Raze

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYp_hBqPbuA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERap8i3qpCw

My point is falsifiable, if Russia loses in Ukraine or Russia wins in Ukraine than attacks NATO I will be wrong as I’ve said Russia will win and won’t attack NATO. Ukraine joining NATO would not make Europe safer as Russia would be more likely to now attack a NATO country with Ukraine and European countries would be obligated to declare war on them and attack.

Because it’s already happened dozens of times. Israel refuses to remove the blockade or settlers, Hamas feels their popularity threatened so they attack, Israel bombards them and Hamas recruits the orphans and they negotiate a cease fire to temporarily reduce some restrictions, repeat. Meanwhile we have examples of other extremist groups stopping when their concerns are taken seriously and they are given political solutions like the IRA. Even the PLO gave up violence thanks to the OSLO accords because they at least saw some possibility of a state.

I’m not dismissing it, I’m asking what it would take to falsify the theory. If you say Ukraine will win and Russia will attack NATO if Ukraine is out of the picture, but if Ukraine loses and Russia still doesn’t attack NATO that doesn’t disprove the claim, it’s an unfalsifiable claim and impossible to bring up counter arguments that you’ll entertain

So why weren’t any of these prior conflicts enough to serve that purpose and how do they know this current onslaught will? https://www.statista.com/chart/16516/israeli-palestinian-casualties-by-in-gaza-and-the-west-bank/

How is it necessary? -it is not necessary to save hostages, they’ve killed way more than they’ve saved -it is not necessary for defense, inside Gaza Hamas normally can’t do anything but send rockets which rarely hit the target, Oct 7 happened because they removed border security from Gaza to go to the West Bank and help settlers, also not necessary as settlers don’t need to be there -it is not necessary for future safety, just like with prior wars this just sows seeds for future violence and risks war with other groups like Hezbollah and Houthi’s.

You’re saying Ukraine is winning and the Ukraine war is necessary to stop Russia from attacking NATO. If Ukraine loses and they don’t attack NATO, that indeed means you were wrong as Ukraine wasn’t winning and what you claim was stopping Russia from attacking is gone. By this logic every country could be constantly attacking every other country because they “might one day attack them” and even if they don’t just say they still weren’t wrong because it might have happened. You can’t just start and support wars because on the off chance they might later attack someone else this will stop them. That also assumes the war weakens them, if Russia beats Ukraine they will potentially end up even stronger as it allows the government to consolidate power, have a larger military, and more resource access, meaning the Ukraine war actually made the potential for Russia attacking NATO worse.

If Ukraine loses and Russia does not attack NATO after that, will you admit your analysis was wrong?

Lately many on this forum have been saying looks is all or almost all that matters. But I saw this video, notice how he gets a almost 2x results improvement just from a personality shift

Putin already confirmed he is not planning on attacking NATO. The war is not “where NATO want it”, they thought it’d be over by now and running out of people in Ukraine with no sight of victory this war has made Russia stronger than ever, it now weathered the sanctions, is closer to China and Turkey, and has a massive military with more experience. we already had leaked emails from US gov officials admitting the entire Russian political establishment saw Ukraine joining NATO as a red line, Putin’s replacement will probably agree with his policy or be even more extreme. It could take 20 years for Putin to die, Ukraine won’t last 10 at this rate.

Who has better odds, someone with 5 numbers to call or 10?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tt-L2pROgk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3miuaOWsj8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eit85FAj4wg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLH7yUwkBPg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7p3-MJJm_R0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7L2MzmE8cwo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBqtJxMHPFM Use this to get over them https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVqANXVTLN4 http://happinessbeyondthought.blogspot.com/2012/05/surrendering-i-letting-go-of-suffering.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MU1Rp184IT4

Just go full vulnerability mode, sometimes she will start trauma dumping and this leads to sex a shocking amount of times.

We should have never tried to include Ukraine in NATO and should have pushed for peace in the first place

The popular clips are usually pretty bad game wise

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=No2iJEFmAcA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DTlnS8aYkQ https://www.girlschase.com/content/how-act-when-girl-rejects-you https://www.girlschase.com/content/how-make-rejections-girls-work-your-favor https://www.girlschase.com/article/if-you-resent-women-youre-blind-real-dating-picture https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SdiL9XFKkU

https://thenextweb.com/news/raven-thorogood-the-stock-market-chimp-that-smoked-wall-street-investing

There are theories about genetic determinism but they are controversial

But womens attraction isn’t just based on genetics, it’s also social conditioning. Even something like height isn’t necessarily a genetic advantage, historically being short had advantages because of needing less calories to survive. they also can’t see invisible things like genetic defects.

Some studies have found how socially dominant a man is or how popular he is with other women can alter how a woman perceives his physical looks.