Princess Arabia

Lmao.

Stick to opening up to infinity. Leave the women having sex with 1000/24hrs out of this. They don't exist. Hehe.

In your mind. The cat up the street doesn't think so, neither does the mouse it's chasing.

Must think pretty low of women if you think we look to have sex with men we think are nobody's. I remember him saying something like that too, but I paid it no mind. Now, I see how it had an impact enough to be asked about. I don't know why you guys are taking advice from Leo about relationships and sex. It's beyond me. Yes, he's intelligent, smart and all that and he knows a lot and can help you guys tremendously in the self-improvement field, spirituality and a lot more. Sex and relationships and knowledge of the female gender is not his expertise and his advice on that will only leave you all more confused when you go out into the real world and see how real women are when you interact with them. I'm not saying he never gives any advice worth taking on this subject, but most of it is based on his own experience and that is based on his personality and so his interactions will be different from yours, plus when you're looking to just get laid, that will also be from a different mindset. Saying women think you're a nobody before sex, then proceed to have sex with you anyway, doesn't compute with the female's way of thinking. So, we get dressed, put in time and energy to go on a date with Mr. Irrelevant and Mr. Unimportant because we are airheads, dumb and stupid, illogical, emotional and are waiting for someone to stick it to us first before we start to show how much we care because we are airheads, dumb and stupid because that's all it takes for women to value a man..it's the way he pumps us in bed. No wonder you're asking this question. Probably puzzled by it's complexities. To answer your question, it depends on the female. It's that simple. Nothing more needs to be said there. Women aren't impressed with your sex. They're impressed with how you treat them and how you make them feel outside of the bedroom and that's where they express their responses - in the bedroom. You'll never have great sex with a woman if you don't bring out those feelings prior to sex. Her sex with you is dependent on how she felt prior.

It's a shame how we're trying to make sense of what nature intended but recognize poison as real medicine. We call nature's medicine alternative and the one's made in a lab normal/real or however it's described. We've been so brainwashed, controlled, programmed and treated like numbers in a system and are being stripped of our humanity to the point where we won't even recognize ourselves anymore. We'll be hybrid. We even attack and ostracize those who speak of natural solutions and call them quacks and witches. It's good you're trying to get information on this topic, but I doubt this is the place except for a limited few. Most people especially our brainwashed youth are more into pharmaceuticals and pill popping and feeding the drugstores. I suggest finding a specialized group online. Barbara O'Neil is great, learnt a lot from her seminars awhile back. Dr Berg is also good but he's more mainstream and gets a lot of flack from people. I've done alternative treatments for everything and with success, but I'm through trying to convince people of the benefits. Too many unhealthy people on here to even bother and switch that around. They'll laugh at you and either say they take too long or they need proof and studies and blah blah. When I recommend stuff, it's not taken seriously enough and people will take the druggists advice more serious and ignore mine, so I don't care anymore. Let them continue to induce their poisons while they're young enough, but I hope when the symptoms start to show up in degenerative ways later on in life they aren't surprised. It's already showing up as depression, anxiety sleep problems and skin issues and hormonal imbalances.

Contracted energy. Mothers to be have contractions. Hmmm. It's everywhere. Concept - at conception (birth).

😢Love you.

😉😉

It's Ms. There is no ego.

Interesting overview. We live in an assumptive world. We're just going around assuming things, myself included. We don't normally question our assumptions. This is what leads to apparent delusions. This is what actually makes a forum like this survive; and this is why there are so many disagreements and different responses to things. Most of the disagreements and responses are only illuminating the separate individuals' dream world, so they're not really incorrect. It's their lived reality. That's why they can seem to go on forever and never gets resolved. How does one come to a resolution that involves different lived realities. You've actually just admitted that you'll argue someone over a thought, which is quite interesting; and reveals a lot about that argument. Thinking something through is still just that, thoughts. So, all that's happening in that case, is thought's arguing with thoughts. I'm not trying to sound woo woo, but showing how the dream makes itself seem so real. Thinking through something deeply and thoroughly doesn't make it true, all it does is reinforces thought upon thought. What happens is the thoughts now start to make sense in succession and solidifies the story and now the person has successfully created a construct. It's interesting seeing how constructs gets created in real time. Thought I'd share.

Yep, exactly.

There is only presence. This "remain present" is nothing but an idea, a concept. Mind trick. Having sex is being present. Arguing with somebody is presence. There's nothing but. Past and future doesn't exist. When the mind is in the past and the future, that is still presence, because it does it in the present. No effort is needed to be present.

Aliveness hides by being alive. The fact that one thinks they are alive and that they are a person living, that hides the fact that the table or chair is also alive. The table has no heart or liver or lung or eyes so the human sees it as a piece of dead furniture. It's not. It's just as alive. Leo once said in one of his videos that there's no difference between me and the coffee table. I never understood or grasp what that meant until now or rather lately. It is quite clear how that's the case.

I just quoted this one part...but, yeah, I've had guys in my field trying to call me out because I didn't agree to do some shit they wanted me to do. They knew what I did, called me, and i refused, then they tried to call me all sorts of names and try to belittle me. lol. I shut him up so quick, he didn't even get past first base. That's why I learnt to get so thick-skinned because I've been there and it's usually the one's who would love to but can't for some reason or another. Not just with me, but I've seen countless times how guys will call hot girls names and say how "they ain't all that" only because they're out of their league and they know they wouldn't give them the time of day. Big boobs and blonde hair females get this a lot.

The choking risk is in the act itself.....in a big way - Pun intended 😅

I've never been so quickly "not challenged" in my life. Lol, I wonder why. Maybe you're smart enough to recognize an expert in the business....maybe. Smart woman. You're gonna get far in life. I'm over here dying. Hehe.

These two comments go hand in hand. Shows the likelihood of it being the case.

Quite unlikely. Never happened to me. It's more likely to come off during regular sex. In oral, you hold the base if he's small as that's when it can get a bit tricky; but getting lodged in the throat isn't likely. Not impossible but not likely.

And neither is anyone else but only in the dream. It's the Absolute appearing as someone who appears to be enlightened. Nothing is separate do how can someone be enlightened and another not if it's not only in the dream of separation.

Absolute freedom cannot be known. There's no one to be aware of freedom, because freedom (in this sense), is all there is. It is not a feeling state. It is what is. Free to even be a slave. Unconditionally free. The separate self, the individual, the contracted energy that thinks it's a human and a person can never feel free because that is freedom expressing as someone who isn't free. There is no becoming free. There's no "you are always free" because there is no you. The person/human is just that seeking energy that seeks to be free and liberated. It cannot be anything else but "not free", but only in appearance.

Simple. If you we're rich, would you go out to do things to make you feel rich. No, because you already feel rich. Insert any adjective there including unique. Hope you get the drift. Nothing intrinsically unique about anything, so the sentient tries. If it were already, it wouldn't feel the need.

Ever seen the movie CHLOE. Pretty good. It's about an escort and a wife that hired her to see if her husband would cheat on her with the escort, and she ends up sleeping with the wife instead. This trailer kind of reminded me of that movie.

Lol. Never mind. Haha

Last thing I'm saying on this. This is what I'm talking about. You need others to identify with what you identify with. Without others, you couldn't say, "then I'll be like everyone else". There wouldn't be anybody else to not be like. You contrast your sense of being and how you define yourself because you have defined everyone else, however that is. You still need others to be able to know what you're like or not like. You need to hear others' opinions and beliefs to be able to contrast that you're not like them. If OP didn't ask the question, you wouldn't even be able to recognize that you're not like him and that you don't need to ask questions because you're operating from your own authority. Something to contrast it with. I'm just trying to let you see how you're operating from the same place OP is operating from but from the inside out, anti-clockwise and clockwise are still from the same clock. It operates both ways but can only do so one at a time. He's asking for opinions, you're saying he should know himself and not depend on others to know for him, but you're also depending on others to be able to know yourself. Either way you look at it you're still dependent on others. You can't be how you are, if you weren't dependent on others. Both of you are dependent on others. His way is just more direct while yours is more indirect.

I didn't say define I said know. You define yourself from what you know and what you know is determined by the outside world. I get what you're saying, but I'm speaking on something different. You still need others to know yourself and to know what your likes and dislikes are. You didn't cone to your assessments because you were in a cave. Point is, telling someone to not ask questions about things and that they should know themselves and not rely on others is defeating the purpose of not getting to know yourself. This is how you get to know yourself, it's by observerving how you respond to life and others and seeing yourself in relation to others. You didn't know yourself at 10yrs old (eg), it took you years of evolution, queries, and knowledge to come to this point. OP is also in this process, which never ends, btw. At 80yrs old, you'll be responding to life and others differently than you do now and you don't know how that will be then. Life unfolds in stages, relatively speaking.