Princess Arabia

Wrong. It's OK you feel that way but I'm being misunderstood here, that's how it seems anyway. Ok, too. When shit hits the fan and whatever happens after that, and the response that occurs is what will be. Doesn't matter about stability. Doesn't matter how in oneness i am with anything. Doesn't matter if I suffer till kingdom come. Doesn't matter. You're saying this as if it'll change what happens and the responses that follow. When shit hits the fan is a fear tactic, the "shit" is not hitting the fan right now and if and when it does, it'll be what happens.

I don't think that figure is right. I remember a time when it used to say for a few weeks 4,000, 2000, 3,000, then it plummeted back down to the hundreds in days, then shot back up, then plummeted again. I don't think its accurate.

This is the secret. Shhhhhh. See how OP shot you down with his limited belief. I know he'll probably tell this pretty girl it's not true, when whenever not so attractive guys approached me with confidence how I tend to just about always welcome them. For some reason I'd usually find those ones more interesting. I've never really been described as hot, usually pretty or beautiful more beautiful, so I don't know if that counts as hot, but either way I usually got approached by short or not so attractive guys, but they were usually confident or funny and that usually works as long as they didn't stink or were super super super unattractive or rude.

😒😒

You cannot be anything but what's appearing as yourself. We think we're special and have our own minds, thoughts, ideas, etc when that's all just illusory. These are the kinds of problems the individual that sees itself as a separate entity will run into and these comments are enforcing that. It will never work because you're not making those choices. If you were, you wouldn't be on here asking how not to be what you're appearing as. Now you make a thread how you hate Leo who is also in the same boat because he can't help what he's appearing as either.

@DavinoSomehow, except for our preferences in processes and differences in the type of work you do VS mine, I think we have a similar way of seeing certain things and can see beyond the spectrum. After re-reading my post I could see why you thought it was a good post; but more importantly, where you saw apparent biases and your train of thought that led you to that conclusion. (I believe, anyway). I think you read into certain aspects as me complaining about why certain things are the way they are and that it isn't fair it is that way and left it at that. I think most of you saw it that way. I was trying to say, it doesn't seem like that is what's ACTUAL but only APPEARS to be the case. It's not that some are left out to fend for themselves, but because there's no actual person in those positions and we are all the same and that those certain circumstances aren't really happening but only appears to be the case. If we were to erase all narratives, ideas about what's happening, thoughts about them, our own interpretations, it wouldn't have any meaning whatsoever and would be neutral in the Absolute sense. It's only because we see ourselves as individuals and everybody else as such why it appears that some are more privileged than others, when in fact no one is any better off than the next. My post was very long and it would have taken a lot more explanation to really get at the core of what I was really getting at, and it just seemed like I was being biased when I wasn't really. But I didn't want to turn it into a book so I tried to get in what I was pointing to without getting too much into it. I think with a little deeper look and with this response, you'll be able to really see what I was pointing to which is that there is actually no teachings required, no one is left behind, no processes needed to become anything as there's actually no separation and it's all the Absolute appearing as limitations and some getting left behind. Either way, nothing has to change and it's utter perfection because the Absolute cannot be anything but.

Nah, it just appears that way to the individual. I wasn't really trying to say, why did God give him looks and not some, I'm past that stage, what I'm pointing to is much deeper than that and i think you miss the deeper aspects to what my post was pointing to.

Glad you enjoyed. Seems like you understand where I was coming from with it, more than most. I don't get the biases to what is part, but I'll read it again to see what part I believe you're seeing as such. Maybe it was more disagreements than biases, but maybe not.

Oh ok. "Monkey gene", that was funny.

Well, this is what I'm talking about in respect to my original post. I don't like the word unfair so I used the word privileged but that also has an underlying connotation linked to it as if I'm looking for a free ride or nothing to work for. I'm not sure what word to use at this point, but I don't think this should be an advantage for anything - looks. You had no control over that and this is just leaving others feeling inadequate and having to go through therapy to deal with the after effects or feelings of low-self esteem and low-confidence. My point though, was not that it should or shouldn't be so, but it's not actually the case even though it appears that way and that there's actually no one actually being left out because of "non looks", in this case and that it is all just illusory. I don't want to get into that but, in your case, it's perfect in making my point. Actually, you hit the nail on the head, because now you are thinking it's because you were born with good looks so you are fortunate and others aren't. This is what I meant by privileged. @Leo GuraMiguels case is perfect for what my post is about, even though it's just an example. Why should he be more privileged to get girls because he was born with looks. Isn't this favoritism on God's part. I don't think so but I'm just saying teachings that don't include the whole I can't get pass.

Thank you

We don't even have to go as far as prostitutes, just regular women will suffice. Most of these guys aren't the prostitute types, most of the men that see pros, especially on a regular bases actually love women and treat them with respect and understand that the women are worth something more than just a quick lay but it's not in their agenda and life choice to marry them or befriend them, so they do the next best thing to equal out things and everyone's happy. Most of these guys are trying to get laid the traditional way, but are just too entitled and don't see the need to work for it somehow.

You definitely have a knack for exaggeration, it definitely makes me chuckle sometimes.

Your mind works a lot differently than the average guy's. You're an exception to most. Not saying all, but from the stuff I see here on this forum, most have developed a temporary discontent and overall dissatisfaction.

Guys are getting angry over approaching and developing hatred for women over their lack of getting laid but women haven't became any more meaningful.

You wouldn't have known the difference, since you'd have nothing to compare it with.

ok

You of all people shouldn't get any answers handed down. You were born with answers locked in that forehead. You just need to find the right key. 😜

These are indeed great ones for practicality. I've seen all these. Very well put together.

Not sure what you're trying to say here.

Thanks, I took a short one and that's all that was needed. Boom, there it was, right before my eyes. Still is. Beauty is, belief or no belief, it's still the Absolute. Total freedom.

This means nothing. I'm not discrediting the use of psychedelics, nor what you're saying to be the case. But it still means nothing in the Absolute sense. I already realized the no control, no free will, no other and all that. I don't need to go get terrified to understand anything. Not necessary. I can still say what I wanna say and so can you. I can still believe what I wanna believe and so can you. You don't have authority to say what's true for one to not be the case and say they know nothing. You're right because there's nothing to know. It's happening as we speak. No time, so how can anything be known, no one, so whose experiencing. Let's not get into that, and I'm not saying you're wrong or right but I have a different view on things and you have no right to want to change that without being asked and insinuate noone knows anything because no one knows everything. How do you know who hasn't had a mystical experience or not. You make a lot of assumptions in your posts and you tend to think you're above the rest in your knowledge and teachings, and tend to discard others'. I don't think mystical experiences are that big of a deal in the Sbdolute sense. How can it. There's no separation. None of what you say makes sense only intellectually, rationally, logically and to the naked eye will look all mighty and dandy. It is the case what you say but you are missing the piece of Absolutism, no separation, I don't care how you rationalize the oneness aspect by saying whatever you say. How can there be consciousness when consciousness is separation. You speak with clarity and all that and very eloquently and do make sense, but the Absolute is unknowable so all that are concepts and theories and ideas. How can an illusion create non-illusion. Idk, I'm not going to get into this with you, as I respect you and think you're highly advanced and I could be the one talking shit but that's on me and will get to whenever it happens. A lot of what you say I agree with and even say the same thing its just I don't think you understand that this is Absolute Aliveness which I've become aware of so-to-speak, and it gets discredited by you in saying all the time I'm parroting and using words that aren't mine. I even made a post about it but no i have to do psychedelics or I'm not qualified, which is bull. I'm coming from a place of not being exposed to all these fancy teachings and have not been too indoctrinated with all those fancy labels and gurus so for me it's more natural and raw. A lot of repetitious exposure can lead one to see certain things without the use of any chemicals and can happen spontaneously as with me so I don't have to be scared shitless to realize the Absolute. I don't need to see fingers on a wall and elephants under my bed.

Yeah, exactly, except the "and that's now a problem" part. It's not a problem. There are no problems in the Absolute sense.

Forget what I said above; but to answer your original question, watching horror flicks here and there won't affect the subconscious. Maybe the subconscious was already impressed with so-called dark stuff, as you put it, why they are watching dark stuff. Many "dark" people get attracted to Spirituality in the first place because they are seeking the "light", are depressed, suffering, anxiety ridden and lost, so movie preferences won't change because of some Spiritual teaching. It takes at least approximately 90days to impress the subconscious and it takes an identity shift for that to be implemented, but that's if you want to go that route. Another route is to say, it's just a matter of taste and doesn't matter in the Absolute sense and calling something "dark" over "light" is just a duality and there's no difference but only what the individual sees it to be subjectively.

Ok, thanks.