Princess Arabia

Just curious as to who you'd choose based on the last sentence in my comment (if you can take a look) who would you choose in that situation. I gave my answer there in my comment. Just curious.

Neither one for me in the looks category; but also remember that even when a woman can only see looks and nothing else, her radar can scan the guy for more than just his looks. She can tell (or is assuming, because she's not always right) a little but about if he'll be right for her just based on his looks alone - to a certain degree of course. No one knows for sure before you get to know the other person so we're speaking about even just the idea of giving him the opportunity to get to know her and to date or go out or whatever. Guys judge women on their looks a lot and tend to think women are as looks-oriented when, they are, but it's the kind of looks that she can tell would be suited to her based on her age and level of development and not necessarily if he's hot or not. The first guy is a little bit too hard on the eyes and the second one a little too easy; not manly looking enough. If I was caught in a corner, though, and my life dependent on choosing one i'd choose the first.

Thank you. You got the drift of what I'm saying here. I don't really talk to people any more about Leo and his content. I did when I first discovered him until I realized I was really unto something here because people were disinterested or couldn't compute what the hell i was saying. I'm talking about before I even got so deep into spirituality. I was like a kid in a candy store. Now it's more engrained and first nature and embodied and who goes around talking about their hands. The topic at hand was more about human behavior and I figured I would try to explain the not so obvious, but to someone who was not so ready to hear it. I really don't see anybody else online discussing the topic at all in such depth as Leo does, so I couldn't reference anyone else; but the post was more about how I found myself having to explain away how I don't condone such behavior from tyrants more than them even trying to understand where I was coming from. This is a perfect example of you live and you learn; because it's not so much about Leo and his teachings, but topics that are metaphysically philosophical. I'll just stick to the "yeah, people are just assholes and this is just life" theories from normies when having a conversation with them.

This is the issue. Even with people here on this forum, it's hard for them to see the nuance.

Not necessary. Criticisms don't enlighten.

Remember this.

Why is it hard for you to communicate without throwing punches at people. You keep saying I don't mean to be rude and no offense. None taken. But the same way, you're saying trying to engage in any meaningful conversation is pointless I could say the same thing. You haven't once asked me any questions about what I truly mean in anything I said, Nor made any queries to ne about what I'm trying to communicate, to be clear yourself that I'm really misunderstanding what he's saying. I'm not saying this is nor isn't the case, but those are signs someone gives to communicate to the other that they are really interested in know clearly and without any doubt that the other person is obviously misunderstanding the message. Maybe it's you that hasn't understood the message, not saying that's the case, but a deeper inquiry and questioning the other is a sure sign that you even care to truly understand what they're communicating and that maybe you're just misunderstanding them. All this doesn't have to be done but to tell the other person with such surety that they are misunderstanding the message, to me, warranties this process. I rest this case thanks for your input.

Stop with this already. lmao . While we're at it he should change the name Actualized.org to Crocodilezed.net lol

Hard to communicate these things with words. People have different definitions for different words. Yes, bad is just an idea so is good.

Ok, you're right. Watch the video that @FlyingLotusshared in the link from his comment to me. It explains it better than I can. You don't have to but, I'm still sticking to what I'm saying and you can keep disagreeing. Nothing wrong with that. I already understood the depth of the message but these things are hard to communicate because they are so radical and profound. Certain points are just being misunderstood and i don't think I can fully communicate them to someone who thinks they already know what I'm trying to communicate.

How can God be selfish when it's formless. We are playing word semantics here. Good in this sense just means it cannot be bad if it's unlimited and infinite. Selfish can only be where there is form. Please don't ask me if a stone is good. A stone is not sentient, it doesn't have feelings.

This is obvious, but surface level thinking. Hate can only come from loving something else and people have different sides to themselves. Ever stop to think a part of someone is hating another part and is using the part they love to destroy the part they hate. What part of a person is it that hates themselves. If that person sees themselves as whole, there would be nothing outside of that whole to hate. So saying someone hates themselves you have automatically divided that person into 'here I am, but there's a part of me that hate the other part". This is what she was trying to point to.

Forget about the AI Leo bot I shared. I read your conversation with gpt-4. It's still missing the point. People are acting from selfish intentions is still on the surface level and trying to explain away why people do what they do. The bigger message here is that God or whatever you call it, is inherently good (not selfish) and is acting through EVERYONE. It just it manifests in different ways and appears to the limited relative mind as bad but nothing bad can come from something that's inherently good without it being "filtered" in some way and can only be perceived by a limited perception as bad.

Beautifully said, thank you.

Ok thank you, I'll check it out.

Beautiful video.

Yes, I touched on it briefly and they even asked me to explain my stance, but they just couldn't see it. I found myself having to keep saying I'm not condoning atrocious behavior and just turned the topic around. Money, power and greed is a surface level understanding on the reasons why dictators act the way they do. Most people are influenced by these things on different levels but we have to go deeper to understand why.

https://chatgpt.com/share/670d6194-db74-8012-a4f7-de8129510d47 I used it to test what it says about People acting from good intentions.

https://chatgpt.com/share/670d6194-db74-8012-a4f7-de8129510d47 This is what Leo AI bot had to say in summary about everyone acts from good intentions.

The heading of the post is a bit misleading as this is not about me spreading Leo's teachings and then having people disagreeing. It's about a conversation that led to a topic that Leo did a video about and could have been used as an explanation, if understood correctly, as to the point i was making in the discussion. Leo is the only person I've been exposed to that has spoken about this topic in such detail and was only using his teaching/video/explanation as a reference point. A POINT THAT I ALSO AGREE WITH because I also can see the depth of what the message was about. This thread is also an example how one can get misunderstood and the details get misconstrued. If you read the post and understood it properly for what it was saying and not what you thought was the case, you would have realized that this isn't about the teachings of Leo but about a conversation I had and used a teaching from Leo's perspective to get my point across. Like using an example of what you're trying to say. This wasn't about you are God and it's all an illusion and you're imagining everything and you will never die. It was a deep conversation but about normal affairs of the world that turned to dictators and how they were bad people and I was trying to show how everyone is actually acting from good intentions; and i found myself having to explain that away but it wasn't well received. Wasn't about spreading Leo's teachings and saying I've stopped spreading Leo's teachings a long time ago isn't what this is about. Sometimes why I write such lengthy posts is so I can make myself clear by sticking in the details i find necessary to accomplish that, but people still read and interpret however they feel and misses the whole point anyway.

This is not about mentioning Leo. It's about having a conversation that led to a topic on a video he made and was trying to use it as a reference. If I knew of another video to reference, i would have done the same with that video. How many videos are there on this topic on yt that one can just reference to off the top of your head.

This topic is being misconstrued. No one is speaking about what's good or bad, and if the actions of people are good or bad. What you described is obviously atrocious, but that's not what the message is about. Watch the video in question and you will see what the post is pointing to. This is why I think Leo is very brave and courageous in putting himself out there with radical topics like these where his is vulnerable to being misunderstood and people misunderstanding the messages he tries to convey. What you've written here, and every thing else under the sun that humans commit unto each other still doesn't stray away from the message that their intentions were still coming from a place where they thought they were doing good but it's not the type of good that we're used to in the description of the word. Don't for once think I'm condoning any of these heinous actions but delving into the psychology of why.

I'm through with that sly, cunning, fox of an ego there. I'm responding to the assumptions you're making about why women post pics online and assuming things. And giving unsolicited advice to men on how to read things and projecting your own boundaries and beliefs. Anyone reading ALL your comments, can tell what you've written here is not ALL you're doing.

Yeah, I eat them once in awhile, I just don't make it a habit.

I've read enough to know you're telling people how to run their relationships as if they're not adult enough to do so. Also, you're assuming women are looking for validation and whatever else you're assuming. Some are, some are not. How will you know which ones are and also SO WHAT. It's just another way to do what you've also done at one time another in your life. SAUGHT VALIDATION. Who cares. I don't see them murdering people and doing mass shootings, go focus on how to stop those and leave people and their relationships that didn't ask you anything alone.