DefinitelyNotARobot

@mmKay Well that's what a beautiful ass will do to a motherfucker... 😂😂

Of course I can define what attracts me to her. If I see a beautiful ass I know that it attracts me, I'm just saying that I personally don't see the point of putting it into words. The ass speaks for itself imo. No amount of theorizing will make her ass more beautiful to me than if I just looked at it. But that's just me, you can theorize all that you want.

@Princess Arabia Glad that it resonates. Doing this exercise from time to time helps to open up the mind not just in a psychological way, but more importantly on an energetic level. It's like an energetic muscle that you strengthen, allowing you to abide in this space more regularly. That has been my experience at least.

Imagine some kind of prism refracting light into all the different colors. Depending on which angle you look at it from you'll see a different color. Reality is similar, but there are an infinite amount of perspectives and each perspective is unique. So it can't be totally understood from within a particular perspective, as it is ALL the perspectives, including that individual one. It includes all perspectives since there is no "other" space to put them. Really, they're all happening "within" each other, but it doesn't appear to us that way, because it's simply another appearance. It serves no purpose, as purpose serves IT, for it is the highest of love. The trick is to realize that you have direct and immediate access to an infinite amount of understanding beyond the immediate scope of the human mind, as "your human understanding" isn't really "your" understanding, but a lower frequency of pure understanding manifesting itself through your relative understanding. The problem then becomes that there is SO MUCH that the human mind gets over flooded with understanding. It's just too much to handle and so we become overwhelmed and frustrated with our thoughts and emotions and seemingly loose control (which really is an attempt to remain in control) This reality has a capacity for infinite seeking without delivering you any substantial answers. The question then becomes whether you can trust reality enough to be okay with the possibility that you may never know all the answers. This then actually opens up the possibility to know. Here is good meditation I like to do, which focuses on the now and also tries to be more direct and practical in raising your understanding. Sit down and think of something you understand. You understand that you aren't currently being hunted by a tiger in the jungle, right? Take that thought and really feel into that thought. Feel into the security you feel when you KNOW that you are safe and that you aren't being hunted, or forced to do anything by anybody. You can go as deep as you want and you will be safe. Really feel into the bodily sensations that accompany your thoughts of safety and security. Focus not on those feelings per se, but rather on the fact that you UNDERSTAND that you feel that way. Try to sit with this understanding for a moment. Can you feel any type of pleasant or unpleasant sensations in the body? Acknowledge them and UNDERSTAND that you're experiencing them. This is where you need to make a crucial shift. You must understand that this understanding isn't YOUR understanding! It's simply understanding! It's completely free from any human restriction! It completely transcends all concept, shape or form. It almost feels like you tap into this river where words just start flowing through your mouth (or in this particular case through our fingers as we're typing) all by themselves. completely spontaneously. I'm often surprised by the stuff these fingers type out, or the thoughts "my" mind reflect to me. Not in a cocky kind of way, but more in a "I genuinely don't know where any of this came from and the message is as helpful to me as it would have be if someone else had written it for me" type of way. These messages often times don't feel like "my" messages (as in the human). The meditation I've provided has helped me cultivate this ability to let go and flow with the river of the moment. I'm not sure if it will resonate, but perhaps someone will find it helpful (I know I did ).

Trying to explain the beauty of a woman is like trying to explain a joke imo. If I tell you a joke and you don't get it, I can explain it to you. Maybe you will get it then and find it funny in retrospect, but it will never be the same as if you understood the joke within the flow of the conversation. The punchline looses its punch. Similarly, being too analytical about a woman's beauty will actually take away from her beauty. You can't get a hold or clear grasp of her beauty. It's something that must be experienced directly. You must flow with her beauty and allow it to melt away your thoughts. True beauty will leave you speechless! Women have a very calming and nurturing energy, which allows me to stay grounded in the present with them, which then in turn calms them down too and allows them to be present as well. That's the key! Presence. The female energy is an invitation to meditate. My mind is usually super ADHD, it's like there is a constant lightning storm of ideas rushing through my peripheral, but when I'm with my gf it's a calm sea. It grounds me which gives her a solid foundation to be herself. My point is simply that you can maximize the beauty of women by taking a "meditative" approach, rather than a "contemplative" approach. It's all about your energies. You could alternatively call it the "trantric" approach, but I don't know a whole lot about tantra so I'm not sure how much that fits the bill. That's just me though. Maybe my approach simply doesn't fit YOUR bill and that's totally fine. I'm just offering my perspective in hopes of inspiring some deeper insights.

Do you think that you might have some parasocial tendencies? I'm not trying to be rude, but you seem to be highly invested in online creators. I've seen you extensively share videos and opinions ranging from Destiny to Mr. Girl and a bunch of other creators, plus you seem to have a lot of opinions on their personalities and what they're doing right/wrong. It seems that you have quiet a fascination with online creators, but that's just my observation so maybe I'm wrong, idk. Take it as some food for thought.

Bro, you're about to create an AI with the perfect rizz and it's absolutely going to steal all the women from us...

There is some truth to that. The human mind likes to twist and turn mystical/psychedelic experiences and awakenings into concepts and images. That's a natural human behavior. So yeah, it's limited in what it can express, remember and feel/think, but don't assume that you are nothing but that human! You are not limited to that human mind. Believing yourself to be nothing but a human is actually another "experience contaminated by your brain and senses". "You" just appear to be a human mind... to the human mind. Consider that the human mind can't fathom how "you" are more than the human mind, because it's simply limited to being a human mind! (take a shot every time I've said human mind lol) So be careful with that line of reasoning. To dismiss mystical experiences is to dismiss them as nothing but human experience. What if they're not limited to that human? What if there is a deeper process at work whenever "a human has a mystical experience"? I'm not saying you should blindly believe everything without any skepticism. I'm saying that you'll trap yourself in a box if you believe that transcendental experiences shall NEVER be taken seriously. You CAN absolutely die prior to "your" physical death (because you've never been alive to begin with as @James123 has stated). Open yourself up to the possibility that there is more to reality than appears to the human mind and that YOU can become aware of it beyond its immediate scope. You basically want to strike a balance between your skepticism and your openness. Be skeptical, but also be skeptical of the human minds ability to apply skepticism in an unbiased manor, since it's limited in it's ability to do so.

There is some validity to that. What I'm saying is that this assumes that you are not infinite and limitless. You believe yourself to be a limited and finite human, which means that this can't be truth. The broader point is that "you" will "die", but when we say "you", we're not talking about what you believe yourself to be, neither are we talking about what you consider to be death. In order to actually get there you'll eventually have to drop the idea of "your" "death" and realize that you ARE death. You ARE life! So chasing ego death for example can be turned into more ego.

Truth is truth no matter whether you're dead or alive. To say that you would die is to say that death is realer than life (because you're basically saying that life is antithetical to truth), but death and life are the same. To say that you can't be awake because of the human is to believe the illusion of the human. YOU won't die, because were never alive to begin with. You are already dead and are dying into each and every moment, but every moment is also a moment of birth. It completely transcends what you believe death/life to be.

@bebotalk I wrote something out but I deleted it because I'm not going to engage with your manipulations any further. Have a nice day.

It's irrelevant in regard to the broader points being made. You getting hung up on the first sentence shows that you don't want to engage with the actual message. So it be.

That's what you project onto them. Consider that there might be a fundamental difference in their basic, visceral experience of reality. They're living their truth by being who they are, you are living your truth by not wanting them to be that. I'm living my truth by acknowledging my perspective (dangerous people should be locked away from society), while also acknowledging the fact that their perspective literally appears to be true to them! They may not have the understanding, mental fortitude and/or intelligence to transcend their darkness. Imagine being raised in a Christian house hold, and being told not to question authorities, for they know what's best for you. One day you hear a voice in your head claiming to be God. The voice is telling you that "the new born of neighbor is the anti-Christ and you must undo this child for I am God". Are you, a guy that was always taught not question authority, going to question THE ultimate authority? That voice is obviously not THE ultimate authority, but it takes a certain type of intelligence to realize it to be nothing other than a voice. Consider, that that person might literally be incapable of differentiating between the voice in their head and God. The fact that this voice is God might be as apparent to them as the screen you're reading these words on is to you, but in the end it's just appearance. So who are we to judge a person for falling for appearances? We are not being THEM, that's for sure. That's your understanding of what I was saying. I think it's a pretty solid example. Schizophrenia can literally erode the line between reality and dream. I've talked to quiet a few Schizophrenics and they're literally incapable of distinguishing their mental chatter from reality. I know this one girl who believes that she is being spied on by Apple, because she's in a "psychic communion with the ghost of Steve Jobs", who was "dissatisfied with what had become of Apple" and had given her the job to "build a new company called" called "Pear". She's currently locked up in a psyche ward, but she believes that the chancellor of Germany will have heard of her by the time that she's is out. She plans on doing business deals with him. She is literally incapable of making sense of what an average person would consider to be reality. Being Schizophrenic is like part of your mind is constantly asleep and dreaming up new events and timelines and people. It's actually quiet scary and sad. But to them it's reality. She isn't unhappy with things being the way they are. They are simply the way they are and that's it. So please take into consideration that your critique of my point has been to fight the perspective within my example, rather than to acknowledge the fact that you're attacking it from an outside perspective. That is my point. It's that you're looking at it from outside of the perspective. You don't know what it's like to be a Schizophrenic idiot with underlying anger issues, or a coldhearted psychopath with no regard for human life whatsoever. Be grateful for that.

@Yimpa f you showed young children an actual slaughter house for like a school trip or something, they'd surely be traumatized. There is a reason the vast majority of children would react this way.

@Razard86 Here is a neuroscientist who, through his work with brain scans, has discovered that he himself is a psychopath. He goes into detail into how psychopathy works and gives some insight into what separates him from a serial killer:

@Razard86 From your perspective! I agree that killing babies is evil, but that's my human bias. It's literally wired into our bodies. Do you ever hear a baby crying in public and you feel distressed? You probably can't help yourself but to share the baby's distress in that moment. But that's you and me. Some people are wired differently. You could say that they're color blind when it comes to the feelings of others. They don't have the capacity the get a true insight into the feelings of others. The point is that you project your relative point of view onto the "evil" person. If you were them, you would not perceive yourself as such. If they were you, they would understand themselves to be evil. Don't take your ability to distinguish between good and evil for granted. It's a gift of the highest love, allowing you to perceive dimension of reality inaccessible to some. Think about what kind of lonely existence it must be to not feel anything even for a baby. That kind of existence doesn't allow for any true intimacy to occur. So meet this gift with love rather than to impose it onto others. There is nothing wrong with judging something to be evil, but we should so from a place of mindfulness and acceptance. That way we can start to approach this problem and find long term solutions. There is nothing you can do for an evil person, but there are things you can do to help the mentally unstable. Preventive measures have to be taken in order to help these people develop into functional human beings, which simultaneously benefits their potential future victims.

Bias. How do YOU make ANY decisions considering that there are an infinite amount of variables at disposal at any given time? Your mind basically needs to seperate relevant information from irrelevant information to reduce the processing cost, which it does through bias.

Beautifully said. Thanks.

My great grandparents (who're still alive) were part of these purges. They're originally from the Ukraine, but were taken away from their homes and translocated over to Kazakhstan. Their families served the Soviet colonialization of Kazakhstan. They support Putin. You would think that people who were traumatized by the Soviets would be more skeptical of the Russian agenda, but they actually see themselves as Russian, which is mind-boggling to me. I think a big part of it has to do with Russian propaganda, but I can't solely blame the propaganda on it, because it itself is a byproduct of the Russian culture having a desire to establish itself as a power in the world. This requires blind trust of the people, which they seem to be more than willing to give. I just wonder what it would take, for Russia to be satisfied with its geopolitical situation. Does Russia merely fight to survive, or does it aim to be THE biggest nation in the world.

This makes me wonder: What are the applications of the conscious leadership you've been talking about? I suppose that what makes Putin a "great" leader isn't the fact that he is a "conscious" leader, but the fact that he understand precisely what level of consciousness he has to appear at in order to serve his agenda and his nation. He understands the collective needs of his people and answers to them on a tangible level, instead of pursuing some "lofty progressive ideals" (that's would be the Russian perspective). Russians generally tend to value hard work, tangible results, analytical thinking over empathy and being a man of your word. Putin gives this culture what it needs. That makes him a "great" leader, but how could you fit in the idea of "conscious" leader ship in an environment as such? Your ability to be a conscious leader seems to intersect with the collective consciousness of your environment, in that being too highly conscious in a low consciousness environment might get you killed (I mean that's especially true on the absolute level as you couldn't even hold on to your physical level as you approached higher and higher levels, but this also seems to reflect on how the relative world works). You could distill this question down to: If being a high conscious leader bared risks relative to your environment, would it actually be wiser to let yourself down to a lower state of consciousness, or would a conscious leader not negotiate on their truth? Where is the split-off between "great" and "conscious" leader ship?

Then don't. I'm not forcing you to grow as a person.

If we've observed one thing from all the recent advancements in artificial intelligence, it's that AI evolves faster than we can anticipate. I remember the first image generation tools a few years back. They sucked ass. They couldn't even create a simple, coherent image of a horse. Nobody back then predicted that this technology would make the jump that it did with DALL-E and Midjourney. In just a couple of years this technology went from being completely unusable to having a commercial use. There is no telling how far it will go in the next 26 years. I'm actually 26, meaning that AI will have the entirety of my life time to evolve to the year 2050. Considering that commercial AI has been available only for like 15% of my life time (and how far it has come in that time frame), I think the chances that it will exceed our expectations are quiet big.

What does it take to build that skill in your opinion?

The level of irony is superb. How are you going to call out other people for suposedly gaslighting you (when they didn't) while ACTUALLY gaslighting someone else in the very next post? You've got to deal with your issues and stop protecting them onto other people dude. People who believe that everyone around is constantly trying to manipulate them are either really insecure, projecting their own manipulative personality, or both. Try to do better than that.

@LSD-Rumi I was talking about Snowden.