Osaid

Moderator
  • Content count

    3,485
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Osaid

  1. Right, with the caveat that experience doesn't actually have any finite contents, since I am the infinite appearing as all the contents. Therefore, there aren't things for me to know since I am all the things. Like she said, solipsism tends to have lots of dualistic suppositions, like inside and outside, which wouldn't actually affect that which is aware of it.
  2. Nice. Indeed, solipsists are still stuck on the subject of the subject-object relation. Like "my" mind and "my" experience, when there actually isn't. There is no experience of something that has no experience, but on the flipside there is also no experience of something that has an experience. Solipsism gets stuck on the latter.
  3. Of course. Infinite cannot know finite. The infinite has nothing to know or understand about itself. The only way to chase after finite knowledge is if you think that you yourself are finite.
  4. If an aspect or behavior in your life seems to be looping without any resolution, it is not a coincidence. It is the result of the ideas and beliefs that you have about experience. The body is simply a conduit which serves these ideas and beliefs, and it acts them out in accordance. The resulting looping behavior is a psychosomatic manifestation stemming from how you are defining your reality (nonsense and dissatisfaction). You already know why all of this is happening. You said it right there. You said that you think life is nonsense and that nothing will satisfy you. As soon as that is questioned, then the behavior will stop. Otherwise, if you believe that the psychedelic is providing you something more than life, then you are getting exactly what you want by repeatedly using the psychedelic. From that perspective it makes sense to continually use psychedelics. That perspective is based on the identity of being dissatisfied. Right. Cycles, loops, and dissatisfaction. Definitely seems like something attributed to separation. Essentially, the infinite reality is being conceptualized as if it is a result of a substance separate of you. The body is acting out this belief, which manifests as a looping behavior "to get back to that reality". That is why sitting in that "thoughtless peace" is so enlightening and humbling.
  5. Lol. Up until even the idea of time vanishes.
  6. It's the same. Just stay there until it is obvious. To be anything requires you to be infinite. It's not possible to be anything while being finite. "Being" is all you need.
  7. Again, it is how you are defining yourself. It is how you are identifying yourself within this experience, which you are being. Where is the "me" which is said to be separate from consciousness? No one has ever actually experienced that.
  8. Infinite love is infinite, and therefore, it is whole. Someone that understands infinite love would be a part, not whole (infinite). It's like asking "why can't the Mona Lisa figure out that it is the whole painting"? It can't because it isn't. The finite can't know that there isn't finite. "How to be infinite love" begs the question: what are you identifying as, or taking yourself to be, which is separate from this experience? This experience is already infinite.
  9. Of course. It's a comparison. There isn't really "everything else" to compare to. If there was "infinite love" and "everything else", that wouldn't be the same as infinite love. And therein, the obscuring of infinite love, on behalf of someone or something other than infinite love that understands infinite love and takes psychedelics in order to become infinite love.
  10. Yeah, you think you solved the problem by people pleasing, but the same problem is now in a reversed direction. In order to people please it requires a disconnection from yourself. The other person isn't actually connecting with anyone or anything, so it still feels disconnected.
  11. Well, it looks like you already know the answer. Connect with yourself first. You can't connect with another if you disconnect from yourself. That means expressing yourself authentically and unapologetically. Then your own tribe will naturally come to you. If you try to impress others by not being you, then you will only attract people who don't want the real you. That's the "disconnection". It's a self-fulfilling prophecy. So yeah, be you, there's no other choice but to be you.
  12. The "triggers" are assumptions. Uninspected assumptions. Uninspected because of how it feels. Fighting and trying to solve is like moving away from the assumption and therein moving away from the feeling, so that it is not inspected and seen as untrue. This allows the continuation of assuming that there is a monster in the closet, and a circular justification that "since I feel this way it must be true that there are monsters living in my closet for me to be angry at". The thread is created so that someone can sell you the solution to an assumption. You're looking for something that "makes sense", as in, something that validates the assumption and therein validates the anger. Therefore, any invitation to inspect the anger itself is dismissed. The solution to Santa Claus would still be the delusion that there is Santa Claus. The only thing that can be triggered in you is what is already in you. If someone is angry at Santa, does it feel real? Hell yes it feels real. That does not prove the existence of Santa. There is no way to put up with people, in the same way there is no way to put up with Santa. Anyone selling you the solution is in the same boat as you, right along with Santa.
  13. Yeah of course he wants to dismiss everyone. Typical.
  14. Consciousness is never separate. The separation is only imaginary, as you said. The mind creates unsolvable koans for itself. You don't become anything and so you don't even experience dying. Unfortunately you're just too infinite to find an answer to these questions. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  15. That would be based on the idea that I am a thinker or a human. Thinking appears as a thinker and a human, or seems to denote that there are these things. That which is aware of thought and these things isn't a thinker or a human. You are aware. In the same way how a dream makes it seem like there is a dreamer, but there isn't. And how experience makes it seem like there's an experiencer, but there isn't.
  16. 🎯🎯🎯 How can Santa Claus be grasped? It isn't. Only the light is. Humans that have intellect is the illusion.
  17. Oops, apparently this section isn't supposed to be spiritual. Yeah I'm sure science will find what created the universe some day, it just has to look harder. Now give me my lab coat.
  18. Modification, control, change, etc. It's like the language of the ego. You would want God to be that, only because you think you are separate from God. For something that isn't separate, all those things are meaningless and useless. Reality would never control, change, or modify reality. That would require it to be separate from itself. Something separate from reality isn't reality. Simple as. Control is "imagination", so there is no control over imagination, either. The desire to separate is strong, but God says "nope, you're included".
  19. It's based on observation, which is true. There's still confusion because it isn't aware that it is observing itself. Quantum mechanics works to dispel this. Proof of this is its repetitive inability to answer the koans it creates for itself through observing thought. Like "what created the universe" and the "hard problem of consciousness", which is actually "the hard problem of science".
  20. Yeah he got indigestion from eating gold and inevitably vomited all of it out. Silly guru.
  21. "Mystical" is realizing there is no spoon. Bending a spoon is just highly advanced technology.
  22. Now no one can use those utensils evil wizard Needs a part 2 where he bends them all back in perfect shape as repentance for his sins