Raze

It’s absolutely war mongering because it’s purposefully provoking a war and ignoring every chance at avoiding it. Even if you think it’s “justified”, it’s still war mongering. It’s also just incredibly stupid. All we have done is sacrifice a generation of Ukrainians and let Russia expand. All we had to do was nor let Ukraine into NATO. NATO was never supposed to aggressively expand.

Social circle is better for social skill experience yes, But that’s just one aspect of game. Game also requires pushing boundaries, showing intent, flirtation, and escalation. In a social circle you have to worry about your reputation, doing these things poorly and getting blown out will have consequences it wouldn’t if it’s just some random stranger.

At 37 min professor Sachs says he asked the White House to negotiate directly before the war but they refused

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/24/opinion/chris-cuomo-cnn.html

Netanyahu admitted he is blocking it https://www.huffpost.com/entry/benjamin-netanyahu-prevented-palestinian-state-two-state-solution_n_6580a368e4b0e142c0bed60b Every year Israel blocks the general UN assembly of “peaceful settlement of the question of palestine”

The funny thing is Chris was accused of sexual assault and got fired for helping his brother deal with allegations of sexual harassment and grooming

Or Israel could let Palestinians have a state, end the blockade and occupation, and pull the settlers out. Has stopping the formation of a Palestinian state, blockading Gaza, and occupying the West Bank and letting settlers live in it made Israel safer? Is Israel safer right now when it’s at war and risking war with Iran?

It’s funny you keep talking about how high conscious and honest you are, but every argument you make is evasive and assumes context that was never there. 1) for the cold approach point you had to insert a comparison that it’s all about sex like selling a bad product. First off that doesn’t prove your entitlement argument, a poor sales man with a bad product still isn’t innately being entitled, he’s just doing a bad job. Secondly I never said that I was suggesting cold approach inherently necessitates that. You can cold approach without being pushy for sex. By the way, if we listen to you and try to get girls by following our goals and having social circles, it’s the same thing, we are doing it for a secondary motive of getting laid. You can’t escape the pesky fact that desires exist and want to be fulfilled no matter how much you demonize it. 2) you’re now conflating successful long term relationships with the conversation topic of attraction women and getting sex, not the same thing, in fact little of the skills carry over between them. 3) you’re still latching onto the idea that a man’s success with women is determined by how high conscious he is and thus you can continue using it as a criticism, like just above asserting emotionalmosquito can’t get girls because he has a bad mindset. Are you sure you are being honest with this belief, and it’s just a coincidence it happens to line up with your moral paradigm and fulfill a just world fallacy for you? Irregardless there are plenty of studies finding traits that are toxic for a long term relationship can actually make a man more attractive to women. If you really want me too I can start dropping them here, but just think about it logically- 1) if women can sniff out toxic men and only want morally good men, why do so many women complain they ended up with men who abused them, cheated on them, or just mistreated them in some way? 2) what are the base traits that make a man attractive initially to women? If you are honest you’d see they either have no correlation to morality or possibly a negative correlation. Ex. Looks, status, and location. None of that determines morality. Then we have confidence, ability to escalate, smooth with girls. These traits can be gained by experience, and men with experience are more often players, or they can even be gained by high narcissism.

The origins of political order political order and political decay Politics among nations patterns of democracy Understanding American politics the righteous mind the logic of collective action coming apart our Kids cynical theories why nations fail End Times: Elites, Counter-Elites and the Path of Political Disintegration

How does that dispute my point? I never said social circle can’t result in successes. My point is telling guys “don’t approach women, just get a social circle” is a misleading answer, it takes a huge amount of effort for limited returns due to limitations of social groups.

Not when Israel is occupying and blockading them they can’t.

No he isn’t, he is not that influential, there are already societal problems which influence him and the Internet, blaming him for it all is silly. What is more likely, everyone came to rsd with no issues and he toxified them, or among the large fan base some came in with issues? And extrapolating that to blame him for Andrew Tate and their ilk is just silly, they only popped off from the vacuum after he was removed.

lol now you’re blaming him for an entire cultural problem?

Israeli’s are protesting because Netanyahu is corrupt. When it comes to Palestine they actually feel he’s too moderate. Even if Jews have a better culture, that doesn’t give them the right to slaughter Palestinians and take their land. If you’re still suggesting the poor quality in life in Gaza is because of Palestinian culture and not Israel, that is so laughable and delusional I do not know what to say.

Has hamas ever harmed any Jews outside of historical Palestine? Why did Hamas’s founder say the organization was founded not to fight Jews but to fight occupiers? Would Hamas have been founded and gotten popularity if Israel wasn’t committing so much violence towards Palestinians? Notice how their popularity grew after every military action.

Do not microdose while on anti depressants especially not mdma

He said surely said some bad things at times in the hundreds of hours of talks he produced, some of which when he was only 20 and thought his audience was just a couple hundred other puas, and definitely told edgy jokes. What Leo doesn’t understand is that the media and mob tactic is to zoom in on the 1% of mistakes and over exaggerate it to delegitimize a movement. No large scale group talking about a controversial subject could survive this sort of hatchet job. He got taken out not because of bad things he said, but because they wanted to take him out so they found bad things he said.

That’s not really true. Other PUA’s who didn’t have any of the edgy content like Adam Lyons and Christian Hudson also had their channels banned or got dropped from their banks. His content was never unethical or abusive, he didn’t advocate for anything like that. Yours wasn’t censored because it didn’t include infield and isn’t popular enough. If it was more popular it probably would be, I’ve seen many people online calling it misogynistic and unethical, it just didn’t pick up steam like it did for RSD.

Amazing how you think Palestinians are an inferior race, Jews are superior and therefore exempt from morality, and Israel is justified in ethnic cleansing for this reason, and somehow everyone else is the nazi.

Traditionalism and being high value doesn’t work because women cheat and the purpose of women in your life is not to settle down as that’s just a way you manipulate yourself but rather the purpose is to force you into presence, and game content was censored because it exposed the truth and now he will stop discussing this because he wants to expose other truths because he thinks civilization is being depopulated or something.

1. Yes, it’s a serious time commitment and effort for limited returns if you have poor social skills and poor game which can be improved through cold approach. 2. Notice how you immediately look to blame the guy. This is why taking advice from people like you is so pointless, you aren’t actually trying to help, you just want to say what you believe should work and if it doesn’t you will just blame the person rather than considering if your advice is bad. Let’s say I have a social circle with 5 attractive single women. Great right? Ok I ask one out and she rejects me. Well guess what, in some form or another the others will find out. Now if I ask a second she’s going to feel like she was a back up option. And if she rejects you also? It’s over, now everyone else will just reject you by default to go along with the herd. Then you’ve developed a reputation as the weird guy who hits on every girl. “the friend zone” is a common complaint because it’s a common problem, it can be harder to turn a platonic friendship romantic which is why guys always hear “I like you as a friend”.

No it doesn’t, it comes from a mindset of being disappointed something you’re doing isn’t working. If you want to make more sales for your business but are struggling, and I tell you to do a cold sale technique, and you get frustrated it’s not working, does this mean you are acting entitled to sales? Let’s say he follows your advice and gets a high conscious goal and becomes a better person, and he still doesn’t get results, when he complains about that you will just turn around and say he’s acting entitled. It’s a blatant deflection. You simply lack experience as you haven’t witnessed how many successful guys struggle with women and how many unsuccessful guys do great. It’s not pseudo science, it’s basic logic. Yes the guys who got women were the ones who could protect them. But that was in a completely different environment than today. Many women themselves admit they are attracted to arrogant or toxic men, why? One reason why is because such traits actually show survival value, in the environment we evolved for. In the modern day things like wealth, loyalty, values are more important, but that’s socially conditioned, not on a genetic basis. The socialization process you’re referring to involved things like religion, taboos against sexuality, and arranged marriages. In this environment you didn’t succeed with women by being confident and charismatic, you succeeded by being wealthy and convincing her family to marry her to you. That isn’t the case anymore, these social systems are dissolving. This is why you need to actually learn game and develop naturally attractive traits. Conflating what women are attracted to, to morality or even competency is inaccurate and misleading. When it comes to short term mating an over-confident frat boy will do way better than a awkward IT genius.

1. Not everyone has access to large high quality social circles, especially now 2. Social circle game can be harder and higher risk because you have to be wary of your reputation