Raze

Ok, but let's break down that argument. Let's compare two situations, a female boss slaps her male workers ass, and a male boss slaps his female workers ass. Is the male boss's situation worse? If you say yes, why? They both did the exact same thing. You may say because women are victims more often then men. Why does that matter? This is a specific instance, the rate of other crimes is irrelevant to it, no one in this situation controls the rest of society and therefore shouldn't be punished differently for it, judging people by their group and not individuals is Jim Crow logic. You may say because the guy is more dangerous to the woman because he is stronger. First off, even if that is true most of the time it may not always be, secondly, why does it matter? Sure she would be in more danger if the male boss tried to go for a full on assault than the female boss, but the male boss didn't do that, he only slapped her ass, why should he be punished harsher for slapping her ass because he could have done something worse which he didn't? It's a simple breakdown of logic. The legal system should not take into account societal trends over fairness and looking at the individual situation. This is why so called stage green people are hated, because they abandon notions of fairness, individuality, and equality in favor of judging people as groups and giving worse of special treatment to compensate for perceived societal injustices. Never said that doesn't have it's place, but not in every aspect of society.

Forcing someone to have sex when they don't want too is rape. There was a 13 year old kid who got drugged by his older female neighbor and raped while he was unconscious, he was traumatized and needed therapy for years, he never got justice and not only that the rapist had his kid and forced him to pay child support. Imagine what that was like, this is what attitudes like what Leo is suggesting cause. This isn't even like the metoo conversation which is based on if someone might be innocent, we are talking about guilty people here. The asymmetry argument is ridiculous, imagine going up to a male rape victim and telling him it doesn't matter because mostly other men rape other women. That has nothing to do with his situation, a crime is a crime.

Very offensive and sexist comment and not remotely true. Data shows many women orgasm during rape, would you say they enjoy it and should just accept it? No you wouldn't, same for guys. Rape is wrong no matter who it happens too, even if the person who got raped doesn't think so (but they most likely would). Leo what in the ever loving fuck are you saying. If what you're saying is not ok with the genders reversed, it's not ok. There have been men who were raped by women and they were traumatized for life. Even if you believe these things you shouldn't post about it because someone will quote it and try to cancel you. Just because women raping men doesn't happen that often and most men are physically stronger then women does not mean it never happens or it's not a problem. Many men who go on to become rapists or kill women were actually molested or raped by older women as a kid, and they never got help or even realized they were traumatized because of behavior like this, and they ended up just hurting more people. If you cannot empathize with men, realize that in the end it will only hurt women. Are you seriously going to call people SJW's for saying you shouldn't say rape victims are at fault when you accuse people of being egoic for mild criticisms of feminism. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/11/the-understudied-female-sexual-predator/503492/ At least study the topic before making insane ignorant comments. Being raped by someone physically weaker than you is not abnormal because of things like drugs or weapons.

He's not nervous lol. He has little/no self, he said he doesn't even really feel excitement anymore. I've watched a lot of his interviews and he rarely ever brings up politics, when he does it's in a general abstract way so as not to say anything that offends anyone. He does maintain that he thinks humanity will self destruct unless there is a worldwide enlightenment.

I mean, watch the video I posted, Warren explains some of it.

The new family unit that is becoming popular is not healthy and anyone who tries pointing out the issue gets blacklisted by the left.

Why is that not valid? There is plenty of data that break-up of the family is damaging to society (and women), and hypersensitivity of some feminists hurts people/ruins lives, closes all the dialogue, and makes feminism look bad.

I didn't say it did, but he clearly understood feminism and read many books on it. He was friends with and worked with many of the most famous feminists, though they all ghosted him after he started saying things they disagree with.

What is your opinion on Dr. Warren Farrell then? He was the most high ranking male feminist, but now he criticizes the movement and says it is damaging gender relations. Here is his debate with Vaush.

how many books critiquing feminism have you read?

I believe it is because humans have a subconscious fear of death and that shows itself in the 'ego' where they desire to assert their identity, so when it's attacked they react violently.

you should break up with her and get therapy to learn why you value yourself so little you're staying with someone who hits you.

Do you watch porn? If you do stop, and try no fap.

https://harpers.org/a-letter-on-justice-and-open-debate/ Recently Noam Chomsky refused to sign a petition by students to remove Steven Pinker from the linguistic society for tweets, J.K. Rowling got attacked for tweets called transphobic, and a few years ago Atwood was criticized for criticizing #metoo.

The problem with cancel culture is it is mob rule and anarchy. As a result we have situations like this: https://quillette.com/2020/02/23/how-anonymous-unproven-accusations-turned-mike-tunisons-career-into-metoo-road-kill/ He lost his job, can't get a new one, all based on 0 evidence from an accusation by an anonymous person. He has no mechanism to prove his innocence or get recourse from what happened. Cancel culture basically created a weapon for anyone to abuse to take down people they don't like.

http://archive.vn/pPvFP Also worth noting this was an in-person survey, so it's possible some people lied. Most likely some single women lied reducing their sex amount, and some single men lied increasing it.

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/502975-california-man-fired-over-alleged-white-power-sign-says-he-was Random guy loses his job because someone snaps a picture of him doing an ok symbol that because Trump does it they believe is a white power symbol. He says he was just cracking his knuckles, and he's mexican. How is it not going too far?

Found one, it's because J.K. Rowling signed it

But this video shows a lack of empathy, first off the teacher says white people don't normally feel excluded, that's kind of ridiculous, everyone feels that at some point in their lives, and even if it's true the solution to that is not to practice segregation to make white people feel excluded. Trying to imprint cultural guilt into someone is not inclusive. For example if you read the article, you'll see the white students were asked about their heritage and it was awkward and felt like a funeral, but the non white students were asked about it and were excited and dancing etc. Is this good? This just looks like an attitude to cements further divisiveness.

I think the antiracism narrative that is being pushed is ridiculous for reasons like this. This video actually isn't that bad compared to other things I've seen. Of course I am anti-racism, but "antiracism" to me is pushing a bizarre narrative that builds a identity around race, and generally speaking the stronger the identity around something the worse it gets. I predict it'll probably cause a backlash of further racism, and generally be counterproductive by inserting strong victim complexes in people, which is not a good place to be, especially if you are actually a victim. I disagree with a lot of this forum's analysis because it feels like most people on here assume anything coming from the left is stage green and the more extreme it is, the more stage green it is. I strongly disagree with that, and I think a lot of the extreme left is not stage green, but rather people in lower stages pushing normally stage green concepts. Which is why they get corrupted and begin seeming like a bizarre imitation of stage green.

From studying the 12 step program and IFS therapy I think addiction is related to a subconscious existential dread and the creation of a false self. So enlightenment could theoretically end that by unwiring a false self and eliminating the existential dread because you'd lose your fear of death. But you could get addicted for other reasons, like simply just the pleasure.

This is a normal stage. There were some really good pua videos about it but they got deleted, from what I remember. -you are elevating losing your virginity and having sex in your mind, in reality after you get it you won't feel any different, but you probably won't be able to accept that until you do. -don't take rejection personally, practice learning to bounce it off, see anything as progress, for example congratulate yourself on just doing an approach or getting a number. Shift your perspective, a rejection is not a loss, generally the people who are delusionally positive get good fastest.

Well leo, modern rsd claims you can become a natural through things like presence and trauma release, and Tyler now says he doesn't use game and simply picks up girls by looking at them and thinking the emotion he wants them to feel, and he can pick up girls without speaking. Maybe he is exaggerating, but there is scientific evidence you can become a natural, based on things like IFS therapy, everyone is a natural inside, it is simply blocked by psychological trauma, and rsd is teaching something similar to that now that they abandoned technique.