Princess Arabia

Still just an experience within the dream of "I". How can it be when there is no separation. More freer, more happy, less attached are all just appearances, which is all there is - appearances. Nothing solid. Whatever arises is everything, timelessness appearing.

I understand. I was asked a question and that was my response. What you're describing is within the dream of separation which are experiences. We can have a discussion about that too, that cannot be denied. It's all within the scope of wholeness. There's no denying what you're saying, but it's just a story. There is only wholeness and nothing is missing, so it doesn't matter.

Because the Absolute is Infinite. Infinite also includes the form, but the form arises out of the Infinite. Form needs something to arise from. Since Infinity is nothing (no-thing) anything that arises from it has to be nothing by definition. Everything you see is only an appearance. Everything. Its not illusory but empty as in no substance. The illusion is the "I". Can you see an "I". No, you see a body. Can you see stories, thoughts, concepts, ideas. Those are the "knowing energy", which is an illusion. All of those have beginnings and endings. Infinity has no beginning nor ending. Knowing is a point. A point of reference. There is no point in the infinite, so it has to be illusory. The 'I" believes it's real so everything it experiences is also "real". That's the dream. Awareness, consciousness, sense of being are all knowing. That's the dream. There's only experience in the dream of knowing. The dream isn't known because the dream and the dreamer are the same thing.

Energy expands and contracts. Appears in different shapes and forms. Water turns to ice and vapor, same water. Vapor cannot be without the water just as the wave doesn't exist without the ocean. The energy appears from nothing and goes back to nothing. It's all energy. There's nothing but energy appearing in different forms. Falls away just means the wave went back into the ocean and realizes it was never a separate entity to begin with. Not saying there is no illusion, but its just an appearance just as a woman appears to be taller in high heels or a voice louder through a microphone or a lip appearing red with lipstick. The lip didn't actually happen to turn red, it only appears red. Same thing; the illusion is, but only appearing to be what it's not.

Ok I understand. Most people (yes, I said people) suffer to an extent, depending on how deep the neurosis is or gets and the conditioning of the brain. No, I'm not going through any deep suffering. I also have a very curious nature. Curious about life and existence. I'm not using this to self-medicate. I find it fascinating and at the same time recognizing certain things as I go. These things I talk about have become obvious to me. As I observe and see how people respond, react and the things being said and inquired about, it even becomes more obvious. Nothing has been disputed so far and it's something i've resonated with.

What I'm saying is there's only that one energy powering it all. It appears as what we call humans, animals, trees, stars etc. There's no one there. It's empty. It is what's writing this right now, and it is what's responding. I'm not sure what the higher insights and awakenings you're speaking about. It's all ultimately the same. Now, that being said, I'm not disputing there are greater insights, awakenings, even enlightenment, but it's all just appearances. Empty. My saying what I said was just responding to your comment about no one knowing anything. You said it by implying there's actually something to know and we're all just oblivious. I was just saying there's no one to know. Doesn't mean I can't see people and in another conversation i would be saying there's no one and no people, I only brought it up to say doesn't matter if no one knows anything.

Oh ok. I see. Hmmm. Not sure where saying "there are no people" is arrogance. Well, I can; but it's because of the knowledge I've attained about people, other than that all I see are bodies.

I'm not sure what it means to be full of myself. All I said was there are no people. I don't consider that a sermon. If you notice in this response here, this more seems like a lecture and a sermon.

"You" and "the Absolute" are two things. You and the Absolute. This is implying that I'm separate from all there is. No point in telling someone they are the Absolute.

He's dreaming within his own dream that he doesn't have a brain. Yet, it's the brain that's responsible for saying so.

Don't get me started on the man-made concept of Spiritual bypassing.

Sounds like Leo. Are you sure you're not a knock off. Sure, that's fine. Congrats. Your presumed understanding of the knowledge you have attained are just thoughts and thought is matter. You have understood matter.

There's no space. Only the appearance of space. So I'll just be appearing to "keep going", getting to nowhere but only to my imagined destination.

There are no people.

The reason why we search for meaning and purpose. There is literally none for existence. If there were, there would be no reason for the mind to look for one.

This I didn't resonate with as it seems to be implying someone being aware of something; maybe you're referring to the one mind being aware of itself.....

*This*

Love this.

@A Fellow LighterOne of the best posts I've seen on here. Only thing is I would change the word Consciousness with The Absolute. In the end, it doesn't really matter as it's only words. A few stuff i didn't resonate with, as in being aware of.....unless you're not speaking about the individual but the Absolute. This is so fucking awesome. Thanks for this great read.

You got it backwards. There is no "you", only the Absolute appearing as a "you". Call it God if you like. There's no God/Absolute to kill because it is all there is. There's no "once you get you", that's also "playing the game of twoness", according to you. How can a "you" get itself. You're using the you to get the you. It's like saying let's use a hammer to hammer itself. Or use an eye to see itself. Impossible.

The conditioning is in the brain and the brain only responds to stimuli. There's no dissolving duality nor was it entered into by ignorance. It's simply just an appearance and is brought on by the sense of separation. The energy of the "I" comes with it these apparent differences and isn't being done by anyone. It cannot be helped. It is not as if one is "doing this separation", it is the "I" energy that IS the seeming separation. When that falls away, it is revealed to never have been. There's nothing that one does to separate themselves from anything. The energy that arises IS the separation. It's illusory and isn't really happening, only appearing to be. There's nothing the I can do to return to enlightenment because the "I" doesn't exist in the first place. The dissolution cannot take place because how can something that never was, be dissolved. No one can dissolve an illusion. Illusion means it's not there. All of this is fine and dandy, nothing can be done because there's no one doing it. The energy has to fall away on it's own. Certain things will just stop appearing. This message is actually pointless, meaningless. The only thing that can happen is a resonance and an apparent dissolution.

Your mind is playing tricks on you. How do you think you were able to watch Leo's videos? How do think you were able to type those words. How do you think you're able to compute what you've been taught; and also Leo's teachings also say everything is imaginary, solipsism is real, life is a dream and you are imagining him. If you're asking how are brains relevant in these teachings, how do you expect him to understand your question and be able to put it into sentences for you to also understand? The biggest question of them all is who are you speaking to, considering you're going off of Leo's teachings and videos. He said you are the only thing in existence. Do you see how you have turned these teachings into a philosophy and have not quite understood the basis of what is truly being pointed to?

yes

https://www.instagram.com/p/C8cRO8AOg2c/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

One cannot recognize enlightenment. Why? Because once you know something, there is space between you and that knowledge. Enlightenment is being one with everything. If you're one with everything, you cannot possibly know or experience anything. There is no separation to begin with. It is the thoughts that create the space between you and that knowing. "I am Enlightened", is duality. Duality is an illusion. So, the reason people chase enlightenment is because there's no way of knowing you're already enlightened. They're chasing something that doesn't exist. Anyone that says they're enlightened is within their own dream and is having an experience in said dream of the knowledge they already know about enlightenment. If they knew nothing about what they believe enlightenment to be, they wouldn't be able to say they're enlightened. It's all enlightenment. It's all freedom, it's all liberation, but for no one. Only in the dream of separation can one say they are enlightened which never really happened because there's no individual to begin with, it's all appearances, appearing from nothing. There is no ground and no substance to anything, it's all emptiness appearing as form.