Raze

As of now they changed their charter to no longer call for the destruction of Israel. Maybe they’re saying it now but that’s because Israel is at war with them. What should be the focus, the hypothetical possibility hamas would want to end Israel even if Palestinians had a state, or the fact Israel right now is refusing to give Palestinians a state and trying to ethnically cleanse them. If Israel just keeps repeating the current status quo of blockading and torture, followed by an attack from Palestinians, followed by brutal Israel response, there will never be peace. If we can’t listen to public statements then Israel should just violently occupy Palestinians forever because they may attack Israel? If hamas is what’s standing in the way of Israel giving them a state, why did Palestinians not get a state before Hamas was founded? Why was the West Bank not turned into its own state and freed from occupation and settlers after Hamas was driven out? Why isn’t Israel offering Palestinians a state if Hamas steps down?

The Israel government is a larger obstacle to peace if we are being honest. Netanyahu openly brags about stopping a two state solution. Prior to Oct 7 Hamas tried to push for political solutions and changed their charter to no longer call for ending Israel. Israel refused to respond to peaceful protests or attempts at political solution because they want to force Gazans to have no option but violence to justify a violent response.

Find a guy who is rich but nervous and needy around you.

remove settlers and occupation from West Bank and give them a state, demand Hamas come to the negotiation table and offer if they turn in hostages and participate in war crime trials on both sides from a mutually agreed third party then they will be allowed full aid to Gaza, a demilitarized state with a mutually agreed upon third party protection. If Hamas doesn’t want to participate work with the UN on a plan to expell them and turn Gaza against them instead of closer. Alternatively dissolve the ethnostate of Israel and give West Bank and Gazans a path to equal rights in a secular Israel. Or at the least agree with Hamas’s initial hostage exchange proposal, stop the bombing which serves no military objective, allow full aid to stop hurting the civilians, and have the IDF expel the settlers from West Bank instead of supporting their onslaught. And stop recklessly bombing Syria and Yemen and pursue a ceasefire with them instead of risking spreading the war.

Jeffery Martin did a study of enlightenment and said he estimates 40% of people reporting enlightenment are women

Perhaps you can find them for free Ultimate man project also has a 2 week free trial for their program and girls chase has a cheap cold approach guide

Try hot seat at home and verbal game academy

It doesn’t, it depends on how quickly and efficiently you learn. If you do the same bad habits 1,000 times you won’t get any better, if you are looking for good advice and regularly testing different ways you can get better much faster.

What is the student to instructor ratio?

This is also the opinion of the former head of mossad… https://apnews.com/article/israel-apartheid-palestinians-occupation-c8137c9e7f33c2cba7b0b5ac7fa8d115#:~:text=Tamir Pardo becomes the latest,Africa that ended in 1994.

If you have lots of options use social circle. Find a good resource on how to cold approach better. Record yourself and write field reports.

The crimes he pardons were already minor and rare to be prosecuted

You can also damage your ears by wearing two head phones and not realizing how loud it is, always test the sound with one ear and make it slightly lower than what you default set it as.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/15/world/europe/ukraine-military-recruitment.html

Read rewire your ocd brain https://www.girlschase.com/article/why-cold-approach-isnt-social-beginners Do not cold approach in an environment where you’ll be recognized, you need relative anonymity. Do it in places with a high volume of people, if the volume is low approach more sparingly and don’t go to the same place constantly so you get a reputation. The cold approach should look like it just happened, not that you’re approaching everyone like it’s a job. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twTrrGiRXtY

The IDF is investigating this, what’s different here is it was Israeli’s who were killed so they may actually get in trouble. Usually if it’s a Palestinian they can just clear themselves. Like this incident where even his fellow IDF testified against him. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/nov/16/israel2

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/initial-idf-probe-hostages-were-shirtless-waving-white-flag-when-soldiers-opened-fire/ interesting article, it seems the hostages killed by the IDF were shirtless and waving a white flag, but unfortunately the IDF mistook them for Palestinians and fired at them then pursued one who was fleeing. When they heard him speak Hebrew the commander tried to get them to stop but they didn’t listen time. This makes me very suspicious about their reports of killing 6,000 Hamas members. Are they actually confirming they’re from Hamas or just assuming any male who looks 18 or older they killed is Hamas? If they’re literally firing at people even if they’re shirtless unarmed and waving a white flag that very well may be the case.

1. That’s not what NATO said was their official war aim, also that’s incredibly unethical. 2. I don’t even think it weakened Russia. The military is larger than ever and now battle hardened. Putin has made enough work arounds with other countries like Turkey to get around sanctions. Now Russia is far more motivated to move closer to China. 3. this was exactly the logic of US support for afghan rebels during the soviet afghan war, literally just to send them weapons and money to kill Russians. And look how that ended up.