trenton

My next argument seems even stronger in my opinion, but this is unrelated to the first. I believe that on some level conspiratorial thinking and conspiracy theories are necessary for justice to be possible in many cases. For example, sometimes there are conspiracies by organized criminals to frame innocent people. I have some questions about what you think of the following claims. Scenario 1: I didn't commit financial fraud because there were organized criminals who stole my identity and used my social security number to make me appear to have committed crimes I didn't commit. Scenario 2: I didn't attempt to kidnap this child. I was set up and tricked by criminals falsely claiming to be this child's relatives while I in reality had no intent of harming this child by claiming to know these relatives mistakenly. Scenario 3: There are organized criminals who frame sex trafficking victims for prostitution. How do you engage in conspiracy theories or conspiratorial thinking when somebody makes claims like these? Once you have witnessed frame ups like these by organized criminals, you become much more open minded to conspiracy theories because they are on some level needed for recognizing these scenarios. I do want to note, that for some reason I feel triggered by this subject of conspiracy theories. I feel the need to type insistently on this subject. Part of the problem might be because I believe in a conspiracy theory that there exists within the American government white collar criminals who do insider trading. What exactly are we labeling "conspiracy theory" versus blatant and undeniable reality? Is it not a conspiracy theory to say that there exists police corruption in forms such as using police stations to cover up drug trafficking operations due to bribery from organized criminals? Can we define conspiracy theory? To me a lot of this is just undeniable reality. The Epstein files might be another example of a very transparent cover up. How exactly should we think about the Epstein files if we are not going to use any conspiratorial thinking regarding government cover ups? It seems completely necessary to me in some cases to apply this mode of thinking. It is probably instructive to figure out why I feel triggered and what to do.

@moonawakening444 Here is the full document. I haven't had anybody review it yet, but I would like help to improve it. I see the systemic failures that enabled this behavior and I hope there are ways to prevent it. This post will be long. Organized Crime and Circumstantial Evidence My name is Trenton Rothan. I am writing this message in the hopes of helping law enforcement or advocacy groups combat organized crime. I was exposed to organized crime against my will as a child due to my father being involved in criminal gangs who for the most part evaded consequences. They were involved in many illegal activities including drug distribution, sex trafficking, coercion, gang violence, money laundering schemes, and sometimes police corruption which enabled their actions. In this document I would like to describe some of what I witnessed along with circumstantial evidence that would corroborate my story and make it more believable when child witnesses report these types of things. There are however limits to our current evidentiary standards which often allows organized criminals to frame their victims while evading consequences. There may also be overlap in trauma research in terms of understudied sexual identity shame in heterosexual males due to being associated with an actual adult male perpetrator. Spiral Dynamics A relevant model for understanding criminal psychology and possible systemic solutions would be Spiral Dynamics or similar models such as Integral Theory or Ego Development Theory. In Spiral Dynamics the stages of cognitive and moral development from bottom to top includes beige, purple, red, blue, orange, green, yellow, and turquoise. Stage red in particular is a common set of psychological patterns in organized criminals in contemporary societies. Stage red is characterized as tough, ruthless, thrill for conquest, impulsive, vengeful, exploitative of systems, sexually exploitative with a sense of power or sadism, and oftentimes a complete lack of a moral compass. In some environments, this kind of psychology is seen as a valid survival strategy due to intimating other bad actors who might victimize stage red, such as another gang. Sometimes boys develop this attitude in response to being sexually abused or groomed into future perpetrators through sex trafficking. Preventing these crimes is complex because a person with this mindset will use any exploit available to them within any system to continue their way of life. Stage blue often emerges in response to the lack of morality in the previous stage. Therefore, religion is often used in an effort to rehabilitate some bad actors with an emphasis on strict moral codes presented as absolute infallible truth. The struggle between good and evil can also be seen in police officers who attempt to deter bad actors through punishment. However, due to being impulsive, stage red often commits serious crimes without thinking through the consequences. Oftentimes, bad actors continue their crimes until they are finally caught and punished, at which point some of them start to rethink their lifestyle. However, this method is unreliable as it is extremely difficult, if not impossible to catch all bad actors, meaning in most cases just desserts aren't actually possible. Stage blue can be prone to violence through religious or ideological extremism, which is relevant in some cases of understanding the psychological background of violent criminals. Due to being ethnocentric, stage blue can sometimes be prone to racism, xenophobia, or strongly condemn non-conformists such as LGBTQ+, which is relevant for some hate crimes. A person with religious or cult-like justifications for their crimes are resistant to rehabilitation if they believe God gave them the authority to engage in violence. Preventing these crimes would require that churches not glorify violence against political or religious enemies. Stage orange might be relevant for understanding white collar crimes because this is the stage of calculated transgression for optimization in which rules are treated as obstacles. This might include corrupt business practices such as wage theft or environmental destruction. Under the current system, Americans are often left with the impression of a two-tiered justice system with the rich often escaping consequences due to prosecution being more difficult compared to poor defendants. Our current government is considered stage orange and is in many ways captured by corporate interests, thus making justice nearly impossible in many cases. These organized criminals are often responsible for financial fraud, but in some cases there is also sexual abuse by business leaders in work settings or other areas. Perhaps a concerning psychological background in such people is that they often view workers or poor people in a negative or even dehumanizing way, which on some level would make abuse feel psychologically justified. In order to deter these crimes, the punishment needs to be strong enough to outweigh the benefit of corporations engaging in calculated law breaking. Stage green is especially vulnerable to stage red. Stage green is often more compassionate and loving which can make them vulnerable to manipulation such as through love bombing. They might fall for scams such as false charities due to being too compassionate, or their forgiveness and mercy might be exploited and capitalized on. Stage green in this society is often left leaning rather than right leaning. They often emphasize things like harm reduction, rehabilitation, or crime prevention through social safety nets rather than through policing as they often fear police brutality. This might be where the stereotype “bleeding heart liberal” comes from. Although stage green is usually less violent than the previous stages, there are cases of political extremism such as in antifa or protests that start out peaceful but later get out of hand. Stage green might feel justified in committing crimes if it believes that the law is fundamentally unjust anyway and the rules need to be challenged as in the case of civil disobedience during the Civil Rights era. Changing unjust laws or systems might therefore prevent these crimes. Stage yellow is a type of cognitive development that uses these types of models to understand human behavior. Stage yellow attempts to integrate the strengths of each mode of thinking while being cognizant of the backfiring mechanisms. Stage yellow is often open-minded, nuanced, focuses on big pictures and systems thinking, and develops expertise in research and education. Integrating developmental models such as these to understand different ways of thinking and facilitating communication between stages is common in stage yellow. This might be relevant for bridging gaps in issues that are very polarizing as the right and left often use very different ways of thinking with different values and priorities. Corruption is much less common at higher stages of self-awareness and moral development, but stage yellow is still not above ego and selfishness. There might be intellectual dishonesty and deception. In some cases, stage yellow might be intellectually arrogant due to its understanding of complex systems which could potentially be used to justify calculated rule breaking for the greater good. A whistleblower or a hacker-activist exposing corruption might use complex ethical reasoning for this rule breaking. Stage turquoise is rare in today’s society. It is often characterized as deeply spiritual with a strong focus on consciousness. Turquoise is non-dogmatic and combines enhanced states of consciousness with an understanding of different stages. Perhaps people like Sadhguru or Eckhart Tolle might be stage turquoise as they place a strong emphasis on self-transcendence. Stage turquoise often focuses on human well-being on a large scale, emotional mastery, and radical not-knowing as part of epistemic humility. There may be practical wisdom in emotional mastery as it may prevent impulsive behaviors as in some cases of bullying in schools, thus potentially reducing long term negative impacts with meditation being used to enhance self-awareness. Social and Emotional learning demonstrated that emotional mastery to some extent reduces bullying, though it is not perfect. The closest example of stage turquoise crimes I could find are maybe high profile cases of spiritual leaders claiming to be enlightened, but in reality using spirituality to cover up sexual abuse. This casts doubt on if they are really enlightened and above ego. The main risk is that their spiritual teachings might eventually lead people into dogmatism or spiritual extremism even with best intentions. This could happen after they die, even if their community was completely peaceful at the time of their presence. Various religions might mention people who seem to operate at this level of development, but ultimately use the teachings to justify harm in the absence of the original messenger. It is worth mentioning that people do not always operate from a consistent stage. Someone might in one part of their life operate from one stage, but in a different area in another part of their life. For example, a seemingly good father at home could be working for a company engaged in financial fraud, which would mix blue and orange. Maybe a person describes high moral or intellectual ideals, but in practice is much less developed. Maybe under normal circumstances a person is usually peaceful until an intimate partner cheats on them, leading to a crime of passion, thus mixing red with another stage of development due to impulsive behavior. My Father Christopher Paul Hamann was my father. He had an extensive criminal record involving drug distribution and child support evasion. He had children by multiple women including highschool girls like my mother, though due to a five year age gap being allowed, it was not considered statutory rape when maybe it should be. My father proceeded to abandon his children he had with at least two women that I know of as he fled the State to avoid paying child support. My mother had extensive legal battles, only to discover that child support enforcement was often ineffective at compensating mothers like her. Child support enforcement might take his license away, only for him to drive without a license. Similarly, men who don’t pay child support might end up in jail while the victims remain without compensation in an unstable home. For the most part, my father remained out of jail despite owing approximately 300,000 dollars in child support. He would argue that he was doing his best to help the kids, and this sympathetic sounding argument covered his criminal lifestyle. Some of the mechanisms for child support enforcement include taxing a paycheck from a job or taxing property. However, my father had methods for evading both of these. He would jump from job to job, so that he could not be taxed due to inconsistent income. He would also pay his landlord in cash which he received through illegal means as part of a money laundering scheme, thus avoiding the property tax. This money was often stolen from family members such as when he broke into mom’s house, or the money would be received from other gang activities which seemed to mainly be drug deals to my knowledge. Sometimes my father would boast about his exploits, mentioning money made from drug deals, glorifying gang violence and death threats, and prostitution deals. Although I initially assumed the prostitutes were adult women selling themselves, I would later discover that prostitutes could be victims who are sold by other men, and the victims could also be children including me. My father was often impulsive and manipulative. He would suddenly run out of the house in the middle of the night, taking money, and going to meet his gang. He would also treat me as if I were special, giving me lots of positive praise while threatening to disown me if I reported his crimes. This was combined with incoherent religious messaging in which he would condemn a teenager for masturbation while soliciting minors for prostitution. He claimed to believe in karma, arguing that people gave him money for his drugs because he made good drugs and did the right thing by not mixing poison in the heroin he was selling them. This gives a psychological profile of someone who is deeply irrational from an intellectual standpoint because in reality the underlying logic is power and whatever serves him. His ideology is therefore inconsistent, similar to a Nazi ideology which is logically incoherent, but has a fundamental message of power and dominance. The details are changed as needed to suit them. My father also appears to have been operating under the “just world fallacy.” From his point of view, so long as he could get away with these things, it was as though God was on his side. He believed that good things happened to good people and bad things happened to bad people. In the mind of organized criminals, this is disturbing because it mirrors patterns in how a psychopath thinks. If a person is stupid enough to fall for their tricks, then to the psychopath, that person deserved to be hurt and they deserve to benefit from hurting them. This is what happens when the just world fallacy is filtered through a psychology rooted in power and control. I was often isolated from the rest of my family while my father would be mixing apparent love with threats. This created a dynamic in which my sisters learned to associate me with a perpetrator and therefore started turning against me. I was the easier target which therefore made me a more compelling scapegoat compared to our father involved in a violent gang. I felt as if I were alone trying to navigate not just my father, but also another unstable abusive situation with Mom and my stepfather involving drugs and domestic violence. Teens from unstable homes are often the most vulnerable to sex trafficking due to the isolation from other family members. In the case of my father, he also wanted me to give him information about Mom and Mike which he later went on to use in court with success. It was suspicious how he got this information, but the court didn’t question it and instead investigated Mom for drugs. My father had ties to police corruption through his father Gerald Hamann. Gerald was a former gang member who later became a police informant. He reported some gangs, but didn’t turn his son into the police despite knowing of his crimes. My father claimed he had extensive involvement in crime with Gerald, but I don’t know which parts are true and which parts are fabricated. The part that concerns me is that these stories are plausible given the context of both of their criminal histories, access to weapons, violent histories, and connections to the police in a way that would prevent accountability. In his free time, he would look like a normal man. He would play videogames, read books, and listen to music. One thing I noticed is that he listened to a lot of dirty rap music that glorified criminal behavior. This music on its own does not necessarily have a connection to real criminal activity. However, a finer psychological point is that the music a person listens to often speaks to their identity on some level. This becomes more blatant when the music is used in the context of actual ongoing criminal behavior. It becomes a sign that he actually resonates with the things being said in the dirty rap music that glorifies violence. This makes me wonder if it might be possible to reduce criminal behavior by allowing for edgy raps that have stronger moral messages while still being badass. An example might be criminals who reformed. If stage red values respect and admiration, then sometimes the military or aiding police becomes a gateway to reform. Other times it leads to corruption in the form of a revolving door between police officers during the day and gang members during the night. My father showed some signs of wanting to be different. He feared that his kids would not respect him if they thought of him too negatively. He needed to keep secrets from the family while claiming to want to break the cycle of criminal behavior. Sometimes having a child inspires criminals to change, but in my father’s case it didn’t. Instead he put the burden on me to fix what I didn’t break while involving me in things I didn’t want to be involved in despite claiming to keep family separate from criminal activities. He would talk about breaking the cycle of crime while actively perpetuating it, claiming to be a product of his environment. The stories he told of his childhood involved racially motivated gangs in both directions. He became associated with criminals early on and was described as an asshole by his sister. He put a cat in the microwave while his mother minimized the behavior and became defensive. Although child sexual abuse is common in youth gang members, it is unclear if my father was “initiated” through such abuse. If he were, then that would explain escalating aggression, but the aggression may have been present regardless of such abuse. He came from a father that was also a gang member and later became a police informant. My father learned to glorify violence and power, including his father’s violence such as death threats and beatings. He had learned that his behavior was only bad if he got caught. The Incident Although my father usually did drug deals with his gang, there was an incident that added another dimension to his criminal behavior that I found disturbing. Back when I was in highschool, my father took me to his gang in the middle of the night. He had previously mentioned prostitution deals, but I didn’t think this included children until I was sexually exploited. Once he brought me to his gang, he left me in the car as he walked off and disappeared from my sight. He had been talking in code frequently to disguise his intentions, including numbers and colors. I waited alone until Dad returned from his deal with someone code named Fat Ass. I never saw this man or any of his supposed five other gang members including a woman. They seem to have set up this situation well to ensure that I would have as little information as possible. This made my report ineffective by the time I tried to tell the police what I witnessed. When Dad came back, he said that Fat Ass would give me 600 dollars if I spent the night with him. He for some reason seemed happy about this, as if on some level he felt a twisted sense of pride or being special for having his son offered to a gang. At first I was confused about what exactly he wanted me to do when spending the night with this man. Because children with autism are more trusting and prone to literal interpretations, I thought he meant that he wanted me to literally sleep with Fat Ass rather than figuratively, meaning have sex with him. The reason I hesitated is because 600 dollars sounded like a lot of money for minimal effort. Therefore, I started to grow suspicious until I remembered that Fat Ass was the man who had supposedly hired prostitutes in other deals. I discovered that these deals also involved children when I was the subject of this deal. Ultimately, I didn’t take the money. I was torn between seeing my father as someone I needed to trust to protect me while reconciling it with the reality of his criminal lifestyle. I fell silent and became heavy after being exposed to trafficking deals. I began to fear that my father and his gang may have done deals like these before with other minors. This turned into survivor’s guilt in which my silence felt like enabling. These feelings seem to be driving me to document what I know about organized crime in the hopes of protecting other victims, bringing perpetrators to justice, and preventing these crimes where possible. Therefore, I would like to describe how circumstantial evidence might be applied to cases like mine along with how it might help to catch perpetrators. It will be important to highlight the limits of evidence, as organized criminals often have deep knowledge of the legal system and know how to manipulate evidence to sometimes frame their victims. Circumstantial Evidence in My Case The sexual exploitation of a minor is often extremely difficult to prove. In my case, I was set up by organized criminals who used coded language, hid their identities, spoke behind closed doors by word of mouth without texts, and exploited the trust of a child toward his father while being linked to police corruption that enabled the behavior. Because of factors like these, the majority of organized criminals for the most part evade significant charges. Therefore, the justice system has been relying more and more on circumstantial evidence which is more difficult to hide even for organized criminals while still implicating them through indirect proof rather than hard evidence that is easier to hide such as a gun or a body. In my case, the proof at first seems nearly impossible, but upon closer inspection it is possible to build at minimum probable cause, even if not beyond a reasonable doubt without a further complex investigation. Using what I know about my father, I can reason backwards to see what the signs were that would implicate him. First of all, my father had an extensive criminal record, including drug distribution offenses that would implicate gang activity. His crimes included fleeing the State to avoid paying child support, after which he structured his lifestyle around avoiding these taxes. He was later caught with a pipe in his car by law enforcement, possibly because a gang member left it there or he was using it himself. There was a broad continuation of the same criminal lifestyle even after he supposedly passed all of his drug tests after being caught the first time. Secondly, organized criminals often have a money laundering scheme. This makes sense because the money they are getting is through illegal means, and then often used for seemingly legitimate purposes. In my case, my father owed about 300,000 dollars in child support, owned property, and had multiple jobs. Normally someone would pay a tax on their property for child support, but in the case of my father he didn’t due to paying the landlord in cash. This combined with inconsistent income tied from jumping from job to job, would implicate a money laundering scheme with which to avoid paying child support because the paycheck is also supposed to be taxed for child support. There are likely many other reasons for money laundering schemes that organized criminals could use. In cases like these, a person with a criminal record that implicates gang activity such as drugs, weapons, or sexual offenses combined with a pattern of tax evasion, would implicate that there is a continued criminal lifestyle. Thirdly, in my case my father was less careful with the text messages he sent me. He was confident that I would not report him, which he seems to have been right about. Some of the messages on my old phone included things like Dad saying he would gank my stepfather. This would actually be treated as hard evidence in a court of law, had I had the courage as a child to turn my father into the police for his gang activities. In other cases there likely are damning text messages that are never recovered due to children being too afraid to become a legal enemy of a parent. My father likely had the contacts of other gang members on his old phone, which would establish an ongoing relationship and criminal lifestyle. Proving sexual exploitation specifically would be the hardest to prove, even if my father were implicated in drug and gang related offenses. Once again, I did not realize what I was witnessing or grasp the significance until later on. In this case, I was the child closest to my father, spending the most time with him on his property. Given his ongoing criminal lifestyle, I would have been exposed to gang activities. The closest thing I can think of that might implicate sexual abuse would be my father’s broader criminal lifestyle and character. If my father is the kind of person who shows very little care for his children such as by evading child support while having children by multiple women, then this person would be very careless, reckless, or dangerous. This kind of character, given an ongoing criminal lifestyle, would be the kind of person to endanger his own child by exposing him to gang activities. In my case the specific endangerment was being solicited by a gang for child prostitution which my father facilitated by bringing me to them. However, in order to prove that the specific mechanism of endangerment was sexual exploitation, that would likely require finding out who these other prostitutes were that the gang was hiring. I don’t see how I could prove sexual exploitation specifically while being an isolated witness against an organized gang without corroborating this kind of testimony. Even if I can’t prove sexual exploitation specifically, there should be sufficient evidence to prove child endangerment in the form of criminal socialization and foreseeable risks such as violence from a criminal gang. Lesser charges might still be possible even if sexual exploitation specifically cannot be proven, and depending on the severity, the lesser charges might be sufficient to ensure a just outcome regardless of absent proof of child trafficking. Relevant factors would include contributing to the delinquency of the minor or using a child to manipulate court outcomes. In my case my father not only said he would disown me if I reported his crimes, but he also wanted me to gather dirt on Mom that he could use against her in court. This put me in a loyalty conflict in which I was forced to choose between two bad parents. I sided with Dad because Mom and Mike were using drugs and destroying the house, causing me to fear for the safety of my siblings. Once Dad got this information, it then changed the legal outcome of the court. Mom was treated with increased scrutiny while being made to take drug tests due to knowledge my father could not have had without me. This therefore helped him to avoid consequences. If a person gets this kind of information that they shouldn’t have, then it might implicate some form of spying. In this case I was used as a pawn due to coercion behind the scenes that the court could not see was happening. I was being forced to make adult legal calculations without guidance as both parents were unsafe. Courts should probably be more skeptical of people giving this information they shouldn’t have other than through hearsay. If a child gave him this information along with this broader criminal lifestyle, then this would implicate something very serious in that I was being coerced into aiding in a felony. I would like to help law enforcement and advocacy groups, but sometimes people like me get charged instead of the people doing the coercion as the truth seems to be too complex for courts to handle easily and routinely. In my case, I showed repeated signs of distress and suicidal ideation that was often ignored in schools when I mentioned these things in creative writing. I would write stories involving me committing suicide or I would mention gangs and domestic violence. It was not until I publicly confessed to homicidal thoughts that the community reacted, leading to Mike’s eviction and my mother coming off of the drugs. Maybe children who write about suicide in creative writing should be taken more seriously in schools as it could lead to discovering serious abuse. My father was the son of a former gang member who became a police informant. This would create a strong incentive to cover up crimes while seeming legitimate. Maybe gang members who become police informants should be treated with more scrutiny if they have family members involved in crimes that implicate gang activities. There might be other factors, but I don’t know what else would implicate my father in these crimes. My hope is that these circumstances can be used to better detect gang activities in other cases, such as men with criminal records related to gang activities who owe hundreds of thousands in child support while being implicated in a money laundering scheme. Maybe these circumstances should be seen as more suspect and potentially leading to the discovery of drug, weapon, or sex trafficking, thereby protecting present and future victims. Limits of present evidentiary standards Although circumstantial evidence can be helpful in detecting likely offenders, there are serious limits. Organized criminals are very familiar with the legal system because they want to know the gaps and the most effective ways to exploit them. This includes manipulating evidence to frame their victims while they remain free. A few examples of frame-up scenarios and set ups include sex trafficking framed as prostitution, identity theft, blind mule set ups, middlemen in money laundering or kidnapping schemes, or rape by coercion from a third party. In situations like these, bad actors often set up the situation such that it is hard to implicate them while the manufactured circumstances falsely implicate the victim. These scenarios directly challenge the evidentiary standards used in a court of law as it is often impossible to prove intent, yet innocent people are easily found guilty anyway. Epistemically, it is impossible for any legal system to distinguish between a genuinely guilty person and a successful frame-up in that by definition, all available evidence would have been manipulated to make an innocent person appear guilty. A simple example of a frame-up could be planted drugs discovered during a traffic stop. Although corrupt police officers doing this lead to explosive cases, there are other possibilities such as a vindictive relative planting evidence in someone’s car without their knowledge. In situations like these it would require impossible knowledge to avoid incriminating oneself as the evidence of drugs in a person’s car strongly implicates them regardless of claimed ignorance. Technically, intent is supposed to be proven, but in practice it often isn’t, leading to many successful frame-ups. Perhaps these scenarios could be mitigated through harm reduction and rehabilitation designed to make addiction less common combined with decriminalization or other measures. The fewer drug addicts there are, the less money there would be flowing to the gangs selling the drugs. In sex trafficking scenarios, prostitution is often used as a set up. It serves to make the victim more afraid to tell the police as they risk being charged themselves even if in reality they were being coerced into the situation. This was part of the set up I witnessed as well and sometimes this leads to a serious miscarriage of justice in which victims of rape are charged with being child prostitutes. Police corruption sometimes aids in this set up if there are informants fabricating police reports in the gang’s favor. Unwitting middlemen are often exploited as fall guys despite in reality having no criminal intent at all. This isn’t just in blind mule set ups, but it could be a kidnapping set up. For example, a couple could falsely claim to be the relatives of a child when in reality having no relationship to the child. This could be part of a trick to isolate the child with an unwitting middleman in a kidnapping frame-up. Once the child is isolated with a man falsely claiming to know relatives who don’t exist, the child will panic and the man will be made to seem like a child predator. The circumstantial evidence would likely be strong but misleading. Identity theft sometimes has clear exculpatory evidence that is overlooked. For example, defendants are often charged with crimes they allegedly committed while they were in jail. This should clearly exonerate them if a person can’t be in two places at once. However, sometimes the justice system fails and charges these people again anyway as it is hard to believe them once the falsified criminal record is established. Living any decent life is essentially impossible when a person is constantly framed for financial fraud by someone hacking their bank account while using their social security number. Rape by coercion from a third party is not very well discussed, and it challenges the way sources like the Center of Disease Control describe the nature of the crime. For example, the rape of males is often classified as “made to penetrate.” This is misleading because it implicates a female perpetrator which isn’t necessarily true. It could be that a man was made to penetrate through coercion by a third party in a scenario in which the woman is also a victim. The incentive to do this would be to frame the victim for rape through DNA evidence and potentially use the woman as a witness against the apparent rapist. In reality the ones creating the situation of mutual rape would be the rapists. This situation commonly emerged in government military experiments and concentration camps, but sometimes human traffickers force people into situations like these as well. “Made to penetrate” likely lumps scenarios like these together with female perpetrators. There should be a separate category such as “coercion by a third party” versus “envelopment.” According to the CDC, 79 percent of men reporting “made to penetrate” reported only female perpetrators. There are likely cases of “made to penetrate” by male intimate partners or via coercion by a third party with multiple perpetrators, but there isn’t a clear category in the CDC for this scenario of mutual rape with a male and female victim. In all of these frame-scenarios, the only reasonable defense for the victim is to become the prosecutor of organized criminals who have deliberately manipulated the evidence to frame them. This is an extremely high burden of proof that is nearly impossible to meet in many scenarios. In practice, the victims of a frame-up are often poor and can’t afford an expensive investigation and a sophisticated defense. At the same time, the way investigations are set up often allows the prosecution to set up the narrative from the beginning and only show the defense attorney the gathered evidence shortly before trial. This can and does lead to exculpatory evidence being overlooked, not necessarily out of malice, but out of simple human errors such as confirmation bias. My recommendation would be to allow joint investigations between the defense and prosecution. This would be an effective measure against falsified evidence while ensuring exculpatory evidence isn’t overlooked. There would be a much more transparent process behind how the evidence is gathered while allowing the defense attorneys to build stronger positions. However, this may require changing the current incentive structure of the justice system which is presently geared toward mass incarceration and rapid case management to clear dockets, often at the expense of quality and proper investigation. Miscarriage of justice is likely in these situations because justice is impossible without truth. Police corruption Police corruption is a significant factor in organized crime because such criminals are the ones most likely to exploit this corruption. Fabricating police reports from informants is one of the methods of using police corruption, but it is not the only way. This can include cases such as infiltration of the justice system by gang members, bribery, drug trafficking, and police brutality linked to gangs. In extreme cases of police corruption, law enforcement has been caught enabling organized criminals through a combination of these corrupt practices. Therefore, anti-corruption is critical for effectively fighting organized crime or else the corruption of law enforcement will be exploited by these gangs. An example of extreme police corruption would be a Mississippi case announced on October 30, 2025. This case included 14 law enforcement officers, two of which were sheriffs. These officers were arrested for enabling drug trafficking by accepting bribes. Some officers accepted bribes as high as 37,000 dollars while enabling drug trafficking. Police vehicles and uniforms were used to cover up the scheme by making it seem legitimate. This isn’t the only example of extreme police corruption in Mississippi in recent years, but it demonstrates clearly how corruption enables organized criminals. Reducing police corruption is a complex endeavor, likely requiring several overlapping methods. There would likely need to be external bodies investigating misconduct rather than relying on internal resolutions which often enable cover-ups. Even the highest level of government such as the CIA rely on internal investigations when there are serious scandals, casting doubt on whether or not these investigations are genuine due to the lack of transparency. Other measures might include whistleblower protections, reallocation of funding to prevent crime where possible rather than risking police misconduct, or potentially removing qualified immunity which has been used to shield officers for excessive force, sexual misconduct, or theft. Furthermore, corruption extends even to public officials in ways that make combating organized crime seem unrealistic. Sometimes there are government officials who benefit from organized crime such as white collar crimes, insider trading, sex trafficking, and many other corruption scandals. This is the highest level of organized crime, leading to many cover-ups that damage faith in the government that is supposed to maintain order. The Epstein files are one of many examples of extreme government corruption enabling organized crime. Therefore, anti-corruption and accountability for government officials is critical for stopping organized crime on a systemic level in that corrupt officials sometimes benefit from these criminals. This is a complex and difficult issue beyond the scope of this document, but it is worth mentioning this because fighting organized crime has serious limits if the ones that are supposed to maintain order are the ones responsible for organized crime. Recommendations for detection and prevention Organized criminals are often difficult to detect because they use their knowledge of evidentiary standards to avoid detection. They exploit every loophole that is available in order to carry out their plans. This not only includes every legal loophole, but also every structural weakness in society that allows them to avoid detection and accountability. Given that determined bad actors will look for any exploitable weakness, it makes it nearly impossible to design a system that would prevent this organized crime completely. Combating organized crime is therefore a non-trivial matter and the answers don’t seem obvious. The changes necessary might be radical or counter-intuitive. Firstly, circumstantial evidence has been increasingly relied upon for investigating sophisticated bad actors. Although organized criminals can easily hide hard evidence, it is difficult even for them to hide the suspicious circumstances they create due to the nature of their crimes. In the case of my father, he racked up about 300,000 dollars in child support while owning property and not paying taxes on that property for child support. This kind of behavior implicates a money laundering scheme which is in reality common across various types of organized crimes. Therefore, anti-money laundering measures seem to be the most promising and universal approach to organized crime whether they are involved in sex trafficking, drug trafficking, or weapon trafficking. One of the measures attempted was to require landlords to verify the source of the payment before taking money from a client. Oftentimes landlords prefer hard cash and don’t question where it comes from even though this easily allows tax evasion by drug dealers. However, measures like these were previously lobbied against and therefore never implemented. If they were implemented, then somebody like my father would not have been able to maintain his scheme as it would force transparency on his part, creating a legal vulnerability that would complicate organized crime. Perhaps there are other anti-money laundering measures that could be used to interfere with these operations, but in practice they are difficult to implement. The alternative to anti-money laundering laws would be to focus on preventing crime rather than punishing it after it happens. If organized criminals usually get away with these operations anyway, then law enforcement can’t be relied upon consistently to stop them. Therefore, measures for preventing crime would reduce the burden on law enforcement who would have to carry out lengthy and expensive investigations while improving public safety. Combating organized crime through harm reduction is likely more realistic. For example, drug consumers contribute to the demand for drug traffickers. If drug users are given access to rehabilitation and harm reduction, it would prevent money from flowing toward organized crime. Similarly, human traffickers sometimes post child sexual abuse material on porn sites in an attempt to profit further from their trafficking operations. There are measures being put in place to prevent this material from spreading such as by using AI to efficiently scan targeted sites with known distribution of such material. This material can then be flagged and blocked more efficiently to prevent it from spreading. This kind of job is more difficult for humans to do because it is psychologically disturbing to look at this material and slow to sort through millions of pornographic images on the internet. An AI might be better suited for this kind of work to protect the mental health of human workers while doing the job quickly. One of the methods for redirecting funds from criminal enterprises might include widespread government education on how to do legal entrepreneurship effectively and how to find these opportunities and capitalize on them. The idea is that organized criminals often make a rational financial calculus when considering their crimes. If someone sees legal opportunities available to them and they believe that this is a legitimate path they can follow, it changes the calculus. On its own, this would likely have a small impact on organized crime while potentially becoming a strong source of investment for the community by helping small business start-ups succeed. In order to have a significant impact on organized crime, it would likely require other measures such as access to start-up money, criminal record reform that presently bars people from these opportunities, and other social safety nets and economic investment. Once again, combating organized crime remains complex and non-trivial. A change in education that may prevent children from becoming criminals is comprehensive age appropriate sex education for minors. It is important to teach children about boundaries and consent because a significant portion of child sexual abuse is perpetrated by other youth. Sometimes when children are sexually abused, they develop a desire to reclaim power and therefore act more aggressively. This pattern of behavior can lead to disengagement in schools which in turn can lead them to turning to crime. Child sexual abuse perpetrated by youth is often under discussed, but preventing it is important both for preventing severe trauma in victims while also preventing the perpetrator from continuing this behavior while risking the victim also becoming a perpetrator. Usually, victims do not become perpetrators, but sometimes they do depending on how their shattered worldview pieces itself back together due to reaction formation. Child Disengagement in Schools Another aspect of reducing crime includes addressing at risk children in schools. Some children have behavioral problems which make them more resistant to obeying authority. Although schools repeatedly give these kids punishment and detention, they don’t change and eventually drop out of school, leaving them vulnerable to organized crime. These children likely recognize that their lack of power is being exploited while moralizing language is used in an attempt to shame them into submission and control. They have a different worldview that is sensitive to this power discrepancy compared to other children while believing that the school is not actually serving their interests. Such children might look for belonging elsewhere, such as other groups of people who were frequently told that they were bad people. These people may be in a position to offer them a sense of autonomy, money, and power through criminal exploits. Schools using punitive methods of discipline may not recognize that they are reducing the child’s sense of autonomy rather than giving them hope that they can control their future through becoming better students. They are instead repeatedly punished for getting into fights and doing whatever they want with a disregard for the rules and their consequences. Perhaps a better disciplinary measure is needed for such children. Rather than inflating their ego even more through trying to scare them and threaten them which they will mimic in adulthood, schools may more effectively help at-risk students by giving them a better deal while helping them to maintain a sense of control over their lives. They want a sense that respect flows in both directions rather than being expected to respect adults that don’t respect them, with one example being adults being allowed to cuss while children can’t. Offers made to these students would need to convince them without the use of moral language, but rather through practical language for achieving what they want. This can be accompanied by school counselors who learn their grievances with the current system while giving them steps to build the life they want through education. If school fails to offer them a better deal by making compelling promises that can be kept with progress reports, then criminal gangs might do a better job of offering these kids belonging, money, power, and autonomy than any formal legal system ever could. More punishment will eventually lead to recidivism as the children don’t believe the system actually serves their interests both in childhood and in adulthood. This could be a method of rehabilitation rather than punishment applied to school systems in addition to criminal justice systems. Heterosexual Shame An overlooked aspect of trauma research is heterosexual shame. Typically, research on sexual shame focuses on LGBTQ+ because it is more systemic rather than context dependent as in the case of straight shame. This is a critical gap in trauma research because heterosexual shame can emerge as a consequence of a child being associated with an adult sexual predator, therefore causing them to view normal sexuality as inherently predatory. Part of my trauma recovery involves heterosexual shame, not just out of what my father did, but also due to facing accusations by my mother in regard to predatory behavior when I was six. She equated me to a child molester and threatened me with jail. This wasn’t the only example of sexual identity abuse because she also fabricated stories about tissues used for masturbation in an attempt to embarrass me as well as she and the family showing signs of wanting me to be gay as if it were desirable. A possible explanation for this apparent preference for my gayness would be the fact that my sisters and my mother felt my father was a sexual predator and therefore felt safer with me not having a sexual attraction toward women. I noticed apparent disapproval from this side of the family in that they would withdraw support and love while becoming colder should I express being straight. Meanwhile my proclaimed Christian father insisted that being gay was sinful. I grew up in my household as an only boy without the guidance of any father while learning that my sexual desires and curiosity made me dangerous when my father was the true source of the harm in this family system. This pattern is typical across other forms of sexual shame. For example, LGBTQ+ are frequently characterized as sexual predators. There is an infamous 1960’s homophobic ad about child predators as they were treated as identical. Similarly, today pedophile and child molester are often used interchangeably despite not being technically identical. A pedophile often internalizes deep sexual shame because of their feelings even if they don’t act on their sexual attraction to children. Meanwhile, a child molester is typically motivated by power rather than sexual pleasure and is more likely to act on these desires than a pedophile. This shame prevents pedophiles from seeking help and may make children more vulnerable as a result if these pedophiles do not instead die by suicide which is also unacceptable. A child molester demonstrates a clear lack of sympathy for the victim’s suffering whereas a pedophile may have sympathy for a child’s suffering and therefore not act on their desires, although some pedophiles do act on these desires. Closing I hope that this document helps in understanding perpetrator psychology while protecting present and future victims from organized crime. Combating organized crime is difficult for many reasons. People who do horrible things operate from a different worldview than most people are used to, making their behavior seem incomprehensible. It becomes difficult to understand why people would do such things. Additionally, organized criminals are both sophisticated in their methods and determined to exploit any weakness available to them in a social system. It becomes nearly impossible to close all weaknesses within a social system even in theory, and then in practice there is often a lack of political willpower to close the identified weaknesses, exacerbating the problem. The changes necessary to combat organized crime therefore often seem threatening to the current social order, radical, politically risky, or counter intuitive due to rehabilitation seeming “soft.” I may struggle with the trauma inflicted upon me by my family and organized criminals, resulting in survivor’s guilt among many other psychological complications. However, I also have unique strengths in the form of my deeply logical and analytical approach to understanding systems. I would like to use my strengths to give others the help that I deserved but did not receive. References Beck, D. E., & Cowan, C. C. (1996). Spiral dynamics: Mastering values, leadership, and change. Blackwell Publishing. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024). Intimate partner violence, sexual violence, and stalking among men. https://www.cdc.gov/intimate-partner-violence/about/intimate-partner-violence-sexual-violence-and-stalking-among-men.html Hare, R. D. (1993). Without conscience: The disturbing world of the psychopaths among us. Guilford Press. Herman, J. L. (1992). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence from domestic abuse to political terror. Basic Books. Lew, M. (1990). Victims no longer: Men recovering from incest and other sexual child abuse. Harper & Row. Mississippi Today. (2025, October 30). FBI arrests delta sheriffs. https://mississippitoday.org/2025/10/30/fbi-arrests-delta-sheriffs/ Wilber, K. (2000). A theory of everything: An integral vision for business, politics, science, and spirituality. Shambhala Publications.

@Leo Gura I have a question about a conspiracy theory. I believe there are epistemically sound conspiracy theories so long as we are honest about what we don't know. I'm curious if this is an example of an epistemically sound conspiracy theory. The CIA probably did something bad, but we don't know what because they covered it up. Sometimes governments cover things up and we don't know what they did, and our government probably did successful cover ups as well, likely including something bad. The CIA also has a history of documented misconduct and various scandals, suggesting that they probably did other bad things as well, but we don't know what. Any scandal or misconduct through the history of the CIA is proof that the CIA might have done other things that we haven't yet discovered. Is this reasoning sound? I also find it funny because it is intentionally unfalsifiable while simultaneously being the point of how cover ups work along with self-aware paranoia about "something bad." The policy suggestion that this conspiracy theory would entail would be whistleblower protections because there are probably whistleblowers trying to tell us that the CIA did something bad, but we can't hear them.

Do you think this guy is evil? Why or why not?

@Eskilon It was a stray cat. I didn't want to keep him. In this case I cared for the cat because it was the right thing to do. Eventually, someone adopted him. I know I am biased toward humans and I get annoyed by animals, however on principle I understood that this cat needed care until we could get it somewhere safe. Just because I feel a certain way toward animals and they often annoy me like this stray cat that gets under my legs and makes me trip, doesn't mean I won't care for the animal anyway out of an intellectual moral reasoning rather than an emotional attachment to animals. Does that clear it up?

I have encountered a dog owner who seemed to think it was no big deal when his dog bit made and tore my pants. He just walked away saying sorry and didn't do anything to pay. He just let his dog on a long leash run across the street and bite me. I'm scared of dogs and he said the dog wants to say hi. It looks like people get really infatuated with their pets to the point that they care very little or are blind to the harm they cause. I would need to do research on why people get this infatuated. My sister is infatuated with animals. Maybe it is because she views animals as fundamentally more innocent than humans as humans have a nasty mind. In my case, I would prefer not to own any pets. I have an instrumental sense of love because of how I was raised. I see the pet as a liability and feel inconvenience rather than connection. For me it is easy to choose the human child. I call this human bias. The human bias is what I define as a human bias in which humans are biased toward humans rather than animals. Although we can argue that humans are more valuable, this is a consequence of human bias toward human bias. Our reasoning is itself not applicable to the value of animals beyond subjective utility or any other number of philosophies invented by humans. I logically understand that animals are worthy of love and respect, but I don't want them. For me it is more abstract that animals are not really less valuable than humans. We just act this way for our social survival. In the case of dog owners, there might be psychological studies we can find to understand why they act this way.

For anybody interested, I have a long document, about 12 pages single-spaced. It is about organized crime, focusing mainly on stage red. This was my first draft, and there might be some mistakes in it. I have given a copy to a couple of people I know in preparation for review, but they haven't gotten back to me yet. I will give you the sections related to my father and circumstantial evidence as it is most relevant for understanding the "monster." If you are interested in the full document, let me know, but I made it by myself without help. Here are some snippets from the document. One thing I didn't mention was grooming behaviors. I didn't understand this very well, but grooming is being criminalized and it explains much of what my father did to me to prepare me for exploitation similar to other child predators. My Father Christopher Paul Hamann was my father. He had an extensive criminal record involving drug distribution and child support evasion. He had children by multiple women including highschool girls like my mother, though due to a five year age gap being allowed, it was not considered statutory rape when maybe it should be. My father proceeded to abandon his children he had with at least two women that I know of as he fled the State to avoid paying child support. My mother had extensive legal battles, only to discover that child support enforcement was often ineffective at compensating mothers like her. Child support enforcement might take his license away, only for him to drive without a license. Similarly, men who don’t pay child support might end up in jail while the victims remain without compensation in an unstable home. For the most part, my father remained out of jail despite owing approximately 300,000 dollars in child support. He would argue that he was doing his best to help the kids, and this sympathetic sounding argument covered his criminal lifestyle. Some of the mechanisms for child support enforcement include taxing a paycheck from a job or taxing property. However, my father had methods for evading both of these. He would jump from job to job, so that he could not be taxed due to inconsistent income. He would also pay his landlord in cash which he received through illegal means as part of a money laundering scheme, thus avoiding the property tax. This money was often stolen from family members such as when he broke into mom’s house, or the money would be received from other gang activities which seemed to mainly be drug deals to my knowledge. Sometimes my father would boast about his exploits, mentioning money made from drug deals, glorifying gang violence and death threats, and prostitution deals. Although I initially assumed the prostitutes were adult women selling themselves, I would later discover that prostitutes could be victims who are sold by other men, and the victims could also be children including me. My father was often impulsive and manipulative. He would suddenly run out of the house in the middle of the night, taking money, and going to meet his gang. He would also treat me as if I were special, giving me lots of positive praise while threatening to disown me if I reported his crimes. This was combined with incoherent religious messaging in which he would condemn a teenager for masturbation while soliciting minors for prostitution. He claimed to believe in karma, arguing that people gave him money for his drugs because he made good drugs and did the right thing by not mixing poison in the heroin he was selling them. This gives a psychological profile of someone who is deeply irrational from an intellectual standpoint because in reality the underlying logic is power and whatever serves him. His ideology is therefore inconsistent, similar to a Nazi ideology which is logically incoherent, but has a fundamental message of power and dominance. The details are changed as needed to suit them. My father also appears to have been operating under the “just world fallacy.” From his point of view, so long as he could get away with these things, it was as though God was on his side. He believed that good things happened to good people and bad things happened to bad people. In the mind of organized criminals, this is disturbing because it mirrors patterns in how a psychopath thinks. If a person is stupid enough to fall for their tricks, then to the psychopath, that person deserved to be hurt and they deserve to benefit from hurting them. This is what happens when the just world fallacy is filtered through a psychology rooted in power and control. I was often isolated from the rest of my family while my father would be mixing apparent love with threats. This created a dynamic in which my sisters learned to associate me with a perpetrator and therefore started turning against me. I was the easier target which therefore made me a more compelling scapegoat compared to our father involved in a violent gang. I felt as if I were alone trying to navigate not just my father, but also another unstable abusive situation with Mom and my stepfather involving drugs and domestic violence. Teens from unstable homes are often the most vulnerable to sex trafficking due to the isolation from other family members. In the case of my father, he also wanted me to give him information about Mom and Mike which he later went on to use in court with success. It was suspicious how he got this information, but the court didn’t question it and instead investigated Mom for drugs. My father had ties to police corruption through his father Gerald Hamann. Gerald was a former gang member who later became a police informant. He reported some gangs, but didn’t turn his son into the police despite knowing of his crimes. My father claimed he had extensive involvement in crime with Gerald, but I don’t know which parts are true and which parts are fabricated. The part that concerns me is that these stories are plausible given the context of both of their criminal histories, access to weapons, violent histories, and connections to the police in a way that would prevent accountability. In his free time, he would look like a normal man. He would play videogames, read books, and listen to music. One thing I noticed is that he listened to a lot of dirty rap music that glorified criminal behavior. This music on its own does not necessarily have a connection to real criminal activity. However, a finer psychological point is that the music a person listens to often speaks to their identity on some level. This becomes more blatant when the music is used in the context of actual ongoing criminal behavior. It becomes a sign that he actually resonates with the things being said in the dirty rap music that glorifies violence. This makes me wonder if it might be possible to reduce criminal behavior by allowing for edgy raps that have stronger moral messages while still being badass. An example might be criminals who reformed. If stage red values respect and admiration, then sometimes the military or aiding police becomes a gateway to reform. Other times it leads to corruption in the form of a revolving door between police officers during the day and gang members during the night. My father showed some signs of wanting to be different. He feared that his kids would not respect him if they thought of him too negatively. He needed to keep secrets from the family while claiming to want to break the cycle of criminal behavior. Sometimes having a child inspires criminals to change, but in my father’s case it didn’t. Instead he put the burden on me to fix what I didn’t break while involving me in things I didn’t want to be involved in despite claiming to keep family separate from criminal activities. He would talk about breaking the cycle of crime while actively perpetuating it, claiming to be a product of his environment. The stories he told of his childhood involved racially motivated gangs in both directions. He became associated with criminals early on and was described as an asshole by his sister. He put a cat in the microwave while his mother minimized the behavior and became defensive. Although child sexual abuse is common in youth gang members, it is unclear if my father was “initiated” through such abuse. If he were, then that would explain escalating aggression, but the aggression may have been present regardless of such abuse. He came from a father that was also a gang member and later became a police informant. My father learned to glorify violence and power, including his father’s violence such as death threats and beatings. He had learned that his behavior was only bad if he got caught. The Incident Although my father usually did drug deals with his gang, there was an incident that added another dimension to his criminal behavior that I found disturbing. Back when I was in highschool, my father took me to his gang in the middle of the night. He had previously mentioned prostitution deals, but I didn’t think this included children until I was sexually exploited. Once he brought me to his gang, he left me in the car as he walked off and disappeared from my sight. He had been talking in code frequently to disguise his intentions, including numbers and colors. I waited alone until Dad returned from his deal with someone code named Fat Ass. I never saw this man or any of his supposed five other gang members including a woman. They seem to have set up this situation well to ensure that I would have as little information as possible. This made my report ineffective by the time I tried to tell the police what I witnessed. When Dad came back, he said that Fat Ass would give me 600 dollars if I spent the night with him. He for some reason seemed happy about this, as if on some level he felt a twisted sense of pride or being special for having his son offered to a gang. At first I was confused about what exactly he wanted me to do when spending the night with this man. Because children with autism are more trusting and prone to literal interpretations, I thought he meant that he wanted me to literally sleep with Fat Ass rather than figuratively, meaning have sex with him. The reason I hesitated is because 600 dollars sounded like a lot of money for minimal effort. Therefore, I started to grow suspicious until I remembered that Fat Ass was the man who had supposedly hired prostitutes in other deals. I discovered that these deals also involved children when I was the subject of this deal. Ultimately, I didn’t take the money. I was torn between seeing my father as someone I needed to trust to protect me while reconciling it with the reality of his criminal lifestyle. I fell silent and became heavy after being exposed to trafficking deals. I began to fear that my father and his gang may have done deals like these before with other minors. This turned into survivor’s guilt in which my silence felt like enabling. These feelings seem to be driving me to document what I know about organized crime in the hopes of protecting other victims, bringing perpetrators to justice, and preventing these crimes where possible. Therefore, I would like to describe how circumstantial evidence might be applied to cases like mine along with how it might help to catch perpetrators. It will be important to highlight the limits of evidence, as organized criminals often have deep knowledge of the legal system and know how to manipulate evidence to sometimes frame their victims. Circumstantial Evidence in My Case The sexual exploitation of a minor is often extremely difficult to prove. In my case, I was set up by organized criminals who used coded language, hid their identities, spoke behind closed doors by word of mouth without texts, and exploited the trust of a child toward his father while being linked to police corruption that enabled the behavior. Because of factors like these, the majority of organized criminals for the most part evade significant charges. Therefore, the justice system has been relying more and more on circumstantial evidence which is more difficult to hide even for organized criminals while still implicating them through indirect proof rather than hard evidence that is easier to hide such as a gun or a body. In my case, the proof at first seems nearly impossible, but upon closer inspection it is possible to build at minimum probable cause, even if not beyond a reasonable doubt without a further complex investigation. Using what I know about my father, I can reason backwards to see what the signs were that would implicate him. First of all, my father had an extensive criminal record, including drug distribution offenses that would implicate gang activity. His crimes included fleeing the State to avoid paying child support, after which he structured his lifestyle around avoiding these taxes. He was later caught with a pipe in his car by law enforcement, possibly because a gang member left it there or he was using it himself. There was a broad continuation of the same criminal lifestyle even after he supposedly passed all of his drug tests after being caught the first time. Secondly, organized criminals often have a money laundering scheme. This makes sense because the money they are getting is through illegal means, and then often used for seemingly legitimate purposes. In my case, my father owed about 300,000 dollars in child support, owned property, and had multiple jobs. Normally someone would pay a tax on their property for child support, but in the case of my father he didn’t due to paying the landlord in cash. This combined with inconsistent income tied from jumping from job to job, would implicate a money laundering scheme with which to avoid paying child support because the paycheck is also supposed to be taxed for child support. There are likely many other reasons for money laundering schemes that organized criminals could use. In cases like these, a person with a criminal record that implicates gang activity such as drugs, weapons, or sexual offenses combined with a pattern of tax evasion, would implicate that there is a continued criminal lifestyle. Thirdly, in my case my father was less careful with the text messages he sent me. He was confident that I would not report him, which he seems to have been right about. Some of the messages on my old phone included things like Dad saying he would gank my stepfather. This would actually be treated as hard evidence in a court of law, had I had the courage as a child to turn my father into the police for his gang activities. In other cases there likely are damning text messages that are never recovered due to children being too afraid to become a legal enemy of a parent. My father likely had the contacts of other gang members on his old phone, which would establish an ongoing relationship and criminal lifestyle. Proving sexual exploitation specifically would be the hardest to prove, even if my father were implicated in drug and gang related offenses. Once again, I did not realize what I was witnessing or grasp the significance until later on. In this case, I was the child closest to my father, spending the most time with him on his property. Given his ongoing criminal lifestyle, I would have been exposed to gang activities. The closest thing I can think of that might implicate sexual abuse would be my father’s broader criminal lifestyle and character. If my father is the kind of person who shows very little care for his children such as by evading child support while having children by multiple women, then this person would be very careless, reckless, or dangerous. This kind of character, given an ongoing criminal lifestyle, would be the kind of person to endanger his own child by exposing him to gang activities. In my case the specific endangerment was being solicited by a gang for child prostitution which my father facilitated by bringing me to them. However, in order to prove that the specific mechanism of endangerment was sexual exploitation, that would likely require finding out who these other prostitutes were that the gang was hiring. I don’t see how I could prove sexual exploitation specifically while being an isolated witness against an organized gang without corroborating this kind of testimony. Even if I can’t prove sexual exploitation specifically, there should be sufficient evidence to prove child endangerment in the form of criminal socialization and foreseeable risks such as violence from a criminal gang. Lesser charges might still be possible even if sexual exploitation specifically cannot be proven, and depending on the severity, the lesser charges might be sufficient to ensure a just outcome regardless of absent proof of child trafficking. Relevant factors would include contributing to the delinquency of the minor or using a child to manipulate court outcomes. In my case my father not only said he would disown me if I reported his crimes, but he also wanted me to gather dirt on Mom that he could use against her in court. This put me in a loyalty conflict in which I was forced to choose between two bad parents. I sided with Dad because Mom and Mike were using drugs and destroying the house, causing me to fear for the safety of my siblings. Once Dad got this information, it then changed the legal outcome of the court. Mom was treated with increased scrutiny while being made to take drug tests due to knowledge my father could not have had without me. This therefore helped him to avoid consequences. If a person gets this kind of information that they shouldn’t have, then it might implicate some form of spying. In this case I was used as a pawn due to coercion behind the scenes that the court could not see was happening. I was being forced to make adult legal calculations without guidance as both parents were unsafe. Courts should probably be more skeptical of people giving this information they shouldn’t have other than through hearsay. If a child gave him this information along with this broader criminal lifestyle, then this would implicate something very serious in that I was being coerced into aiding in a felony. I would like to help law enforcement and advocacy groups, but sometimes people like me get charged instead of the people doing the coercion as the truth seems to be too complex for courts to handle easily and routinely. In my case, I showed repeated signs of distress and suicidal ideation that was often ignored in schools when I mentioned these things in creative writing. I would write stories involving me committing suicide or I would mention gangs and domestic violence. It was not until I publicly confessed to homicidal thoughts that the community reacted, leading to Mike’s eviction and my mother coming off of the drugs. Maybe children who write about suicide in creative writing should be taken more seriously in schools as it could lead to discovering serious abuse. My father was the son of a former gang member who became a police informant. This would create a strong incentive to cover up crimes while seeming legitimate. Maybe gang members who become police informants should be treated with more scrutiny if they have family members involved in crimes that implicate gang activities. There might be other factors, but I don’t know what else would implicate my father in these crimes. My hope is that these circumstances can be used to better detect gang activities in other cases, such as men with criminal records related to gang activities who owe hundreds of thousands in child support while being implicated in a money laundering scheme. Maybe these circumstances should be seen as more suspect and potentially leading to the discovery of drug, weapon, or sex trafficking, thereby protecting present and future victims.

@Ziran in the case of grievance rapists, they usually target someone in an intimate relationship, partially due to the entitlement worldview. This worldview was actually prevalent throughout history due to women being considered property of men and expected to submit. In fact, marital rape wasn't fully criminalized in America until 1993 due to the assumption that the relationship automatically confers consent. Sometimes rapists operate under these relational assumptions such that they believe they are justified in using force against an intimate partner to get sex and to them it isn't even rape. The same is still the case in less developed country where women are seen as property and expected to submit. The entitlement worldview is part of the problem, and it can worsen if they expect infidelity. In that case the grievance might be so bad that they could rape and murder and intimate partner. However, they might sometimes attack strangers. These strangers or random women that they barely know just might happen to remind them of a past woman they felt betrayed by. Therefore, raping this woman symbolically destroys the type of person he now hates. They seem to be triggered by loss of control and power, which is well known in domestic violence cases, making it dangerous when a woman tries to leave. The disturbing implications is that the one documented rape at the time of the murder, is only the tip of the iceberg of a long brutal history. This rapist likely sexually abused this woman many times before she tried to leave him, and this is implied in relationship studies of abuse cases, but not always clearly and starkly stated. The rapist often says "that bitch deserved it." Defense attorneys often look horrible when they try to defend these people, but our system does require due process for such people and some kind of attempt at a defense even when the behavior seems indefensible.

I finished reading a book called "Without Conscience" by Robert D. Hare. I think it gives some pretty good explanations as to how psychopaths function, how they think, and the limits of our current system for handling people with such conditions. Treatment attempts are known to often backfire by teaching psychopaths how to fake progress and learn to manipulate even more effectively. It seems to truly be difficult to get a determined psychopathic offender to just behave themselves without trying to screw people over. To this day our justice system doesn't really have a good answer for such offenders. Preventative and proactive measures in early childhood seem to be the best bet, but with our current system focused on reactive measures, it would be difficult to make such a leap. It might require restructuring the incentive structure of our justice system which seems to focus on mass incarceration rather than crime prevention.

@moonawakening444 This reminds me of my father. He had some really deep self-deception and a profound lack of self-awareness. He would act like he cares about his children, but then constantly be absent due to gang activities. I remember when he took the Bible and tried to preach to me about morality. He told me about how he was a good honest drug dealer who doesn't mix rat poison in with his cocaine when he sells it to addicts. The fact that they come back for more is good karma, proving he deserves to make money off of drugs. He genuinely saw no irony in selling "poison free heroin." He also was poorly educated due to not completing school. He often couldn't follow things like irony or school vocabulary because he didn't care for school. It is like he really believed his own nonsense. That is why psychopaths say things like "I lie as easily as I breathe." It is like these people have no real sense of what integrity looks like in practice. They believe that acting is good enough so long as you don't get caught. This is the kind of extreme behavior that spiral dynamics stage blue is reacting against, which is why it is so strongly moralizing and emphasizes integrity, love, god, and truth. From the point of view of stage red, these are all instrumental tools for control and manipulation with no real value beyond it, making them very difficult to change due to resistance to shame and guilt at the harm they cause.

@moonawakening444 some of this might seem like a bit of stretch for understanding incomprehensible behavior that most would simply call evil. Personally, I haven't seen anything about these people hating themselves. Instead, I found that these people are often narcissists who have inappropriately high self esteem while believing themselves to be the victims. A common DARVO tactic in such offenders might be that one of their victims deserved to be raped and they should have known better than to piss this guy off. They seem to find the rules of society as constraining and they want to place themselves above the rules and other people who they frequently dehumanize or actively exploit their humanity to maximize suffering. A person can feel like an outsider rejected by society while having inappropriately high self esteem. The one thing that would obliterate their self esteem would be if they self reflected on the harm they caused others and took accountability for their actions. Therefore, they must rationalize their behaviors while boasting about exploits against stupid people who deserve to be raped and killed. They often operate under the just world fallacy. Good things happen to good people and bad things happen to bad people, also known as karma. Therefore if they can get away with raping someone, then that person deserved to have something bad happen to them and because they got away with it, that is the proof that their behavior is acceptable. I made a document on my father that explains more details of his psyche. He seemed narcissistic or psychopathic in his behaviors. I might share it on the forum later.

@Oppositionless I guess that does pair with serial rapists who say "i just like to fuck." Animals seem to act like this when they just want to fuck so they gang rape a lone victim and rape them. In the animal kingdom, there are fathers who frequently abandon their children and keep fucking while doing nothing to support the family. The closest parallel to a dead beat dad I could find would be like a lion who sleeps all day while the mother works alone to feed the children.

@UpperMaster I have some questions. This girl you made out with, how does she feel about the interaction? Does she regret the interaction or do think she would have acted differently if not mildly drunk? The lack of clarity is what draws a lot of negative attention to these situations, especially when one person is drunk and the other sober, creating a power imbalance. Secondly, did she initiate any sexual interaction with you? Did she enthusiastically participate? These are considered for legal reasons, but the issue gets tricky if someone was mildly drunk but not to the point that it would completely impair judgment. Moving forward, I want you to know that there are legal risks with having sexual interactions of any kind with a drunk woman. It is better to wait if this kind of situation creates any ambiguity, potentially triggering serious accusations. This can include people accusing you of rape in some cases such as another forum member is doing right now. The mixed opinions are part of the ambiguity these situations can create, so be careful.

I previously posted that women seem to love me very easily with very little effort. This created confusion in which people claimed it was difficult to get girls to like them while my experience appeared to show the opposite. I was fed a lot of lies and convincing partial truths which caused me to believe I was attractive when this may be very far from the truth. When I was bullied by men, it was very obvious. They would slam my face into the table and steal from me while calling me a fa*****. This happened in school because I was isolated, socially awkward, and sexually traumatized. However, there were also girls who would act as if they found me attractive and I am now rethinking these interactions and having doubts as an adult. The first incident was in the eighth grade and was obviously bullying. There was a girl named Josie who wanted to hook up with me. However, the relationship was the front for bullying in that she would now demand my belongings and grab my private parts despite my objections. She would apologize and do it again. Eventually she started trying to manipulate me with breakup threats, so I just let her breakup with me. She tried to get back together and I said no. The other boys often insisted that I was lucky that she was in to me and liked me. This is commonly used to minimize sexual bullying from females and added to my confusion given that my boundaries were already shattered from earlier experiences. An outside bullying story that might apply to me is when a group of women intentionally find unattractive guys and dare other girls to flirt with them. These situations are made to seem like positive attention when really it is negative attention. This pattern appeared when I was in highschool while others treated me as if I were a chick magnet. For example, when I was on the bus to highschool, a girl sat next to me and started talking to me. She started asking me if I think she looked pretty. I evaluated her smile as beautiful and she then asked if I wanted to hook up with her. I remembered what happened with Josie and how she started grabbing my private parts. Therefore I started vetting her and checking her motives for why she would love me despite not speaking to me much. She then started to stumble and couldn't give a clear answer. Therefore I told her that if she isn't sure then we should probably wait and get to know each other better before making such commitments. When I said this, the other girls started laughing. The girl who was just asking me out looked embarrassed. I asked why are they are laughing and eventually the girl admitted that they told her to ask me out. Apparently, the joke is that this girl got rejected by the most unattractive guy in the school. The alternative joke is that the unattractive guy gets his hopes up or crosses some boundary. The apparent positive attention I received from girls was probably in reality negative attention from being especially unattractive rather than a chick magnet. Another incident occurred when girls would block me in the stairwell on the way to lunch. They wouldn't let me through and would sing about wanting to be my lover. This was unwanted attention, but I was being treated like I was lucky again. There was even one girl who told me I was really cute like a puppy before shoving a dog treat in my mouth which I found disgusting. She would pet my head and tell me I was adorable. I also recall that over time there were some girls who would either show remorse for their behavior toward me or become defensive when other girls started talking behind my back about how I look, my behavior, and so forth. Some girls became opposed to how the others were acting when they came to see my character as honest and in good faith while struggling with an abusive family full of drug addicts and gang activity which sometimes led to suicidal thoughts. It seems that the girls were less likely to act this way once I started to mean something to them in a way that made bullying psychologically more difficult. However, I shouldn't have needed to reveal these things to not be bullied even though this was the reason why I was often isolated, quiet, and socially awkward. Part of the reason I believed I was receiving positive attention was not only because boys would tell me I was lucky, but also because of another plausible dynamic at play. Apparently, women often find gay men attractive despite gay men having no interest in them. I figured that this was because many men often make vulgar sexual comments with a clear agenda. Meanwhile, gay men have no such agenda and therefore can paradoxically become more attractive. I figured that this might apply to me because I didn't make the vulgar comments the other guys were often making that women would find unattractive. I didn't have a sexual agenda toward these girls which could paradoxically make me seem more attractive. At the end of the day, this was unwanted attention. My boundaries were being violated and confused due to gaslighting. Therefore the most likely reality is that I am not chick magnet and I may be somewhat unattractive. I would strongly advise that women not bully unattractive men in this way. If you don't know their history and you are intentionally confusing them, it might worsen creepy behaviors in other contexts. If he thinks he is a chick magnet and women are into this behavior, it might translate into other problematic situations with sexual harassment for future women as a consequence of this man's boundary confusion. This behavior could realistically come back to bite other women beyond just the bullies.

@Monster Energy one thing that should be concerning is how easy it is to access porn. When people post this on the internet, anybody can access this including minors. In fact, given a cellphone and incognito mode, there is a realistic chance that a parent would never find out if their child was looking at porn. In my case, I initially didn't look at porn and was confused by this behavior. However, when I was a teenager I was watching a police show. They were investigating a sexual predator. A police officer said that he would take pictures of women to increase sexual pleasure during masturbation. Once given this information, it gave me the idea to now look at porn. My family never seemed to find out. It is possible that they knew, but stayed silent. In any case, I did access pornography as a child. Once I experienced the initial high, this brought me back to it in adulthood. My recommendation is that we should probably make this content more difficult for minors to access. Maybe you can't simple Google images for pornography. That's what I did. Maybe Google would have to remove this content from being findable via these means. They might need to be isolated to websites to make it a little harder to find. Then if the minor does go to that site, I'm not sure what other measure should be used. Does anybody think minors looking at porn is a problem?

@Leo Gura When companies claim AI does the work, but really humans do it behind the scenes, it is called "artificial artificial intelligence" or compared to the wizard of Oz with the man behind the curtain. So I guess we are technically having an AAI revolution rather than an AI revolution.

@Koeke So far I haven't learned how to do manual programming. I'm still learning. I plan to apply for a job in IT that might offer the training I need to get better at understanding the manual work behind it. so far, I am having a tool do most of the programming, I'm just trying to figure out how it should do it. I am running into a lot of problems though with usage limits, so knowing how to do manual coding would help.

I have recently taken an interest in programming chess computers. My dream is to one day combine a C++ model with a LLM to create an advanced chess computer that both finds the best move and can articulate complex strategic reasoning in terms a human can understand. One day this might become a universal chess coach that anybody can access. It would be cool if the method of reasoning were adapted to the player's reasoning style. This would have to combine a chat function similar to Claude or some other bot with a chess engine capable of deep and precise calculation combined with reinforcement learning. I tried to build a prototype of this using Claude programming, but something went wrong and I need to rethink the project. The usage limits are problematic and they slow my progress considerably. I might require a large database of annotated grandmaster games to teach the machine patterns in human reasoning. I am also looking for a team that might be able to help me with this kind of project. For now I scaled back the project to focus on solving something simple first. This project I am submitting is based on a simple chess variant called the pawn game. This variant uses four pawns for each side. The pawns move the same way as in normal chess including en passant. The objective of this game is to get one of your pawns to the other side of the board. With perfect play, I believe white wins by force. Therefore, if you play against the computer as black, you should lose no matter what you do. I published a study on this chess variant on lichess.org. I originally solved it through human analysis and concluded that white should always win with either 1. e4 or 1. d4. the AI appears to agree with my analysis. My next attempt will be to expand this to the eight pawn game. Although I solved the simple version through my own analysis, the larger version is much more complex and I struggled. Apparently, white can win, but it is not with the intuitive central grab that I assumed. It might be with a flank pawn instead as it maintains flexibility with the central pawns. Here is version 3 of this project. It might be a little slow to load up at first, but it is working for me. https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/072e5c52-b844-41b1-b7ac-2d17e01aca50 Are you able to open the link? If so, feel free to test yourself against this computer as either color. If you find a line that allows you draw or win with black, then it indicates that this AI is probably broken or has a bug. I refuted versions 1 and 2 by winning with black. The line I used was as follows, but should no longer be possible in version 3. 1. d4 f5 2. e3 e6 3. f3 d6 4. f4 d5 5. c3 c6 6. c4 dxc4 7. e4 c3 8. d5 c2 9. dxc6 c1 Here is a link to my lichess study if you are interested. https://lichess.org/study/ORdmNFQD/RcBMDy26 If you are able to access everything just fine, then what do you think of this sort of project so far? Personally, I find myself really sucked into this.

@Joshe One of the key winning strategies in this variant is to exploit en passant. The reason white wins is because by advancing the pawns to the fifth rank first, it limits black's options greatly. en passant can then be used at any moment while running the opponent out of moves. This is also the reason why if en passant were not allowed, then this variant would be a draw as white's strategic set ups would no longer be effective. Sometimes this is a theme in a real chess game such as variations of the Sicilian or king's Indian defense. In the Sicilian white can sometimes push a4-a5. Once black has already played a6 preparing b5, this en passant set up can limit black's options for expansion. Similarly in the King's indian defense, white sometimes wants to play a3-b4 to expand on the queenside for a strong attack. In some positions black can slow this by using the maneuver Nb8-d7-c5 in conjunction with a5-a4. This kind of set up would limit white's option as using the en passant set up prevents white's expansion on the queenside with b4.

@Joshe I'm glad you like it. I submitted version 5 to chess in schools. These chess programs often use simplified chess variants for teachings young beginners. These variants are simple enough for a strong human to solve. This analysis can be verified with a chess computer that can calculate the limited number of positions. This is good because children often love chess computers anyway. This would make learning even more engaging and it would help the children to learn optimal strategy and play quickly. I haven't tried the full pawn game yet. It would be much more complex and the computer would need more time to calculate everything. I might require a more efficient computer for that variant.

I made an updated version. I found some bugs with the previous version involving draw and win conditions. This version 5 now allows the player to flip the board. It also has a description of the rules that can be accessed. The AI is set to play the most efficient win. https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/53204627-e589-4a97-95a5-61a405d2b7c2 If anybody wants to test this out, I hope you have as much fun as I had solving this game and using AI to verify my analysis.

@DocWatts I just have a question. I remember Gandhi in India used civil disobedience to an extreme degree. This included nonviolence while the British were tying people to cannons and blowing out their guts. It makes me ask, what would happen if Americans used extreme civil disobedience to the point of groups of peaceful protestors sitting down and being recorded as ICE agents publicly shot dozens of them to death? I am not sure what would happen in that scenario. Would there be overwhelming mass outrage? Or would the media claim that all of them were domestic terrorists, making the mass killings justified? Would this kind of situation be different or similar to what happened in India? Furthermore, it looks like ICE more accurately matches the description of terrorists than the people they kill, but they are State sponsored.

I have autism. I'm not sure how much detail I should give about this.

https://lichess.org/study/ORdmNFQD/8eQFKUPD This is chapter 1 of the lichess study. It has the central pawn opening.