remember

@Deepconcepts is this your thought? it´s not even on the standard of scientiffic research. it`s not even holdable on a survival level. it´s yet another disillusioned solipsistic mindset that doesn`t know what exactly made it so lonely. people want a lot that they confuse for love, and they sometimes confuse for love what it is not, because they want it to be like that. being confused about love doesn`t mean that it is not essential. exactly that mindset makes love extinct from this species. thinking of it like a mechanical tool just shows how disconnected most people are. it`s making people sick not healthy the mind paradigm.

@samedm9 i still try to look into it - actually i was not really into the details but the whole drama is in that sense indeed dubble standard from an external observer point of view as i see more the overall effects of all of it. i just see fingerpointing in all directions and it doesn`t make sense to finger point to the opponent while using international politics to secure ones personal interests, that make fingers pointing back. it`s like asking who has the most dirt on the shoe instead of seeing the mudhole they are standing in. i just tried to make some sense out of the almost notorious question about that single coincident, no one was answering, because it`s so clear what you where aiming at, to support your own perspective - while from my perspective having an image about american right wing policy from the outside, and it`s overall effect, also having a picture about corruption taking place in politics in general. i really don`t care who has more dirt on the shoe. if they want to smear each other and strangle each other, may they. let`s hope that makes it more possible for a more serious and more coherent politician who shows more integrity to win the next election. a judge usually uses a hammer to bring silence into a court. just about that.

@samedm9 well i guess there is some kind of diplomatic protocol if it wasn`t like that it would be easy to become a diplomat, wouldn`t it. what do you think how politics work?

he makes a deal with his position for personal favours on an international political level. it is a preview of what the politics will look like in further conversation he has to return the favour, that`s the point of a deal. so you can already think further what the other president is to expect. again in another context: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_Ukraine

president first.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf yeah then read it. notice he asks his favour in a call after someone got elected as a president. first country priority.

yes but well everything else is less important in the whole turmoil, because the whole turmoil distracts from what the president does to your country and it`s like someone sitting in the middle of the chaos and smirking.

no the president smears his opponents with political deals. don`t get it confused, you need to build attention to make people aware of that.

sorry was unattentive while reading, it`s still a very interesting talk. i guess adam shiff just tried to get as much attention on the conversation as possible as trump tries to deal with his position on a personal matter instead of going the legal way. why is his personal political reelection not presidents priority you might ask. why not use international politics for personal deals? https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

with all due respect trump is projecting right populist culture as something respectable to the world, everyone indeed should take full responsibility to the fact that politics seem to be a joke rather than a responsibility. a society is not free in all aspects, or it can`t be or it wouldn`t be a society neither a culture. the dynamics of fascism are not defined by american politics but mainly through italian history now let`s stay serious if the right says they are more social than the socialists why did they then chose to be right wingers? it all doesn`t make sense, this whole article is pre political or pre scientific or pre historic or what it claims not to be. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benito_Mussolini a quote: Much later Mussolini said he felt by 1919 "Socialism as a doctrine was already dead; it continued to exist only as a grudge" don`t confuse one black block for another one, one was there to hold people down the other one is there to remind us of that.

it`s probably not that god doesn`t know how, but that god has a significance problem, and even if god is aware of itself there is still a significance problem that`s how god knows and doesn`t know and knows how and doesn`t know how.

if you go deep enough, it`s not a joke not a parade of empty words even though you know all of it, it sounds like you know it from the outside and knowledge is not a thought, it is something you mostly read in a book. or learned from someone else. how can you say you know when you call something a joke which is not a thought?

@zeroISinfinity thank you. it was not in that sense a question just for the reason of having a question.

what about spiritual? how do you percive these entities of yourself? where does the zooming happen? can you tell me about that? it`s interesting if you talk about these dimensions of yourself, like if it was on a visual dimension. but how about from an emotional dimension or from a mental dimension? did you also go into chakra work?

i also wonder what the law on precedents is. does someone know? i mean even if there is no law in that case, what would be the law on precedents? i also find this very interesting in the debate, but i`m not really understand ing what is going on in the us constitutional law and am far away from the dynamics in the us. constantly wondering about media used for defamation in general and about twittering defamations and so on. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_defamation_law

https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199796953/obo-9780199796953-0107.xml i find this very interesting, also i thought why not have a look into the law the us helped to install in west germany after ending the known incident which we don`t want to take as a comparison to the situation taking place in the us. but is widely known as a precedent of setting a deeply disrupted country into order again. we are thankful to the day minute and second that we have such a strong law at our side. constitutional laws are also there to judge in the name of constitutional democracy and to find ways to streangthen democracy.

in some sense some smudging practices against the political left also remind me of what happened at the moment starts to remind me about what happened in the time of mccarthy. as the political right tries to somehow manipulate what is commonly accepted by the world as political and scientiffic order.

sometimes i wonder if there is no law in the us where civilists can sue a president, insted of imeachment or sue for impeachment in front of an constitutional court. it would be interesting if this would be not handled by a second party but by a legal act. there are precedences for everything. i wonder if it`s possible to win a lawsuit against a big company for selling burning hot coffee why it is not possible to sue a president for political scheeming and manipulation which is not only disruptive for the relationship of the people towards their trust in politics but also for the image of the country. in some sense trump is doing a good job to unmantle a lot of political scheeming that happened in the usa for some time. at least for people from abroad. but as healthy that is, as unhealthy it can get if it goes on for too long a period of time. i also wonder why it is not possible to try to sue ones own country for for example the voting system for not being democratic enough.

@Leo Gura thought so but you just killed the fun by correcting it. don`t be such a perfectionist. the world is beautiful because it`s not perfect.

@nexusoflife are you happy with that wholeness? it doesn`t sound like it - but it also means you really are missing out on something. what do you mean when you say there is no core to it? you seem like someone in a sort of melancholic state of meaninglessness as you seem to be lost in zooming and sooming instead of disconnecting from all of that for a while. sometimes traveling without cellphone to a land where they almost don`t speak our language could be a reconnection to what you are missing out on. what do you think phenomology is? i don`t really know what phenomology you are suffering from - but maybe your approach to it is kind of disconnected. even though it has some lyrical touch, your writing. i hope on your bucket list is at least traveling the world to some extend. and at least once learning something practical like ceramics or woodworks, some kind of art. it sounds as if you could even write a book or lyrics for songs with your language skills, if it comes from where that came from.

are you talking about the character of the ring, the russian citty or is it samsara = nirvana, who says that? there are some refference issues here. the refference issue even exists before it can be obsereved or experienced. although purely observing might be a reference problem in itself.

rebound effects are exactly about that - the only explanation about why we would need more nuclear plants is because the creation of nuclear plants made it possible to feel like energy was available without consequences, of course in the denial about the real consequences as long as they where not visible. but the consequences are visible, as the atomic plants only had the effect that we started to take energy for granted in all directions. the rebound therefore goes into two directions, the unawareness of the use of resources (awareness was still the case before nuclear energy) and the enormity of the atomic waste problem. now the question is why it even makes sense to invest in new atomic plants instead of developing renewable energy with what energy is already available, of course because of the pressure to produce more waste, because waste still makes money even though we need to produce waste in masses to only get a little bit out of it. maybe investment in brain energy would be interesting, we could maybe recharge our cellphones with the unused energy that goes into nowhere.

@traveler you could just open the window for a starter.

@traveler notice that you decided that for yourself.

why shouldn`t it? if i wrote it like that i probably meant it that way, why should i produce absolute nonsense? see the relationship to the now and the past and the future is only in your hands, if you only dwell in yourself what more impotance is there as the now. if it is hoplessness of course you must find the answer within, but to not see everything as hopeless you need to find the answer somewhere else, and the answer is only to be found by walking a path.