Danioover9000

@Rigel Too over simplistic and bad faith.

@Squeekytoy Because @AdeptusPsychonautica 's career and job, is being a YouTube Reactionary creating drama content, within the psychedelic and spiritual community. It's both a sunk cost fallacy, as he's had several + years investing time and energy into making content of this nature, therefore any admittance of fault significant enough to question the integrity of his position and standing in society and life will be avoided or obfuscated. The other reason is that he latched onto @Leo Gura and the outlandish nature o his claims, as it's a now reliable source of income and drama farming that now it's meaningful to keep on making tabloid, sensational exposes of his spiritual teachings. So, for him back out and change his trajectory and make content that actually he likes and is helpful, is no longer an easy choice to make.

@Leo Gura True, although you may want to consider changing a bit of your rhetoric in delivering these insights, you're one of the few that tells of these insights in such a direct manner. If anything, besides how easily people misunderstand these insights, they're probably hung up on the bluntness of the presentation, thinking it's very little comapssion.

@ThermalTide The problem is you haven't contemplated enough about the train problem, and having to choose whether a few di or many die. In context this has been addressed here before, there are risks to the vaccine, but the risks of Covid are way worse and of higher volume, so you're stuck choosing which of the two evil outcomes: To vax and risk the side effects, or to not vax and risk the Covid-19 effects, which are far worse than vaccine risks?

@Emerald Better than a Totalitarian?

@soos_mite_ah I'm just stating a likely probability, based on the current mainstream American voters and who they vote for typically, that it may be unlikely that Marianne Williamson my reach the finals to debate with Biden. Only small chunks of America vote for socialists/progressives, typically within cities under their own ideological loyalties. Not just MLK, but Ghandi, Jesus Christ, and others.

@Leo Gura 100% agree, Buddhists are so annoying.

@abundance Not going to work.

Another example:

@JTL I think it's problematic to label them as such, as it kills any good faith and charitable takes you can have with them. You can attack a person's actions and behavior, but as soon as you attack a person's identity, that kills discussions quickly.

@Emerald I'm surprised you agree with how Vaush is straw manning the right and think it's okay. Donald Trump nor DeSantis would be sending people to death camps in current era or anytime soon. This rhetoric is problematic due to it being a thought terminating cliché and majority would not engage with good faith and charitability. Don't you mean gravel?

@Carl-Richard You have good taste in music, for heavy metal.

@Waken How do you know it's cheating or not? Who gets to decide? What group/who gets to decide what's work and what isn't? Is it justified to create and introduce technology, that ends up disrupting and destroying a person's job/career when in their life story they spent 5-10-20 years of education and training to be that role and excel at that field? Of course, what you consider cheating, work, justified creating for joy, is largely relative and based on your stage of development, cognitive and moral development, personality type and traits, states of consciousness, life experience and other lines of development in different domains of life. Even ideologies indoctrinated into your mind by your culture shapes what you feel and think, that you falsely think you have agency, and falsely think you are right in certain cases, when in the grand scheme of the world you are fundamentally wrong. While I do have some values in stage yellow, and because of how good I am at visualizing places and people and time of passage, I can ultimately see the net positives of this A.I technology, but also can ultimately see the net negative if humanity doesn't put in place ways to regulate these disruptions in technology, because we now are godlike in how we imagine and utilize tech. We have created nuclear plants, strategic/tactical nukes that can wipe out natural environments within seconds that no animal could naturally do. We can develop GMO and CRISPER to develop stronger strains of food types, or mutations of viruses like in gains of research, that is faster than in natural biomes. We can now do cloning technology, create copies of an organ or even a whole human body, and we can splice genes together to create human hybrids and other human variations not normally found in nature, with unknown consequences if such hybrids are allowed to breed and proliferate. We have already seen some extent to how disruptive this A.I program can get, eventually outplaying GM chess players and world class talents in Chinese Go, to playing music to a highly reasonable above standard, and creating nearly photo realistic pictures that make my skin crawl.

A.I is just so scary now, it's not just going to settle down at creative arts and jobs related to that, it's going to go after knowledge work jobs and even more labor jobs. So, what's the ultimate consequence this technology has for the human race? Get the majority to meditate and be hippies? Even that and spirituality the A.I is going to take away from humanity. What a dark future we're heading to:

@mmKay An incredibly skilled visualizer, and very strong imagination powers, you might as well call him a son of God for how powerfully he can imagine and sustain that level of visualization. He's one of my role modals, and I work everyday on my visualization to someday be able to design an art piece in my head, complete with landscapes and characters, all in perspective and all the other art fundamentals. Maybe even design a machine as well. Also thanks to him I play chess even more in my mind, even trying out blindfolded chess games.

@The Mystical Man Decent enough podcast, voices do need improving. It's now a thing in YouTube , making ChatGPT related content?

@The Mystical Man Perfect for a BGM or Title menu song.

@vindicated erudite That's interesting, if they can pull it off.

@Osaid ??‍♀️

@Juan But @Juan! How do I balance A.I as a tool, when I'm getting mind raped by Tik Tok and social media platforms?!

Pretty interesting video:

@The Mystical Man No, why he fundamentally doesn't accept the possibility of extraterrestrial life, and UFOs existing, that it's send him deep into existential crisis, and have him question more deeply his worldview, which is already very threatening as is. This is why he conveniently hides behind the justification that the other person claiming existence of Aliens needs to give him proof. How convenient.

@Waken In the context of developing drawing skill, I don't think so. The process won't be in a progression that's easy to track and record for the newbie learning to draw. It's possible to use A.I generated images, and trace parts of the shapes and areas, or do additive/subtractive art onto of the generated image, I disagree that it leads to a solid development in mastering the drawing and art fundamentals that takes months to years of dedicated study to master to some level of proficiency. It also feels mostly like a cop out and lazy way of doing art, but that's because excellence is part of my top ten values, and how I honor that value in me is taking a bit more traditional or progressive ways of learning and progression of skill, in a linear fashion. and less non-linearity if possible. I like to feel that I put in some effort, energy and attention to drawing, feels like 80% of my time/energy spent in a 20% action taking that produces 80% of the results. I feel like using A.I generated images is both cheating, laziness and even unethical if those stories of these programs taking other people's art is true.

@Emerald Of course, technological development over time, and the pioneers and groups/person behind the designs, do so from a place of bias based on their stages of development, cognitive and moral development, personality types, states of consciousness, life experiences and other lines of development in other domains of life, and ideological indoctrination from upbringing. Also, technology is not values neutral:https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwj29vDGutn9AhV4SUEAHcerD54QFnoECA8QAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fconsilienceproject.org%2Ftechnology-is-not-values-neutral-ending-the-reign-of-nihilistic-design-2%2F&usg=AOvVaw2Ibrxt3LZMNTAtdZg8j4f5 Ultimately, in the long term, degreee and certifications pale in comparison to the disruptive technologies done by those deep into stage orange materialism. @Waken @Juan As usual, you all underestimate the disruptive nature of technological development and the increase in unemployment it can cause short term.

@The Mystical Man Sorry, he's too materialistic and rationalist in his worldview to account for the existence of UFOs. He's improperly using skepticism to actually serve his bias and conform to others who don't belief in UFOs by appealing to physics, 'common sense', and other appeals.