Princess Arabia

Sometimes out of reacting compulsively and out of control this may happen and forgivingly so, but it's not necessary or even the more mature way to deal with this. Most times if I've been disrespected or felt that way, my response as long as I'm not in a state as I stated above, is to respond back respectfully but in a stern manner and state that I'm through with the engagement or something appropriate depending on the circumstance. No need to disrespect back and turn two wrongs into a right.

That's the thing. Some men think it's playing games. They're not understanding the psychological part of it when a woman sleeps with a man. They sometimes think we're in disgust mode or don't want to; but the stigma holds when we're so used to be labelled as easy or too willing. Not to mention how prostitutes are labelled VS a man that sleeps a round whoring down the town placing his dick wherever he can. He's cheered on while she's black-listed. Not comparing but associating. Lots of things involved psychologically for the female. Not saying if she does, it's harming her, but it's way more that she has to lose. It's not easy for a way younger female to maneuver this while still interested but wants to make it a choice she won't regret and not seeming like playing games. It's very challenging. Especially if she wants to but more so wants to take her time. Guys thinks because they're so ready and willing that women who are not are just simply playing games. Maybe, but most times it's not a game of I'm just going to let you wait because I can, but my life and feelings are at stake here. Most times it's not even conscious on her part that that's the reason she's the way she is, it's innate. Instead of trying to understand, some men especially the younger one's think all women are like the ones that they label as 'did them wrong'.

No need to much when there's social media and Tinder. Restaurant bars, casino nightclubs and sports bars are the thing these days.

Guys get bored with women, It's easy to get laid with them and harder to commit. Just as you said. Doesn't matter gay or straight.

You're describing exactly what I said earlier (not to you but Leo) about men giving and women receiving. They are both giving and receiving but in direct action she receives and he gives. That's the sexual act itself in a nutshell. It is an expression of love.

Sounds like the typical guy. You're have women problems.

If I had to have sex by being a prostitute, I would have never become one or be in the industry for this long. I'm not lying when I say I'm probably the most sexless (intercourse wise) person on the planet since i've been doing this work. I had more sex as a non-worker than I have in this field. So much so that if a guy's dick is too big I'd give him a refund if he wanted to have sex. My belly would hurt and my pussy torn up. Ok that's way too much info. You guys are just unaware of what established men are willing to pay for. It's sexual in nature, yes, but intercourse is not necessary and far and few. In 10-15yrs of doing this I probably had intercourse like 10x or maybe less because I remember 5yrs straight of none. (in the field, that is).

I think it's because they won't turn it down if available but it's not where true fulfillment lies. (relatively speaking).

I'm just quoting this part, but yes, we tend to not engage for too long before the guy commits to a real date because talking and engaging too long for 'free' can be enough for some to get their 'fix' and just waste your time. It's something one learns in the process. Some initial getting to know is required but some guys will string along, especially if it's on the phone, just to be able to just talk and engage and that'll be enough. It all depends, though, and I'm never referring to street walkers as that's just in a different category that I don't engage in. I've seen where a guy would talk to a female for awhile who didn't know any better and kept his company for nothing on end hoping she'll convince him then a hotter chick cones along who doesn't play around and gives him the sexy look and ge goes straight away with her. The other female list out because she spent too much time cuddling his fancy and he was now ready fir some real fun but she now was in the friend zone and therapist zone.

😅😅it was meant to be.

It's a different kind of growth. I'm assuming you're speaking of learning from these men as opposed to growing because of these men. A man can get a different type of value from a woman than she gets from a man. Without getting into specifics and for brevity's sake, I'm not saying both don't grow but, imo, a man's growth from being with women is more long-term and highly beneficial to him VS a woman's growth where she might only grow from learning in that particular relationship. A man can learn and grow and know a lot about women, pursuit, leadership, confidence, etcetc from just being with one woman. The mile stretches further from him with less effort in terms of quantity. Not sure if that's clear. These are just my opinions, BTW, not absolute facts nor across the board with everyone; there are always exceptions. Not the amount of sex, perse, but the amount of sexual partners. I'm not speaking necessarily monetarily. How many guts of any value do you hear speak of wanting a promiscuous female. The more a woman who is not taken off the market by a particular guy, the more he tends to not value her in terms of long-term monogamous commitment. He will take the sex and string her along but won't invest as much because he's getting the cow for free. I've seen even men on here say how they'd sleep with multiple partners before getting married. They don't value those women as much to invest in them. I'm speaking investment wise.

OK, so the men go there to look for and have sex with women having stimulating small talks with each other.😜

The video wasn't promoting sex. The video wasn't insinuating that the women were there for sexual reasons. It never once said or insinuated or implied anything about sex. You did that. None of those women were selling prostitution. That was a very low blow. There are also male prostitutes but mostly for men and a few older women - not as popular. Prostitution is not a thing because sex is valuable, it's a thing because some people just simply love to pay for it and it takes away the emotional baggage that comes with sex when it's personal. Also because some men find value in being with lots of women. Lots of men are paying women for a lot of things that doesn't involve sexual intercourse, just the mere presence of being with a woman is enough and will engage in activities that doesn't involve intercourse.

Even most of these statements reveal that women are the prize. Like you said, it's not about the sex, it's the value they give. Men are valuable to women too but in a different way (not necessarily speaking monetarily either). Women aren't necessarily growing with their interactions with men as much as men are growing with them. A woman can grow a man quicker in more ways than one than a woman growing from a man - in this way. Women grow by talking to other women and learning from each other. Then they take that growth out with them on their dates. They learn and learn from men, in this context by learning from, or not, from their mistakes. These statements show a woman's value in not in her sex, it's in her being. Infact, the more sex she has the more her value goes down. That's what being the prize means. You guys reveal this all the time without even realizing it because you think being the prize means lucky to be with or better than. It's not.

Maybe, but in what way. Women who feel, think or act in a way like OMG, I don't want to lose this guy because he's so special or what you said previously are pickmeisha females who don't understand their value. I'm referring to guys they just met or barely know, not long-time bfs or husbands.....and even then. BTW, I just watched the nightclub video you just shared on your blog and it speaks volumes about women, their value and how they're the prize. The club isn't lucky to have them there, they are better off and the club's value goes up, not because of the men initially, but because of the women and more so the type of women. They obtain the men's value after the fact and because there are attractive women there that makes them stay. The women are needed for the place to flow, then the men's value comes afterwards. All the women need do is show up and need do nothing but be somewhat attractive. The men are the givers and the doers. That's the dynamic there and that's what makes for something to be a prize amongst other ways. It's not about the men feeling lucky that the women are there. Women add value just for being. Corrupt or not. Your video proves this.

Ever find yourself staring into space for like a quick second; that's like a glimpse into nothingness. The sense of a person apparently came back, but not really because it's not really there. Ever talking to someone and lost your train of thought. It's not your thought, it's thought "thoughting" (already the case), but wasn't being claimed in that moment and it slipped by without a sense of a person claiming it. Nothing can be grasped or held unto and in that apparent moment, that was experienced. Something like a non-dual moment, but not really. No such thing as non-duality. We're just making shit up. No such thing as anything, really. Even Nothing is a made-up word by nothing. It likes to talk about itself and name itself. It's nameless. It's not a void or a black hole, it's nothing. What is nothing? Nothing. Hehe....being everything...which is still nothing....hahahehehoho...i love this shit. Won't be saying nothing when asked what's that hit upside the head.

No two fingerprints alike because this is Oneness. It's like having just one print. There are no exact duplicates of anything and nothing is ever repeated. Infact, there are no things.

The seeker (spiritually speaking) will never find what it's looking for simply because seeking depends on not finding. A seeker never becomes a non-seeker. The seeker dies and it's revealed to not have been but to no one. If there's a sense of a person there it automatically seeks, seeker dies, it collapses and there's no one left to even know the difference.

Life cannot be boxed up and sold as a course. It can be, but that's like buying a stale box of chocolate. It cannot be told as a story. It can be, but that's like taking to a history class. It cannot be reminisced about. It can be, but that's like digging up the grave of a skeleton. It cannot be thought about. It can be, but that's like thinking about your pee after peeing.

This is not what actual being the prize means in these contexts. I won't get into that. So your "lucky one" went from one gender to the next to make it pertinent for one to feel lucky. Not good for either to feel "lucky". If a woman feels like the above mentioned as you've described, that's not a healthy way to feel about oneself and is setting the stage for a dysfunctional relationship whether long or short term, especially for a woman where the feminine is designed to receive and be receptive to what's coming to her in these regards in a healthy way as long as she chooses to do so willingly. What you've described, if a masculine were to act that way, it's not taken as unhealthy or he won't feel some type of insecurities surrounding that because the masculine is designed for competition (competing for a prize), leadership, control and aggression. It's already tempered that way so it won't be off-balanced. You're asking for women to go against the grain to protect the fragile male ego and for a woman to be subservient to a man by relinquishing her own importance in the dynamic, whatever that may be. P,S. You other statements in this comment that I didn't quote I agree with for the most part, so I'm 'rebutting' all of it.

Then you have the nerve to talk about easy sex and knowing what to do to get it. Whose using who there. Guys with these kinds of talks about women make me sick.

Another women are the prize comment. Men aren't worth shit sexually. That's why you can give it up so easily without a care in the world. No value there. The more the better. Like a 99c store. Don't care about the naysayers. I've seen enough to know it's the case. The men who value themselves in this way are out there, not talking to you. Then we knock hookers for charging and give the bargainers a high five. Ugg. Wanting to 'Easy to sleep with' is not saying much about you. Let's hear it, sex is hard to come by...ugg.

Yeah. When I watch him and others like him, it's so beautiful to watch. I just see a body in it's raw form with no care in the world, just being.

Not to veer off topic but rich, beautiful and smart people can get away with a lot in life. He's an example of the smart. Gosh, I had to strain to follow his speaking pattern. Reminds me of rich Elon Musk. He can barely speak too.

This is the dream itself. There's no one dreaming. This is the dream writing itself. There's no escape. No thinking your way out of what's appearing. The dream is dreaming a mind that is powerful. There is no "your anything"; that's the dream. There is no awakening to be owned. There's no one to have an awakening. There's no thinking and projecting your way to perfection. It's all perfection already. Even seeming imperfection is also perfection. There's nothing that can be or needs to be done. It's already done. Just not for anyone and there's nothing for anyone because there isn't anyone. Whom am I talking to? No one. Energy responding to energy through empty words. THIS is playing with itself, but I don't like this game - there is no I, so my shit's outta luck.