remember

in germany we didn`t have an organic label for a long time and then we got one and it`s a really good one, although the european organic label is compared to that really not that good because it allows up to 30% non organic ingredients - therefore we have some really good alternative organisation like demeter who are even going a step deeper in the biodynamic production. and there are producers who are known for their strict rule alignment. so for the us it`s all a matter of how producers connect and organize themselfs. for example a supermarket can control what kind of products they want to provide and they could also set up rules if they are in enough power to do so. there could be year plans to eliminate certain factors from the soil or to only dry fruit under certain temperature etc. in fife years the whole product line would look completely different. although it is a lot of work to then really controll what the producers are doing and if the quality is sufficient. detoxing soil sometimes means eliminating soil from the surface, growing special plants on the soil that take out some toxins etc. what to do wit these plants then, well i don`t know yet, maybe burning and then compressing it and storing it somewhere deep down in the earth to be found again in centuries - whatever.

purple is sacral chakra. it`s crown for children though. (and yes it is connected to the sexual organs - in sense of family connection tribe, descendants, relationship to father mother, role models and psychology but also the first connection to nature and being a descendant of earth/metaphysics)

it doesn`t matter, i, you, we it all means love.... although it`s interesting to try to not use the "i" word for a time, because if it`s not used it`s sometimes not existent. it`s an "it" then, and we could wonder, what is it then? we could marvel on that "it" or be offended. what is the difference between the "i" talking about "i" or the "i" talking about "you"? sometimes the you is just a generalization "i" make for example, because you actually means me or it means how "we" generally act or could act, it doesn`t mean in that sense you it doesn`t mean in that sense "i" it just means that the "i" identifies if "it" gets offended or attracted. and then there is the "i" that talks about emotions and experiences, because it wants to address "you" to interconnect as a "we" and isn`t really aware of what pointers it uses to get to that point. but to get to the point of a we experience where i meets i. like i i we all probably can still learn on how we use the identification pointer to maximize love=you/we. (try to put an i everywhere where the "you, we, it" is exchangeable for a starter, let`s better not get too neurotic over it though - sometimes people just say what they say and sometimes "it" is love)

@Serotoninluv see no esmeraldas, no snow queens - only chili for the toddlers.

@Serotoninluv by the way, downfall... does it still hurt the ice slide - did it already snow where you are? esmeralda is probably the snow queen.

laying the cards open does not mean that there can`t be mystic. the problem is trying to keep one card in hand and neglecting all the other ones trying to control chaos that doesn`t want to be controlled - that`s more of a problem. which card is it?

@Thewritersunion there is only so much inferiority as you assign to it. if you don`t like inferiority as wording it is completely fine - as where he got that from doesn`t speak about inferiority but it being not the highest path to enlightenment. although the notion of truth would also mean to understand what truth means and if it might not just be a nice twist of the tongue that leads you to a different outcome than the original would do. you bend the spoon, you are not it.

yes seriously - you think because people express it in a language you can understand it makes them superior to people who maybe don`t have the words - but in the end expression is not only words. and finally it doesn`t count what they say it only counts if you can listen.

sublime enlightened consciousness and conscious sublime expression/communication/transcendence are not exactly the very same thing. but ultimately they are, although most people tend only to see one special form/manifestation of it.

@FuriousGeorge sometimes the traumata of a loved one becomes our traumata. it´s both important that your son has someone maybe a therapist who might guide him through some difficult times especially when he starts to grow from a child to a man, probably - because the memory will come back probably then. but it`s also important that you go through these emotions of your own traumatisation of being helples, of guilting yourself maybe, that you were not more cautious. also be careful that you don`t deny it because you wish everything is alright, because it might be hidden at the moment, although it`s also difficult to not be suspicious about every sign that is showing. it`s very sensible and you have to realize that this is like an autoimmune disease of your son, he has that now, it won`t go away, but it might be possible to hold it in check. be prepared that it will surface from time to time and that he might need help to coap with it - like with all memories, they surface from time to time. maybe you could even do father son therapy - don`t know... family therapy is probably difficult, as you are not together with your ex.

some ironic vibes.

mhhh you see here we usually say: you can`t know! but we love our entrails... so that`s a little bit of a problem as you certainly came to the wrong place for what you are searching for. you would have to eat everything backwards to finally know - but obviously you are already doing that... so maybe you are not so wrong here at the second glance - but would be interesting then what you will say on the third coming. let me know if you need some help to clean all that colour up.

why "was"? you know it`s kind of difficult to understand what you mean by asking why you can`t feel other bodies. does it mean you can`t feel their pains and feelings in the body itself or does it mean you can`t anticipate the feeling of them in their body. it`s not true that there is no possibility to feel into someones body. for example my body feels pain when i see others having pain, usually - do you mean you can`t feel that? then i would probably go deeper into it by trying to visualize or emotionalize the bodies of others. and then try to emotionalize your own... is it still empty? you know the only reason why i can`t feel some others anymore is usually because i have pulled up a fence against them. so you are supposedly not really really barrier free even if you have the feeling as if there were no boundaries. also imagine, if you would feel others bodies pains in the same intensity they do, there would be no one to manage the situation if the other body needs help...see. there is a big difference in not being able to feel into someones body and to read their minds. complete different topics - but the accessibility to what someone speaks of out of their mind is much bigger if you can feel into the other beings body, usually the more often you get the possibility to feel into others the better you can feel them. you don`t need to dip anything for that.

it`s even possible to go on media addiction rehab - for those who didn`t know.

what if someone told you, you don`t have many years? what if you would have to get to that point much much faster, so you really could have many years? what if we would have to put up a giant universal trash bin and would have to dump every mental junk inside to never pull it out again. what if this endless talking about it just makes it worse while it could be the cure? we don`t need just a heavy metal detox, most of us are not yet through with detoxing their lifes from orange. body detox in a sense is just another orange green scheeme while the world outside is rotting - the detox doesn`t start in the body it has to start outside.

this argument is so hollow - why should there be a nutritional difference? it`s about toxins intake all the way, toxins like round up for example - what`s not good for the bees can`t be good for other beings. bon apetit. there could be labels organic farmers voluntarily are assign to which regulate what is allowed to be used in organic farming - if no one controls that control it yourself to gain more trust - that´s all i can say about that.

thought we were talking about being i less, sounds more like teethless... shouldn`t have touched that booty.

started a list lately for interesting sources, although it`s not news but more reports, it`s some extra cherry: https://theintercept.com/ https://www.investigate-europe.eu/ (thought there were more but others are not english... sorry) for documentaries: https://www.arte.tv/en/

yes, people make history and history makes people he showed something, didn`t he? somehow obama is like a hypothesis. trump might be the anti thesis.

@pluto @GreenWoods what do you think about the ayurvedic way of drinking ghee to detox the gut - i`m not really specialized on that but i know that it`s part of traditional panchakarma how they do it in india. although in a vegan diet i would probably take in coconut oil or so instead... some toxins are more fat resolvable and the fat is supposed to take the toxins out of the guts, and if you exchange fats it might be that it could be healthier for people who are underwheight to accompany their fasting with it, or maybe to do the fat drinking in advance. or afterwards - i`m not really sure if the ghee drinking is only until the purgation day or also afterwards, would have to research that. what i read about dmsa is that there is a possibility to just smell it over a longer period of time to detox - sounds weird but seems to be the safest method. problems with dmsa are that you will also loose on all minerals and you can get alergies from it. it`s contraindicated for multiple sclerosis patients, leads to epileptic cramps in that case. (would be interesting if he would recommend that for the masses - its a chemical for serious cases)

thank you @Mu_ ! the shift was real for me what you made of the now was worth its title. whatever it is, it is now and it is forever that what we make of it. mostly a preconceived bubble of information to make sense of what actually happens to us, coaping mechanisms to handle the situation, attempts to maximize self or ego while excluding or including everything surrounding us from or into the bubble of i (we). but the now is only fully perceivable if it`s empty of identification with egoic appropriations, because sharing is giving, taking is also giving the question is always: what? whom? i=you=we is non hirarchic non judgmental but sometimes i=you=we only means i and then there is something missing in the hirarchy. before you look up, look down, then you might be able to meet everyone on eye height - if you only look up you don`t see the actual moment. same accounts for past and future.

it`s kind of funny to read all of this when you think about the situation before obama. i guess obama showed what is and what is not possible in the us, fast changes are not. or at least they were not - so obama, is still someone who at least managed to remind the world of how difficult it is to live a dream. "yes we can", is not a fairytale, therefore there is no fairy that snipps with the fingers and everything is set. what he managed though is showing a direction with the message: we still can, and we still want to. the problem though, is the problem.

mhh in some sense i would agree with that, for example watching horror movies if i know how they are made but my subconsciousness is more visual, which works pretty much independent from my more logical understanding i create some dissonance that will eventually surface in my dreams or maybe when i walk down a dark alley. – so in a sense the horror movie can`t be truth! but the dark alley still is. although if i run away from my fears and don`t look into them, like not accepting that the horror movie is creating my fears and not evaluating if my fears of a dark alley are in a sense not fears but being cautious, enforced by the horror movie i won`t find out about truth. if i never saw the horror movie i would might have never gotten cautious of the dark alley though and maybe would not be alive anymore because i never would have found out about the potential dangers of the dark alley. sometimes it`s good to face the devil head on. everyone has fears. the more fearful we are the more we need to face them.

well of course it`s always good to see your own red and blue mechanisms from the other side. political structures are internal and external stuctures - it does never mean that if we live in a certain structure that we are in complete harmony with it. why, because it´s sometimes not the structure but the content. of course pushing people into the limits of their being meaning into beige, will at one point always backlash - a fight for survival is in a sense always justified, by the survival alone. and there is no change without making some noise. we use to be judgmental about beige the most, even though it`s the colour that needs the most attention. because at one point all colours fuse into the illusion of light, which is transparency.

@Strangeloop what would keep you from trying? i mean just once maybe kissing a guy and then finding out, just go to the next gay bar and try. (even if you have to do that in connection with a short trip) i once was surprisingly kissed by a woman and it was quite nice, but all i thought was oh wait why is your mouth so freaking soft (she was a very very feminine person) i want to have the same... so whatever your feelings are about guys either it`s about comparing yourself or being attracted or just being curious, you could always find out. maybe it`s more about realizing how huge the spectrum of nuances is and finding out about your own gender a little bit more, before you can open up to sexuality with confidence again, if that`s with women or men maybe it doesn`t really matter(no woman is exactly like another one and no man is exactly like another one)