Danioover9000

I think TechLead made a valid point when a YouTuber uses your face without permission. I can understand the feeling and I actually don't like it if strangers used my real life face without my permission as well. In another example, to bring up a similar context for me to make sense of this issue and for relatability, if an artist used parts of my work that constitutes as the 'heart' of my work, or my entire work and claimed they are the ones who made the art, or made claims whether they credited it to me or someone else, but gave a badly exaggerated critic that's hateful and bordering onto slander, then hell yeah I'd FEEL REALLY PISSED AND ANNOYED! Almost that same thing when an A.I. program st4eals your artwork without crediting it to you or claims it for it's own and badly distorts it, I'd be angry man. That's my fucking life's work you're shit talking about.

@StarStruck Why? Also, is that enough justification to dismiss his claims against Lex Fridman?

@MarkKol Wait, he's a millionaire? In cryptocurrency?

@mmKay So Coffeezilla is a YouTuber, who's life purpose to be a journalist and expose those are scammers and potential scammers? Yeah, just like a thread I did or participated in about hackers exposing Indian Hackers in India, while videoing it and making content, I'll state this what I stated there: This vigilante life purpose is SHALLOW AND WAF! There's little value generated or provided other than the content creators themselves, wait for the catch 22, relying on said evil doers or evil problems to begin with. If said world problems or evil doers went extinct or are resolved in other ways, that results in the decrease in the markets of your field of interest and may even result in said life purpose declining in relevancy. I also already hate this YouTube Channel, and the person. Screw this person, as the 10 minutes are never coming BACK!!!

@Arthogaan DESTINY DOES THAT SAME THING!!! He makes his titles and thumbnails click bait too! So now this justifies him commentating shit he doesn't know about TechLead?!He is a to-the-core HYPOCRITICAL DOUBLE STANDARD, who got cornered by Mr. Girl addressing him buddying up to Nick Fuentes despite Nick once did claiming to be a Nazi himself, a NAZI! Destiny buddying up with a NAZI, and writes it off as a justification of him trying to 'infiltrate' Nick's community to persuade and convince parts of Nick's community, when it's more likely he wanted to exploit and manipulate parts of his community to join his despite risking mixing alt right wing ideologies into his community. Mr. Girl brought that because of the scale of Destiny's community, and him running a PR of making Nick Fuentes the friendly neighborhood Nazi, that it makes it okay and normalizes people like Nick Fuentes to join online communities and social circles instead of rightly ridiculing them of being bad faith uncharitable actors of a past ideology that killed over tens of millions of people, Jews, the English, Americans, French, Canadian soldiers that fought in WW2. That justifies some defensiveness and conservative attitudes towards Nazism and very similar in structure ideologies to Nazism. He even threatened to kill those of other races and even Jews, which Mr. Girl is partly a Jewish person. Despite Mr. Girl attempting to warn Destiny, he sweeps it under the rug, and acts like nothing happened or isn't surprised that his 'friend' then blocks Destiny, refuses to talk to him anymore to join up with KANYE WEST! To be very clear, if TechLead is actually a Grifter bad fiath uncharitable actor, and so would be Mr. Girl, I'm not defending nor condoning their worldviews, positions, actions and behaviors as such, but Destiny is not to be trusted after that event. Also, really good website most of you are sleeping on: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwienOD0vff7AhWEYMAKHRXBA7wQFnoECBAQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fconsilienceproject.org%2F&usg=AOvVaw1ImyY7BeMECTNDN040KHot Especially on the good faith/bad faith communication, which I'm guilty of here a bit, but see how it fits with the people I've mentioned here.

I really don't like Destiny saying something that isn't his business at all. Just because Lex Fridman and Destiny are mutually benefiting each other to some degree, that doesn't give him the right to say something with him not knowing who TechLead is. Call him a Grifter, great, I get to call you a Nazi Sympathizer. I hope YouTube kicks him out the same way Twitter and Twitch kicked him out for spouting fucking nonsense!

@DrugsBunny Sorry, I meant how he speaks is similar to how you and the other user writes here.

@Arthogaan Grifter, and grifter humour?

@DrugsBunny Great, I just needed confirmation that it wasn't you, just found it interesting both your writing styles match up. Fantastic,, thanks for the confirmation, have a nice day!

@Tyler Robinson Got yo drift. What's really annoying though, is why did Destiny involve himself into this video? He's willing to call this TechLead person a grifter, well, I get to call Destiny a Neo Nazi sympathizer. What? He did buddy up to Nick Fuentes despite clearly knowing his political and belief system of exterminating the Jews when he has enough power.

@StarStruck In this video I tend to think and feel it's more likely he's trolling rather than being serious.

@Leo Gura Oh, I didn't know it's allowed to use somebody's face in a clickbait title of a thumbnail in a video without their consent. Can I use your face then, for an upcoming video? I swear it's not a drama vid or anything. P.S. I heard in the USA, either Ohio or some other state you can sue someone for taking a picture of you without consent, is this true?

I've been getting http error 500 for the past few days. Was there a problem with the forum? I was okay with accessing your website but not the forum...

Destiny has made a video recently about this, although I don't know why he should involve himself in this: What are you thoughts and feelings about this situation? I find his framing of this situation manipulative.

IS this you @DrugsBunny, @Scholar? It kind of sounds familiar with your writing style.

I think this link to the consilience project is valuable at this point, before we go deeper into this discussion between users supportive of A.I and are okay outsourcing their visual art pieces, and users against A.I image generators and are not okay outsourcing their visual art pieces. I especially get that feeling and understand it, and it can effect the quality of conversation happening here as all sides facing this issue are spiraling downwards the quality of discourse, which is why this is important. Check out the website and go to the article on good faith versus bad faith discussions: https://consilienceproject.org/

@DrugsBunny Fair enough and fair play, let's part ways, artfully agree to disagree today to avoid debate and arguing till judgment day. Have a nice day bunny babe.

@Majed Plausible and possible, but not [probable and absolute, until we find another planet to go and colonize and terraform to our needs and standards.

@Oeaohoo Ring of Power, The Wheels of Time, Star Wars, majority of western movies, comics, music videos being too woke cultured, to name a few, although it's largely stage orange big companies tailoring their marketing towards LGBTQ communities, SJW's and the loudest leftist activists screaming virtue signaling and victim shaming. Even Netflix is starting to get corrupted and a few writers made the actor in The Witcher quit due to them not caring enough of the source material, and others. Am I close enough?

@spiritual memes Wait a minute, wasn't he also a user here a while back? is he @Aaron p? I remember the profile pic was him with a beach background.

@eggopm3 Put that way, I can see why a discord of that type is problematic.

@Nilsi I tend to type slower so that 2 minute minimum isn't an issue to me. @Tyler Robinson @Leo Gura What type of discord are we not allowed to participate in the future? Like the discords found in the streaming community, aka Destiny, Vaush, and so forth? Is it all types of discord? Asking for clarity, and I don't even participate in chat groups as my fingers are too slow and am not part of the chatter/streaming community.

@Scholar Good for him, let this be an example of integrity.

@Godhead That's fine, as I am wrong in the little details, but him losing his older brother and joining the DAP and other areas of his life back then played a significant part when taken as a whole. That and I was just using Stalin and Hitler as extreme examples of traitorous behavior which contrasts strongly to Senator Sinema's apparent betraying of the Democratic party.

@DrugsBunny To be clear, and to clarify for the hundredth time, I'm not here to argue or debate a cultist rationalist/scientist filled with intellectual hubris, so I'll say this one more time and address each point you bring up in as good faith as I can humanly muster, without cursing. Yes, about 50% of my threads and mostly posts in other user threads in the political/career sub forum starts with 'depending on your stage of development, cognitive and moral development, ego development, personality typing, life experiences and other lines of development, and worldviews and beliefs systems and ideologies indoctrinated into your mind.', and other variations of that phrasing mainly because the issue being discussed and who is in discussion is relative, that there's much needed nuance and big picture thinking and holistic understanding needed before being reductionist with your view of any issue. This way of me starting is to frame myself as a complex moral person, and to signal to others here that I think more in abstract and complex patterns. 40% of my posts consists of me posting spiritual/paranormal topics in the spiritual sub forum. 10% involved rapping and freestyle rhyming, on the other hand, were me joking about, and I have a short list of users I rap about who are dogmatic, close minded and tend to have demonizing and patronizing language, and it also happens to include you as I found your judgmental posts close minded and insulting. Majority of my posts had little intention of demonizing or name calling. Yes, I am cognitively, morally, psychologically and intellectually superior compared to you because I don't engage with debates and arguing as strongly as you do to humiliate other users. That's your problem to resolve, not mine, only I can mention your blind spot and it's up to you to fix that psychological codependency of arguing and debating. Now that could be seen as me not fully engaging with a subject matter and maybe being a jerk, and that's fine, because as soon as you see me engage with a subject matter less, that's a sign that there's not much to continue discussing when a person's mind is closing down. For example when you stereotyped Senator Sinema as a traitor, it seems like a progressive caricature, so I was pointing out how you might have characterized her inaccurately as she may have instead discovered a political alignment more accurate to her, that of being a moderate Republican rather than a Democrat. Maybe that seems traitorous to you, or to those with different biases, opposing biases or even to those in-groups or out-groups, but personally to her that may not be betrayal, in fact remaining inside a political party that's less aligned with your interests is more traitorous than leaving and joining one with closer alignment. I've found it useful to peg and put other individuals and other groups into these modals for my own observations and personal heuristics. However, sometimes I can be inaccurate and that's fine as I continue refining my heuristics of stereotyping people and cultures first, then refine later on into more accurate mental representations. I will own up to my potential mistakes here, as I stated many times in the past I suck at arguing and debating, maybe I'm not as equipped at debating, but I'm not here to debate, I'm here to talk with an open mind and humbleness, while also having some fun. I actually don't have much IRL or internet friends as you think I have, so me stating your intellectual hubris is an observational statement based on your writing style at me and how you tackle topics here, it's just too dogmatic and argumentative for an open minded, good faith and charitable discussion, which I could be wrong for assuming. If you don't mind, with whatever remaining level of attention you have, could you clarify to me where I'm wrong, or being uncharitable or bad faith to you? Also, to @Leo Gura and @Carl-Richard, where in my discussion with @DrugsBunny and other users here am I being uncharitable or bad faith, or am I more good faith and charitable?