Princess Arabia

There is no you and yourself for anything to be between. Your and self are two, the you and the self. Where is the you and where is the self when there's no separation but only as an illusory dream.

Great, you're on the road to recognition. The recognition that there's no one that needs saving, no teachers, no gurus, nothing to hold unto, nothing to grasp and that everything is nothing being everything. This is not an accomplishment because the seeker is just an illusion and only appears to be a seeker. It doesn't matter if one seeks or not because it's all wholeness appearing as such. The only difference is that something within wholeness might recognize itself and the seeking energy might fall away on it's own. You are just an effect, a by-product of this energy that appears to be a seeker and there's nothing no one can do to undo anything because it's not really happening and there's no one to do or not do anything. Even the recognition is not happening to anyone, it's wholeness appearing as someone that recognizes.

Yes. It's all inseparable anyway. Don't mind my rants they're coming from a place of what it thinks it knows and can't be helped. Thanks for the lovely message.

Great! Experience that is.

I'm conscious enough to know that I appear to be conscious. BTW, what is God Consciousness.

Makes no sense that I have to reach myself.

Yes, God, because you know.

No, we don't know why water is wet and we also don't know THAT water is actually wet and is not just appearing to be wet.

How can one make plans to reach God Consciousness in 10 yrs when time and space doesn't really exist. I'm not saying we don't live in time and space; but something as God Consciousness, if there's even such a thing can only be accessed now. We can make plans for our future and living in the dream, but you're also saying accessing God Consciousness is also a dream if you're placing it in the future that doesn't exist.

Taste buds. Sugar isn't sweet. The taste buds is the difference. Someone with no taste buds can't tell the difference, so it's the taste buds not the sugar.

Seriously. Saying Reality is neutral is nihilism. OK, if you say so. Call it what you wish.

❤️

Just an ideology. There are no rule books that says one has to see everything as beautiful. That's a condition. Unconditional love doesn't give a shit about seeing everything beautiful. Seeing things as they are without interpretation and adjectives is more ideal.

"Everything I said is only true from a certain point of view". That's it.

It's there for me...so not sure what's going on on your end.

Hit BLOG.

Duh! He was responding to yours.

Seems to me the two goes hand in hand.

Men will justify their behavior as being high testosterone or that they're powerful and wealthy or it's a man's thing or I have needs or whatever the excuse to go sex down the whole town, but a woman can be a slut and a whore for being faithful with one partner but wears a daisy duke shorts. Yes, imma harp on this because I find it pathetic. Not that men love to sex up everybody they can but that they look down on women who do. Only fans, porn stars, strippers, pros, you name it but when it comes to men, it's OK. Fuck outta here. Yes, it's my only gripe with the world. Get tha fuck outta here. Don't call that woman a slut if you're willing to go cold approach to go get into some strangers pants. Prostitution and pick-up is the same thing. One is just willing to do it for free.

Nobody shames the men in porn. They get called names like long-john silver and the big hurricane diver and sasquash biggie dicky. Lol I just made that up.

Aren't you aware of this. Don't you follow these stars. Don't you watch porn. Do you think you're all alone. Millions do. So why not have a following. They are not shamed, people project shame unto them. It's the one's uncomfortable with their own porn watching that tries to do the shaming. Meanwhile.......

Hope you're doing ok. If you still have the need, you can dm me.

Funny how we accept the screen's way of feeling but cringe at the real stuff feelings. We pay to get scared at the cinemas but in real life we don't want those feelings.

Irony is, the egoic mind is what's making that distinction.

I'm not sure. I think it's a matter of perception and interpretation and also conditioning. I nagged into Buck just to show her this. It's not really the violence because we love that in movies and can tolerate that. Then the value thing was just another conditioning factor because we engage in lots of things that has no value or even destroys us but a simple video thread of police cams now is recognized as valueless to that same perceiver. It's just me noticing how the mind works and how if things aren't within our constructed dream, it becomes the "enemy". It is something deeper, but I'm not sure exactly what; but all I can say is that it's about the egoic structure and how it fits into it's construction.