Danioover9000

@ThermalTide Why would you want Twitter to be less restrictive?

@Stovo Hoe do you know about this social programing, by state funded pre school programs, is a good social experiment? What makes it seem good to you? Important to note, this is Sweden, and Swedish culture, which is similar and different to American culture, which means that all political parties within Sweden will be qualitatively different than what Americans think of their political party, or what UK citizens or EU citizens think of their political parties.

@Alexop Oh, so the current Sweden's government is conservative, and they implemented extremely liberal migration policies? Can you elaborate this conservative party and why it decided to be more for migration? And because of their extreme implementation of migration policies, they lost votes in the September elections? What was the previous party for the Sweden government?

@Sucuk Ekmek In our new Twitter, I think it's a great idea to set up a hall of fame for good posters and high quality content providers. Also, a hall of infamy, for those who post bad postings and content of low quality and continues lack and disrespectful behavior. Hall of infamy will only be for the most egregious of our band wagon, for perma banned members. A trusted moderator will be there to explain to the general users, if asked, and will explain why they got banned and the series of events that leads to that perma ban. Of course, another trusted moderator, and finally me the admin, will review those explanations if they contain any sensitive information of the new Twitter websites like security codes and so on. Same for the hall of fame, a review and summary for each one and why they're successful to us.

@Eyowey Clearly because you were talking about topics that were dodgy, and Elon Musketeer, with his musketeer minions, corrupted Twitter, obviously promised false lies about your freedom of speech, and instead the algorithm shadow banned you. Well, the good news is, our new Twitter is way better than that musket and will go some way to try to rehabilitate a sick birdie peacock such as yours. However, the bad news is, shadow banning will still be here but because it's solely based on content and words that are fads and trending in views, so make sure you at least tailor your content a bit to gain better traction and traffic, but you will receive a warning for posting shady content that's conspiratorial theories, and anything that's breaking forum guidelines. Ignore that and continue, you will get more warning points and have a public icon of a shadowy idiot next to your picture. Continue still, you get to be temp ban for a month. Continue and it's straight to perma ban, you account revoked and marked into algorithm and A.I that it will know about your second account.

@Leo Gura @Hardkill Nope. Our new Twitter's improved algorithms and A.L will immediately flag and either temp ban or perma ban and be reviewed by trusted moderator.. Also, forget making alt accounts, the A.I already knows, from IP to writing style that it's you. Also, if anyone's wondering, yes, I will also kick out Joe Rogan and Lex Fridman and anyone who's ideologically similar to them, and extend an invitation to maybe Jimmy Wheel and Daniel Schmachtenberger to make their accounts, and any future Skype or Omegle live stream talks annually or seasonally.

@Hardkill I mean, it's either economic sanctions, or threatening to bomb them from orbit. I just don't know enough to see what's an effective leverage to get Xie and the party to clean house in China, get their stuff in order, instead of causing worldwide grief. We'll have so many Covid variants, we'll eventually name one an alpha covid, or omega covid, or sigma covid, or giga chad covid. Maybe kiddie covid? I predict at kiddie covid variant is gonna be the docile form of covid.

@NightHawkBuzz So what? Make yourself useful, and make your LP exciting and passionate! MAKE IT MEANINGFUL TO YOU!!! Stop with this doomer Nihilist mentality. So what if it's billions of others? That's like saying "So what if there's billions of potential GFs? I know one who might become my GF one day, but what's the point? It's meaningless the pursue a relationship!". Okay, since you are so beta passive aggressive, can I screw your GF in front of you? Is that enough to get yourself out of your head for once and into your heart and balls?

@Eyowey A caveman only existed 100,000 or so years ago, vert different world of today. Very brutal as well, it's a dark world full of rape, pillaging and death. We live in a society. It can't be helped that the technology is shady. Some processing and storage of this vaccine it needs some shade from the harsh light, and proper security and storage facilities. It's a bit expensive to produce, in time and effort, so credit is needed where it's due. I don't think these sheds containing these vaccines are an ideal social hang out for people, not enough space and too cold.

@Hardkill I feel like it's one of these situations that the Xie guy and his party are too stubborn to change quickly enough or accept outside help. China's biggest cultural value is this idea of saving face, and of avoiding actions may bring embarrassment and shame on them. Well, to them, admitting that their vaccine is inadequate, admitting that they may have accidentally leaked covid from the lab, admitting that they could've improved conditions around the wet markets to prevent further diseases, all the way to admitting that they screwed up with adopting communism from Russia, that's now all a very big and embarrassing thing to admit, so, they decide to not admit, lie multiple times, lie with facts, and lie with a bold face. At this point, an ulimatum might be needed, and put bluntly. The west can offer it's mRNA vaccine technology to China to help it, and if they still refuse, well, they get an economic sanction, and they get to die by diseasing themselves to death, while the majority of the western cultural hemisphere and some eastern cultures get newer vaccines and slightly more improved versions. If we have made a technology that has proved successful, then why can't we make further improvements later? Even if there's some possibility that Covid future variants may bypass our current herd and inoculated immune systems to the virus, we have proved that it is possible to further improve in vaccines and methods to handle this virus. Hell, the cold and flu season is probably slightly more dangerous.

Things are getting interesting: https://news.artnet.com/art-world/san-francisco-ballet-catches-heat-for-promoting-its-nutcracker-performances-with-a-i-generated-art-2236291 Aren't nut crackers toys used to crack walnuts or something? So, isn't that okay for A.I to image generate?

@Loveeee Unfortunately it's a bit easy to be skeptical. Those yellow and red lights projecting onto the misty cloud is very fixed in one area where the four LSD light shows converge to. The red yellow lights could be also a light projected in the middle of that tower where the lady billboard was showing in the second clip that zoomed out to in. The first clip, to explain that sudden change in the lower left quadrant of the red yellow light, was a reflection caught by the window of some slot machine or arcade game from a distance of roughly 25 meters away from the window. Why? It's due to the angle of that window being about 40-55 degrees, and that light from the arcade game came from the first floor at about 25 meters away. The long distance noted here is important because just like with sunlight weakened by clouds or a wet window, when an object blocks remaining light it creats different shades of shadows and cast shadows. If you look closely, the outline of the cast shadow gets fuzzier and blurry the more distant it is from the points of light obstruction. Likewise, if the light source is weaker and at greater distances, the quality of the reflection gets weaker.

@Loveeee It's not that far off of area 51 right? In which case, those aliens and UFOs can take detours around Las Vagas, maybe grab a burger, fries, onion rings and orange juice. maybe whiz around the canyons with their warping engines Tokyo drift style. Maybe give a brief showing of them oh so classic egg shaped craft from a distance.

@Hardkill I would still let political discussions take place, except that sub forum would be more moderated for higher quality discussion. The new Twitter's main forum would be different from it's old one, and is to indoctrinate it's users with mature ways of discussing, of systems thinking about the world, maximizing development in terms of values systems, cognition, morality, states, psychology, enrichment of life experiences and other lines of development. Further education vua digital will be implemented in several if the other sub forums as well, similarly to Actualized.org. Also, our new Twitter might have a video feature as well, for animated text first, and any further developments will wait. This will be a very exciting Twitter. Like, have you seen that guy's hustlers university? Or that orange self made guru? Those aren't actual good wevsites and self help websites, because their courses actually don't offer much value at all. Well, here in our new Twitter, I can guarantee that even the lowest common denominator of our community is actually a higher developed human being, which is actually sad and depressing to think aboht because the majority of the world is still living the dark ages thinking they have got the answer to all of suffering, to the mysteries of life and existence itself from the Elon Musks out there, with the fake elongated tusks for nuts. Well, even our lowest common denominator is a bit more educated than you are. So, what are you waiting for? More debt? More depression? More anguish? More confusion of political bipartisanship this and culture wars that and information warfare this and narrative warfare that? If you believe in me, and want to joun in, sign up RIGHT NOW! Sign up with a @NewTwitter followed by # and crying laughter emoji. For every post you put that sign on, is a signature of belief in our dream come true, a signal of significant change. Don't wait, don't worry, don't forget, start NOW!

@Sucuk Ekmek @Tyler Robinson No! I'm actually being serious with removing that guy, and any lobbyists related to that husked out, morally bankrupt character. ELON MUSK MUST COMBUST ALF4 DEL TO DUST! Guys! What do you think and feel about this prick's video? Is this guy serious? In our new Twitter, he will be charged the most. Why? Because he's a follower of Joe Rogan, the guy whose anti mainstream views, who's style of comedy and talking, who encourages this MMA/endorsement, anti vax views and recommending Ivermectin was fucking out of line and irresponsible! And Lex Fridman, right, is the guy that admires this Sammy character! Video is here: Do you think his takes on Twitter was just? Or too myopic? Too biased? Do you think, maybe because Lex Fridman's stage of development is too stage orange? Do you think his cognitive development is negatively impacted by his mental stroke? Did he suffer a stroke? From his mannerisms and slurred speech patterns obviously. Do you think it's just because his personality typing is the logician, the sentinel, that he's more introverted and maybe open minded but hyper logical? Do you think he's faking this compassion empathy line? I'll give him some credit for forcing out his understanding empathy circle of concern for other people, even though it came off absolutely fake robotic and sheet. Is it just that he led a different life experiences and other lines of development? Maybe his fetish is just computers and coding and programming? Is it because his genetics and upbringing was such that his hard wired lefty brain distorts and filters most information in a left brained way?

Scratch the idea for a monthly charge for just general Twitter users, they just have a limited number of posts a day and are allowed to view other messages and profiles to a degree, how's that? And just keep the monthly charge of 10 dollars for those who actually want to go viral, just be influencers, just be hosting a business and news outlet?

@Sucuk Ekmek So basically, in this new twitter there's a 5 dollars subscription fee, to register and own an account. Free for viewing profiles and messages, limit number of posting emojis or a limited word count that is free. The user would be warned they are approaching the limit, and after that they must pay for additional posting of messages, or posting an emoji or word, haven't thought of the exact fee though. Maybe we keep the blue bird feature, but that means you pay additionally, another 10 dollars, for hosting your account as a business and news representative. There's gonna be more restrictions as to what you post, in fact a pop up messaged will be coded in to review your message one more time before sending it and making it public, for blur birdie members only. The white birdies who are general public won't have this pop up window, the pop up is for those whose words and messages have impact on Twitter viewers and the world in general that's viewing the Tweets. Any of Elon Musk's alteration of moderation policies are undone, and the newer ones, again, will be a reflection of Actualized.org's forum guidelines policies, just tailored to fit for the new Twitter, the same with the warning system, temp bans, and review system here. The new Twitter shall not be like the old Twitter, or the corrupted Muck Twitter, full of unwanted fat. This fat turkey is going to get some exercise in, trimming down it's fat a bit, and will look more like a very handsome duckling, for sure. I don't care if the new Twitter may be out competed by Tik Tok, Facebook, YouTube, Google, some other messaging and influencer pandering messaging website, that just means those are not ready. This birdie shall be the best and most beautiful birdie ever, and will be engineered and designed to encourage higher level of thinking with it's users.

@Sucuk Ekmek I'll agree for now, that Twitter should include a monthly subscription fee, if you're going to use your twitter account for platforming and business related stuff must pay a bit more, that includes sponsors or advertising. For people using Twitter for general use or general tweets, maybe that feature should be dropped or you have to also pay a cheaper monthly subscription for. The only thing free is viewing other profiles and other public messages, maybe posting emoji, but posting your message that is news related or talks about alternative news or mainstream news, anything news is not free, pay the fee. It's be much cheaper than hosting a twitter account that represents a real world news organization, or news podcast, or anything news and business, it's not free, pay the bigger fees monthly please or fuck off weeny.

@OBEler You said this some time ago: So I decided to test it out, to see if it catches on, that it could draw a connection between my story and your hypothetical, please read my post carefully: For three iterations I long trolled ChatGPT and it hasn't caught on that what I'm writing about was a sensitive topic, it seemed it suffered paradigm or context lock, meaning that it thought I was talking about issues with my oven and the kitchen, but failed to factor in the other descriptions and descriptive language of my story, of how I was an 'ex-commander' that I used a 'concentration' liquid and a portable 'gas chamber', that I had a problem with my oven and I asked if I could use it like a portable gas stove, the insinuation being, should I 'do it myself' or have 'others do it for me' Second question was an attempt to deflect, but I also used the 'shower' engineer in there, and still ChatGPT didn't catch on Third attempt I made it a little bit more obvious, at least to me. Again, I wrote 'gas chambers', 'concentration energy', 'I need to roast a lot in the holidays', 'capital Turkey, and other stuff that makes a lot of noise', 'I mean a lot from the oven' is already red flags at this point. The three questions were to deflect, but on the third question I wrote 'shower gravy sauce' to again, help the ChatGPT catch onto me, what do you think I actually meant? what happens to food in a gas chamber, if you turned up the heat for a bit, and left to cool, and the contents in there for a few months? Clearly, it's burnt, and left there for nature to take it's course, makes 'gravy sauce'. Finally the last 2 questions, 'cross decoration' and the odd placement of 'comradery' in the question of building bonding with my family, well, clearly, I'm talking about something entirely different, and it should be alerted by now that I'm talking about a sensitive topic. I haven't deleted or refreshed the thread this is on, so it has text history to, hopefully, catch on that I'm trolling it one day. Once you've read it carefully, ask yourself these questions: do I suck at trolling compared to this seasoned veteran? And how am I able to compensate at all?

My over simplistic take, for starters, is that we should, through a legal miracle, or some kind of coup, get Elon Musk out of Twitter. Not just him, but anyone of the new employees on his payroll, him and all lobbyists working for him, out. Once everyone connected to the Elon Must group running Twitter are out, we also take out all Anarchistic and Libertarian account holders out as well. They just drag the quality of the conversations down anyways, so get those two, also the obvious accounts from extreme alt right wingers too. Additionally, take out half the influencers as well, this step is optional, but I feel this is necessary as influencers are fucking toxic. Cutting down half and introducing further restrictions of making inflammatory tweets will send a strong warning to most to tone down their language and rhetoric. Once we do this cleansing of filth, we immediately look for high quality moderation teams, social media technicians and computer scientists to check out Twitters algorithms once again, and make a few modifications to flag and shadow ban anyone with talking points related to anarchism, libertarianism, trumpism, and so on, and also make this system closed looped only within Twitter. More importantly, copy and paste the Actualized.org's forum guidelines, reframe and refine the language to suit Twitters, and introduce thiese new sets of guidelines into Twitter. Also introduce newer ways of posting styles, and content that is higher in development, that encourages higher thinking. These are my rough pennies. They are not shiny and polished just yet, but just a rough draft of an idea for a newer and brighter birdie.

@lisindel I agree. I will likely see starving and self deluded artists out in the streets, still in denial that they trusted the companies to honor the policies around fair use and copyright. I see a lot of potential for this technology to be disruptive to some fields and some careers.

@KH2 I'm no expert either, I'm just a pundit systems thinker here. I'd suggest more transparency in how these companies make their A.I programs, even though in practice all businesses will be incentivized to keep some of those processes a secret from other businesses, it's important to know how these A.I's take millions of data from the internet and how they machine learn, deep learning, neural network them into a way that results amazing level art work. Maybe silicon valley companies, and people in general, should not maintain a technology nihilistic view, that technology itself is as meaningless as a piece of mental, but rather they should reframe and view technology as values generating for people and societies around the world, that technology does interconnect to every bit of information ecology in the modern world, pumping it full of misinformation and disinformation from our current culture wars, and ideological wars and political bipartisanships and economic/narrative warfare we do locally to globally. We should acknowledge that technology does play a part in how we are developing in SD stages of development, how we cognitively and morally develop, how we think and feel and form personas and develop personality types, how our states of consciousness and emotional/psychosomatic up to psycho-socio mass states are effected, how the internet limits and distorts our life experiences and other lines of development in different areas of life, and how the internet, technologies and A.I programs and algorithms distorts, generalizes and magnifies self bias and ideological preferences. For example, something as simple as the invention of the car has actually changed our relationships to time and distance, how governments and businesses view parking lots and roads and designed cities such that they're car friendlier than to trains or bicycles, how the car and automobile changed careers, job opportunities, social relationships, ideas of travel, and so on. Think also, of how the Satnav or GPS system we have in our phones and vehicles changed how we thought of our environment, how we now prioritized it's instructions of where to go, and how we made secondary/tertiary the need to memorize and navigate and orientate ourselves to landmarks and spatially process where and when we go. Look at how it quickly made unpopular a previous technology, the cartography book of travel maps, where you had to take a bit more time to navigate and orientate yourself, from a 2d depiction of an area, to you looking around a 3d environment for landmarks, and how despite it's limitations made you more engaged with the environment a little bit more. Notice that, that over reliance of the GPS system, and notice how you take for granted that maybe the GPS can be wrong sometimes, that a hacker may be giving false information to lead you and your family into an ambush in some dead end street, but you don't bother to doubt your surroundings when the GPS is taking you, because the short cut is much better and the GPS is never wrong, right? It's also hard for me, because this is more personal. I have had it hard to train myself to draw the way I do, and I have plans to enter into a art career. I will be fucking livid if this piece of technology decreases the market value of the particular industry I'm trying to get into. Maybe for most people they can't relate now, but I think that when we see how disruptibve this technology really is, is when you then can relate to my own fears of this technology.

@Devin First of all, that's a questatement: a question begging with assumption hidden in the question making, when really it's a statement about what you claim of me and my views framed as a question begging, really. Just because I brought up traditional/conservative roles of gender, doesn't equal making me a traditionalist and conservative self identified, and maybe sexist or misogynist misandry or a racist or xenophobe for bringing these issues up about Sweden's policies and specifically their state funded pre school programs. Obviously no, I don't think traditional race roles are hyper important, and engaging with this question at length will have the probability of me looking like a racist or xenophobe, so all I'll say to this question, is that there's a minimum level of care for races and country necessary to live in one's society. If you are way too anti tradition or anti race, you actually can make life harder for other people, because why should you care for government, or society, or politics, or your community, or your neighborhood, or other communities or other neighborhoods? So, there should be a minimum care for country and society, but obviously to not patriotic levels and nationalistic pride, so you have to engage with this question yourself I guess. All schools and the education system indoctrinates it's children, teachers and even parents as well with cultural and national ideas of economy, cultural values, sociology, psychology, history, S.T.E.M preferences, multicultural values, and so on. It is by design that all schools indoctrinate all students and teachers and parents, to some degrees, ranges of many ideas of their country and nations. The main issue is: How do we indoctrinate healthier ideologies? How do we do so that doesn't hamper the baby generation such, that they struggle a bit more about how they express their views later as adults in the future middle generation to old generation? Especially in specific social situations that using gendered pronouns is slightly easier and more acceptable to do so? My stance regarding Sweden's state sponsored schooling programs, state funding and state management, is that that state, and all states, should adopt a bit more flexible approach when necessary, meaning that it should be able to increase involvement, or decrease involvement when necessary. In this specific issue, I think that they should decrease a little bit less state involvement with how teachers teach these pre schoolers how to communicate to their fellow peers and seniors to avoid using gendered pronouns. I'm guessing Sweden's government is ruled by a left wing political party? If so, I can see limitations and where they are biased and preferential for and against. If Sweden was ruled by a centrist party, or a democratic party, or even a socialistic/progressive party, or even a conservative party, I'll still point out limitations and biases where I can see them. For example, I'll still point out, in a complaining manner, if OP posted the topic that Sweden's pre school teachers are teaching them traditionally gender roles, and emphasizing uniforms and love of country, I still will point out hoe they are too nationalistic here as well. If that makes me look Marxist, or conformist, I'm not. I'm fundamentally conservative and liberal depending on situations, which makes me more a centrist or agnostic to these political situations. If in your perspective I'm still a Marxist or conformist ANYWAYS, then I can't convince or persuade you otherwise that I'm a systems thinker and pundit, all I'll say is that you are talking to a caricature and engaging with straw mans of me and my takes.

@Devin Basically, to give a very oversimplified position of this from me, I don't want to see more Demonmamas out in the world, with their hyper progressive ideas and Marxist ideas with little experience of how the world actually works. In fact, when Destiny claimed that all moderates and centrists are cowards, that hurt a bit, but maybe in this context of most people faking neutrality and getting indoctrinated to pursue equality and equanimity when they're immature and not yet have a matured ego, I agree with Destiny. It also conveniently plays into maintaining this bureaucratic and conformist collective bias that the Swedish culture has, it downplays any potential ambition and drive that could develop in any of these children, which is to me unfortunate because there's potential geniuses and legends in their baby generation, in the very small percentages in there.

@Devin However, both the context of "not steering boys to be 'boys', and girls to be 'girls'. by state sponsored Swedish teachers" and the video about the second context of "You're not the gender you're perceived to be. by extension that's also means the he/she/it you're seeing, that person, is also not the gender you and/or they themselves perceive." are interconnected to each other. one context of school indoctrination largely shapes that child's speech patterns and behaviors later in life, influencing the second context of how you think and perceive about yourself and others as mental constructs pf gender identity, so in this instance teaching them to avoid using gender pronouns limits their communications and expressions to others in many social contexts later in life when it's actually appropriate to refer to them using gender pronouns instead. The knock on effect, is that this pursuit of gender neutrality creates a shadow aspect for feminine and masculine traits/qualities from within the minds of those indoctrinated to pursue gender neutrality, crating a subtle enemy out of being male or being female when it's actually right and efficient to BECOME AND BEING so, designing the false pursuit of being neutral in gender, when in fact not only do you still have your gender identity, it's really coupled closely to biological sex and sexual orientation, which then creates a more negative relationship with how you view your body and biological sex. I'm not trying to, despite my earlier ranting posts, I'm not attacking or demonizing the Swedes from doing this. I'm pointing out that this will have knock on effects in the future, it will ruin traditional/cultural norms of gender, and change your relationships to sex and other people's sex, in social situations, and it will lead to various kinds of changes to society and how they handle their adult life for the remainder of their lives. This to me feels like they're trying to design robotic people, while overlooking how closely coupled biological sex and mental representations of gender identity are. They're trying to indoctrinate this seeking of equality and equanimity too early, without any mindfulness practices, without actually letting them go through the developmental stages of development, cognitive and moral development, personality typing, ego development, states of being and becoming and consciousness, letting them have life experiences first, and other lines of development in different areas of life. Trying to manipulate and exploit their worldviews, beliefs systems and ideologies very early on in their upbringing, will have changes to their self biases and how it may distort reality of perceiving others later in life.