Princess Arabia

I don't care how much one claims to have awakened, have higher consciousness, know about Reality and the likes, etc, if you're a human being and is operating on that level, you are and will not be any different than the average Joe. There's no you and the average person, there's you and other. There is only having more knowledge or understanding better or more familiar with or maybe a higher IQ or EQ. It's the same as having a bigger house, a more luxurious car, living in a fancier neighborhood, wearing a more expensive watch, fancier clothes, than the average guy. Celebrities, depending on who they are inside, might feel a sense of superiority over their fans or the regular person. They might feel they're better than. Not just celebs but also whites against blacks, rich against poors, pretty VS ugly, all sorts of ways people feel they're better than. It's the same thing with highly spiritual people. Now they're too conscious for the next man and categorize them as average or conversations now seem one-sided because their views and knowledge is far superior to the average thinker and they weigh and measure instead of seeing it as just a conversation to be had, to enjoy, to experience, to possibly learn from or about the other. It's about my need to express myself and you're just too dumb to grasp what I'm saying and because of that, I'm feeling this isn't getting me what I want. I kinda used to be the same way when I first got into spirituality. I used to think people who didn't think like me in this aspect or people who engaged in 'low conscious' ways of thinking or being were not on my level and average. This only lasted for a short while when life put me in check. Life showed me there is no other that's beneath or above. Only different. It showed me that my judgements of them were my own insecurities and that the moment I felt this way is the moment I went backwards in my quest for relative unification - the reason why I find spirituality interesting and meaningful in the first place. LOVE. I'm limited and unconditional love is something I'm not capable of because everything is and I'm just a sublet of that so it's impossible, but I can at least try to represent that as much as I can. Thinking I'm better than or more than or above only sets me back in this way. Life will teach you things if you let it. If one at least try to understand that it's not about us. It's not personal. It's hard because of survival and the egoic structure but we suffer because of it and we're not seeing how it's all about the differences and the similarities. I try to learn everyday, to incorporate unity and love the best I can even though I'm still corrupted and seeking for ways to survive. I've accepted that. I've also accepted that it cannot be any other way. So when I encounter people now, I try to allow them to express themselves, share themselves how they feel the need to or want to or like to and i either share along those levels, if appropriate, if they're listening and allow for a smooth engagement of conversation and see the beauty in that or I cut it short if I feel a sense of irritation because I'm just not resonating, but not on a judgmental level but because I will not resonate with everyone. It could be where they're being disrespectful or maybe too controversial or something on those levels, but not because I feel I'm above them and they're beneath me either intellectually or spiritually. If it's one thing I'm very good at and that's holding a conversation. My line of work gave me a lot of practice here and I'm a very good conversationalist. I know how to keep it balanced and I'm fairly knowledgeable in quite a number of fields even if it's just enough to carry and hold a casual conversation, so there's plenty of room there for me to express and allow for the other's expression. I see in everyone the same thing.....Absolute perfection. The only difference is how I relate to them, respond to them and the way they make me feel. That's the difference in being human and how I see the differences. I will not try or attempt to resonate with everyone like everyone, love everyone, accept everyone....that's asinine, but what I can do is not see them as above or beneath me, not even as equal, but simply just see them as how they've presented themselves and respond accordingly.

Hope they read him his rights.

Ok, so the word seem is the key point here. All depends on whose looking because "seem" implies that. I get your whole point and it is well-taken. I'm not agreeing or disagreeing because I think it's a matter of personal opinion but I do think most people are biased and one-sided when it comes to this issue and are basing their opinions and views only on how they see it and not what's actually the case which is only natural and to be expected. Kind of the same thing where one doesn't care about something they're not aware of that's not personal to them and or are affected personally by. By aware of I mean crushing an ant with your feet while walking or smashing a nuisance fly or running over a turtle - that is not an issue for the person concerned about animals being tortured for food. It's all conditional and depends on. This is why I don't get too involved in the issue because all sorts of reasonings and rationalizations are at play.

@Natasha Tori Maru @ExploringRealityOk, I see. Both have similar views. The morality you speak about comes from a sense of right and wrong, I assume, which also comes from a sense of a higher purpose, which stems from a sense of hierarchy over yourselves which I suspect is God, which I suspect to whom this sense of morality subjugated you into subordinance over it. So, this hierarchy which gave you free will and choice by your admission, can bring upon these animals whatever it chooses, but you as a subordinate under it (morality-based) cannot "will and choose" from this free will given to you to do as it does. In other words, it can use itself to kill animals because it's not personal but you are personally judged and condemned if you do with the free will it has bestowed upon you. Is that right?

Reprogramming The Subconscious: Who would be reprogramming it. This suggests there's a you and there is a subconscious mind that's not you. What is operating this mind. It's programming. How is this programming recognized. Who is it that sees a program that needs to be reprogrammed. You are a person that has a subconscious mind that has been programmed. Now you don't like its programming and want to change it to another program. The subconscious mind's programming - who is it running. Who is it controlling. You? If the subconscious is running you and controlling you, what is it that's causing the need to reprogram your controller. Is it this same subconscious mind. Is the subconscious mind the one that wants to reprogram itself or is it you. If it's the subconscious mind that wants to reprogram itself, this makes no sense. This is like expecting an apple to reprogram itself to turn into an orange. If it's you that wants to reprogram the subconscious, then if it's the one running you, then it's pretty much the subconscious wanting to reprogram itself. If it's neither, then what is it that thinks the subconscious needs reprogramming. If there is a you separate from the subconscious, why do you need it. Just distance yourself from it and do whatever the hell you want. You can't? Why not? You are being run by this mind and need it to function? Then how do you know this subconscious mind isn't playing games with you and fooling you that it needs reprogramming. Which one is it. Is there a separate you from this mind, is this mind separate from you but is controlling you and your actions or is the two inseparable. Either way, none of it makes sense. Not saying it can't be done but that it doesn't make sense. Nothing does in the dream. I will expose it all until there is nothing left.

Every image is it.

Who? - There is no who. What? - It's Nothing and Everything. How? - Unanswerable or as a Concept. Where? - Nowhere and Everywhere.

I really don't want to debate this issue but I'm curious to what you would say when asked how you view the issue of mother nature sending her wrath with hurricanes, floods and tsunamis and all the animals in the way gets killed. What is the difference with that and people killing animals when it comes to how you feel and do you see it differently.

No matter how far the ego goes or how many awakening it has, it's always shooting for more. Why? Because it's trying to get somewhere but will never get there. So it makes up some story about how it will take numerous awakenings and how there's always more somewhere down the line. It will get to a point of "almost", but will never cross it because it doesn't even know itself what it's awakening to. Life is about more. Without it, there's nothing because what appears and disappears is no longer there and if more doesn't appear then nothing will.

When you get to University level education it means you can understand Kindergarten level. One doesn't belong in University who hasn't passed through kindergarten levels. To understand something at a lower level means you've been pass that stage. Maybe up your level a bit and then they won't seem like lower level but only where they're at. No one criticizes a kindergarten student for not being at University level; it's understood that's where they're at and without judgement. All your posts shows criticisms and judgements. That's not coming from a higher level but a form of low-level thinking.

Direct Experience Is Not King/Key: How can direct experience be that. Humans are confused and delusional. If we're going off of our senses which are not reliable because we can lose any of them at anytime. Sense of smell, taste, touch, sight and hearing..,,,people lose them all the time. So now, what is that person who cannot hear, see, taste or smell going off of. When you taste an apple you know what an apple tastes like and it cannot be described. One has to directly taste the apple. What happens then to that someone that cannot taste. What is their direct experience of that apple. How can they say they have direct experience of what an apple taste like. Apply this to anything. It's not the apple you're tasting, it's the sense of taste that's being applied to the apple. Taste a banana and that tastes differently using the same sense. If everything is one and distinctions are being created by the mind, how can one say that their direct experience of tasting an apple and a banana is king when someone else doesn't and cannot use the same sense because they don't have it, It's only king to you within your experience. Can't deny that, but it's not king in general. Going through something in life has to be interpreted for it to be processed and understood, and we all process things differently. One cannot even have an experience of God, because God is everything. How can we truly be experiencing anything if there's no real time, no real space, everything is one and there's no separation. We would have to debunk all of that first to then say there's true experiencing.

Why is this Love and how is this perfection: Perfection is easy. How can ONE be anything other than perfection. There's nothing outside of it to compare it to. So, it has to be perfection by default. Humans have their own meaning of perfection that's why it's so hard to see this as perfection. Anyhow, anyway, any(whatever) way one wants to describe this is also perfection. Anything that happens, appears, arises, thought of, remembered, consume, created, says, anything and everything is perfection. How can it not be if that's what's arising or appearing. It's perfection appearing and arising as limited and imperfect. It's only limited and seems imperfect to an observer. That observer isn't really observing anything, only appears that way, seems that way, and now the observer has thoughts and ideas about what's appearing. Whatever it says about what's appearing isn't true or false because how can anything be true or false in ONE. It just is. Those thoughts and ideas are also perfection. It's only within the dream of separation where things become unreal, tainted, biased, perceived, believed....and now a whole new world is formed. That energy is filled with resistance and constraints and therefore becomes contracted and a sense of self emerges. That's the so-called observer that is conscious and aware but only in the dream. This now is where humans come in into thinking they live in a world and have a life and lo and behold everything is imperfect and needs fixing. The rest is history. How is it love. How can it not be. Whole and complete =Love. Not the Love that we're used to calling love but metaphysically. There can only be anything else if there's an observer. If there is only ONE, what's outside of it to judge, hate, condemn, envy, etcetc. We could also call this hate if we wanted to. These are just words we use but we say love because it's definition has the closest meaning to what's being said here. We could even call it air-bag. What's being suggested here is that it's all the same, no attributes, no meaning, no purpose, no substance, no anything, it's empty and void of anything. How can that not be LOVE. Like I said, it's the closest word we have to explain this and it's not that it's LOVE because that's still a definition and this is indescribable, but to explain using words and language it's what we have and everyone can relate to the word love. If we take away all words, descriptions, labels and meaning what's left is this purity and in the end it doesn't matter what you call it, call it French fries if you may. So, it's not that it's LOVE perse it's just pure, whole, complete and has no qualities, untainted. The same way we use other words for God, it's the same thing. It's not the word but the use of the word to understand. *These are my writings, my thoughts my explanations. None of it is a claim, it's just what I've come up with on my own based on the knowledge I've acquired and my understandings. Matter of fact, everything I write here is such.*

It's not the eating of the meat alone that's helping, it's the getting rid of the other stuff that is. Carnivore diet does nothing on it's own but stopping the eating of junk does. Now you think it's the meat doing it.

Such a touching story. Most unique one I've ever seen. Beautiful.

Yes, and I've felt the effects. That's the magic of existence. The body touching itself and an I that feels it. Without this feeling, I'd be dead. So, the energy that calls itself an I, touches itself and I claim to feel it and says I felt that touch. There's just touching happening. Now let's get back to Reality where i touch myself.

@SchizophoniaIt's fine by me and i don't care about your errors. I'm just showing how your own obvious writings are filled with errors for you to proofread with such accuracy all on your own. I make errors too, so this is not a criticism or judgement, just a pointer. I'll leave it here.

I'll start and end here. Too time consuming to fish for grammatical errors in your posts. This has enough.

Ok. From now on I'm going to nick pit every post and comment you make for grammar, spelling and punctuation. I'll start here.

The ego/self/separation didn't start by you. Therefore, it can't end by you. No one said. Oh shit, I feel a sense of separate self coming on. My, my, here comes the ego, darn it I'm developing a sense of separation. Now I must kill it, I must get rid of it, I feel separate and I must feel a sense of oneness. How silly. This neurotic energy drives humans to the asylum. It's not crazy, it's just lost and is looking for home. The good news is that it's not really happening and everyone is already home. It's just not a personal home like our comfy little or big houses we've constructed to feel safe away from others we've also constructed.

Ok, punctuation, grammar and all. All done by translater. Nice tool.

Some posts are long, some are short. We want everything to fit into our little boxes. Move on if a post is too long and go get your short fix. This is Infinity where diversity is the spice of life. Short enough for you. Point taken?

Yes, because they're looking for entertainment. A quick fix. Shorts seemingly does this to the brain. On to the next, please. I don't have time for this. I'm in a rush to get to nowhere.

It's quite the opposite at times. It can show the clarity and depth one has of understanding the point being relayed. Leo's videos are 3hrs long. Do you say he lacks the clarity to express his message that's why he does it in 3hrs. Provably not.

So you used a translater.

Same thing. God is emptiness. NOTHING, ZILCH, NADA. Can't touch it.