The0Self

Wonderful.

Can depend on what model you use. The Theravada Buddhists might say it’s just cycling through the ñana’s in the progress of insight. Firm, clear objectification of sensations is what drives one further along. To stay where you are, you can get absorbed in whatever appears. To move on, you can objectify sensations clearly and persistently. That’s just the Buddhist paradigm but it’s one of the most reliable imo.

Because arahatship is supposedly indestructible. It closes the loop of ego-death/ego-backlash cycles and kundalini/piti. It can’t get more closed than closed.

Leo is doing things the hard way. He’s doing things the beautiful way. He’s not doing things. And neither are you. My character prefers transcendence over depth. Leo seems to prefer depth. (Just in a story though). I can respect his approach. Maybe you can too. Question is, can you recognize the love in his approach? Neither can I, but it is seen. What I described is what this sees; you’ll see something else entirely.

Well, death is not like anything. This is death. There is no death.

Fair enough, but for them, in a sense, they think it’ll be like something. They think it’ll be like going to dreamless sleep but never waking up again, for instance, as you said.

This is actually impossible to think. Any individual can think they know it, but they don’t. They sometimes might even have a feeling in the back of their mind that “they will experience nothing” — still an imagined experience. To solidify my point, the reason (or at least an obvious gesture toward) why the individual cannot imagine what it’s like when it’s not there anymore, is obviously, of fucking course, because it isn’t there now.

@Mojinius I really want to say something helpful but with everything and especially this topic, there just are no rules, only seems like there might be. You’re golden however you slice it though.

It's just a story, but God is imagining someone who has forgotten/ignored their self to be God/wholeness/freedom, thereby God can experience imperfection and meaning through the unreal, imagined subject, "you." There isn't a you -- only empty-fullness, or consciousness, freedom, or whatever you want to call this.

Just a theory: He was very depressed and had a lot of shame. He was kind, but awkward, stressed, and not popular at school. Very damaged ego. Humility is seen in his words here. What was left of his ego really didn't like the feeling of humility, so the psychological construct of vulnerable narcissism developed as a result. He became corrupted by the ego of the far more confident and popular (but still somewhat of an outcast) Eric Harris (huge ego; psychopath; grandiose narcissist), and their constructs fit each other like yin-yang and all hell broke loose. Eric gave Dylan purpose; Dylan gave Eric admiration.

Yeah, as is real-unreal. Nonduality points to the neither real nor unreal.

@SamC It can cycle. One of the best ways of gauging your current level of consciousness is to check how much gratitude is present in your experience. You can perhaps short circuit this by intentionally focusing on things to be grateful for while you're in a low state - or just remain aware of the various mind states that arise while you're in these low states, but make sure to be grateful for your ability to do that! And remember to complement/appreciate yourself for your ability to remember to do that.

They can. Once they wake up, they often abandon their addiction(s), but not always. If they do keep an addiction, it's often enjoyable and it just seems to continue to happen. The body can be dependent on anything.

Ecstasy is for novices and newcomers. Having no need for ecstasy, on the other hand... And btw, what exactly do you mean by enlightenment? What do you think it is? What do you think you're gonna get?

Daniel Ingram is definitely in a sort of Buddhist paradigm lock, but if you're a spiritual seeker you'd be interested to know that what he "has" is some undoubtedly profound, mind-blowing skill in meditation. He can enter 8th jhana at will by just closing his eyes and inclining his mind to the place that's neither perceiving nor not-perceiving. You don't quite get to where he is without years of countless 10-90 day meditation retreats though.

You (ego; falsehood) will say it seeks truth, but will actually seek happiness -- that's how it survives. Truth is the end of it. Truth is all there is. Truth cannot be found, because it was never lost. Navigating the infinitely integrated layers of reality instead is a fine endeavor.

The amount that you need to learn academically is tiny. What gives success in this area is truly 90 percent kindness, intuition, counter-intuition, fun, playfulness, practice, and non-neediness/non-neuroticism. Knowing stuff won't really help much in pickup; trying stuff will. Try anything with relaxed diligence and fun. The people that have the most problem with this are guys who are decent-looking but very shy or fearful -- these guys often have secret admirers from afar (as does any decent-looking human) that they'll never know about, and if they do find out, their awkwardness or neediness usually drives the girl away. Fearlessness, humility, and confidence derived from humility and self-love rather than arrogance, is what will provide success. If your mood when picking up women is primarily one of gratitude, you're golden. And if you've done enough consciousness work to be in a transcendent-integrated state, it really doesn't matter what you do, unless you're somehow deficient in creativity, in which case you could research how to be more creative and spontaneous. Don't do it with the goal of trying to get something from women though.

You can keep yourself in the dream by doing this: Keeping a vision of what it could mean to be a profound/etc human being in the future. Make it idyllic enough, or just continue enhancing it, and there’s no danger of it ever being achieved, so you can remain in the dream. At least until you are confronted with hopelessness. For the exact opposite, you could do the exact opposite. Neither is better or worse than the other.

Perhaps just meditate and figure out what you want. Nonduality is the story that cuts through all the other ones. It may resonate. Head in tiger’s mouth, if you are there, you wait for it to either bite off your head/ego, or not.

Yes. But it is possible that it will go away if it wasn’t absolute. If there’s still an apparent “wow” going on there, it could last a while (or perhaps not long at all) if it wasn’t complete, but in your case it easily could be complete — it‘ll be obvious if it’s the latter. “First, mountains are mountains. Next, mountains aren’t mountains. And then, mountains are mountains again.“ The quote has nothing to do with the first paragraph I wrote. Just realized it might seem that way. It describes the recognition that seemed to happen in relation to your character.

“First, mountains are mountains. Next, mountains aren’t mountains. And then, mountains are mountains again.“ - some Zen quote

No one knows what God is because God is no one. And no one knows that.

@Juliano Zn You're welcome!

Not only that, Oregon decriminalized simple small-amount possession of all drugs, even cocaine and heroin.

lol oh god