Breakingthewall

I respect a lot the people who works with sick people or old people, that's a different dimension of work.

What I understand as solipsism is that the people that I see in the street have not their own experience and I'm creating them for some reasons, to awake , to be asleep, anything

You are talking about a dimension of existence that we call life that you know, but maybe there are another infinite dimensions of existence that you literally can't imagine. Anyway, Considering this concrete dimension called life, which evolves from the basic to the complex through competition, it's not so astonishing; it's a simple survival program that adapts to the environment and competes for resources. It's no more astonishing than the formation of molecules or the fabric of spacetime. Everything in reality is extremely complex and perfect, synchronized and balanced to infinity. If reality is infinite, any partition of reality is total infinity. If something, let's say an atom, is stable, this means it contains infinity in perfect synchrony, moving like a perfect mechanism within it. Seeing this, nothing impresses anymore. Everything is absolutely perfect, since the slightest lack of synchrony would mean infinite asynchrony, and that reality could not manifest itself. Do you understand the normality of infinite perfection? It's the most normal, since absolutely everything that exists is like this.

Solipsism means that the others are not real. How do you know?

It has to be absolutely totally developed always. We can't make a mental picture, it's impossible, but reality must always be infinitely expanded. It has no beginning, therefore no progression. Infinity cannot be understood; it's impossible, since understanding is a mental scheme that is made with limits. However, you can deduce that the development of form is always complete, but given the inherent instability of something unlimited, it flows eternally. This, now, is this flow. What we can't do is open ourselves to its nature and realize that despite the form, always the absolute is and we are that.

Seems obvious that there is an infinite will of being, but from what I can deduce, absolute being exists because there are no limits or opposites. Absolute non-being does not exist, so absolute being is total, and its positive thrust is total; it is uncontainable. Since reality is unlimited, nothing goes anywhere, therefore everything returns to its origin. Everything is cyclical. And for one form to be, another form must sustain it, move in sync with it. Without movement, there is no form. And in infinity, movement can only be relative to other movement: vibrations of reality upon itself. If reality synchronizes upon itself to the infinite power, since it has no limits, this creates increasingly complex patterns and infinite interconnected dimensions. Any non-synchronous movement simply does not exist, since movement only exists if it is synchronous with another movement, and thus form arises. Its essence is always absolute being, and all spirituality is focused on realizing that you are the absolute being and perceiving yourself as the absolute being fully, regardless of form. So, why is there a hurricane? because a butterfly flapped its wings in another galaxy in another dimension.

We should never have abandoned the monarchy, at least it was elegant

It's lke a boy who was a bully in elementary school and everyone feared him, and now in middle school he tries to intimidate and everyone looks at him like: Didn't you understand that was in elementary school? Now we hang out with girls, dress cool, laugh at bullies and you are nobody. Grow up, retard. And the bully goes crying to the psychologist.

Sure but why is that happening? "explore" suggests the intention to reach a place or understand something. Where can infinity go? What intention could it possibly have? Any intention is limited, it's finite. It would have already arrived infinite times; there's nowhere to go, no possible intention; it's just the flow of infinite being developing cyclically. It can't be anything else, it's absolutely impossible due the nature of the absence of limitations, it just is, and being encompasses everything, including the intention of exploring, but that intention is just a relative arising in the absolute, another relative manifestation that arrives nowhere, like my will about gain money or anything else relative

Maybe it's not that reality has to experience to understand itself, but that the potential of reality is absolute then perception happens and that's it. Because "has to" implies limits, same like doing things for a reason, or arriving to something Sorry for being smartass but I'm just pointing the implications of the absence of limits that's inevitable

Yes reality fully understands itself: it is. That's the absolute understanding and everything is in it. But when we talk about understanding we mean things like: reality is a mind that is imagining. This is relative understanding, it's inside of the absolute reality, then it's just relative.

And? He already did? Or maybe he needs more exploration? If its infinite it will never fully explore itself (aka understanding), then he could stop right now if the reason is that

I already did and I can tell you the answer: ultimately understanding is impossible because you only can understand what is contained in your mind, and absolute reality is not contained in your mind, but your mind is contained in absolute reality, or better it's made of the absolute reality. If you want to open yourself to the absolute, you must let go of what you value most: your mind. If you don't and are greedy, then you will remain going around in an endless circle. You think you understand things. For example, you see a bird and you think you understand it because you know how it works. But to what extent do you understand it? You can understand that its nature is divine and perceive that nature, but you cannot understand that nature because it is not comprehensible, it's the being, the reality, you, the absolute. The absolute is just absolute, you can understand that it's absolute, but nothing else, but understanding that it is is absolute understanding. Anything else is relative understanding, then it is a possibility between infinite possibilities, aka zero. It depends what we understand as understanding

You can fully perceive what you are, but you can't understand it because what you are is before than understanding. What means understanding? See the structure of something, how it works. It's always limited, you can't fully understands nothing because it's ultimate nature is beyond understanding, is not originated. You can understand that it's not originated, but not what it is because to understand you have to put yourself above and it's impossible in the case of ultimate reality

If reality is a mind, what is that mind? We call mind the ability to imagine, understand, and conceptualize. Is that reality? Sure? Reality is an ability? What is the substance that supports that ability?

Yes you are the reality perceiving itself. The thing is how deep can you perceive yourself. When I said above that the absolute cannot be understood, I meant that the substance of reality cannot be understood because it is not comprehensible since it is the source of understanding, but one can understand how it acts, how it develops. But how acts is not what it is, it's a different dimension. What reality is can be perceived, but not understood, how could it be?

Experience is the same than consciousness. Conciousness is the absolute observing itself. Conciousness is something that the absolute does, not the absolute. Of course the substance of consciousness, or experience, is the absolute, but the experience itself is relative movement. That's why it's difficult to open yourself to the absolute, because we identify ourselves with the experience, because the experience is what is happening and we can't think in other dimension than the dimension of happening

The difference between self and being is that self is created by barriers and has a form, while being has no form. The substance of the self is being, and being can exist without barriers or with them. An animal has a self, since it differentiates between good and bad for it's survival. The bias is the structure of the self, and its structural basis is survival. From here, a system of energetic barriers is created, which can be simple, as in the case of a tuna, or complex, as in the case of a human. Being without any structure is the absolute being, but being without structure is not an experience because it is not happening. Happening needs movement, and movement needs form. Without form there is no time, and the no time is not happening, even it's so real than the reality in movement. Time is just subjective, same than experience . The absolute doesn't need experience to exist. Experience is conciousness, without time there is not conciousness, but the absolute is. Give to the self the meaning of the belief of what you are is wrong, this is just a layer of the self, it's exactly the same than hunger, just in another frequency

im talking about a limited vision. Reality is unlimited, but it's your site, ok, I won't argue about this topic if you don't like

when Leo talks in his blog about Buddhists, or those who meditate in search of emptiness and equating that with enlightenment, being wrong. Well, who meditates in search of emptiness? That makes no sense. You seek openness, and there are people who believe that emptiness promotes openness since the mind is closed by energetic barriers. This may be true, it depends on the person. The absolute is not on the mental plane. You cannot understand the absolute since understanding is a structure that occurs within the absolute; you can open yourself to it. The absolute is what you are; there is nothing to understand. You can understand many things, but not the absolute. When someone says they understand reality and that it is God imagining it, or that reality is a infinite mind, they are wrong. That is not the absolute; it is an egotistical mirage. Completely closed in a cause-and-effect vision in which God is the cause. The cause of what? Of reality? So there is God on one hand, that is something, and reality, something else, on the other hand. Well...and God creates it for a reason or dreams it up. All of this is a closed structure. Enlightenment is real, but of course, if you're stuck in a delusional structure, you can't intuit it.

The problem with Buddhism is that it differentiates between the false, maya, and the true, nirvana. Supposedly, for some reason, we are trapped in something negative whose essence is suffering, and we must reach something positive, which is liberation from the wheel of reincarnations, the nirvana. These reincarnations are not infinite, since they will end; that's why they began. Why? And why are they negative? Perhaps the only negative aspect is being a Japanese human in the 12th century, but there may be infinite other dimensions of existence. Oh no, there are only four: demigods, animals, demons, and humans. It sounds like a superstitious nonsense. Besides, emptiness is the goal to achieve, which is superior to wholeness. IMO, it's wrong and a negative philosophy in it's essence

The self is not an illusion. The fact that if you fall from a height of 10 meters, your bones will break is not an illusion; it's a reality. It's not a false self that you create because you're mistaken; it's your human identity, and it's absolutely real. What you can do is open to your absolute nature, realize that the essence of who you are—your being, your core, your substance—is the substance of reality. You are the absolute and total reality, since any part of the absolute is the absolute; there are no parts. But the point insnt knowing that you are absolute, is perceiving yourself as absolute and perceive the quality of your nature . That doesn't mean you can jump off a fifth-floor without consequences.

It seems so, but how to do it? How to reindustrialize a country? I'd say there's only one way: accepting years of serious recession. Tightening our belts and competing with the Chinese in the factories. Are the American people willing to do that? I'd say no. The Democrats' option was much more Roman: plundering Russia. This would have given them a few decades of prosperity. But of course, if you want to be Roman, your legions must be willing to die for Rome; otherwise, the barbarians will laugh at you. So, what's left? Find the weakest kid in the schoolyard and beat him up. But that kid, Iran, has friends. Difficult situation... Get a job in the factory? Maybe if there were robots to do it, it would be a good idea.

Because lies bind you in stupidity, and once bound, you slowly rot.

When, in the primordial ocean filled with photosynthetic bacteria, some of them join together to form a larger organism so they can kill the others and steal their life force, is the devil who came up with that idea. Without devil there is not complex life.