bastard you can reach some kind of agreement, with the predator you are going to be preyed on.

We will see. Maybe he has an instinct that helps balance the situation, or maybe it will be a disaster. We all know that Trump is corrupt, it is absolutely obvious, but corrupt is not the same as evil to me. evil is provoking a war for business. Would Trump do that? I don't know. maybe not. rumsfeld, victoria nuland or blinken it seems so. it's just an opinion

It is not so easy to make an opinion. Trump's interview with Zelensky is the most rude, embarrassing and crazy thing in the history of modern politics, but maybe it will prevent 50 thousand guys from dying or being crippled when the final result is already clear and inevitable, so is it positive or negative? Maybe You are sure that it is negative, but from another point of view it is positive. The other possibility was the blinken option, lowering the recruiting age from 25 to 18 to send 18-year-olds to die for something? For what?