Raptorsin7

Do you think if you reach high enough in the spiritual it can resolve all physical issues?

Yeah that was very clear nice. I always wondered if someone could be so loving that any conversation or interaction could enlighten someone

@Salvijus You might find this information interesting. When I was doing this emotional processing technique with my pua coach, he said he has partial psychic abilities. He said he can feel the tension from my head in his own being, and it hurts his head. I have had really bad heaches for my whole life, and for the past few months I've had tremendous pressure building in the head, but I can handle it better I don't really suffer from it like I used to. I wasn't sure about paranormal abilites etc, but he was clearly the suffering from my headaches

Sorry if I wasn't clear. I mean, you are trying to share your understanding right? Trying to point people to seeing that fear is an illusion, and intellectual understanding is not sufficient etc. But clearly they are resistant and not accepting what you're saying. What would you have to say so the other people could see clearly what you are saying. So if you're trying to point people to seeing that fear is an illusion because you have seen through the illusion, how can you ensure that the person you're speaking to can recognize the insight you're trying to share. So it would be like: "Hey this is x inisight, now do y and then boom you can recognize what i'm trying to share with you" - Salvijus "Wow I can see exactly what you are pointing to. I no longer experience fear! Amazing!- Veganawake lol

@Salvijus What do you think is stopping you from sharing your understanding with others? Couldn't we say that your understanding is not sufficient unless you can share it with others?

That makes a lot of sense. I cleared a bunch of traumatic events, and now the energy is flowing smoother. I feel right now how I feel on psychidelics, but I'm only on weed. All the energy is starting to collapse into the center of my forehead. And my perception is becoming clearer.

If the police were actively moving to disrupt looting and the destruction of property then I would agree that vigilantism is not necessary. I think the police were given orders not to break up the rioting and looting because politicians did not want to deal with the political storm it would cause. So they took a hands off approach and allowed the looters to burn through the area, like they allow a forest fire to burn itself out. If there were looters and rioters active in Rittenhouse's area then he does have a right to protect community property against looters and rioters. Can you link this. I am operating on the video and the psychology of the police and politicians

Who should protect property if the government refuses to intervene?

I live in Canada. And yeah I trust law enforcement.

Okay so you're saying that the community should accept the destruction and looting of their community and business's So when the government does not enforce the law because of political ineptitude you will be content watching cities and neighborhoods go up in flames because only the government has the right to protect and defend the community? This is easy to say when it's not your community being destroyed. I wonder how you respond if this happened in your neighborhood

What difference does it make who's storefront he is protecting? Apparently he had family members and friends who worked and had business's in that area. So only the actual business owner can protect their specific location? What about their friends, family etc? I'll ask again, do you think that the community should have accepted the destruction and looting of their community, given the government inaction? Also, where is responsibility on those who attacked Rittenhouse and escalated the situation?

So in this case where the government did take action due to politicians fearing backlash, what are the alternatives for business owners and members of the community? if it was your neighborhood, would you be content watching the place go up in flames?

I'm asking what you believe So most "high quality woman" don't have the sense to avoid my scumbag example?

So most "high quality woman" don't have the sense to avoid my scumbag example?

Isn't it part of the definition of high quality that she would have the sense to not get involved with scumbags? "Hey I have 6 children with 6 different woman, you want to be my 7th "- Scumbag "Omg yeah, I would love to do that. I just can't resist"- High quality woman

Lol why do you believe this true? If a woman is high quality don't you believe she would not be attracted to scum bags?

Did you always have this personality? What was your childhood like? Do you ever remember a time in your life where you did think this about yourself?

He likely has ideological presuppositions that underlays his entire paradigm around the issue. He cannot be truly honest because the truth will contradict his core beliefs. To him, he likely thinks he's arguing with a stone walll. I do not have ideological presuppositions, I can be honest and see this situation for what it is. If i'm wrong I will simply admit I'm wrong. I'm curious if anyone has the integrity to answer my specific questions honestly

Not to me. I don't know if he admits he's wrong, he thinks i'm a right wing troll, I'm not worth responding to etc

It's funny, the first tell that someone isn't the most woke is them referring themselves as the most woke So we might both be disqualified haha The tension started a few years ago when I first found the forum and got really into seeking. I have dissolved it completely on psychidelics so i see it as a symptom of the suffering I still haven't uprooted. But I actually had a significant breakthrough thanks to a technique developed by pua coach. The tension is the result of unprocessed trauma in the brain. For me it's related to getting shamed by grandpa for shitting on the floor as a baby, my sexual repression from sd blue parents, and my traumatic relationship with my parents. I went into each activating memory, the core experience of the trauma, and reimagined it, formed new beliefs around it, and did EMDR to process the trauma in the brain. It was 1 day ago and I already feel like a different person. One significant thing I did was I unblocked my chakra around the bladder region. I can actually drain the tension from the head and my stomach problems, directly into that lower chakra.

Maybe we can do both? And rioting and looting should be deterred and prevented Also, why did you choose to not answer my questions?

So the looter aggression against business is acceptable? So in Ritten Houses' case when he was aggressed upon, should he not be entitled to defend himself with lethal force? What if they run a business with poor insurance claims? And they know they stand to lose a significant portion if not their entire livelihood?

Because you are providing no alternatives to the community to protect their business'. If the government does not take responsibility because of political correctness and fear of political backlash then what are the options for protection? So if someone breaks into a business and starts looting and destroying what is a business owner supposed to do? What is the business owner supposed to do if a looter decides to aggress upon them?

You are condoning rioting. If the government, who has the right of the law, does not take responsibility for preventing violence and looting then who is responsible? You seem to be saying that in this case no citizens have the right to take responsibility to protect their community, and so the looting and rioting is an inevitable consequence. Also, if he is there with the intent to protect property and the community, he is assisting and is therefore an extension of business owners protecting their property and livelihoods. Do you acknowledge that business owners have a right to protect their property and business's when there is rioting and looting? We could just easily say that when you are apart of a protest that involves looting and rioting that you forfeit any right to be assumed as a peaceful protestor. As far as a business owner or authority figure is concerned you are an active combatant by choosing to remain in a violent protest against government curfew

He was not continuing to shoot, there were clear options for the protestors to get the police and not escalate the violence. He was running away, and he was aggressed upon. He had a right to shoot when people are chasing him. Chasing him down needlessly escalated the situation. Imagine a situation where a business owner shoots a looter in their store, would the looters be entitled to rush the shooter because they don't want others to get shot? No, they don't. There is a causal chain, and those who act first bring upon them the consequences.