Epikur

I did not see his crazy compilation. I like it it's funny because I watched so much of him. There were some minor scandals with him. He used to post thousands of self drawn porn anime and sexually harrass a girl online or something like that. Anyway nothing big but still wild this young boy.

To be fair he studied sociology

Why care anyway? The guy is a freak That is why I like him.

I feel like he is lying quite a bit because he has a ideology and agenda. Destiny is less biased in that regard though he likes to bend facts too. It seems to me that Destiny does better research than Vaush but I could be wrong.

I think what I got is he uses it wildly in his private life. He is obsessed with (optics) so he tries to hold himself back in the videos but actually he is a gamer bro. Pretty unhinged and wild. That is why many people don't believe him.

At least you don't want to kill yourself because it's so boring to read Kant, Hegel and Wittgenstein

Vaush is quite entertaining. I think he uses the N-word. He is an edgelord. Hi copies a lot of rhetoric styles from different people. One time he sounded exactly like Stefan Molyneaux. That was funny. His father's background is in Hollywood so he seems to know how to entertain people. He got help from Destiny to get to his status. He is obsesessed with coops. It's not really convincing but it gives him munition and excuse when he wants to get wild on people. He is basically the only leftist who is entertaining. He is quite funny as a personality. David Packman gives a feeling of a sleepy oppurtunist.

Destiny alligns with David Pakman. He is Destiny's last leftist buddy. Elites: “Democracy? I want nothing to do with a system which operates on the premise that my rights don’t exist simply because I am outnumbered.” — R. Lee Wrights

We all know that Socrates was a corrupter of the youth. He was a pro about it and he wil do it again. He might ask confusing questions and try to create a following and he will have sex with some of them.

Actually I heard somebody said he ment that he doesn't know anything that is worthwhile.

Socrates would approve Lex Fridman as the science gate keeper

Thanks

@Onemanwolfpac Yes I agree. do you have a link? Seems like sleepy Eckhart is quite awake

That brings the question how to face boredom for 2 hours? There are levels to boredom btw

I think he is a fluctuating post modernist.

The classic example of utopia in star trek: Naval Ravikant said we should all become scientists. Then we can reach the technology level we need to become free from work. I guess a mix between scientist and artist sounds good to me. One of the biggest problems is aside from the classic problem of rich and poor is the fight for sexual partners. That caused a lot of problems. I guess once we are in this utopia the even bigger problem might be to keep our motivation level in order not to degenerate. Some totalitarian elements seem to be necessary to fight chaos. One has to be prepared for the challenges tha will come to the paradies.

@Parththakkar12 I don't know how to get there but the endresult should feel like this:

I think he would have a hard time figuring things out like the rest of us:

I guess the numbers will come down naturally.

I think as an idea it is very progressive. Science like military is a male project. Females find it brutal and cruel and inhuman. If you could bring all men down to accept a global matriarchy you may not need them anymore. There are tribes that function like that. Disarming all men does not sound so easy. Convincing living without technology does not sound like fun too.

Yes we were wrong. Don't be so stiff by accusing people to being stiff. Anyway back to topic. I still believe Sam should take acting classes or somecommunication training. On the other hand he is not really a speaker he is a writer he did say. So maybe we should just not listen to him and just read him. Jordan on the other hand I guess should meditate more. He was all over the place. He should not play the archetypical hero all the time.

We were wrong and we want to punish us so we can remember it. In english it's majestic not majectic. Sometimes we do care

You were too quick I was editing. It should have been: pluralis majestatis

I guess with "we" I ment me in pluralis majestatis

I like them but sometimes I am an oppurtunist and run with the mob Jordan was important when he came up. The left was crazy at that time. Most akademics were to afraid to talk against it. He is kind of weird. His frog voice doesn't make things easier. He looks like he is in pain all the time. Not too enjoyable. Sam is really boring. His talks are actually meditations. On the other hand he is not really rhetorically good. I think he needs some acting classes to be enjoyable like Joe Rogan or Leo. He is kind of reasonable that is quite a plus I guess.