Synchronicity

Cool picture! You are the devil whispering lies into your own ear

@Leo Gura Objectively lower? Whichever one is lower (or even whether they’re both equal, as I’ve said) depends on what values and cognitive skills you consider greater. I have my reasons for why Liberal cognitive and moral value is no higher than Conservatives and I gave them. You said your reasons for placing Conservatives lower is because they have greater sense of self. Well, Liberals have just as great a sense of self (in my opinion) as more of them claim victim status and want laws to conform to their social identities. I see no less dense a sense of self there than Conservatives.

@Cody_Atzori Actually it is possible. I’m constantly immersed in It. I know that sounds cocky but I’m just saying it’s possible and actual

@zeroISinfinity Why are you now claiming superiority. I was at the point where there were no dualities and then later than that came the realization that there both are and aren’t Which is why I embrace your perspective but you’re trying to invalidate mine

@zeroISinfinity I’m including your perspective in mine. Like how God includes all selves within itself. Nonduality unites Dualities

@zeroISinfinity That is your perspective and experience of Truth Which is not meant to invalidate it by the way. It integrates it

@zeroISinfinity Ohh I see. So mine is a belief but your’s is objectively true

All actions are double-edged swords. There’ll be a positive and negative aspect to anything done. The game being played is to try and maximize the positive with as little negativity as possible. We’re almost like mathematicians trying to find the area of maximization. Searching for this balance is the trick.

*Anyone! Whoever is it depends on one’s definition of Enlightenment ? Could be her, him, Jim, everyone, no one etc.

I don’t really like that liberals are ranked a whole stage higher than conservatives. In my opinion, conservatives have just as many good points as liberals. Similarly, just like conservatives, liberals have a lot of negative traits. For example: many claim victim status and blame the world for their problems instead of focusing on inner work; many try to control other people’s lives (ban people from owning guns); many try to force others to see them how they want to be seen (they’ll get angry over binary gender perspective which is just another perspective) etc. So I think they’re both equal.

Don’t be so quick to count out the notion of infinite reality and call it delusional. Many people here, including me, have experienced that it’s infinite. Now, Truth is relative, so if you’ve experienced reality as finite, that’s fine. But there’s no need to establish your Truth as Absolute and mine as delusion.

@Shadowraix Ahh yes, I see what you’re saying. In pursuing spiritual awakening it can definitely be a distraction

Yes, Siddhis are possible. Everyone on here is saying they’re distractions. They’re only distractions if you use them as such. Siddhis can do a lot of good for the world. It’s just that nobody’s used them effectively enough. One example of a siddhi is telepathy. This would allow a person who has realized Truth to directly transmit that direct experience into the minds of others, thereby, allowing others to directly know Truth without having to interpret your words. “But that doesn’t allow the other people to realize the Truth for themselves!” you may object. Well is that really so bad? Good and bad are relative. So there’s nothing objectively wrong with advancing the world in such a way. There exist infinitely many worlds where this has been done, is being done, and will be done.

Mind isn’t inherently bad. All things have pros and cons. There do exist paths that rely on the Mind as well.

I’m only Enlightened if I’ve Enlightened you. I appreciate your encouragement @Aakash but this is a topic that excuses one from the work done on this forum. As such I realize that it may have no business here. It has nothing to do with Enlightenment because it’s not anything at all. The fact that this “thing” is beyond omniscience is precisely what makes it so that there’s no such thing as beyond omniscience. This topic is so nuanced that it’s backwards and to know it (know nothing) is to not know anything at all. If you want to hear how it’s impossibly substantial though (despite not being actual) anybody is free to message me. But I don’t want to take away the purpose of this forum. It’s up to the Mods or Leo if they’d like me to discuss further publicly

They exist. Everything exists. It’s just that all of Existence is within God’s Mind and is God’s Mind. God’s Imagination = Existence. So Imagination = Reality and vice versa.

@Freakrik Yeah, there’s always a way out. No realm is impossible to escape. As for choosing the next realm you live in, think of everyday life. Yes, someone could get out of work and head somewhere else purely on whim. Sometimes they’ll head somewhere that they feel obligated to be. Other times, they could get pulled somewhere by someone. Similarly, you could choose your next life realm based on your ego’s whim (not using that word ego negatively here) or you could go somewhere due to an obligatory feeling or even get pulled somewhere while your ego feels out of control. However, if you identify with being All of Reality than you’re aware that every realm that your ego travels through is always chosen by you, even in the circumstances where your ego is getting forcefully pulled somewhere.

Exactly! There’s infinitely many levels and dimensions of infinity. Awakening never ends.

@Freakrik And I’ll just add something to Leo’s response. There’s infinitely many levels of infinity but only one Absolute Infinity. Correspondingly, there’s infinitely many sizes of Eternity (or forever) but only one Absolute Eternity. With that said, Leo’s correct in that no one thing (including suffering) could ever last forever (on an Absolute scale). However, you Freakrik, are also correct in that suffering could last forever (in a relative Eternity). So you both (Leo and Freakrik) are correct. Leo’s answer corresponds to the Absolute scale of Eternity but your answer, Freakrik, corresponds to partial/relative levels of Eternity. And yes, Superman, Deadpool, Darth Vader etc. all exist. I’ve shaken Peter Griffin’s hand (call me insane?)

?This made me laugh more than it should have

The more you interact with others (be social) the more you learn about yourself (like in meditation). And vice versa. The more you meditate and learn about yourself, the easier your social interactions will be To learn about others is to learn about yourself and to learn about yourself is to learn about others.

How about a poll on the Divine Masculine?

??I appreciate it

@Nahm and @Aakash Here’s the link: https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCxcbnGOBwIUe19hlEmUHNkMy channel’s called “Everything Explained by Ethan Kahn” which sounds egotistical but is actually an acknowledgement of ego. It’s everything explained from one human mouth haha

What do I think about 5-D? Well... here’s the thing. Most spiritualists and New Agers point to it like it’s the end-all be-all of Existence. I saw one woman comment on Leo’s Relativism video saying that the 5th dimension is beyond relativity and 5-D beings laugh at us relative 3-D beings. However, 5-D is not the end-all be-all. There’s an Absolute Infinite number of dimensions and all of them experience Relativity (including the feable 5th dimension). Nobody is free from Relativity. So, to free yourself from it, you have to become nobody Lol Hence all of the no-self work being done on this forum.