Raze

The US was actually extremely incompetent with 9/11. The CIA was aware of the hijackers but wouldn’t cooperate with the FBI for political reasons. The counter terrorism advisor was warning Bush about Al Queda but Bush cut his funding and didn’t meet with him. Bush even got a memo warning Al Queda planned to attack within planes and didn’t read it. Since 9/11 the government is onto a lot of the tactics and has been both legally and illegally spying on a most of the country, so it would be pretty difficult to pull something of that scale off.

But Israel chose to strike the Iranian general in their embassy and assassinate the hamas political leader in Tehran, if Iran is provoked into attacking Israel then Israel will simply have all the politicians they influence vote for war approval.

interesting: Jewish political scientist Peter Beinart thinks even if Hamas is destroyed Israel won’t be safer https://peterbeinart.substack.com/p/even-destroying-hamas-wont-make-israel

@Leo Gura https://rumble.com/v5g2qmb-system-update-show-339.html?start=4154 Norman Finkelstein seems to believe we are headed to war with Iran, do you think this analysis has merit?

He did make a video for women years ago but it got backlash

They are real examples of wider data I already posted. The people watching it as entertainment isn’t new, there were other examples as well. I’ve also been posting Israelis who disagree. I never said either represents the entire country.

Interesting: a former Palestinian militant and a former IDF soldier who speak together interviewed by Tony Robbins

Take a cold shower

A former British MI6 and diplomat who was stationed in Lebanon gives his analysis:

No, calling mainstream human rights organizations and Jewish intellectuals all antisemitic and dismissing them is textbook propaganda and single mindedness. Actually explain how what they say is antisemitic or wrong, just crying that I can’t appeal to authorities makes no sense. That’s like saying if experts on crime judge an act as criminal we shouldn’t consider their opinions because it’s appealing to authority. No it doesn’t. It does say if you die defending Muslims you will be rewarded, that doesn’t mean it justifies killing every non believer. Again, suicide is strictly forbidden, which is why suicide bombing is a relatively recent phenomenon.

That war killed 15K people. Later when they had a war with major foreign intervention which the US used as a proxy conflict, it killed 2-3 million

This is false, US gov officials admitted they actually were supplying islamists earlier than that to try and trigger a soviet invasion https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/01/07/history-trump-cia-was-arming-afghan-rebels-before-soviets-invaded/ (Link with no pay wall) https://web.archive.org/web/20230322182509/https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/01/07/history-trump-cia-was-arming-afghan-rebels-before-soviets-invaded/ https://www.democracynow.org/2001/10/22/how_the_us_baited_the_soviet

It’s not that simple. Suicide is strictly forbidden, the suicide bombing was justified by one extremist imam, but there was so much backlash in the Muslim world even Hamas stopped doing it. Independent analysis finds suicide bombings are motivated politically, also most of them just kill the attacker so odds are they just use it as an excuse to commit suicide. Nothing in Islam is inherently against America or Jews, America wasn’t discovered during islams founding and Jews were considered a protected class.

One thing to note is a lot of terrorism was actually a attempt to replicate of state tactics. For example Bin Laden said he was inspired to do 9/11 by witnessing bombings of a tower in Lebanon. A much older example would be that Natives only started scalping people after they started getting scalped by hunters when the government was paying for them. Former cia director here kind of implies we could see terrorists attempting to replicate something like the pager attack.

Osama bin Laden was wealthy and strategic. Most extremists aren’t. Also the US government has massive spying capabilities now and a huge internal security apparatus. It will be much harder to pull off another 9/11.

That’s wrong too

I’m talking about foreign policy, not domestic policy, if your house gets bombed you wouldn’t consider it less of an issue if the bomber was pro lgbtq

Is this the book we are discussing? https://www.amazon.com/Gaddafis-Harem-Story-Young-Abuses/dp/0802121721 What is the proof this is a real person or it’s a real account, as far as I know this is just what the journalist said. You are massively extrapolating the honor killing phenomenon, plenty of Muslim women come out publicly about being raped and their family supports them, or even if they don’t they don’t get killed. Some came out publicly about Isis for example. Yes I find it hard to believe he could rape literally thousands and not a single one comes out publicly, like seriously not even one out of one hundred? He isn’t in power anymore so it’s not like they can hurt them. How is it a conspiracy, if we are just going by a book literally anyone could write anything. Maybe she could get corroboration from some larger organization. Like I said it wouldn’t surprise me, dictators obviously do stuff like this, like Saddams sons, but that’s not proof.

how many countries overseas to it has China bombed in the last 100 years compared to the USA