GreenWoods

Taking care of yourself is love relative to you. Taking care of yourself is in many cases not love relative to the environment.

Well I think Absolute Infinity is unlimited enough to include both scenarios of unity of consciousness as well as seperation and multitude of consciousness.

He was probably speaking relative to human consciousness. Relative to human consciousness, taking care of yourself is love and not taking care of yourself is not love. Relative to a high state of consciousness, not taking care of yourself can be seen to be love too. Everything might be equal relative to a certain state of consciousness. But relative to other states of consciousness, everything is certainly not equal. And if you take the wisdom from that high state, then you could say that every state is equally important and true. Which means that "everything is not equal" is not a lesser truth.

Looking through the lense of my model, raising baseline includes: Illumination dimension: higher consciousness which means recognizing and becoming conscious of facets of awakening void dimension: consciousness becomes more formless and spacious

@puporing Great!

I think transmissions, self inquiry and psychedelics are one of the most effective techniques to raise baseline. Here explained in more detail.

I think our understandings are not too much apart.

Not necessarily. If there can be one subject, one consciousness, then why can't there be multiple subjects, multiple consciousnesses? Your experience could be my consciousness in the past or future. Or it could be a completely different consciousness. That means, I have never experienced you and never will. Maybe I did experience a life that was identical to yours, down to every atom. But it wasn't necessarily exactly you. But maybe it was, and my past is literally your present. I think it can't be known either way, at least not in our current form. How would that be possible? Maybe Oneness includes manyness. And Non-duality includes duality. Why would Absolute Infinity be limited to strict Oneness and Non-duality? What would limit it? I think there are no limits whatsoever.

I think Absolute Infinity could be called God. And every bubble of consciousness is a small part of that. Parts can be connected as well as disconnected. Both are possible scenarios within Absolute Infinity. How is that possible? Well how is anything possible?

Benefits of a high Void, Illumination and Magnitude Dimension - Benefits of a high Void Dimension: Intensified experience of Oneness, Emptiness and no self awakenings and an increased sensation of spaciousness higher energetic sensitivity. Thus receiving transmissions become more powerful. (In my experience, the void dimension is the biggest factor that determines the strength of transmissions) a high void dimension affects your aura and therefore the aura of others. In that way, a high void dimension naturally leads to a spiritual transmission to others increased peace and the feeling of liberation increased bliss (as well as love and happiness) (more about bliss at the middle of this post) resistance dissolves it becomes easy, natural and automatic to surrender. And you are more in the flow and life becomes seemingly more effortless. less suffering from the ego mind (due to high void dimension of no-self) increased intuition and psychic perception increased psychic power (reason explained here) the higher your void dimension, the closer you are to the non-physical and astral realms. That means a high void is neccesary for OBEs. And invocations become more vivid (because you are closer to the realm where spiritual entities reside). (invocations also become more vivid due to increased psychic perceptions and increased energetic sensitivity) - Benefits of a high Illumination Dimension: Enlightenment: recognition and being conscious of facets of awakening (+ benefits that this awareness brings) understanding, wisdom - Benefits of a high Magnitude Dimension: intensified experience of God, Infinity and Love awakenings a high magnitude dimension affects your aura and therefore the aura of others. Thus it results in a transmission to others possibly an increase in psychic power advanced progress on David Hawkins LOC model and the density model of the law of One.

That just means that an outside can be neither validated nor invalidated. It can only be speculated about. Based on my understanding and assumptions, an outside is extremely likely.

That just means that time is relative. In that scenario, relative to you, no time has passed. Relative to possibly other life forms, 5000 years have passed. No. It just means that relative to you, time has no existence and no relevance without you. But if there are others, time still has existence and relevance to them, regardless of whether you exist or not.

... relative to you. Yes.

So you are saying there exists a major duality? The you, the NOTHING. And objects. Things you are conscious of. Most people here on the forum would probably say that there is no difference between these two. There is only one 'substance'. Objects are not observed by a subject. Everyhing is Consciousness and therefore, objects = subject. Therefore I wouldn't call it non-existence.

If there is something outside your bubble, it would exist relative to itself. And relative to you it wouldn't exist. Your direct experience is the absolute, relative to you.

This. Of course. But that doesn't mean that there can't be something outside your experience. It just means that your idea of an outside isn't proof of an actual outside.

What makes you sure you are all of Absolute Infinity? Even when you are in an insanely high state of consciousness, I don't think this can be called all of Absolute Infinity. It's just one possible form/state within Absolute Infinity. It can sure feel like it is all of Absolute Infinity (because it feels like there is nothing outside you), but I don't think it necessarily means that that's the case. Also it's kind of circular logic. All that means is that if there is something outside you, you can't become conscious of it (because in that moment, it would no longer be outside you).

The main assumption this explanation is based on is that there isn't anything outside you. But you can't be sure of that.

Update I currently don't use the intensity dimension anymore. I think it is not necessary in order to conceptualize and map states of enlightenment. I think what I thought the intensity dimension covers, can to a great extend be covered with the void and magnitude dimension. - Oneness, Emptiness, no-self, spaciousness, Peace (+ feeling of liberation) High Illumination dimension leads to recognition of these facets. High void dimension leads to an actual, immersive and intense experience of these facets Formlessness (= high void dimension) directly results in (or equals) a more intense experience of these facets. - God, Infinity High Illumination dimension leads to recognition of these facets. High magnitude dimension leads to an actual, immersive and intense experience of these facets High void dimension makes the experience formless Formlessness doesn't make the experiences of these facets more intense. It only makes them more formless. To make the experience of these facets more intense, the magnitude dimension is required. - Love High Illumination dimension leads to recognition of that facet. High intensity of a love awakening is dependent on: high Illumination, high void, high magnitude, and emotional capacity to feel love That means, the intensity dimension is not necessary and would only add unnecessary complexity. Using only Illumination, void and magnitude is good enough to make sense of most enlightened states (+ using the distinction of different facets of awakening, of course). But my understanding of the magnitude dimension needs a lot of improvement. Many times, the distinction between magnitude and Illumination as well as the distinction between magnitude and void is very unclear. They seem to overlap. A better understanding of the magnitude dimension will make things clearer.

What you call Nothingness, I would still call something. If it were literal Nothingness, it would be non-existence. Either we just label the same 'thing' differently or you have a potentially deeper understanding than me, an understanding which doesn't make sense to me lol.

I think awakening helps only to a relatively small extend to find out what's the best career for you. If right now your number one goal is to discover your career, then I think it might be better to do things that have a more direct and bigger impact on discovering that. Like taking Leo's LP course. And contemplating about that all the time (rather than inquiring about the "I"). If you've done everything imaginable to discover your LP, and still now clue, then rather than doing any random career, you could do some enlightenment work, and once you've got some idea about a potential career, shift your focus to that. Angelic Magick can help to find your LP.

@Insightful27 Depends on how strongly you want to become enlightened. Can't you live without it? Then you are a hardcore seeker and can put all effort into enlightenment first, to the extend normal life allows it. But for most seekers, I think focusing primarily on LP first and doing enlightenment alongside might be better. Maybe this post helps to reconcile enlightenment with human life in general.

If you are abused, then in my opinion forgiveness means to forgive the other person for not being high conscious and mature enough to act better, but it doesn't mean to forgive the abuse itself. So if someone is abused, that person should do everything possible to avoid further abuse and leave. But now the conscious thing would be to not hate the absuer but forgive their lack of maturity. But not forgive the absue itself, and that the person did the abuse.

Good points, I agree with everything. The only thing I would add is: When someone does something to you which you don't like, then relative to you it is not love. But relative to the other person it might still be love for you, depending on why they do what they do. ( out of love for you or love for themselves).

I don't know whether I understand everything you wrote. Are you saying this right here is literal legit Nothingness? I would say it is something.