Raze

Full:

What is your attachment style

this is comedy, not real life. Homicide isn’t the top cause of death for women.

Get ifs therapy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPKQuwyYScQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovS27WQU5-g https://www.girlschase.com/content/get-introduced-girls-and-play-game-easy-mode https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twTrrGiRXtY

How exactly do you do that to a girl who is a complete stranger you just randomly approached? She will just be confused or think you’re hiding your intentions out of shame or ulterior motives

Another issue, is what is being taught https://manhattan.institute/article/school-choice-is-not-enough-the-impact-of-critical-social-justice-ideology-in-american-education

Completely wrong, sex releases oxytocin which is the bonding chemical. Waiting for sex will just make her out you in the provider category where you don’t want to be, it’s much better to start as a lover then move towards commitment.

No one is saying he is totally free of suffering, he said himself he isn’t, the point is if he can be partially free of suffering theoretically that process can be expanded all the way to completely or almost completely be free of suffering

But theoretically it could be possible someone could. He also said his default experience of suffering is much less now.

But that’s false, you can reduce suffering even in hostile situations, Shinzen Young said he temporarily experienced 0 suffering while in extreme pain when he was studying zen and strong determination sitting.

If it’s possible to reduce suffering why isn’t it theoretically possible to reduce it to the point of being non-existent?

California has been a disaster under him with rising crime and insane homelessness. Tons of people and businesses have been leaving. Even liberals like Ana Kasparian who live there have denounced him. He’s also not particularly progressive https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFQ5WuMeBWQ

Unexplained constipation could be caused by parasitic infection

You still go to the police because you don’t know what they’ll find and it’ll provide credence if someone else reports them in the future. You can go to the media but the media should be balanced and not report something baseless or be clear it is just an allegation and not try to create a narrative and pressure companies to drop someone. The public should also be reasonable enough to understand you don’t know what you don’t know and people shouldn’t be judged guilty by default.

It’s actually not crazy because in real life you have to actually present evidence and go to court to prove something, just saying something happened really shouldn’t mean anything because anyone can say anything. Being on camera looking at someone isn’t necessarily proof you did something else.

No, it isn’t. You said he’s guilty because he’s upset, I’m saying he’d be upset even if he’s innocent. Justice is making judgements based on evidence, not jumping on a bandwagon and openly declaring you believe in guilty until proven innocent and cheering on large corporations hypocritically restricting someone based on just allegations when they didn’t do the same to others on their platform who are actually guilty.

The solution is not to have an absurd standard that you can destroy someone based on allegations alone. We’ve already had multiple examples of innocent men being destroyed. That is the same logic that lead to witch trials and lynching. If you want Justice you should go to the police and prove it, if you wait 20 years to bring it up that’s on you, it’s absurd to think we should just by default believe you and take someone out because anonymous people said unverifiable claims. A culture or “toxic masculinity” is not a real thing, there just exists inappropriate behavior, ascribing it to be an inherent part of one’s “masculinity” is pointless and unprovable. What we are seeing is the far more dangerous effects of a feminized society that leads with emotions and doesn’t put emphasis on things like evidence, truth, and personal accountability, instead turning everything into a hysterical argument where all sides try to out virtue signal the other and insert their own political ideologies and cultural takes into it rather than just looking at the facts. Imagine if in a fact finding attempt in a court of law the lawyers started ranting about toxic masculinity and the patriarchy and how all of society needs to change, and accusing you of internalized misogyny if you disagree as proof of their argument for guilt in a specific case.

So if he was innocent he would be totally calm and happy while his entire reputation and career gets destroyed? You all do not understand the slightest thing about how Justice works, this thread is a great example of how people willingly give up freedom to dictators and engage in hysterical witch trials and lynch mobs.

His father didn’t kill his mother or her lover, they lived after that.

If you care about your job, no.

https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2023/sep/21/video-platform-rumble-rejects-mps-call-to-demonetise-russell-brand UK Government is now trying to get him pulled off of Rumble.

What job can you do aside from teaching math?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0ZpRcLjcmI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riTO5jyCpxk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXB80VEaRQQ