Princess Arabia

No, I'm not stepping on roaches, they're bugging me and in the room where they might get sprayed.😏its ok, i'm good now. That energy is dissolving and going elsewhere. Thanks for your quirky words. They made me smile.

I understand and I also apologize for how I came off at you by saying "don't tell me to let it go". Its just I'm tired of the one to always having to let go of the bullying I receive on this forum by certain types of guys. I know you didn't mean any harm and I respect that, but, come on, it's getting a bit out of hand. Someone here told me the same thing with the preety India issue, let it go. Not much said to the perpetrators. It's starting to seem personal at this point on their end and I'm responding to that. Never any reason for their animosities towards me.

If you notice, i do, it's only certain types of guys that wants to fuck with me on here. No matter how much disagreements I have with certain types, I never run into a problem nor disrespect. It's always respectfully agreeing to disagree this includes schizophrenia, breakinthe wall, davino, and many others who don't disrespect others. I just sense a projection and I sense it being personal for them. They will fuck wit me and take my response to "not them" but the op personally. If that's not picking on, and projecting their personal views about me on me, I don't know what is, and I'm never initially responding to them in the first place. The result, Arabia, let it go and shut up. The paper trail is there, go read it.

Don't tell me to let it go. Nobody ever tell the guys to let anything go only the females. Did you read the whole convo, I think he's the one that needs to be told to let it go not me. I'm starting to really hate being on a male-dominated forum. It sucks. But I'm not here for all that, so I can suck it up. I never start anything, I only try to stick up for myself when there's an obvious projection of something other than having a discussion or a disagreement. What's wrong with saying the words I, achieve, and enlightenment shouldn't be used in the same sentence, if it's how I feel. Thats all I said and I got chewed out by an onlooker. Goddamit, I should just not speak at all. I bet plenty here would love that. Too much woman talk. Silence her. Let it go Arabia, not hey leelajoker you didn't have to be so harsh and mean ; instead you called his disrespect "a poke".

I never told anyone what they should or shouldn't do. I merely said what words shouldn't even be in the same sentence as a remark which I'm entitled to do on a public forum. Your remarks didn't move me one bit. They were harsh remarks that were addressed to someone who wasn't even addressing you in the first place. All I said was the words I achieve and enlightenment shouldn't be used in the same sentence and you cursed be out like a step child suggesting I shouldn't use the word shouldn't. How ironic. What's up with you guys here on the forum with your bullying ways. You don't scare me.

Yes, sir. Next time I'll stay silent. Yes, sireee. Nothing new here. I'm used to be silenced. Seems to be a trend here. I treated this one kindly though, you got off on this one. Next time I might not feel so kind.

You'll always seem stuck if you insist on a "you". That's where you're stuck at and keep thinking there's something to do like surrender or open up. If you can just drop all that, a revealing might happen where the self is illusory and all just is and nothing to do because this is already it.

I'm not sure anything arises from anything, but I do agree there's an openness that is possible to allow for the sense of self to "open up" or see things not as object/subject, but it happens all on it's own and without a cause or an effect and is not done by anyone but the body naturally opens to this.

You're assuming I meant it as an achievement. I never used that word nor did I mean it as such. Plus I'm not claiming enlightenment.

"Everything" is empty, no substance and doesn't have it's own reality. Yes, nothing is being everything and appearing as and can be full or empty depending on how you want to look at it. There are no potentials, it's immediate and appears as...potential suggests time and space. It is also every seeming potential. So, potential is nothing appearing as potential and is not full of it.

See, I didn't have to prove anything. I invited you into my world of direct experience.

🥰I won't argue with you.

It's not difficult, it's impossible. Cannot detach from all there is and what's not separate.

Oh boy, you're doing the same thing here. Who are you to define what I should or should not express about how I feel about enlightenment.

Ok, will check them both out.

No limits mean unpolarized and unpolarized suggests neither dead nor alive. It is full and empty simultaneously. You say it's alive because it has no limits; well, that's a limit - to be alive.

This is like a night dream, except there's no one dreaming. The person is the dream. One doesn't say in a dream, this hammer doesn't hurt because it's just a dream, that shit hurts in the dream. Is the dream really happening or going anywhere or does it have a center or location. Is there a self in the dream. No one wakes up from the dream because there's no one and a dream to wake up from. When the body dies, the body dies and there's no one left to know that. There's no one here already, this is appearing as a sense, a sense that senses there's a person in this body. The body doesn't need a person to operate, it does it all on it's own. Decisions are decisions and actions are seeming to happen but no one is doing that.

Sure, why even discuss that, that's quite obvious. We're discussing the thing that's not that obvious and what really is the case. Locality is illusory, perspectives are illusory, there is no real substance to anything. Can't have totality...but. It is either total or it's not. The illusory stuff just isn't happening and doesn't exist. The only thing real is nothing which is appearing as everything and an appearance is void of substance.

No one is disputing the fact that feelings aren't felt and things aren't appearing as something is happening. Arguing that to drop a hammer on the foot and see if it doesn't hurt is not a valid claim to say that something is definitely happening because of that or that there's someone actually feeling anything. There's no proof there and nothing can be proven either.

There is no self and nothing is really happening, as for there to be something really happening, there has to be time and space existing on their own and this has to be going in a direction. This is directionless and isn't coming from anywhere nor going anywhere. If there is no observer time and space isn't a felt sense just as in sleeping.

There is no illusion. The only illusion is the appearance of a separate self. The illusion is the sense that there are people walking around in these bodies. The illusion is the one that thinks it's at the center and is located somewhere in time and space. It's a felt sense. It feels real, very real, very very real. To the point where it invents stories and ideas around it's existence and now every thing that appears is in relation to it. I'm over here and it is over there. That's the only illusion. There is no self as in a real person having free will in these bodies.

Lol

lol. The words "I", "achieved" and "enlightenment", shouldn't even be used in the same sentence. It's like a mixed match sandwich.

I guess you didn't notice her last paragraph. Same as you're saying here.

OK, so then I'm safe. Thanks.