Princess Arabia

If you're aware that it's toxic behavior then you're only unconsciously hurting yourself. If you're unaware that it's toxic, you're still only hurting yourself. So, just from it being toxic period, it's of no value, only survival based. Nothing wrong with that, but eventually the so-called "value" will become invaluable in the long run.

The degree to which you love yourself is the degree to which you are capable of showing and giving love. So saying you'll love yourself more than a woman doesn't mean you're showing her less love than yourself, it only means that's how much you're capable of loving yourself.

What you're saying here i get, but I was referring to the fact you said "toxic". I'm assuming you know they are toxic but still stand by them, that's what I was responding to, not just merely having principles or boundaries and stating upfront who you are as a person. If one has toxic principles and are aware they are toxic, and will stand by them no matter what, that,s a wounded individual, that's why I used the word. Maybe your use of the word toxic altered your meaning. Also, stop saying I know nothing about game because I'm the one the game is being played on. I'm the referee in your game. I decide if it works or not. I may not need to learn fame but u sure know how to referee it.

This right here is coming from a hurt individual. A wounded character. If you're going to go into a relationship with a woman, boundaries needs to be set into place but cannot be selfishly and strictly based on principles that are only for your own gratifications. Compromise is key, and the other's best interest. You say if your principles are toxic then, oh well, I won't change them for a woman because that'll make me weak, ilm assuming that's the reason; but that's exactly what makes a man weak when he's not flexible enough to accommodate the woman in his life even if it means to adjust his own toxic principles. This is saying I don't care about you, I'm only protecting my wounds.

What he said is what happens a lot, the most beautiful or the most handsome is not always who gets laid the most or even gets approached the most. Doesn't matter especially with men, beautiful women will get more attractions but men need to step up their game more and it has nothing to do with looks.

This is the KEY right here. It is kind of pointless to ask if women are attracted to looks because that depends on who's looking. What some fail to understand is that just because one is attractive, even if EVERYONE in the whole wide world thinks that person is attractive, it doesn't mean everyone will find them SEXUALLY attractive. We're not talking about a modelling contract here or trying to hire someone for a poster event, we're talking about sexual attraction and people have different things they are turned on by. An ugly girl with long legs could attract a guy who just loves long-legged girls or big boobs or curly hair or whatever, but when it comes to women, for the most part what attracts us is a guys personality; but don't get me wrong, i didn't say he has to have a good personality or one of high caliber. He can still be an ass a jerk a moron - whatever, or kind, gentle and compassionate, but that's what attracts her most not his looks. When a guy approaches, yes she's looking at his looks but that alone will not deter or repel her nor the opposite, his game, personality and how he makes her feel is more important. Not his butt size or lack of a six pack or beard.

I'm not saying these are the only criteria or even what they set out to do consciously. People of good quality and positive traits and characteristics will still have vain ways about them and doesn't mean its the only thing that they look at when it comes to settling down in a monogamous relationship. What you're saying is great and should be why people are together but certain things are inherent and are not even done on a conscious level and are sometimes survival based.

That's just a belief. And not one with any merit either. You're just going off of assumptions here. Probably looking at groupies and women who are really just gold-diggers and who provide no value and who might not care about fame or status and will just milk you just for milking sake. Just because a woman likes men of status or high-value (which can be defined differently) doesn't mean she's a gold digger or is of low quality. That's just a personal assessment and carries no weight.

No, that I need to look better than you, is how most attractive women feel. That you won't be in the mirror longer than me and that you won't spend too much on your looks and spend it on me instead, and that you don't outshine me physically. Outshine me in status, personality, accomplishments etc., but not looks. That's how they think, indirectly. Subconsciously.

Please don't ask Leo about how much does looks play a role in relationships or influences a man's attractiveness. @kamillsaid it perfectly. Of course, if you're dried up and look like a bum on the street or dirty and smell like garbage it won't work so well, but that's the obvious and works both ways, but on a general scale most women don't really care and, listen to this, because it's very important ESPECIALLY THE HOT, VERY FEMININE ATTRACTIVE ONES. They're not running around seeking handsome dudes with muscles, a six pack and who dresses like Don Juan, they are mostly attracted to men's traits, character and personality - whatever that may be. The looks is just an added bonus.

Yeah, makes sense.

Grandma ain't making the laws. Sorry. Most people in politics are stage red or orange. I noticed you didn't mention these stages. Even the so-called stages you've mentioned have engaged even if it's by patronizing.

I'm in the sex industry, sorry. Speaking from direct experience.

Didn't even knew it was possible to be something or someone other than yourself in a dream. Anytime I've dreamt, that I can remember anyway, I was always myself. Not the same character I am now as in doing the same things and having the same friends, but me as a person. I dream a lot about celebrities. Like me and Beyonce are friends in the dream and I'll be hanging out at her concert or me and 50cent hanging out in a platonic way. Beyonce more than once, and it felt so real. More celebs but I can't remember who exactly now cause it's been erased. I think J-lo and Mariah and Puffy. BTW, is it true you can never die in your dreams. Someone told me that, but idk if it's true or not. I've never died in my dreams, but have come close. Always woken up at the verge when I was about to. I used to dream of plane crashes and one would crash three days later in real life. Not in a while with that one though.

Nothing to do with morals. These law makers don't care about morality. It's mainly because these girls aren't paying taxes. Just like selling drugs, drug dealers don't pay taxes. They legalized marijuana and now they're getting their cut. It's a lucrative business. Always look at the monetary side of things before you see morality. People's best interest isn't in mind when it comes to making laws, it's about dollars and cents. Now, in order to legalize the sex industry a lot has to be considered, that's why it's not that popular. Not sure of all the details but nothing to do with morals. Neighborhoods and vicinities are sometimes a factor because of what goes with the industry. Ilm referring to the US anyway.

These girls aren't out there enjoying the act, no. They just tolerate it and do their job. Porn is different. You'll find most enjoy it their but mostly because they're drugged up. It's not common to find females enjoying sex with strange men. Also bear in mind the sex industry doesn't always involve intercourse. Sex work entails a variety of things.

Ok, great.

Nice story and it was entertaining to read. I also frequently visit my local health food store and everybody there are friendly and helpful with pleasant demeanors. Even the patrons. It's a different kind of atmosphere like all the time with very few exceptions. Reason is, frequent shoppers there are usually healthy eaters and you can just feel the vibe which can sometimes even rub off on the employees.

I get you. I also agree. I should have said irrelevant in what way, because I didn't mean irrelevant on a general scale or just in general, but compared to the big picture.

Since you've been back, I've noticed a different aura about you. More freeing, less weight more fluid.

Why are you trying to Absolutely satisfy. When you eat and feel satisfied, don't you get hungry again. Do you ask how do you satisfy your hunger for good with one pop everytime you get hungry, no you just eat, and then eat again. There's nothing to satisfy. The egoic mind cannot understand this because it's what's trying to satisfy itself. The egoic mind can never be satisfied. Just experience life and all the joys it has to offer including the need to feel satisfied. See it for what it is. Illusory. Don't get attached to it. Just eat. You will get attached, but also see that for what it is. Temporary.

Ok, cool.

Is the Absolute EVERYTHING, or does it embrace everything; because that's duality. "IT" and "embraces" implies something doing something. This sentence implies separation.

I don't think so. Why? Because the mind is still focusing. The objective is to train the mind to be still. How can focusing on a theme to contemplate be the most powerful practice. To me it would be to not focus at all, just be. The ability to concentrate would probably be what that practice would be useful for. Not saying silence with no distraction, only that just being silent with no distractions is enough.

Autistic, are we. Amazing how you noticed that. Do you attribute that to your autistic behavior. I'm genuinely curious.