RedLine

I am sorry for you. Looks like you have a lot of fear/resistance to the Absolute (to death) and that's is where your problems are coming from. You decided to cross a line and you want to go back but you can't...

status just that

@SirVladimir If I state "Pschycodelics are not recommendable for teenagers", it doesn't implies that pschycodelics are bad for each of the teenagers in the world. It is called generalization, and it is what abstract reasoning is about.

It does not work that way, it is not that simple. Ego is necesary, trascendence is going beyong the ego. It is necesary to build a healthy ego. Study The Atman project - Ken Wilber

first you need to develop personal before going to transpersonal. pschycodelics are very dangerous in teenagers, they did not form a solid indentity yet. It is very irresponsable whaty you are saying here, That´s all.

No. Under any circumstance. Of course if you ask any 15-year-old he will think and say that he is mature enough. That is not a good criterion.

You have individual knowlege (science): physics, language, psychology, etc If you need to use several fields of knowlege to explain something you are doing phillosophy. Basically everything that is not science, or encompasses more than one science, is phillosophy.

damn, it is amazing if you are enlighten since 1986, why do you need to meditate since that? As long as I know enlighten people does not need to meditate anymore (sitting/technical meditations) because they are "always meditating".

Historians differentiate between the historical Jesus (Jesus of Nazareth) and the mythological Jesus (Christ). There is a consensus among historians that Jesus of Nazareth existed. But obviously we cannot know if he has like the Jesus of the Bible, or if it was just myths attributed to that guy by word of mouth and evangelists. What I believe is he was a mystic with paranormal abilities (miracles). Regarding the resurrection, I don't think so. But all this doesn't matter. What matters is Christ as religious symbol.

The same thing happens to me. It is because there are still evil in me. If you go back to your ego (desire) when you are communicating with other people, it is because you are judging (desiring) in that conversation. There is still shadow work to do. If you are complete love and no judge there is no way interaction with people could hurt you.

He is right. The idea that there is Nothing and then the Universe starts so there is something is complete stupid. This is not science, this is a believe. Science can´t prove before big bang there was Nothing, because the idea itself does not make sense. The Universe is and was always Nothing or is/was always Something, depending if you are talking in a Absolute or relativistic way.

What is the fear that pushes you to want to leave society? Maybe that is what you have to research.

You can awake right now, without meditation or pschycodelics. You just need to surrender, stop desiring, accept death.

There is an evolution of the stages of consciousness/awareness through history but I don´t think it is the same that the increase of consciousness/awareness at the individual level. At the individual level, more consciousness = less selfiishness = more love At a evolutionary/historical level, more awareness seems to have no moral qualities.. It looks like it is just change. Yes, this is a rant against Ken Wilber.

No.

Hi, I have a question: How do I know if my 5 Meo DMT is HCL or freebase?

Congratz men! It would be also great a brief description of your spiritual path/practise in that 5 years.

This is about subjectiviy, it is not about sciencie. Science could at best record the brain changes that occur when the shake occurs, as they do with brain wave in meditation, but I don't think this is of much interest. I think you are still in a materialistic paradigm. If you are asking about literature about the subject, if I remember correctly, Freud and Jung writed about this stuff. In the bioenergy literature I am sure they also deal with things of this type.

Shadow/trauma release or maybe ego release I guess, all the crow or priest support the idea that devil release is real so it is easy for that people to enter into that state. Theorically it is possible to get that through bioenergetics. By the way, that videos look fake but the fenomenonolgh exists.

It is a classic idea in spirituality. It basically means enlightment is the end of desire so if you are doing something to reach enlighment you are doing it wrong because it is a desire itself. It is a paradox you have to deal with in your spiritual path.

The observer is a metaphor.

If you are in a non-dual state and you experience God, you experience that everything is love, but it does not mean that the rest of the people are experience that. The same happens when you are depress and you deeply think the world is shit; an on the contrary, when you are very glad you think the world is wonderful. Maybe the world is Love from your enlighment perspective, you can deeply feeling it, but it does not mean that the world is Love, in general terms. What about the holocaust? What about the daily suffering of people? Oh yeah they are not actually suffering, it is just an illusion! You founding it through enlighment! It is bullshit. You are prioritizing your subjectivity over that of others. Why should your subjectivity be more important than that of others? In short: even though you may have the deepest experience / intuition that the world is love, this does not imply that the Being is love; it only implies that the Being is love FOR YOU. The proof that everything is not love is that you chose the path of enlightenment over not taking it, because you knew there is suffering, and that it is better to get out of that suffering than to be in that suffering.

Yes! You formulate the problem very well. I could formulate the question of Love/suffer in a different way: Is life worth living if you're not elighten? Is God in the daily life of people who live in their ego? Is there brightness in their lives? Does your view of ordinary people's lives change when you reach enlightenment? If yes, is this change in your point of view genuine? RIght now I think their lives are suffer. Now I guess more non-dualistic rethoric. Why don´t you people can be humble and say "I don´t know"?. No, it is not all about subjectivity, it si not all about non-duality. The words exists, the relative world exists, others exist.

It is useful to learn AQAL, otherwise subjectivism can be a problem to face reality, as we can see with extreme modalities of posmodernity these days. For example, in a cartoonish way: - Student: Professor, which is the speed of light - Professor: There are no speed or light, can you experience that concepts? they are just concepts created by society Of course the professor is right, but he is inoperative. But yeah, I get your point, it could be bad for the spiritual path if you take that map in a metaphysical way . You just need to know that it is a useful tool but is not very deep stuff and ultimatley there is no disctincions of any kind. Both approaches are useful.

so Wilber is not awake